Loading…

Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws

Experimental axial pullout tests of a new type of pedicle screw were done on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The manner in which specimens were secured in the testing apparatus was varied to determined influence of specimen fixation method on the maximum pedicle screw pullout force. To determine the app...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 1996-05, Vol.21 (9), p.1037-1044
Main Authors: PFEIFFER, M, GILBERTSON, L. G, GOEL, V. K, GRISS, P, KELLER, J. C, RYKEN, T. C, HOFFMAN, H. E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63
container_end_page 1044
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1037
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 21
creator PFEIFFER, M
GILBERTSON, L. G
GOEL, V. K
GRISS, P
KELLER, J. C
RYKEN, T. C
HOFFMAN, H. E
description Experimental axial pullout tests of a new type of pedicle screw were done on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The manner in which specimens were secured in the testing apparatus was varied to determined influence of specimen fixation method on the maximum pedicle screw pullout force. To determine the appropriateness of embedding (i.e., potting) spinal specimens in polymer resin (e.g., bone cement or Plastic Padding [Plastic Padding Ltd., High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, England]) for axial pullout tests of pedicle screws. Several different specimen fixation methods were examined to make recommendations for the standardization of future experimental testing protocols. Axial pullout of transpedicular screws, although not a likely clinical mode of failure, is a popular experimental testing mode for evaluating screw-bone biomechanics. A wide variety of techniques for securing a vertebral specimen to counter the axial pullout force has been reported (including the use of polymer resin) with a correspondingly wide range in the resulting axial pullout strengths. The possible influence of the specimen fixation method on pedicle screw axial pullout strength has not been addressed previously. Axial pullout tests of pedicle screws (DDS, Plus Endoprothetik, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) from the pedicles of 21 isolated lumber vertebral bodies were done using a Model 810 MTS Universal Testing Machine (MTS Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). The specimens were secured in a custom-made vise fixture either as is or after the vertebral bodies were potted in Plastic Padding up to the pedicle origin. Some of the potted specimens were wrapped first in latex to prevent polymer resin intrusion, and the others were unprotected. Pullout tests were attempted on both the left and right pedicles of each specimen, and the maximum pedicle screw pullout force was recorded. Measurement of bone mineral density by means of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, in addition to macroscopic and scanning electron microscopy histologic analyses, microradiography, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, was done post-test to assist in the interpretation of the data. The maximum pedicle screw pullout force was found to be dependent on both the bone mineral density and the mode of fixation of the vertebrae. Embedding in polymer resin without protection of the specimen (i.e., latex wrapping) led to several instances of well-documented polymer resin intrusion; in these specimens, mean maximum pedicle screw pull
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78203252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78203252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMlOwzAQhi0EKqXwCEg-IG6B8Rr7iKqySJW4wDlynbEIykbsCHh7Ugidy4z--WbRTwhlcMPA5rcwRa4Fz5i1GhQwyPaSPSJLprjJGFP2mCxBaJ5xKfQpOYvxfSK0YHZBFibnEky-JJtNCOgT7QKNPfqqwZaG6sulqmtpg-mtK-lU9WNdd2OiCWOKe7jHsvI10ugH_Izn5CS4OuLFnFfk9X7zsn7Mts8PT-u7bealkCnT0gdlkWnDpGIYuCtLo6Rnxnpbaul2KD1IIcCDFUGpwBlwbQITTnPUYkWu__b2Q_cxTr8UTRU91rVrsRtjkRsOgis-geYP9EMX44Ch6IeqccN3waDYO1j8O1gcHPyV7DR6Od8Ydw2Wh8HZsql_Nfdd9K4Og2t9FQ-YAAMyz8UPsFR3dg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78203252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>PFEIFFER, M ; GILBERTSON, L. G ; GOEL, V. K ; GRISS, P ; KELLER, J. C ; RYKEN, T. C ; HOFFMAN, H. E</creator><creatorcontrib>PFEIFFER, M ; GILBERTSON, L. G ; GOEL, V. K ; GRISS, P ; KELLER, J. C ; RYKEN, T. C ; HOFFMAN, H. E</creatorcontrib><description>Experimental axial pullout tests of a new type of pedicle screw were done on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The manner in which specimens were secured in the testing apparatus was varied to determined influence of specimen fixation method on the maximum pedicle screw pullout force. To determine the appropriateness of embedding (i.e., potting) spinal specimens in polymer resin (e.g., bone cement or Plastic Padding [Plastic Padding Ltd., High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, England]) for axial pullout tests of pedicle screws. Several different specimen fixation methods were examined to make recommendations for the standardization of future experimental testing protocols. Axial pullout of transpedicular screws, although not a likely clinical mode of failure, is a popular experimental testing mode for evaluating screw-bone biomechanics. A wide variety of techniques for securing a vertebral specimen to counter