Loading…
Effects of prior testing with the WAIS-R NI on subsequent retest with the WAIS-R
Seven subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Revised as a Neuropsychological Instrument (WAIS-R NI) were administered to 20 nonreferred university students. The same participants were administered the corresponding subtests from the WAIS-R 3 to 4 weeks later. Data concerning amount and...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Archives of clinical neuropsychology 1996, Vol.11 (2), p.123-130 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 130 |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 123 |
| container_title | Archives of clinical neuropsychology |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Slick, Daniel Hopp, Grace Strauss, Esther Fox, Diane Pinch, Diane Stickgold, Kira |
| description | Seven subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Revised as a Neuropsychological Instrument (WAIS-R NI) were administered to 20 nonreferred university students. The same participants were administered the corresponding subtests from the WAIS-R 3 to 4 weeks later. Data concerning amount and consistency of change in ‘scaled scores’ were compared to those reported by Wechsler (1981) for test-retest with the WAIS-R. Performance on standard items was also compared to performance on multiple choice items from the WAIS-R NI. Gains observed in subtest ‘scaled scores’ at retest were comparable to those reported by Wechsler (1981). A substantial minority of participants obtained lower scores on some multiple choice items than they did on corresponding standard items. Implications and limitations of the current data, and the pressing need for comprehensive normative data for the WAIS-R NI are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0887-6177(95)00007-0 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77927836</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0887617795000070</els_id><sourcerecordid>77927836</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4cb0c4cd89d4676a37525cbc944ee58199a6ae7510a8208e15d5cef19831765a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotlbfQCQr0cVoMkkmyUYopWqhqHjBZZhmztiRdqYmGcW3N2OLggvP5my-_1w-hA4pOaOEZudEKZlkVMoTLU5JLJmQLdSnSrJEKM62Uf8H6aE9718jIyhNd1GPcqGUpmkf3Y3LEmzwuCnxylWNwwF8qOoX_FGFOQ5zwM_DyUNyj28muKmxb2ce3lqoA3bQoX-5fbRT5gsPB5s-QE-X48fRdTK9vZqMhtPEMsFCwu2MWG4LpQueySxnUqTCzqzmHEAoqnWe5SAFJblKiQIqCmGhpFoxKjORswE6Xs9duSbe44NZVt7CYpHX0LTeSKlTqVgWQb4GrWu8d1Ca-Ocyd5-GEtOZNJ0m02kyWphvk4bE2NFmfjtbQvEb2qiLwMUagPjlewXOeFtBbaGoXDRqiqb6f8MXfcKAaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77927836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of prior testing with the WAIS-R NI on subsequent retest with the WAIS-R</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Slick, Daniel ; Hopp, Grace ; Strauss, Esther ; Fox, Diane ; Pinch, Diane ; Stickgold, Kira</creator><creatorcontrib>Slick, Daniel ; Hopp, Grace ; Strauss, Esther ; Fox, Diane ; Pinch, Diane ; Stickgold, Kira</creatorcontrib><description>Seven subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Revised as a Neuropsychological Instrument (WAIS-R NI) were administered to 20 nonreferred university students. The same participants were administered the corresponding subtests from the WAIS-R 3 to 4 weeks later. Data concerning amount and consistency of change in ‘scaled scores’ were compared to those reported by Wechsler (1981) for test-retest with the WAIS-R. Performance on standard items was also compared to performance on multiple choice items from the WAIS-R NI. Gains observed in subtest ‘scaled scores’ at retest were comparable to those reported by Wechsler (1981). A substantial minority of participants obtained lower scores on some multiple choice items than they did on corresponding standard items. Implications and limitations of the current data, and the pressing need for comprehensive normative data for the WAIS-R NI are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-6177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0887-6177(95)00007-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14588912</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 1996, Vol.11 (2), p.123-130</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14588912$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Slick, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopp, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauss, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinch, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stickgold, Kira</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of prior testing with the WAIS-R NI on subsequent retest with the WAIS-R</title><title>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</title><addtitle>Arch Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><description>Seven subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Revised as a