Loading…

A comparison of wire brush and diamond fraise superficial dermabrasion for photoaged skin : A clinical, immunohistologic, and biochemical study

Superficial dermabrasion has a proven beneficial effect on photoaged skin, but little is known about the differences between the two major modalities used in dermabrasion, the diamond fraise (DF) and the wire brush (WB). We compared the clinical, immunohistologic, and biochemical changes after super...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1996-02, Vol.34 (2), p.235-243
Main Authors: NELSON, B. R, METZ, R. D, GOPA MAJMUDAR, HAMILTON, T. A, GILLARD, M. O, RAILAN, D, GRIFFITHS, C. E. M, JOHNSON, T. M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 243
container_issue 2
container_start_page 235
container_title Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
container_volume 34
creator NELSON, B. R
METZ, R. D
GOPA MAJMUDAR
HAMILTON, T. A
GILLARD, M. O
RAILAN, D
GRIFFITHS, C. E. M
JOHNSON, T. M
description Superficial dermabrasion has a proven beneficial effect on photoaged skin, but little is known about the differences between the two major modalities used in dermabrasion, the diamond fraise (DF) and the wire brush (WB). We compared the clinical, immunohistologic, and biochemical changes after superficial dermabrasion with DF and WB. Eight photoaged patients (mean age, 68 years; range, 49 to 80 years) underwent facial dermabrasion to the level of the papillary dermis. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline and at 3 and 12 weeks after dermabrasion. Biopsy specimens were taken from both dermabraded halves at the same time points and assessed by routine histologic and immunohistologic examinations, western blot analysis, and radioimmunoassay. Scoring of intracellular and extracellular transforming growth factor-beta 1 was based on a semiquantitative ordinal scale (0 = no staining to 4 = maximum staining) in half-unit increments. The score for each specimen represents the average of values obtained from four high-power fields. Both methods of dermabrasion resulted in significant resolution of actinic keratoses, lentigines, and wrinkling. No statistical significance was noted between the two methods in regard to clinical efficacy. Significantly fewer milia occurred after DF than after WB. Solar elastosis decreased with both the WB and DF. Immunohistologic examination demonstrated a highly significant increase in papillary dermal fibroblast staining for amino terminal procollagen I (type I pN-collagen) at 3 weeks for both DF and WB compared to baseline. Staining at 12 weeks had decreased from the peak noted at week 3, but was still significantly increased from baseline. Western blotting of type I pN-collagen demonstrated a 5.4-fold (p = 0.01) increase from baseline at 3 weeks and a 4.9-fold (p = 0.002) increase at 12 weeks after dermabrasion with the WB. Similarly, the DF produced a 4.9-fold (p = 0.006) increase at 3 weeks and a 5.1-fold (p = 0.008) increase at 12 weeks after dermabrasion. Western blotting of amino terminal procollagen III (type III pN-collagen) showed a 6.1-fold (p = 0.07) increase from baseline at 3 weeks and a 3.9-fold (p = 0.04) increase at 12 weeks after dermabrasion with the DF. The WB showed a 3.8-fold (p = 0.07) increase from baseline at 3 weeks and a 5.1-fold (p = 0.05) increase at 12 weeks. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 demonstrated a significant increase in extracellular staining with DF (3.3 +/- 0.2) and WB (3.7 +/- 0.2)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0190-9622(96)80118-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78041433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78041433</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-88562e4193f32d205f3132fa5b5472eaf95673dd1fb4f370483b4a47e51f2a7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1q3DAUhUVpSCfTPkJAi1ASGKf6syVnNwxJWhjIIu16uLakzG0ty5FsQp4ir1y3GWZ1Fue7H9xDyDln15zx6tsj4zUr6kqIy7q6MoxzU1QfyIKzWheVNvojWRyRT-Qs59-MsVpJfUpOTaUEM2ZB3ta0jWGAhDn2NHr6gsnRJk15T6G31CKEOKdPgNnRPA0ueWwROmpdCtAkyDhf-pjosI9jhCdnaf6DPb2hs7vDHlvoVhRDmPq4xzzGLj5hu_qvbzC2exf-ITSPk339TE48dNl9OeSS_Lq7_bn5Xmwf7n9s1ttiELIcC2PKSjjFa-mlsIKVXnIpPJRNqbRw4Ouy0tJa7hvlpWbKyEaB0q7kXoC2ckm-vnuHFJ8nl8ddwNy6roPexSnvtGGKKyln8PwATk1wdjckDJBed4cF5_7i0EOev5h36lvMR0wyJgzn8i96RYIr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78041433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of wire brush and diamond fraise superficial dermabrasion for photoaged