Loading…

Stretch reflexes of the proximal arm in a patient with mirror movements: absence of bilateral long-latency components

The stretch reflex responses evoked by unilateral limb displacement in distal (first dorsal interosseus (FDI)) and in proximal (biceps brachii (Bb)) arm muscles were studied during matched bilateral contractions in a patient with congenital mirror movements. In this patient unilateral transcortical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology 1996-04, Vol.101 (2), p.79-83
Main Authors: Fellows, S.J., Töpper, R., Schwarz, M., Thilmann, A.F., Noth, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-c3a2ed95684ea807c371e94ae418f053e61a3872609c497f92b8080d86e8dbd13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-c3a2ed95684ea807c371e94ae418f053e61a3872609c497f92b8080d86e8dbd13
container_end_page 83
container_issue 2
container_start_page 79
container_title Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology
container_volume 101
creator Fellows, S.J.
Töpper, R.
Schwarz, M.
Thilmann, A.F.
Noth, J.
description The stretch reflex responses evoked by unilateral limb displacement in distal (first dorsal interosseus (FDI)) and in proximal (biceps brachii (Bb)) arm muscles were studied during matched bilateral contractions in a patient with congenital mirror movements. In this patient unilateral transcortical magnetic stimulation (TMS) elicited not only the normal contralateral EMG response but also a clear ipsilateral component in the EMG of both proximal and distal arm muscles. As expected from previous studies, the ipsilateral FDI muscle responded to stretch of the index finger with short- (M1) and long-latency (M2) reflex components. In addition, the FDI contralateral to displacement exhibited an abnormal mirrored response corresponding to the M2 interval. In contrast, whereas the ipsilateral Bb responded to imposed elbow extension with a marked M1/M2 reflex response, no mirroring of either reflex component was apparent in the contralateral Bb EMG. If the mirroring of the M2 in the FDI is accepted as evidence for the transcortical nature of the M2 reflex response, then it follows that the absence of such mirroring in the Bb indicates that a transcortical mechanisms cannot play a major role in the generation of long-latency stretch reflex responses in proximal arm muscles.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0924-980X(95)00247-I
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78073824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0924980X9500247I</els_id><sourcerecordid>15793738</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-c3a2ed95684ea807c371e94ae418f053e61a3872609c497f92b8080d86e8dbd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFLHDEYxUOxrKvtf1AhByl6GJtMMpPEQ0FE7cKChyp4C5nMN92Umck2yVr975txlz3aU0i-33vkew-hL5RcUELrb0SVvFCSPJ2p6pyQkoti8QHNqRRlIYhiB2i-Rw7RUYy_M6SEqGZoJmsuSFnN0eZnCpDsCgfoeniBiH2H0wrwOvgXN5gemzBgN2KD1yY5GBP-69IKDy4EH_Dgn2HIj_ESmybCaGHSN643CUIW9378VUyX0b5i64e1Hyf6E_rYmT7C5915jB5vbx6ufxTL-7vF9dWysJyKVFhmSmhVVUsORhJhmaCguAFOZUcqBjU1LK9bE2W5Ep0qG0kkaWUNsm1ayo7R161v3ubPBmLSg4sW-t6M4DdRi2zKZMn_C9JKKJbRDPItaIOPMYem1yHHFF41JXqqRU-Z6ylzrSr9VoteZNnJzn_TDNDuRbse8vx0NzfRmr4LZrQu7jFGKyLLOmPftxjk0J4dBB2tm1JvXQCbdOvd-__4B44nqo8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15793738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stretch reflexes of the proximal arm in a patient with mirror movements: absence of bilateral long-latency components</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Fellows, S.J. ; Töpper, R. ; Schwarz, M. ; Thilmann, A.F. ; Noth, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fellows, S.J. ; Töpper, R. ; Schwarz, M. ; Thilmann, A.F. ; Noth, J.</creatorcontrib><description>The stretch reflex responses evoked by unilateral limb displacement in distal (first dorsal interosseus (FDI)) and in proximal (biceps brachii (Bb)) arm muscles were studied during matched bilateral contractions in a patient with congenital mirror movements. In this patient unilateral transcortical magnetic stimulation (TMS) elicited not only the normal contralateral EMG response but also a clear ipsilateral component in the EMG of both proximal and distal arm muscles. As expected from previous studies, the ipsilateral FDI muscle responded to stretch of the index finger with short- (M1) and long-latency (M2) reflex components. In addition, the FDI contralateral to displacement exhibited an abnormal mirrored response corresponding to the M2 interval. In contrast, whereas the ipsilateral Bb responded to imposed elbow extension with a marked M1/M2 reflex response, no mirroring of either reflex component was apparent in the contralateral