Neuropsychological Instrument (WAIS-R NI) were administered to 20 nonreferred university students. The same participants were administered the corresponding subtests from the WAIS-R 3 to 4 weeks later. Data concerning amount and consistency of change in ‘scaled scores’ were compared to those reported by Wechsler (1981) for test-retest with the WAIS-R. Performance on standard items was also compared to performance on multiple choice items from the WAIS-R NI. Gains observed in subtest ‘scaled scores’ at retest were comparable to those reported by Wechsler (1981). A substantial minority of participants obtained lower scores on some multiple choice items than they did on corresponding standard items. Implications and limitations of the current data, and the pressing need for comprehensive normative data for the WAIS-R NI are discussed.</description><issn>0887-6177</issn><issn>1873-5843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotlbfQCQr0cVoMkkmyUYopWqhqHjBZZhmztiRdqYmGcW3N2OLggvP5my-_1w-hA4pOaOEZudEKZlkVMoTLU5JLJmQLdSnSrJEKM62Uf8H6aE9718jIyhNd1GPcqGUpmkf3Y3LEmzwuCnxylWNwwF8qOoX_FGFOQ5zwM_DyUNyj28muKmxb2ce3lqoA3bQoX-5fbRT5gsPB5s-QE-X48fRdTK9vZqMhtPEMsFCwu2MWG4LpQueySxnUqTCzqzmHEAoqnWe5SAFJblKiQIqCmGhpFoxKjORswE6Xs9duSbe44NZVt7CYpHX0LTeSKlTqVgWQb4GrWu8d1Ca-Ocyd5-GEtOZNJ0m02kyWphvk4bE2NFmfjtbQvEb2qiLwMUagPjlewXOeFtBbaGoXDRqiqb6f8MXfcKAaA</recordid><startdate>1996</startdate><enddate>1996</enddate><creator>Slick, Daniel</creator><creator>Hopp, Grace</creator><creator>Strauss, Esther</creator><creator>Fox, Diane</creator><creator>Pinch, Diane</creator><creator>Stickgold, Kira</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1996</creationdate><title>Effects of prior testing with the WAIS-R NI on subsequent retest with the WAIS-R</title><author>Slick, Daniel ; Hopp, Grace ; Strauss, Esther ; Fox, Diane ; Pinch, Diane ; Stickgold, Kira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4cb0c4cd89d4676a37525cbc944ee58199a6ae7510a8208e15d5cef19831765a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Slick, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopp, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauss, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinch, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stickgold, Kira</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Slick, Daniel</au><au>Hopp, Grace</au><au>Strauss, Esther</au><au>Fox, Diane</au><au>Pinch, Diane</au><au>Stickgold, Kira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of prior testing with the WAIS-R NI on subsequent retest with the WAIS-R</atitle><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><date>1996</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>123-130</pages><issn>0887-6177</issn><eissn>1873-5843</eissn><abstract>Seven subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Revised as a Neuropsychological Instrument (WAIS-R NI) were administered to 20 nonreferred university students. The same participants were administered the corresponding subtests from the WAIS-R 3 to 4 weeks later. Data concerning amount and consistency of change in ‘scaled scores’ were compared to those reported by Wechsler (1981) for test-retest with the WAIS-R. Performance on standard items was also compared to performance on multiple choice items from the WAIS-R NI. Gains observed in subtest ‘scaled scores’ at retest were comparable to those reported by Wechsler (1981). A substantial minority of participants obtained lower scores on some multiple choice items than they did on corresponding standard items. Implications and limitations of the current data, and the pressing need for comprehensive normative data for the WAIS-R NI are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>14588912</pmid><doi>10.1016/0887-6177(95)00007-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0887-6177 |
| ispartof | Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 1996, Vol.11 (2), p.123-130 |
| issn | 0887-6177 1873-5843 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77927836 |
| source | Oxford Journals Online |
| title | Effects of prior testing with the WAIS-R NI on subsequent retest with the WAIS-R |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A52%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20prior%20testing%20with%20the%20WAIS-R%20NI%20on%20subsequent%20retest%20with%20the%20WAIS-R&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20clinical%20neuropsychology&rft.au=Slick,%20Daniel&rft.date=1996&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=123-130&rft.issn=0887-6177&rft.eissn=1873-5843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0887-6177(95)00007-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77927836%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4cb0c4cd89d4676a37525cbc944ee58199a6ae7510a8208e15d5cef19831765a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77927836&rft_id=info:pmid/14588912&rfr_iscdi=true |