Loading…

Goal-Directed Fantasy, Hypnotic Susceptibility, and Expectancies

We conducted an initial screening session in which hypnosis was presented as a "test of imagination" and administered with other imagination measures. In a second session, we instructed high- and low-hypnotizable subjects to imagine along with suggestions but to resist responding to motori...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of personality and social psychology 1987-11, Vol.53 (5), p.933-938
Main Authors: Lynn, Steven Jay, Snodgrass, Michael, Rhue, Judith W, Hardaway, Richard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a438t-e2b0da89c9b9fd0b088a5023568419cbdda4053a54a5d9f0898a11dc20311c1f3
cites
container_end_page 938
container_issue 5
container_start_page 933
container_title Journal of personality and social psychology
container_volume 53
creator Lynn, Steven Jay
Snodgrass, Michael
Rhue, Judith W
Hardaway, Richard
description We conducted an initial screening session in which hypnosis was presented as a "test of imagination" and administered with other imagination measures. In a second session, we instructed high- and low-hypnotizable subjects to imagine along with suggestions but to resist responding to motoric suggestions. Subjects received either instructions to use goal-directed fantasies (GDFs) or no facilitative instructions. Sizable individual difference effects were secured. Hypnotizable subjects exhibited more suggestion-related movements and reported greater involuntariness than did low-hypnotizable subjects. With GDF instructions, low- and high-hypnotizable subjects reported equivalent GDF absorption and frequencies. However, hypnotizable subjects exhibited greater responsiveness and reported greater involuntariness than did those low in hypnotizability, even when their GDFs were equivalent. Thus, no support was generated for the hypotheses that sustained, elaborated suggestion-related imagery mediates response to suggestion ( Arnold, 1946 ) or that absorption in suggestions is of particular importance for low-hypnotizable subjects ( Zamansky & Clark, 1986 ). Our finding that measures of response expectancy paralelled responding and reports of nonvolition support the hypothesis that expectancies mediate the relation between imagination, involuntariness, and responding ( Kirsch, 1985 ; Spanos, 1982 ). Hypnotizable imagining subjects in the study discussed here exhibited greater responsiveness than a comparable sample of subjects did in a previous countersuggestion study ( Lynn, Nash, Rhue, Frauman, & Stanley, 1983 ) in which no attempt was made to foster an association between imagining and involuntary responding in the initial screening session.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0022-3514.53.5.933
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77846371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1295980477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a438t-e2b0da89c9b9fd0b088a5023568419cbdda4053a54a5d9f0898a11dc20311c1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1r3DAQBmBRGtJN0j8QCCxN6CnezujDlm4Jab4gkEPbsxhLMjh4bVeyofvvqyXLBgrNSYd5ZjTMy9gpwgpBVN8AOC-EQrlSYqVWRogPbIFGmAIFqo9ssQef2FFKLwAgFeeH7FCUGkulF-zqfqCu-N7G4Kbgl3fUT5Q2l8uHzdgPU-uWP-bkwji1ddu1Uy5Q75e3f8bMqXdtSCfsoKEuhc-795j9urv9efNQPD3fP95cPxUkhZ6KwGvwpI0ztWk81KA1KeBClVqicbX3JEEJUpKUNw1oownROw4C0WEjjtnX17ljHH7PIU123ebNuo76MMzJVpWWpagwwy__wJdhjn3ezZYouQFj9HuIg9FcQykyOv8fQm6U0SCrKiv-qlwcUoqhsWNs1xQ3FsFuY7LbFOw2BauEVTbHlJvOdqPneh38vmWXS65f7OqUHHVN3B477VklkVecvzEayY5p4yjmzLqQZRrffvsLCjSjFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614290998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Goal-Directed Fantasy, Hypnotic Susceptibility, and Expectancies</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PsycARTICLES</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Lynn, Steven Jay ; Snodgrass, Michael ; Rhue, Judith W ; Hardaway, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Lynn, Steven Jay ; Snodgrass, Michael ; Rhue, Judith W ; Hardaway, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>We conducted an initial screening session in which hypnosis was presented as a "test of imagination" and administered with other imagination measures. In a second session, we instructed high- and low-hypnotizable subjects to imagine along with suggestions but to resist responding to motoric suggestions. Subjects received either instructions to use goal-directed fantasies (GDFs) or no facilitative instructions. Sizable individual difference effects were secured. Hypnotizable subjects exhibited more suggestion-related movements and reported greater involuntariness than did low-hypnotizable subjects. With GDF instructions, low- and high-hypnotizable subjects reported equivalent GDF absorption and frequencies. However, hypnotizable subjects exhibited greater responsiveness and reported greater involuntariness than did those low in hypnotizability, even when their GDFs