Bb EMG. If the mirroring of the M2 in the FDI is accepted as evidence for the transcortical nature of the M2 reflex response, then it follows that the absence of such mirroring in the Bb indicates that a transcortical mechanisms cannot play a major role in the generation of long-latency stretch reflex responses in proximal arm muscles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-980X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0013-4694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7093</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0924-980X(95)00247-I</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8647025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arm - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Electromyography ; Hand - physiology ; Human ; Humans ; Long latency ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Movement Disorders - physiopathology ; Muscle Relaxation - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Nervous system as a whole ; Neurology ; Reflex - physiology ; Stretch reflex ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 1996-04, Vol.101 (2), p.79-83</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-c3a2ed95684ea807c371e94ae418f053e61a3872609c497f92b8080d86e8dbd13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-c3a2ed95684ea807c371e94ae418f053e61a3872609c497f92b8080d86e8dbd13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3150826$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8647025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fellows, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Töpper, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thilmann, A.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noth, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Stretch reflexes of the proximal arm in a patient with mirror movements: absence of bilateral long-latency components</title><title>Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology</title><addtitle>Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>The stretch reflex responses evoked by unilateral limb displacement in distal (first dorsal interosseus (FDI)) and in proximal (biceps brachii (Bb)) arm muscles were studied during matched bilateral contractions in a patient with congenital mirror movements. In this patient unilateral transcortical magnetic stimulation (TMS) elicited not only the normal contralateral EMG response but also a clear ipsilateral component in the EMG of both proximal and distal arm muscles. As expected from previous studies, the ipsilateral FDI muscle responded to stretch of the index finger with short- (M1) and long-latency (M2) reflex components. In addition, the FDI contralateral to displacement exhibited an abnormal mirrored response corresponding to the M2 interval. In contrast, whereas the ipsilateral Bb responded to imposed elbow extension with a marked M1/M2 reflex response, no mirroring of either reflex component was apparent in the contralateral Bb EMG. If the mirroring of the M2 in the FDI is accepted as evidence for the transcortical nature of the M2 reflex response, then it follows that the absence of such mirroring in the Bb indicates that a transcortical mechanisms cannot play a major role in the generation of long-latency stretch reflex responses in proximal arm muscles.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arm - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Hand - physiology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Long latency</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Movement Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Muscle Relaxation - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Nervous system as a whole</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Reflex - physiology</subject><subject>Stretch reflex</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0924-980X</issn><issn>0013-4694</issn><issn>1872-7093</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFLHDEYxUOxrKvtf1AhByl6GJtMMpPEQ0FE7cKChyp4C5nMN92Umck2yVr975txlz3aU0i-33vkew-hL5RcUELrb0SVvFCSPJ2p6pyQkoti8QHNqRRlIYhiB2i-Rw7RUYy_M6SEqGZoJmsuSFnN0eZnCpDsCgfoeniBiH2H0wrwOvgXN5gemzBgN2KD1yY5GBP-69IKDy4EH_Dgn2HIj_ESmybCaGHSN643CUIW9378VUyX0b5i64e1Hyf6E_rYmT7C5915jB5vbx6ufxTL-7vF9dWysJyKVFhmSmhVVUsORhJhmaCguAFOZUcqBjU1LK9bE2W5Ep0qG0kkaWUNsm1ayo7R161v3ubPBmLSg4sW-t6M4DdRi2zKZMn_C9JKKJbRDPItaIOPMYem1yHHFF41JXqqRU-Z6ylzrSr9VoteZNnJzn_TDNDuRbse8vx0NzfRmr4LZrQu7jFGKyLLOmPftxjk0J4dBB2tm1JvXQCbdOvd-__4B44nqo8</recordid><startdate>19960401</startdate><enddate>19960401</enddate><creator>Fellows, S.J.</creator><creator>Töpper, R.</creator><creator>Schwarz, M.</creator><creator>Thilmann, A.F.