Loading…

Nosocomial Infection in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Its Prevention with Selective Intestinal Decolonization: A Multivariant Evaluation of Infection Reduction

A prospective cohort study in a neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) was carried out to evaluate whether the incidence of infection in neonates receiving intestinal decolonization was reduced in comparison to those who did not. This study was performed after controling possible confounding infection r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of epidemiology 1994-10, Vol.10 (5), p.573-580
Main Authors: Herruzo-Cabrera, Rafael, Gonzalez, Jesus I. Garcia, García-Magan, Pilar, Del Rey-Calero, Juan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-ed8b6ffe0ed31f3d84fe0fff4cd712364ba64d7ca1201594eaf7c557eff6e3453
container_end_page 580
container_issue 5
container_start_page 573
container_title European journal of epidemiology
container_volume 10
creator Herruzo-Cabrera, Rafael
Gonzalez, Jesus I. Garcia
García-Magan, Pilar
Del Rey-Calero, Juan
description A prospective cohort study in a neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) was carried out to evaluate whether the incidence of infection in neonates receiving intestinal decolonization was reduced in comparison to those who did not. This study was performed after controling possible confounding infection risk factors. A total of 536 babies were screened in our ICU during the 27-month study period. Neonates were admitted to the ICU for different reasons: low weight, respiratory distress syndrome, acute fetal suffering, surgery, etc. The doctor in charge decided whether the baby should be decolonized or not, so this experimental study was non-random. Thus more of the babies with a greater risk of infection were decolonized more often than the other babies who were not so much at risk. In this study, babies were classified by type of decolonization given: a well-performed Selective Intestinal Decolonization (SID) was done (early and with three oral drugs: E polymyxin, tobramycin and nystatin): 10.8% of the babies; Incorrect SID (was begun late and/or less than three drugs were used): 16.7% of the babies; and Without SID (72.9%). Total nosocomial infection (NI) was 11.2%, catheter-associated sepsis was 42% of the total NI. When the NI incidence was directly compared among groups, it was lower in the group without SID, but infants with decolonization initially had more infection risk factor than the first group. For this reason, multiple logistic regression was used in order to stratify factors by infection probability, and correcting the existing bias. In this case, well-performed SID was a powerful protective factor (OR = 0.17) for infections of possible 'intestinal origin' (respiratory, sepsis, urinary tract infection and surgical wounds), while infections of 'non-intestinal origin' (catheter-associated sepsis, skin, mucous and other infections) were unaltered. Our study demonstrated that nosocomial infection in neonates was significantly reduced by early and complete (three drug) prophylaxis with SID. Benefit was greatest in babies who had a central catheter and/or mechanic ventilation for over a week, although our conclusion will require confirmation by a randomized study.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF01719575
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77729948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3521175</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3521175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-ed8b6ffe0ed31f3d84fe0fff4cd712364ba64d7ca1201594eaf7c557eff6e3453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkVFP2zAUhS20qXTAy56H5Kc9TMqw4zhO9sY6yipBQUCfI9e5FkapzWyn0_Z79kNx0gr25Cuf7xxd3YPQR0q-UkLE2fc5oYLWXPADNKVcsEzkVfEOTQmrWZbXNTlEH0J4IoRUpOYTNBEVrysupujf0gWn3MbIDi-sBhWNs9hYLPESnJVx_I9gg9kCnkkPeGVNxNK2eBEDvvWwBTuafpv4iO-hGzISO7hCNDYF_ADlOmfNXzmA3_A5vu67BElvpI34Yiu7fpSw0_9tcQdtP07H6L2WXYCT_XuEVvOLh9nP7OrmcjE7v8pUXuYxg7Zal1oDgZZRzdqqSLPWulCtoDkri7Usi1YoSXNCeV2A1EJxLkDrEljB2RH6vMt99u5Xn7ZvNiYo6DppwfWhEUKkYxZVAr_sQOVdCB508-zNRvo_DSXNUEnzVkmCT_ep_XoD7Su67yDpn3b6U4jOv8qM55Qm-wvrCZPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77729948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nosocomial Infection in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Its Prevention with Selective Intestinal Decolonization: A Multivariant Evaluation of Infection Reduction</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Online Journals Archive Complete</source><creator>Herruzo-Cabrera, Rafael ; Gonzalez, Jesus I. Garcia ; García-Magan, Pilar ; Del Rey-Calero, Juan</creator><creatorcontrib>Herruzo-Cabrera, Rafael ; Gonzalez, Jesus I. Garcia ; García-Magan, Pilar ; Del Rey-Calero, Juan</creatorcontrib><description>A