were equivalent. Thus, no support was generated for the hypotheses that sustained, elaborated suggestion-related imagery mediates response to suggestion ( Arnold, 1946 ) or that absorption in suggestions is of particular importance for low-hypnotizable subjects ( Zamansky &amp; Clark, 1986 ). Our finding that measures of response expectancy paralelled responding and reports of nonvolition support the hypothesis that expectancies mediate the relation between imagination, involuntariness, and responding ( Kirsch, 1985 ; Spanos, 1982 ). Hypnotizable imagining subjects in the study discussed here exhibited greater responsiveness than a comparable sample of subjects did in a previous countersuggestion study ( Lynn, Nash, Rhue, Frauman, &amp; Stanley, 1983 ) in which no attempt was made to foster an association between imagining and involuntary responding in the initial screening session.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.5.933</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3681658</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Concentration ; Expectations ; Fantasy ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Goals ; Human ; Humans ; Hypnosis ; Hypnotic Susceptibility ; Imagery ; Male ; Personality traits ; Personality. Affectivity ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Set (Psychology) ; Social research ; Suggestion</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 1987-11, Vol.53 (5), p.933-938</ispartof><rights>1987 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Nov 1987</rights><rights>1987, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a438t-e2b0da89c9b9fd0b088a5023568419cbdda4053a54a5d9f0898a11dc20311c1f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223,33774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7412722$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3681658$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lynn, Steven Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snodgrass, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhue, Judith W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardaway, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Goal-Directed Fantasy, Hypnotic Susceptibility, and Expectancies</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>We conducted an initial screening session in which hypnosis was presented as a "test of imagination" and administered with other imagination measures. In a second session, we instructed high- and low-hypnotizable subjects to imagine along with suggestions but to resist responding to motoric suggestions. Subjects received either instructions to use goal-directed fantasies (GDFs) or no facilitative instructions. Sizable individual difference effects were secured. Hypnotizable subjects exhibited more suggestion-related movements and reported greater involuntariness than did low-hypnotizable subjects. With GDF instructions, low- and high-hypnotizable subjects reported equivalent GDF absorption and frequencies. However, hypnotizable subjects exhibited greater responsiveness and reported greater involuntariness than did those low in hypnotizability, even when their GDFs were equivalent. Thus, no support was generated for the hypotheses that sustained, elaborated suggestion-related imagery mediates response to suggestion ( Arnold, 1946 ) or that absorption in suggestions is of particular importance for low-hypnotizable subjects ( Zamansky &amp; Clark, 1986 ). Our finding that measures of response expectancy paralelled responding and reports of nonvolition support the hypothesis that expectancies mediate the relation between imagination, involuntariness, and responding ( Kirsch, 1985 ; Spanos, 1982 ). Hypnotizable imagining subjects in the study discussed here exhibited greater responsiveness than a comparable sample of subjects did in a previous countersuggestion study ( Lynn, Nash, Rhue, Frauman, &amp; Stanley, 1983 ) in which no attempt was made to foster an association between imagining and involuntary responding in the initial screening session.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Concentration</subject><subject>Expectations</subject><subject>Fantasy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnosis</subject><subject>Hypnotic Susceptibility</subject><subject>Imagery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Set (Psychology)</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Suggestion</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1r3DAQBmBRGtJN0j8QCCxN6CnezujDlm4Jab4gkEPbsxhLMjh4bVeyofvvqyXLBgrNSYd5ZjTMy9gpwgpBVN8AOC-EQrlSYqVWRogPbIFGmAIFqo9ssQef2FFKLwAgFeeH7FCUGkulF-zqfqCu-N7G4Kbgl3fUT5Q2l8uHzdgPU-uWP-bkwji1ddu1Uy5Q75e3f8bMqXdtSCfsoKEuhc-795j9urv9efNQPD3fP95cPxUkhZ6KwGvwpI0ztWk81KA1KeBClVqicbX3JEEJUpKUNw1oownROw4C0WEjjtnX17ljHH7PIU123ebNuo76MMzJVpWWpagwwy__wJdhjn3ezZYouQFj9HuIg9FcQykyOv8fQm6U0SCrKiv-qlwcUoqhsWNs1xQ3FsFuY7LbFOw2BauEVTbHlJvOdqPneh38vmWXS65f7OqUHHVN3B477VklkVecvzEayY5p4yjmzLqQZRrffvsLCjSjFw</recordid><startdate>19871101</startdate><enddate>19871101</enddate><creator>Lynn, Steven