Loading…
Comparison of axillofemoral and aortofemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease
Purpose: A comparison of aortofemoral bypass grafting (AOFBG) and axillofemoral bypass grafting (AXFBG) for occlusive disease performed by the same surgeons during a defined interval forms the basis for this report. Methods: Data regarding all patients who underwent AOFBG or AXFBG for lower-extremit...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of vascular surgery 1996-02, Vol.23 (2), p.263-271 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose: A comparison of aortofemoral bypass grafting (AOFBG) and axillofemoral bypass grafting (AXFBG) for occlusive disease performed by the same surgeons during a defined interval forms the basis for this report.
Methods: Data regarding all patients who underwent AOFBG or AXFBG for lower-extremity ischemia caused by aortoiliac occlusive disease were prospectively entered into a computerized vascular registry. The decision to perform AOFBG rather than AXFBG was based on assessment of surgical risk and the surgeon's preference. This report describes results for surgical morbidity, mortality, patency, limb salvage, and patient survival for procedures performed from January 1988 through December 1993.
Results: We performed 108 AXFBGs and 139 AOFBGs. AXFBG patients were older (mean age, 68 years compared with 58 years for AOFBG,
p < 0.001), more often had heart disease (84% compared with 38%,
p < 0.001), and more often underwent surgery for limb-salvage indications (80% compared with 42%,
p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in operative mortality (AXFBG, 3.4%; AOFBG, |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0741-5214 1097-6809 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0741-5214(96)70270-7 |