</creator><creator>Noth, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960401</creationdate><title>Stretch reflexes of the proximal arm in a patient with mirror movements: absence of bilateral long-latency components</title><author>Fellows, S.J. ; Töpper, R. ; Schwarz, M. ; Thilmann, A.F. ; Noth, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-c3a2ed95684ea807c371e94ae418f053e61a3872609c497f92b8080d86e8dbd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arm - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Hand - physiology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Long latency</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Movement Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Muscle Relaxation - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Nervous system as a whole</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Reflex - physiology</topic><topic>Stretch reflex</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fellows, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Töpper, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thilmann, A.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noth, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fellows, S.J.</au><au>Töpper, R.</au><au>Schwarz, M.</au><au>Thilmann, A.F.</au><au>Noth, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stretch reflexes of the proximal arm in a patient with mirror movements: absence of bilateral long-latency components</atitle><jtitle>Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>1996-04-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>79-83</pages><issn>0924-980X</issn><issn>0013-4694</issn><eissn>1872-7093</eissn><abstract>The stretch reflex responses evoked by unilateral limb displacement in distal (first dorsal interosseus (FDI)) and in proximal (biceps brachii (Bb)) arm muscles were studied during matched bilateral contractions in a patient with congenital mirror movements. In this patient unilateral transcortical magnetic stimulation (TMS) elicited not only the normal contralateral EMG response but also a clear ipsilateral component in the EMG of both proximal and distal arm muscles. As expected from previous studies, the ipsilateral FDI muscle responded to stretch of the index finger with short- (M1) and long-latency (M2) reflex components. In addition, the FDI contralateral to displacement exhibited an abnormal mirrored response corresponding to the M2 interval. In contrast, whereas the ipsilateral Bb responded to imposed elbow extension with a marked M1/M2 reflex response, no mirroring of either reflex component was apparent in the contralateral Bb EMG. If the mirroring of the M2 in the FDI is accepted as evidence for the transcortical nature of the M2 reflex response, then it follows that the absence of such mirroring in the Bb indicates that a transcortical mechanisms cannot play a major role in the generation of long-latency stretch reflex responses in proximal arm muscles.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>8647025</pmid><doi>10.1016/0924-980X(95)00247-I</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0924-980X
ispartof Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 1996-04, Vol.101 (2), p.79-83
issn 0924-980X
0013-4694
1872-7093
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78073824
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adult
Arm - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Electromyography
Hand - physiology
Human
Humans
Long latency
Male
Medical sciences
Movement Disorders - physiopathology
Muscle Relaxation - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Nervous system as a whole
Neurology
Reflex - physiology
Stretch reflex
Time Factors
title Stretch reflexes of the proximal arm in a patient with mirror movements: absence of bilateral long-latency components
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A11%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stretch%20reflexes%20of%20the%20proximal%20arm%20in%20a%20patient%20with%20mirror%20movements:%20absence%20of%20bilateral%20long-latency%20components&rft.jtitle=Electroencephalography%20and%20clinical%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Fellows,%20S.J.&rft.date=1996-04-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=79-83&rft.issn=0924-980X&rft.eissn=1872-7093&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0924-980X(95)00247-I&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15793738%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-c3a2ed95684ea807c371e94ae418f053e61a3872609c497f92b8080d86e8dbd13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15793738&rft_id=info:pmid/8647025&rfr_iscdi=true