Difference Between Splenic Volume Measured at Necropsy and That Measured in Vivo by Radionuclide Tomography

Reference values for splenic volume used in this study are based on necropsy measurements made in 1970. Because the volumes (measured by radionuclide tomography) seemed to be consistently greater than the necropsy values, the splenic volume in 35 healthy male volunteers ranging in age from 18–30 yea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical nuclear medicine 1994-11, Vol.19 (11), p.979-980
Main Authors: OTTO, ANTON C, NINHAM, ESTELLE, PRETORIUS, P HENDRIK, WAGNER, LEON, RHONDA du TOIT, D J, SCHALL, ROBERT
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cadaver
Colloids
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous. Technology
Organ Size
Radionuclide Imaging
Radionuclide investigations
Reference Values
Spleen - anatomy & histology
Spleen - diagnostic imaging
Technetium Compounds
Tin Compounds
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3849-fe209b2bd33d5e221461988151024da05d24cd8bfc4efcb08501f756f01067b93
cites
container_end_page 980
container_issue 11
container_start_page 979
container_title Clinical nuclear medicine
container_volume 19
creator OTTO, ANTON C
NINHAM, ESTELLE
PRETORIUS, P HENDRIK
WAGNER, LEON
RHONDA du TOIT, D J
SCHALL, ROBERT
description Reference values for splenic volume used in this study are based on necropsy measurements made in 1970. Because the volumes (measured by radionuclide tomography) seemed to be consistently greater than the necropsy values, the splenic volume in 35 healthy male volunteers ranging in age from 18–30 years (median age, 21 years) was studied. Their mean (SD) splenic volume was 281 (73) ml compared with 138 (34) ml in the reference group. The mean splenic volume in healthy volunteers seems to be significantly greater than in cadavers, and these results suggest that reference range for splenic volume in vivo should be revised.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00003072-199411000-00009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77722164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77722164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3849-fe209b2bd33d5e221461988151024da05d24cd8bfc4efcb08501f756f01067b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1vFCEUhonR1G31J5hwYbwb5Ws-uNTaWpOqia69JQwcXCwzjDDTzf57WXe7d3JDeN-Hcw4vCGFK3lIi23ekLE5aVlEpBaXlVO0l-QStaM2bijAmn6IV4Q2vZNuw5-g859-E0IY24gydtZ1gteQrdP_ROwcJRgP4A8xbgBH_mAKM3uC7GJYB8BfQeUlgsZ7xVzApTnmH9WjxelOUk-tHfOcfIu53-Lu2Po6LCd4CXsch_kp62uxeoGdOhwwvj_sF-nl9tb68qW6_ffp8-f62MrwTsnLAiOxZbzm3NTBGRUNl19GaEiasJrVlwtiud0aAMz3pakJdWzeOUNK0veQX6M2h7pTinwXyrAafDYSgR4hLVm3blqqNKGB3AMujck7g1JT8oNNOUaL2OavHnNUp53_SvserY4-lH8CeLh6DLf7ro6-z0cElPRqfTxjnlJdhCyYO2DaGGVK-D8sWktqADvNG_e-X-V9x_pRo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77722164</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Difference Between Splenic Volume Measured at Necropsy and That Measured in Vivo by Radionuclide Tomography</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>OTTO, ANTON C ; NINHAM, ESTELLE ; PRETORIUS, P HENDRIK ; WAGNER, LEON ; RHONDA du TOIT, D J ; SCHALL, ROBERT</creator><creatorcontrib>OTTO, ANTON C ; NINHAM, ESTELLE ; PRETORIUS, P HENDRIK ; WAGNER, LEON ; RHONDA du TOIT, D J ; SCHALL, ROBERT</creatorcontrib><description>Reference values for splenic volume used in this study are based on necropsy measurements made in 1970. Because the volumes (measured by radionuclide tomography) seemed to be consistently greater than the necropsy values, the splenic volume in 35 healthy male volunteers ranging in age from 18–30 years (median age, 21 years) was studied. Their mean (SD) splenic volume was 281 (73) ml compared with 138 (34) ml in the reference group. The mean splenic volume in healthy volunteers seems to be significantly greater than in cadavers, and these results suggest that reference range for splenic volume in vivo should be revised.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-9762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-0229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003072-199411000-00009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7842593</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CNMEDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cadaver ; Colloids ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous. Technology ; Organ Size ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Radionuclide investigations ; Reference Values ; Spleen - anatomy &amp; histology ; Spleen - diagnostic imaging ; Technetium Compounds ; Tin Compounds</subject><ispartof>Clinical nuclear medicine, 1994-11, Vol.19 (11), p.979-980</ispartof><rights>Lippincott-Raven Publishers.</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3849-fe209b2bd33d5e221461988151024da05d24cd8bfc4efcb08501f756f01067b93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3313067$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7842593$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>OTTO, ANTON C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NINHAM, ESTELLE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRETORIUS, P HENDRIK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WAGNER, LEON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RHONDA du TOIT, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHALL, ROBERT</creatorcontrib><title>Difference Between Splenic Volume Measured at Necropsy and That Measured in Vivo by Radionuclide Tomography</title><title>Clinical nuclear medicine</title><addtitle>Clin Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Reference values for splenic volume used in this study are based on necropsy measurements made in 1970. Because the volumes (measured by radionuclide tomography) seemed to be consistently greater than the necropsy values, the splenic volume in 35 healthy male volunteers ranging in age from 18–30 years (median age, 21 years) was studied. Their mean (SD) splenic volume was 281 (73) ml compared with 138 (34) ml in the reference group. The mean splenic volume in healthy volunteers seems to be significantly greater than in cadavers, and these results suggest that reference range for splenic volume in vivo should be revised.