prospective cohort study in a neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) was carried out to evaluate whether the incidence of infection in neonates receiving intestinal decolonization was reduced in comparison to those who did not. This study was performed after controling possible confounding infection risk factors. A total of 536 babies were screened in our ICU during the 27-month study period. Neonates were admitted to the ICU for different reasons: low weight, respiratory distress syndrome, acute fetal suffering, surgery, etc. The doctor in charge decided whether the baby should be decolonized or not, so this experimental study was non-random. Thus more of the babies with a greater risk of infection were decolonized more often than the other babies who were not so much at risk. In this study, babies were classified by type of decolonization given: a well-performed Selective Intestinal Decolonization (SID) was done (early and with three oral drugs: E polymyxin, tobramycin and nystatin): 10.8% of the babies; Incorrect SID (was begun late and/or less than three drugs were used): 16.7% of the babies; and Without SID (72.9%). Total nosocomial infection (NI) was 11.2%, catheter-associated sepsis was 42% of the total NI. When the NI incidence was directly compared among groups, it was lower in the group without SID, but infants with decolonization initially had more infection risk factor than the first group. For this reason, multiple logistic regression was used in order to stratify factors by infection probability, and correcting the existing bias. In this case, well-performed SID was a powerful protective factor (OR = 0.17) for infections of possible 'intestinal origin' (respiratory, sepsis, urinary tract infection and surgical wounds), while infections of 'non-intestinal origin' (catheter-associated sepsis, skin, mucous and other infections) were unaltered. Our study demonstrated that nosocomial infection in neonates was significantly reduced by early and complete (three drug) prophylaxis with SID. Benefit was greatest in babies who had a central catheter and/or mechanic ventilation for over a week, although our conclusion will require confirmation by a randomized study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0393-2990</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7284</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01719575</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7859857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Catheters ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Cohort Studies ; Colistin - administration &amp; dosage ; Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) ; Cross Infection - epidemiology ; Cross Infection - microbiology ; Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control ; Decolonization ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Infections ; Intensive care units ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Intestines - microbiology ; Logistic Models ; Logistic regression ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nystatin - administration &amp; dosage ; Predisposing factors ; Prospective Studies ; Sepsis ; Spain - epidemiology ; Sudden infant death syndrome ; Tobramycin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><ispartof>European journal of epidemiology, 1994-10, Vol.10 (5), p.573-580</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-ed8b6ffe0ed31f3d84fe0fff4cd712364ba64d7ca1201594eaf7c557eff6e3453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3521175$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3521175$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7859857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herruzo-Cabrera, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Jesus I. Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Magan, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Rey-Calero, Juan</creatorcontrib><title>Nosocomial Infection in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Its Prevention with Selective Intestinal Decolonization: A Multivariant Evaluation of Infection Reduction</title><title>European journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>A prospective cohort study in a neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) was carried out to evaluate whether the incidence of infection in neonates receiving intestinal decolonization was reduced in comparison to those who did not. This study was performed after controling possible confounding infection risk factors. A total of 536 babies were screened in our ICU during the 27-month study period. Neonates were admitted to the ICU for different reasons: low weight, respiratory distress syndrome, acute fetal suffering, surgery, etc. The doctor in charge decided whether the