Loading…

Sleep movements and poor sleep in patients with non-specific somatic complaints — I. No first-night effect in poor and good sleepers

To evaluate the possible first-night effect on the nocturnal motor activity 25 poor sleepers and 12 good sleepers slept on the Static Charge Sensitive Bed (SCSB) during two consecutive nights The frequency of body movements in poor sleepers was almost two times higher than in good sleepers. The meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of psychosomatic research 1987, Vol.31 (5), p.623-629
Main Authors: Kronholm, Erkki, Alanen, Erkki, Hyyppä, Markku T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate the possible first-night effect on the nocturnal motor activity 25 poor sleepers and 12 good sleepers slept on the Static Charge Sensitive Bed (SCSB) during two consecutive nights The frequency of body movements in poor sleepers was almost two times higher than in good sleepers. The method itself was reproducible across two nights. There were no statistically significant and systemic level differences between the nights in the movements in bed (MIB). The difference t-test did not either reveal group differences in the magnitude or direction of changes from night to night. Results are consistent with the view that level of motor activity is one of the determinants of sleep quality. No first-night effect exists in terms of psychomotor activity.
ISSN:0022-3999
1879-1360
DOI:10.1016/0022-3999(87)90041-9