Descriptive features of gastric ulcers: do endoscopists agree on what they see?

• Published in: Gastrointestinal endoscopy 1995-12, Vol.42 (6), p.555-559
• Main Authors: Moorman, Peter W., Siersema, Peter D., van Ginneken, Astrid M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Diagnosis, Differential; Digestive system. Abdomen; Endoscopy; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Medical sciences; Observer Variation; Stomach Neoplasms - diagnosis; Stomach Ulcer - pathology; Terminology as Topic
• ISSN: 0016-5107; 1097-6779
• DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70010-2

Background: Little is known about the interobserver variation between endoscopists on descriptive morphologic features. Methods: This study describes the agreement among 10 endoscopists on their description of 12 morphologic features, using 10 photographs of gastric ulcers, and on their eventual interpretation. The endoscopists used a form with predefined options for description. Results: Kappa value was on average 0.36 for descriptive features and 0.31 for interpretation. The proportion of endoscopists agreeing on descriptive features was on average 84%, and 81% on interpretations. The chance of an endoscopist describing all 12 morphologic features of an ulcer on a photograph exactly the same as a colleague ranged from 4% to 46% (average 15%). A positive correlation between agreement in description and interpretation (0.75, p < 0.05) was found. Conclusions: These results indicate a poor agreement between endoscopists in their translation of visual observations into descriptive terms. The positive correlation between agreement in description and interpretation suggests disagreement in description as an important cause for disagreement in interpretation. We believe that the use of more explicit descriptive terms will improve agreement in description and in subsequent interpretation. (Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:555-9.)