baby should be decolonized or not, so this experimental study was non-random. Thus more of the babies with a greater risk of infection were decolonized more often than the other babies who were not so much at risk. In this study, babies were classified by type of decolonization given: a well-performed Selective Intestinal Decolonization (SID) was done (early and with three oral drugs: E polymyxin, tobramycin and nystatin): 10.8% of the babies; Incorrect SID (was begun late and/or less than three drugs were used): 16.7% of the babies; and Without SID (72.9%). Total nosocomial infection (NI) was 11.2%, catheter-associated sepsis was 42% of the total NI. When the NI incidence was directly compared among groups, it was lower in the group without SID, but infants with decolonization initially had more infection risk factor than the first group. For this reason, multiple logistic regression was used in order to stratify factors by infection probability, and correcting the existing bias. In this case, well-performed SID was a powerful protective factor (OR = 0.17) for infections of possible 'intestinal origin' (respiratory, sepsis, urinary tract infection and surgical wounds), while infections of 'non-intestinal origin' (catheter-associated sepsis, skin, mucous and other infections) were unaltered. Our study demonstrated that nosocomial infection in neonates was significantly reduced by early and complete (three drug) prophylaxis with SID. Benefit was greatest in babies who had a central catheter and/or mechanic ventilation for over a week, although our conclusion will require confirmation by a randomized study.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colistin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</subject><subject>Cross Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Decolonization</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Intestines - microbiology</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Logistic regression</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Nystatin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Predisposing factors</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Spain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Sudden infant death syndrome</subject><subject>Tobramycin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><issn>0393-2990</issn><issn>1573-7284</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkVFP2zAUhS20qXTAy56H5Kc9TMqw4zhO9sY6yipBQUCfI9e5FkapzWyn0_Z79kNx0gr25Cuf7xxd3YPQR0q-UkLE2fc5oYLWXPADNKVcsEzkVfEOTQmrWZbXNTlEH0J4IoRUpOYTNBEVrysupujf0gWn3MbIDi-sBhWNs9hYLPESnJVx_I9gg9kCnkkPeGVNxNK2eBEDvvWwBTuafpv4iO-hGzISO7hCNDYF_ADlOmfNXzmA3_A5vu67BElvpI34Yiu7fpSw0_9tcQdtP07H6L2WXYCT_XuEVvOLh9nP7OrmcjE7v8pUXuYxg7Zal1oDgZZRzdqqSLPWulCtoDkri7Usi1YoSXNCeV2A1EJxLkDrEljB2RH6vMt99u5Xn7ZvNiYo6DppwfWhEUKkYxZVAr_sQOVdCB508-zNRvo_DSXNUEnzVkmCT_ep_XoD7Su67yDpn3b6U4jOv8qM55Qm-wvrCZPk</recordid><startdate>19941001</startdate><enddate>19941001</enddate><creator>Herruzo-Cabrera, Rafael</creator><creator>Gonzalez, Jesus I. Garcia</creator><creator>García-Magan, Pilar</creator><creator>Del Rey-Calero, Juan</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19941001</creationdate><title>Nosocomial Infection in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Its Prevention with Selective Intestinal Decolonization: A Multivariant Evaluation of Infection Reduction</title><author>Herruzo-Cabrera, Rafael ; Gonzalez, Jesus I. Garcia ; García-Magan, Pilar ; Del Rey-Calero, Juan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-ed8b6ffe0ed31f3d84fe0fff4cd712364ba64d7ca1201594eaf7c557eff6e3453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colistin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</topic><topic>Cross Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Decolonization</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Intestines - microbiology</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Logistic regression</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Nystatin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Predisposing factors</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Spain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Sudden infant death syndrome</topic><topic>Tobramycin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herruzo-Cabrera, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Jesus I. Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Magan, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Rey-Calero, Juan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herruzo-Cabrera, Rafael</au><au>Gonzalez, Jesus I. Garcia</au><au>García-Magan, Pilar</au><au>Del Rey-Calero, Juan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nosocomial Infection in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Its Prevention with Selective Intestinal Decolonization: A Multivariant Evaluation of Infection Reduction</atitle><jtitle>European journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1994-10-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>573</spage><epage>580</epage><pages>573-580</pages><issn>0393-2990</issn><eissn>1573-7284</eissn><abstract>A prospective cohort study in a neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) was carried out to evaluate whether the incidence of infection in neonates receiving intestinal decolonization was reduced in comparison to those who did not. This study was performed after controling possible confounding infection risk factors. A total of 536 babies were screened in our ICU during the 27-month study period. Neonates were admitted to the ICU for different reasons: low weight, respiratory distress syndrome, acute fetal suffering, surgery, etc. The doctor in charge decided whether the baby should be decolonized or not, so this experimental study was non-random. Thus more of the babies with a greater risk of infection were decolonized more often than the other babies who were not so much at risk. In this study, babies were classified by type of decolonization given: a well-performed Selective Intestinal Decolonization (SID) was done (early and with three oral drugs: E polymyxin, tobramycin and nystatin): 10.8% of the babies; Incorrect SID (was begun late and/or less than three drugs were used): 16.7% of the babies; and Without SID (72.9%). Total nosocomial infection (NI) was 11.2%, catheter-associated sepsis was 42% of the total NI. When the NI incidence was directly compared among groups, it was lower in the group without SID, but infants with decolonization initially had more infection risk factor than the first group. For this reason, multiple logistic regression was used in order to stratify factors by infection probability, and correcting the existing bias. In this case, well-performed SID was a powerful protective factor (OR = 0.17) for infections of possible 'intestinal origin' (respiratory, sepsis, urinary tract infection and surgical wounds), while infections of 'non-intestinal origin' (catheter-associated sepsis, skin, mucous and other infections) were unaltered. Our study demonstrated that nosocomial infection in neonates was significantly reduced by early and complete (three drug) prophylaxis with SID. Benefit was greatest in babies who had a central catheter and/or mechanic ventilation for over a week, although our conclusion will require confirmation by a randomized study.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><pmid>7859857</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF01719575</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0393-2990
ispartof European journal of epidemiology, 1994-10, Vol.10 (5), p.573-580
issn 0393-2990
1573-7284
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77729948
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; SpringerLink Online Journals Archive Complete
subjects Antibiotics
Catheters
Chi-Square Distribution
Cohort Studies
Colistin - administration & dosage
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Cross Infection - epidemiology
Cross Infection - microbiology
Cross Infection - prevention & control
Decolonization
Drug Therapy, Combination
Humans
Incidence
Infant, Newborn
Infants
Infections
Intensive care units
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - statistics & numerical data
Intestines - microbiology
Logistic Models
Logistic regression
Multivariate Analysis
Nystatin - administration & dosage
Predisposing factors
Prospective Studies
Sepsis
Spain - epidemiology
Sudden infant death syndrome
Tobramycin - administration & dosage
title Nosocomial Infection in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Its Prevention with Selective Intestinal Decolonization: A Multivariant Evaluation of Infection Reduction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A19%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nosocomial%20Infection%20in%20a%20Neonatal%20Intensive%20Care%20Unit%20and%20Its%20Prevention%20with%20Selective%20Intestinal%20Decolonization:%20A%20Multivariant%20Evaluation%20of%20Infection%20Reduction&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=Herruzo-Cabrera,%20Rafael&rft.date=1994-10-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=573&rft.epage=580&rft.pages=573-580&rft.issn=0393-2990&rft.eissn=1573-7284&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01719575&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3521175%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-ed8b6ffe0ed31f3d84fe0fff4cd712364ba64d7ca1201594eaf7c557eff6e3453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77729948&rft_id=info:pmid/7859857&rft_jstor_id=3521175&rfr_iscdi=true