skin : A clinical, immunohistologic, and biochemical study</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>NELSON, B. R ; METZ, R. D ; GOPA MAJMUDAR ; HAMILTON, T. A ; GILLARD, M. O ; RAILAN, D ; GRIFFITHS, C. E. M ; JOHNSON, T. M</creator><creatorcontrib>NELSON, B. R ; METZ, R. D ; GOPA MAJMUDAR ; HAMILTON, T. A ; GILLARD, M. O ; RAILAN, D ; GRIFFITHS, C. E. M ; JOHNSON, T. M</creatorcontrib><description>Superficial dermabrasion has a proven beneficial effect on photoaged skin, but little is known about the differences between the two major modalities used in dermabrasion, the diamond fraise (DF) and the wire brush (WB). We compared the clinical, immunohistologic, and biochemical changes after superficial dermabrasion with DF and WB. Eight photoaged patients (mean age, 68 years; range, 49 to 80 years) underwent facial dermabrasion to the level of the papillary dermis. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline and at 3 and 12 weeks after dermabrasion. Biopsy specimens were taken from both dermabraded halves at the same time points and assessed by routine histologic and immunohistologic examinations, western blot analysis, and radioimmunoassay. Scoring of intracellular and extracellular transforming growth factor-beta 1 was based on a semiquantitative ordinal scale (0 = no staining to 4 = maximum staining) in half-unit increments. The score for each specimen represents the average of values obtained from four high-power fields. Both methods of dermabrasion resulted in significant resolution of actinic keratoses, lentigines, and wrinkling. No statistical significance was noted between the two methods in regard to clinical efficacy. Significantly fewer milia occurred after DF than after WB. Solar elastosis decreased with both the WB and DF. Immunohistologic examination demonstrated a highly significant increase in papillary dermal fibroblast staining for amino terminal procollagen I (type I pN-collagen) at 3 weeks for both DF and WB compared to baseline. Staining at 12 weeks had decreased from the peak noted at week 3, but was still significantly increased from baseline. Western blotting of type I pN-collagen demonstrated a 5.4-fold (p = 0.01) increase from baseline at 3 weeks and a 4.9-fold (p = 0.002) increase at 12 weeks after dermabrasion with the WB. Similarly, the DF produced a 4.9-fold (p = 0.006) increase at 3 weeks and a 5.1-fold (p = 0.008) increase at 12 weeks after dermabrasion. Western blotting of amino terminal procollagen III (type III pN-collagen) showed a 6.1-fold (p = 0.07) increase from baseline at 3 weeks and a 3.9-fold (p = 0.04) increase at 12 weeks after dermabrasion with the DF. The WB showed a 3.8-fold (p = 0.07) increase from baseline at 3 weeks and a 5.1-fold (p = 0.05) increase at 12 weeks. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 demonstrated a significant increase in extracellular staining with DF (3.3 +/- 0.2) and WB (3.7 +/- 0.2) from baseline (1.2 +/- 0.2, p &lt; 0.001) at 3 weeks. Superficial dermabrasion with DF and WP appears to be similarly efficacious in the treatment of photoaged skin. Significant increases in type I pN-collagen, type III pN-collagen, and TGF-beta 1 occurred in the papillary dermis after both types of dermabrasion. These results suggest that increased fibroblast activity and consequent collagen I and III synthesis underlie the clinical improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-9622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0190-9622(96)80118-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8642088</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAADDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Blotting, Western ; Dermabrasion - adverse effects ; Dermabrasion - instrumentation ; Dermatologic Surgical Procedures ; Diamond ; Diseases of the skin. Cosmetics ; Epidermal Cyst - etiology ; Equipment Design ; Face - surgery ; Fibroblasts - pathology ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Keratosis - metabolism ; Keratosis - pathology ; Keratosis - surgery ; Lentigo - metabolism ; Lentigo - pathology ; Lentigo - surgery ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Peptide Fragments - analysis ; Procollagen - analysis ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Skin - chemistry ; Skin - pathology ; Skin Aging - pathology ; Skin Diseases - etiology ; Transforming Growth Factor beta - analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1996-02, Vol.34 (2), p.235-243</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3002811$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8642088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NELSON, B. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>METZ, R. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOPA MAJMUDAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAMILTON, T. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLARD, M. O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAILAN, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRIFFITHS, C. E. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, T. M</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of wire brush and diamond fraise superficial dermabrasion for photoaged skin : A clinical, immunohistologic, and biochemical study</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><description>Superficial dermabrasion has a proven beneficial effect on photoaged skin, but little is known about the differences between the two major modalities used in dermabrasion, the diamond fraise (DF) and the wire brush (WB). We compared the clinical, immunohistologic, and biochemical changes after superficial dermabrasion with DF and WB. Eight photoaged patients (mean age, 68 years; range, 49 to 80 years) underwent facial dermabrasion to the level of the papillary dermis. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline and at 3 and 12 weeks after dermabrasion. Biopsy specimens were taken from both dermabraded halves at the same time points and assessed by routine histologic and immunohistologic examinations, western blot analysis, and radioimmunoassay. Scoring of intracellular and extracellular transforming growth factor-beta 1 was based on a semiquantitative ordinal scale (0 = no staining to 4 = maximum staining) in half-unit increments. The score for each specimen represents the average of values obtained from four high-power fields. Both methods of dermabrasion resulted in significant resolution of actinic keratoses, lentigines, and wrinkling. No statistical significance was noted between the two methods in regard to clinical efficacy. Significantly fewer milia occurred after DF than after WB. Solar elastosis decreased with both the WB and DF. Immunohistologic examination demonstrated a highly significant increase in papillary dermal fibroblast staining for amino terminal procollagen I (type I pN-collagen) at 3 weeks for both DF and WB compared to baseline. Staining at 12 weeks had decreased from the peak noted at week 3, but was still significantly increased from baseline. Western blotting of type I pN-collagen demonstrated a 5.4-fold (p = 0.01) increase from baseline at 3 weeks and a 4.9-fold (p = 0.002) increase at 12 weeks after dermabrasion with the WB. Similarly, the DF produced a 4.9-fold (p = 0.006) increase at 3 weeks and a 5.1-fold (p = 0.008) increase at 12 weeks after dermabrasion. Western blotting of amino terminal procollagen III (type III pN-collagen) showed a 6.1-fold (p = 0.07) increase from baseline at 3 weeks and a 3.9-fold (p = 0.04) increase at 12 weeks after dermabrasion with the DF. The WB showed a 3.8-fold (p = 0.07) increase from baseline at 3 weeks and a 5.1-fold (p = 0.05) increase at 12 weeks. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 demonstrated a significant increase in extracellular staining with DF (3.3 +/- 0.2) and WB (3.7 +/- 0.2) from baseline (1.2 +/- 0.2, p &lt; 0.001) at 3 weeks. Superficial dermabrasion with DF and WP appears to be similarly efficacious in the treatment of photoaged skin. Significant increases in type I pN-collagen, type III pN-collagen, and TGF-beta 1 occurred in the papillary dermis after both types of dermabrasion. These results suggest that increased fibroblast activity and consequent collagen I and III synthesis underlie the clinical improvement.