Biocompatibility evaluation of laser-induced AAm and HEMA grafted EPR. Part 1: In-vitro study

• Published in: Clinical materials 1994, Vol.16 (4), p.177-187
• Main Authors: Mirzadeh, H., Khorasani, M.T., Katbab, A.A., Burford, R.P., Soheili, Z., Golestani, A., Goliaei, B.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Absorptiometry, Photon; Acrylamide; Acrylamides - standards; Alkenes - standards; Animals; Cell Adhesion - physiology; Ethylenes - standards; Fractals; Health technology assessment; Lasers; Macrophages, Alveolar - physiology; Materials Testing; Methacrylates - standards; Mice; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Rubber - standards; Spectrophotometry, Infrared
• ISSN: 0267-6605
• DOI: 10.1016/0267-6605(94)90115-5

Samples based on ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR) have been surface grafted with acrylamide (AAm) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) using CO 2-pulsed laser as a stimulation source. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA) and attenuated total reflectance infrared (ATR-IR) spectra were performed on the modified samples. These techniques revealed the formation of grafted poly(AAm) and poly(HEMA) on the surface of EPR. The surface grafted poly(AAm) and poly(HEMA) were found to have a fractal type of morphology. EDXA showed insignificant grafted AAm and HEMA in regions where fractals were absent. Fractal patterned surfaces provide hydrophilic and hydrophobic sites, making EPR suitable as a biomaterial. In-vitro adhesion and spreading of alveolar macrophages (AMs) cultured on the surface of modified samples have been evaluated by hemocytometry and SEM, respectively, and compared with unmodified controls. Relationships between AM adhesion and their spreading, with surface morphology, graft level and water compatibility are also discussed. Generally, more AMs attach onto unmodified surfaces with a greater degree of spreading, than on the modified EPR. Samples grafted between 0·7mg/cm 2 and Img/cm 2 showed fairly low AM density compared with both unmodified EPR and lightly modified samples (less than 0·2 mg/cm 2). AMs cultured on the unmodified EPR were larger and displayed pronounced ruffling of the plasma membrane, an increased capacity for adherence and spreading on the surface, and an increased number of extensive filopodia. Moreover, AMs attached onto the surface of modified samples appeared rounded, with minimal cytoplasmic spreading and ruffling.