Jay</creator><creator>Snodgrass, Michael</creator><creator>Rhue, Judith W</creator><creator>Hardaway, Richard</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19871101</creationdate><title>Goal-Directed Fantasy, Hypnotic Susceptibility, and Expectancies</title><author>Lynn, Steven Jay ; Snodgrass, Michael ; Rhue, Judith W ; Hardaway, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a438t-e2b0da89c9b9fd0b088a5023568419cbdda4053a54a5d9f0898a11dc20311c1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Concentration</topic><topic>Expectations</topic><topic>Fantasy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnosis</topic><topic>Hypnotic Susceptibility</topic><topic>Imagery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Set (Psychology)</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Suggestion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lynn, Steven Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snodgrass, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhue, Judith W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardaway, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lynn, Steven Jay</au><au>Snodgrass, Michael</au><au>Rhue, Judith W</au><au>Hardaway, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Goal-Directed Fantasy, Hypnotic Susceptibility, and Expectancies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>1987-11-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>933</spage><epage>938</epage><pages>933-938</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>We conducted an initial screening session in which hypnosis was presented as a "test of imagination" and administered with other imagination measures. In a second session, we instructed high- and low-hypnotizable subjects to imagine along with suggestions but to resist responding to motoric suggestions. Subjects received either instructions to use goal-directed fantasies (GDFs) or no facilitative instructions. Sizable individual difference effects were secured. Hypnotizable subjects exhibited more suggestion-related movements and reported greater involuntariness than did low-hypnotizable subjects. With GDF instructions, low- and high-hypnotizable subjects reported equivalent GDF absorption and frequencies. However, hypnotizable subjects exhibited greater responsiveness and reported greater involuntariness than did those low in hypnotizability, even when their GDFs were equivalent. Thus, no support was generated for the hypotheses that sustained, elaborated suggestion-related imagery mediates response to suggestion ( Arnold, 1946 ) or that absorption in suggestions is of particular importance for low-hypnotizable subjects ( Zamansky &amp; Clark, 1986 ). Our finding that measures of response expectancy paralelled responding and reports of nonvolition support the hypothesis that expectancies mediate the relation between imagination, involuntariness, and responding ( Kirsch, 1985 ; Spanos, 1982 ). Hypnotizable imagining subjects in the study discussed here exhibited greater responsiveness than a comparable sample of subjects did in a previous countersuggestion study ( Lynn, Nash, Rhue, Frauman, &amp; Stanley, 1983 ) in which no attempt was made to foster an association between imagining and involuntary responding in the initial screening session.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>3681658</pmid><doi>10.1037/0022-3514.53.5.933</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3514
ispartof Journal of personality and social psychology, 1987-11, Vol.53 (5), p.933-938
issn 0022-3514
1939-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77846371
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PsycARTICLES; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Concentration
Expectations
Fantasy
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Goals
Human
Humans
Hypnosis
Hypnotic Susceptibility
Imagery
Male
Personality traits
Personality. Affectivity
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Set (Psychology)
Social research
Suggestion
title Goal-Directed Fantasy, Hypnotic Susceptibility, and Expectancies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A36%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Goal-Directed%20Fantasy,%20Hypnotic%20Susceptibility,%20and%20Expectancies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Lynn,%20Steven%20Jay&rft.date=1987-11-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=933&rft.epage=938&rft.pages=933-938&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-3514.53.5.933&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1295980477%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a438t-e2b0da89c9b9fd0b088a5023568419cbdda4053a54a5d9f0898a11dc20311c1f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614290998&rft_id=info:pmid/3681658&rfr_iscdi=true