Loading…
The accuracy of pulse oximeters: a comparative clinical evaluation of five pulse oximeters
The accuracy of five commercially available pulse oximeters was compared against arterial blood oxygen saturation, under similar clinical conditions. The oximeters had very similar performance in the clinically useful range of 80-100%, with a tendency slightly to underestimate the true saturation.
Saved in:
Published in: | Anaesthesia 1988-03, Vol.43 (3), p.229-232 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-4200fa133eaaf45aef9e90a22a80a678691ad019eee959d1b995b409972a40be3 |
container_end_page | 232 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 229 |
container_title | Anaesthesia |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | TAYLOR, M. B WHITWAM, J. G |
description | The accuracy of five commercially available pulse oximeters was compared against arterial blood oxygen saturation, under similar clinical conditions. The oximeters had very similar performance in the clinically useful range of 80-100%, with a tendency slightly to underestimate the true saturation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb05549.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78194678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78194678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-4200fa133eaaf45aef9e90a22a80a678691ad019eee959d1b995b409972a40be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRtFZ_ghBEvCXOfiTd9SbiFxS86MXLMtlOMCVp6m4i9d-7wdCDcxmY931nmIexSw4Zj3Wzzrgs8lSAUhk3Wmd9CXmuTLY7YLO9dMhmACBTocCcsNMQ1gBcaK6P2bGUhSqUnLGPt09K0LnBo_tJuirZDk2gpNvVLfXkw22CievaLXrs629KXFNvaodNQt_YDHHWbcZUNWr_omfsqMI4OZ_6nL0_PrzdP6fL16eX-7tl6gTwPlUCoEIuJSFWKkeqDBlAIVADFgtdGI4r4IaITG5WvDQmL-NLZiFQQUlyzq7_9m599zVQ6G1bB0dNgxvqhmAXmhsVF0Xj7Z_R-S4ET5Xd-rpF_2M52BGsXduRnh3p2RGsncDaXQxfTFeGsqXVPjqRjPrVpGOIfCqPG1eHvW2Ra62EkL8OXoNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78194678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The accuracy of pulse oximeters: a comparative clinical evaluation of five pulse oximeters</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>TAYLOR, M. B ; WHITWAM, J. G</creator><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, M. B ; WHITWAM, J. G</creatorcontrib><description>The accuracy of five commercially available pulse oximeters was compared against arterial blood oxygen saturation, under similar clinical conditions. The oximeters had very similar performance in the clinically useful range of 80-100%, with a tendency slightly to underestimate the true saturation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb05549.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3364643</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANASAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthesia: equipment, devices ; Biological and medical sciences ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Oximetry - instrumentation ; Oxygen - blood</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia, 1988-03, Vol.43 (3), p.229-232</ispartof><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-4200fa133eaaf45aef9e90a22a80a678691ad019eee959d1b995b409972a40be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7588422$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3364643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, M. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITWAM, J. G</creatorcontrib><title>The accuracy of pulse oximeters: a comparative clinical evaluation of five pulse oximeters</title><title>Anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><description>The accuracy of five commercially available pulse oximeters was compared against arterial blood oxygen saturation, under similar clinical conditions. The oximeters had very similar performance in the clinically useful range of 80-100%, with a tendency slightly to underestimate the true saturation.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesia: equipment, devices</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oximetry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Oxygen - blood</subject><issn>0003-2409</issn><issn>1365-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRtFZ_ghBEvCXOfiTd9SbiFxS86MXLMtlOMCVp6m4i9d-7wdCDcxmY931nmIexSw4Zj3Wzzrgs8lSAUhk3Wmd9CXmuTLY7YLO9dMhmACBTocCcsNMQ1gBcaK6P2bGUhSqUnLGPt09K0LnBo_tJuirZDk2gpNvVLfXkw22CievaLXrs629KXFNvaodNQt_YDHHWbcZUNWr_omfsqMI4OZ_6nL0_PrzdP6fL16eX-7tl6gTwPlUCoEIuJSFWKkeqDBlAIVADFgtdGI4r4IaITG5WvDQmL-NLZiFQQUlyzq7_9m599zVQ6G1bB0dNgxvqhmAXmhsVF0Xj7Z_R-S4ET5Xd-rpF_2M52BGsXduRnh3p2RGsncDaXQxfTFeGsqXVPjqRjPrVpGOIfCqPG1eHvW2Ra62EkL8OXoNQ</recordid><startdate>198803</startdate><enddate>198803</enddate><creator>TAYLOR, M. B</creator><creator>WHITWAM, J. G</creator><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198803</creationdate><title>The accuracy of pulse oximeters: a comparative clinical evaluation of five pulse oximeters</title><author>TAYLOR, M. B ; WHITWAM, J. G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-4200fa133eaaf45aef9e90a22a80a678691ad019eee959d1b995b409972a40be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesia: equipment, devices</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oximetry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Oxygen - blood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, M. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITWAM, J. G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TAYLOR, M. B</au><au>WHITWAM, J. G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The accuracy of pulse oximeters: a comparative clinical evaluation of five pulse oximeters</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><date>1988-03</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>229-232</pages><issn>0003-2409</issn><eissn>1365-2044</eissn><coden>ANASAB</coden><abstract>The accuracy of five commercially available pulse oximeters was compared against arterial blood oxygen saturation, under similar clinical conditions. The oximeters had very similar performance in the clinically useful range of 80-100%, with a tendency slightly to underestimate the true saturation.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell</pub><pmid>3364643</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb05549.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2409 |
ispartof | Anaesthesia, 1988-03, Vol.43 (3), p.229-232 |
issn | 0003-2409 1365-2044 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78194678 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthesia: equipment, devices Biological and medical sciences Evaluation Studies as Topic Humans Medical sciences Oximetry - instrumentation Oxygen - blood |
title | The accuracy of pulse oximeters: a comparative clinical evaluation of five pulse oximeters |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A07%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20accuracy%20of%20pulse%20oximeters:%20a%20comparative%20clinical%20evaluation%20of%20five%20pulse%20oximeters&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia&rft.au=TAYLOR,%20M.%20B&rft.date=1988-03&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=229-232&rft.issn=0003-2409&rft.eissn=1365-2044&rft.coden=ANASAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb05549.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78194678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-4200fa133eaaf45aef9e90a22a80a678691ad019eee959d1b995b409972a40be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78194678&rft_id=info:pmid/3364643&rfr_iscdi=true |