Direct vs Indirect Blood Pressure at Rest and During Isometric Exercise in Normal Subjects

• Published in: International journal of sports medicine 1995-11, Vol.16 (8), p.514-518
• Main Authors: Sagiv, M., Hanson, P. G., Ben-Ska, D., Nagle, F. J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Blood Pressure Determination; Diastole; Exercise - physiology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Hemodynamics. Rheology; Humans; Male; Physiology and Biochemistry; Reproducibility of Results; Systole; Vertebrates: cardiovascular system
• ISSN: 0172-4622; 1439-3964
• DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-973046

Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured by intraarterial means and by auscultation. Comparisons were made with simultaneously determined intraarterial catheter and auscultation measurements. Five healthy males were measured at rest and during handgrip and deadlift isometric exercises, utilizing small and large muscle mass. The data suggest that indirect systolic blood pressure is highly correlated with the direct method at rest, during handgrip and deadlift (0.8, 0.9 and 0.91 respectively) isometric exercises. Indirect diastolic blood pressure correlates well with intraarterial at rest (0.7) and during the isometric handgrip bout which utilized small muscle mass (0.8). As for the deadlift manoeuvre, the correlation coefficients between the indirect and direct methods were low. These results suggest that when utilizing large muscle mass during isometric deadlift exercise, the indirect method is not valid for assessment of diastolic blood pressure.