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Blotting, Western</subject><subject>Dermabrasion - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dermabrasion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Dermatologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Diamond</subject><subject>Diseases of the skin. Cosmetics</subject><subject>Epidermal Cyst - etiology</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Face - surgery</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Keratosis - metabolism</subject><subject>Keratosis - pathology</subject><subject>Keratosis - surgery</subject><subject>Lentigo - metabolism</subject><subject>Lentigo - pathology</subject><subject>Lentigo - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peptide Fragments - analysis</subject><subject>Procollagen - analysis</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Skin - chemistry</subject><subject>Skin - pathology</subject><subject>Skin Aging - pathology</subject><subject>Skin Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Transforming Growth Factor beta - analysis</subject><issn>0190-9622</issn><issn>1097-6787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1q3DAUhUVpSCfTPkJAi1ASGKf6syVnNwxJWhjIIu16uLakzG0ty5FsQp4ir1y3GWZ1Fue7H9xDyDln15zx6tsj4zUr6kqIy7q6MoxzU1QfyIKzWheVNvojWRyRT-Qs59-MsVpJfUpOTaUEM2ZB3ta0jWGAhDn2NHr6gsnRJk15T6G31CKEOKdPgNnRPA0ueWwROmpdCtAkyDhf-pjosI9jhCdnaf6DPb2hs7vDHlvoVhRDmPq4xzzGLj5hu_qvbzC2exf-ITSPk339TE48dNl9OeSS_Lq7_bn5Xmwf7n9s1ttiELIcC2PKSjjFa-mlsIKVXnIpPJRNqbRw4Ouy0tJa7hvlpWbKyEaB0q7kXoC2ckm-vnuHFJ8nl8ddwNy6roPexSnvtGGKKyln8PwATk1wdjckDJBed4cF5_7i0EOev5h36lvMR0wyJgzn8i96RYIr</recordid><startdate>19960201</startdate><enddate>19960201</enddate><creator>NELSON, B. R</creator><creator>METZ, R. D</creator><creator>GOPA MAJMUDAR</creator><creator>HAMILTON, T. A</creator><creator>GILLARD, M. O</creator><creator>RAILAN, D</creator><creator>GRIFFITHS, C. E. M</creator><creator>JOHNSON, T. M</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960201</creationdate><title>A comparison of wire brush and diamond fraise superficial dermabrasion for photoaged skin : A clinical, immunohistologic, and biochemical study</title><author>NELSON, B. R ; METZ, R. D ; GOPA MAJMUDAR ; HAMILTON, T. A ; GILLARD, M. O ; RAILAN, D ; GRIFFITHS, C. E. M ; JOHNSON, T. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-88562e4193f32d205f3132fa5b5472eaf95673dd1fb4f370483b4a47e51f2a7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Blotting, Western</topic><topic>Dermabrasion - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dermabrasion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Dermatologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Diamond</topic><topic>Diseases of the skin. Cosmetics</topic><topic>Epidermal Cyst - etiology</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Face - surgery</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Keratosis - metabolism</topic><topic>Keratosis - pathology</topic><topic>Keratosis - surgery</topic><topic>Lentigo - metabolism</topic><topic>Lentigo - pathology</topic><topic>Lentigo - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peptide Fragments - analysis</topic><topic>Procollagen - analysis</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Skin - chemistry</topic><topic>Skin - pathology</topic><topic>Skin Aging - pathology</topic><topic>Skin Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Transforming Growth Factor beta - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NELSON, B. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>METZ, R. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOPA MAJMUDAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAMILTON, T. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLARD, M. O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAILAN, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRIFFITHS, C. E. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, T. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NELSON, B. R</au><au>METZ, R. D</au><au>GOPA MAJMUDAR</au><au>HAMILTON, T. A</au><au>GILLARD, M. O</au><au>RAILAN, D</au><au>GRIFFITHS, C. E. M</au><au>JOHNSON, T. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of wire brush and diamond fraise superficial dermabrasion for photoaged skin : A clinical, immunohistologic, and biochemical study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><date>1996-02-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>235-243</pages><issn>0190-9622</issn><eissn>1097-6787</eissn><coden>JAADDB</coden><abstract>Superficial dermabrasion has a proven beneficial effect on photoaged skin, but little is known about the differences between the two major modalities used in dermabrasion, the diamond fraise (DF) and the wire brush (WB). We compared the clinical, immunohistologic, and biochemical changes after superficial dermabrasion with DF and WB. Eight photoaged patients (mean age, 68 years; range, 49 to 80 years) underwent facial dermabrasion to the level of the papillary dermis. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline and at 3 and 12 weeks after dermabrasion. Biopsy specimens were taken from both dermabraded halves at the same time points and assessed by routine histologic and immunohistologic examinations, western blot analysis, and radioimmunoassay. Scoring of intracellular and extracellular transforming growth factor-beta 1 was based on a semiquantitative ordinal scale (0 = no staining to 4 = maximum staining) in half-unit increments. The score for each specimen represents the average of values obtained from four high-power fields. Both methods of dermabrasion resulted in significant resolution of actinic keratoses, lentigines, and wrinkling. No statistical significance was noted between the two methods in regard to clinical efficacy. Significantly fewer milia occurred after DF than after WB. Solar elastosis decreased with both the WB and DF. Immunohistologic examination demonstrated a highly significant increase in papillary dermal fibroblast staining for amino terminal procollagen I (type I pN-collagen) at 3 weeks for both DF and WB compared to baseline. Staining at 12 weeks had decreased from the peak noted at week 3, but was still significantly increased from baseline. Western blotting of type I pN-collagen demonstrated a 5.4-fold (p = 0.01) increase from baseline at 3 weeks and a 4.9-fold (p = 0.002) increase at 12 weeks after dermabrasion with the WB. Similarly, the DF produced a 4.9-fold (p = 0.006) increase at 3 weeks and a 5.1-fold (p = 0.008) increase at 12 weeks after dermabrasion. Western blotting of amino terminal procollagen III (type III pN-collagen) showed a 6.1-fold (p = 0.07) increase from baseline at 3 weeks and a 3.9-fold (p = 0.04) increase at 12 weeks after dermabrasion with the DF. The WB showed a 3.8-fold (p = 0.07) increase from baseline at 3 weeks and a 5.1-fold (p = 0.05) increase at 12 weeks. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 demonstrated a significant increase in extracellular staining with DF (3.3 +/- 0.2) and WB (3.7 +/- 0.2) from baseline (1.2 +/- 0.2, p &lt; 0.001) at 3 weeks. Superficial dermabrasion with DF and WP appears to be similarly efficacious in the treatment of photoaged skin. Significant increases in type I pN-collagen, type III pN-collagen, and TGF-beta 1 occurred in the papillary dermis after both types of dermabrasion. These results suggest that increased fibroblast activity and consequent collagen I and III synthesis underlie the clinical improvement.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>8642088</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0190-9622(96)80118-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-9622
ispartof Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1996-02, Vol.34 (2), p.235-243
issn 0190-9622
1097-6787
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78041433
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Blotting, Western
Dermabrasion - adverse effects
Dermabrasion - instrumentation
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures
Diamond
Diseases of the skin. Cosmetics
Epidermal Cyst - etiology
Equipment Design
Face - surgery
Fibroblasts - pathology
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Keratosis - metabolism
Keratosis - pathology
Keratosis - surgery
Lentigo - metabolism
Lentigo - pathology
Lentigo - surgery
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Peptide Fragments - analysis
Procollagen - analysis
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Skin - chemistry
Skin - pathology
Skin Aging - pathology
Skin Diseases - etiology
Transforming Growth Factor beta - analysis
title A comparison of wire brush and diamond fraise superficial dermabrasion for photoaged skin : A clinical, immunohistologic, and biochemical study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T23%3A04%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20wire%20brush%20and%20diamond%20fraise%20superficial%20dermabrasion%20for%20photoaged%20skin%20:%20A%20clinical,%20immunohistologic,%20and%20biochemical%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology&rft.au=NELSON,%20B.%20R&rft.date=1996-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=235-243&rft.issn=0190-9622&rft.eissn=1097-6787&rft.coden=JAADDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0190-9622(96)80118-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E78041433%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-88562e4193f32d205f3132fa5b5472eaf95673dd1fb4f370483b4a47e51f2a7d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78041433&rft_id=info:pmid/8642088&rfr_iscdi=true