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Colloids</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous. Technology</subject><subject>Organ Size</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Radionuclide investigations</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Spleen - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Spleen - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Technetium Compounds</subject><subject>Tin Compounds</subject><issn>0363-9762</issn><issn>1536-0229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kV1vFCEUhonR1G31J5hwYbwb5Ws-uNTaWpOqia69JQwcXCwzjDDTzf57WXe7d3JDeN-Hcw4vCGFK3lIi23ekLE5aVlEpBaXlVO0l-QStaM2bijAmn6IV4Q2vZNuw5-g859-E0IY24gydtZ1gteQrdP_ROwcJRgP4A8xbgBH_mAKM3uC7GJYB8BfQeUlgsZ7xVzApTnmH9WjxelOUk-tHfOcfIu53-Lu2Po6LCd4CXsch_kp62uxeoGdOhwwvj_sF-nl9tb68qW6_ffp8-f62MrwTsnLAiOxZbzm3NTBGRUNl19GaEiasJrVlwtiud0aAMz3pakJdWzeOUNK0veQX6M2h7pTinwXyrAafDYSgR4hLVm3blqqNKGB3AMujck7g1JT8oNNOUaL2OavHnNUp53_SvserY4-lH8CeLh6DLf7ro6-z0cElPRqfTxjnlJdhCyYO2DaGGVK-D8sWktqADvNG_e-X-V9x_pRo</recordid><startdate>199411</startdate><enddate>199411</enddate><creator>OTTO, ANTON C</creator><creator>NINHAM, ESTELLE</creator><creator>PRETORIUS, P HENDRIK</creator><creator>WAGNER, LEON</creator><creator>RHONDA du TOIT, D J</creator><creator>SCHALL, ROBERT</creator><general>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199411</creationdate><title>Difference Between Splenic Volume Measured at Necropsy and That Measured in Vivo by Radionuclide Tomography</title><author>OTTO, ANTON C ; NINHAM, ESTELLE ; PRETORIUS, P HENDRIK ; WAGNER, LEON ; RHONDA du TOIT, D J ; SCHALL, ROBERT</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3849-fe209b2bd33d5e221461988151024da05d24cd8bfc4efcb08501f756f01067b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Colloids</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous. Technology</topic><topic>Organ Size</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Radionuclide investigations</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Spleen - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Spleen - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Technetium Compounds</topic><topic>Tin Compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OTTO, ANTON C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NINHAM, ESTELLE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRETORIUS, P HENDRIK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WAGNER, LEON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RHONDA du TOIT, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHALL, ROBERT</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OTTO, ANTON C</au><au>NINHAM, ESTELLE</au><au>PRETORIUS, P HENDRIK</au><au>WAGNER, LEON</au><au>RHONDA du TOIT, D J</au><au>SCHALL, ROBERT</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Difference Between Splenic Volume Measured at Necropsy and That Measured in Vivo by Radionuclide Tomography</atitle><jtitle>Clinical nuclear medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Nucl Med</addtitle><date>1994-11</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>979</spage><epage>980</epage><pages>979-980</pages><issn>0363-9762</issn><eissn>1536-0229</eissn><coden>CNMEDK</coden><abstract>Reference values for splenic volume used in this study are based on necropsy measurements made in 1970. Because the volumes (measured by radionuclide tomography) seemed to be consistently greater than the necropsy values, the splenic volume in 35 healthy male volunteers ranging in age from 18–30 years (median age, 21 years) was studied. Their mean (SD) splenic volume was 281 (73) ml compared with 138 (34) ml in the reference group. The mean splenic volume in healthy volunteers seems to be significantly greater than in cadavers, and these results suggest that reference range for splenic volume in vivo should be revised.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</pub><pmid>7842593</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003072-199411000-00009</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-9762
ispartof Clinical nuclear medicine, 1994-11, Vol.19 (11), p.979-980
issn 0363-9762
1536-0229
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77722164
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cadaver
Colloids
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous. Technology
Organ Size
Radionuclide Imaging
Radionuclide investigations
Reference Values
Spleen - anatomy & histology
Spleen - diagnostic imaging
Technetium Compounds
Tin Compounds
title Difference Between Splenic Volume Measured at Necropsy and That Measured in Vivo by Radionuclide Tomography
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A09%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Difference%20Between%20Splenic%20Volume%20Measured%20at%20Necropsy%20and%20That%20Measured%20in%20Vivo%20by%20Radionuclide%20Tomography&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=OTTO,%20ANTON%20C&rft.date=1994-11&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=979&rft.epage=980&rft.pages=979-980&rft.issn=0363-9762&rft.eissn=1536-0229&rft.coden=CNMEDK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003072-199411000-00009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77722164%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3849-fe209b2bd33d5e221461988151024da05d24cd8bfc4efcb08501f756f01067b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77722164&rft_id=info:pmid/7842593&rfr_iscdi=true