If too much of a good thing is bad, is too much of a bad thing BPD?

The report by Poets and Sens1 in this issue clearly shows that raising the criteria required for endotracheal intubation and intermittent mandatory ventilation (ET/IMV) in an entire community population of vulnerable, very low birth weight (VLBW) infants reduces bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Out...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 1996-07, Vol.98 (1), p.125-127
Main Author: Cassady, G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Artificial respiration
Babies
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - etiology
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Disease
Germany
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation - adverse effects
Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects
Mechanical ventilation
Pediatrics
Prevention
Research Design
Retrospective Studies
Weight
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-29d613cca5b23e9733d43eb61dbfd47c9c70ca8693d3f7515ee2f194956f98953
cites
container_end_page 127
container_issue 1
container_start_page 125
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 98
creator Cassady, G
description The report by Poets and Sens1 in this issue clearly shows that raising the criteria required for endotracheal intubation and intermittent mandatory ventilation (ET/IMV) in an entire community population of vulnerable, very low birth weight (VLBW) infants reduces bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Outcomes in all live-born infants with birth weights of between 500 and 1499 g from the German state of Lower Saxony, cared for in tertiary centers (comparable to level III neonatal intensive care units [NICUs] in this country) as well as in community centers (level II NICUs), from 1992 through 1994 were examined. No apparent price was paid for this improvement in pulmonary outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1542/peds.98.1.125
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78106990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A18486260</galeid><sourcerecordid>A18486260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-29d613cca5b23e9733d43eb61dbfd47c9c70ca8693d3f7515ee2f194956f98953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0s-LEzEUB_AgylqrR4_C4EH20Kn5_eO0rFXXhcJ60HPIJC-zs0wndTID-t9vyhahUpBAHjw-JI_HF6G3BK-J4PTjHkJeG70ma0LFM7Qg2OiaUyWeowXGjNQcY_ESvcr5AWPMhaIX6EJLqZnmC7S5jdWUUrWb_X2VYuWqNqVQTffd0FZdrhoXVod6akr3SD59_3z1Gr2Irs_w5liX6OfXLz823-rt3c3t5npbe67VVFMTJGHeO9FQBkYxFjiDRpLQxMCVN15h77Q0LLCoBBEANBLDjZDRaCPYEn14enc_pl8z5Mnuuuyh790Aac5WaYKlMbjA9__AhzSPQ5nNUqoZU5Kr_yHMWLmXaPWEWteD7YaYptH5FgYYXZ8GiF1pXxPNtaTy8HF9hpcTYNf5c_7yxBcywe-pdXPOVt9sT-jqHPWp76EFWxa9uTs3iR9TziNEux-7nRv_WILtITf2kBtrtCW25Kb4d8dtzM0Owl99DAp7BF05t0o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228303328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>If too much of a good thing is bad, is too much of a bad thing BPD?</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Cassady, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Cassady, G</creatorcontrib><description>The report by Poets and Sens1 in this issue clearly shows that raising the criteria required for endotracheal intubation and intermittent mandatory ventilation (ET/IMV) in an entire community population of vulnerable, very low birth weight (VLBW) infants reduces bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Outcomes in all live-born infants with birth weights of between 500 and 1499 g from the German state of Lower Saxony, cared for in tertiary centers (comparable to level III neonatal intensive care units [NICUs] in this country) as well as in community centers (level II NICUs), from 1992 through 1994 were examined. No apparent price was paid for this improvement in pulmonary outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.98.1.125</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8668384</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEDIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Artificial respiration ; Babies ; Bronchopulmonary dysplasia ; Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - etiology ; Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) ; Disease ; Germany ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Very Low Birth Weight ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal ; Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation - adverse effects ; Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects ; Mechanical ventilation ; Pediatrics ; Prevention ; Research Design ; Retrospective Studies ; Weight</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 1996-07, Vol.98 (1), p.125-127</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1996 American Academy of Pediatrics</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1996 American Academy of Pediatrics</rights><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics Jul 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-29d613cca5b23e9733d43eb61dbfd47c9c70ca8693d3f7515ee2f194956f98953</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8668384$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cassady, G</creatorcontrib><title>If too much of a good thing is bad, is too much of a bad thing BPD?</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>The report by Poets and Sens1 in this issue clearly shows that raising the criteria required for endotracheal intubation and intermittent mandatory ventilation (ET/IMV) in an entire community population of vulnerable, very low birth weight (VLBW) infants reduces bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Outcomes in all live-born infants with birth weights of between 500 and 1499 g from the German state of Lower Saxony, cared for in tertiary centers (comparable to level III neonatal intensive care units [NICUs] in this country) as well as in community centers (level II NICUs), from 1992 through 1994 were examined. No apparent price was paid for this improvement in pulmonary outcome.</description><subject>Artificial respiration</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Bronchopulmonary dysplasia</subject><subject>Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - etiology</subject><subject>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Very Low Birth Weight</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</subject><subject>Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0s-LEzEUB_AgylqrR4_C4EH20Kn5_eO0rFXXhcJ60HPIJC-zs0wndTID-t9vyhahUpBAHjw-JI_HF6G3BK-J4PTjHkJeG70ma0LFM7Qg2OiaUyWeowXGjNQcY_ESvcr5AWPMhaIX6EJLqZnmC7S5jdWUUrWb_X2VYuWqNqVQTffd0FZdrhoXVod6akr3SD59_3z1Gr2Irs_w5liX6OfXLz823-rt3c3t5npbe67VVFMTJGHeO9FQBkYxFjiDRpLQxMCVN15h77Q0LLCoBBEANBLDjZDRaCPYEn14enc_pl8z5Mnuuuyh790Aac5WaYKlMbjA9__AhzSPQ5nNUqoZU5Kr_yHMWLmXaPWEWteD7YaYptH5FgYYXZ8GiF1pXxPNtaTy8HF9hpcTYNf5c_7yxBcywe-pdXPOVt9sT-jqHPWp76EFWxa9uTs3iR9TziNEux-7nRv_WILtITf2kBtrtCW25Kb4d8dtzM0Owl99DAp7BF05t0o</recordid><startdate>19960701</startdate><enddate>19960701</enddate><creator>Cassady, G</creator><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960701</creationdate><title>If too much of a good thing is bad, is too much of a bad thing BPD?</title><author>Cassady, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-29d613cca5b23e9733d43eb61dbfd47c9c70ca8693d3f7515ee2f194956f98953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Artificial respiration</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Bronchopulmonary dysplasia</topic><topic>Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - etiology</topic><topic>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Very Low Birth Weight</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</topic><topic>Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cassady, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cassady, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>If too much of a good thing is bad, is too much of a bad thing BPD?</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>1996-07-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>127</epage><pages>125-127</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><coden>PEDIAU</coden><abstract>The report by Poets and Sens1 in this issue clearly shows that raising the criteria required for endotracheal intubation and intermittent mandatory ventilation (ET/IMV) in an entire community population of vulnerable, very low birth weight (VLBW) infants reduces bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Outcomes in all live-born infants with birth weights of between 500 and 1499 g from the German state of Lower Saxony, cared for in tertiary centers (comparable to level III neonatal intensive care units [NICUs] in this country) as well as in community centers (level II NICUs), from 1992 through 1994 were examined. No apparent price was paid for this improvement in pulmonary outcome.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Pediatrics</pub><pmid>8668384</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.98.1.125</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 1996-07, Vol.98 (1), p.125-127
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78106990
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Artificial respiration
Babies
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia - etiology
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Disease
Germany
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation - adverse effects
Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects
Mechanical ventilation
Pediatrics
Prevention
Research Design
Retrospective Studies
Weight
title If too much of a good thing is bad, is too much of a bad thing BPD?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T00%3A18%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=If%20too%20much%20of%20a%20good%20thing%20is%20bad,%20is%20too%20much%20of%20a%20bad%20thing%20BPD?&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Cassady,%20G&rft.date=1996-07-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=127&rft.pages=125-127&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft.coden=PEDIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.98.1.125&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA18486260%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-29d613cca5b23e9733d43eb61dbfd47c9c70ca8693d3f7515ee2f194956f98953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228303328&rft_id=info:pmid/8668384&rft_galeid=A18486260&rfr_iscdi=true