the axial pullout force has been reported (including the use of polymer resin) with a correspondingly wide range in the resulting axial pullout strengths. The possible influence of the specimen fixation method on pedicle screw axial pullout strength has not been addressed previously. Axial pullout tests of pedicle screws (DDS, Plus Endoprothetik, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) from the pedicles of 21 isolated lumber vertebral bodies were done using a Model 810 MTS Universal Testing Machine (MTS Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). The specimens were secured in a custom-made vise fixture either as is or after the vertebral bodies were potted in Plastic Padding up to the pedicle origin. Some of the potted specimens were wrapped first in latex to prevent polymer resin intrusion, and the others were unprotected. Pullout tests were attempted on both the left and right pedicles of each specimen, and the maximum pedicle screw pullout force was recorded. Measurement of bone mineral density by means of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, in addition to macroscopic and scanning electron microscopy histologic analyses, microradiography, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, was done post-test to assist in the interpretation of the data. The maximum pedicle screw pullout force was found to be dependent on both the bone mineral density and the mode of fixation of the vertebrae. Embedding in polymer resin without protection of the specimen (i.e., latex wrapping) led to several instances of well-documented polymer resin intrusion; in these specimens, mean maximum pedicle screw pullout force was significantly greater than that of specimens secured without polymer resin and that of embedded specimens for which intrusion did not occur. Polymer resin intrusion can have a significant effect on the biomechanical characteristics of the bone-pedicle screw interface. When polymer resins are used to secure vertebral specimens for in vitro biomechanical tests of the bone-pedicle screw interface, it is important to either prevent intrusion (e.g., with a latex wrapping) or document post-test (e.g., through the methods described in this article) that intrusion did not occur for the specimens included in the analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8724087</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPINDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Density - physiology ; Bone Screws ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Female ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - anatomy &amp; histology ; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology ; Lumbar Vertebrae - ultrastructure ; Male ; Materials Testing - methods ; Medical sciences ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic surgery ; Regression Analysis ; Specimen Handling - methods ; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1996-05, Vol.21 (9), p.1037-1044</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3080477$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8724087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PFEIFFER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILBERTSON, L. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOEL, V. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRISS, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLER, J. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RYKEN, T. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOFFMAN, H. E</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>Experimental axial pullout tests of a new type of pedicle screw were done on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The manner in which specimens were secured in the testing apparatus was varied to determined influence of specimen fixation method on the maximum pedicle screw pullout force. To determine the appropriateness of embedding (i.e., potting) spinal specimens in polymer resin (e.g., bone cement or Plastic Padding [Plastic Padding Ltd., High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, England]) for axial pullout tests of pedicle screws. Several different specimen fixation methods were examined to make recommendations for the standardization of future experimental testing protocols. Axial pullout of transpedicular screws, although not a likely clinical mode of failure, is a popular experimental testing mode for evaluating screw-bone biomechanics. A wide variety of techniques for securing a vertebral specimen to counter the axial pullout force has been reported (including the use of polymer resin) with a correspondingly wide range in the resulting axial pullout strengths. The possible influence of the specimen fixation method on pedicle screw axial pullout strength has not been addressed previously. Axial pullout tests of pedicle screws (DDS, Plus Endoprothetik, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) from the pedicles of 21 isolated lumber vertebral bodies were done using a Model 810 MTS Universal Testing Machine (MTS Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). The specimens were secured in a custom-made vise fixture either as is or after the vertebral bodies were potted in Plastic Padding up to the pedicle origin. Some of the potted specimens were wrapped first in latex to prevent polymer resin intrusion, and the others were unprotected. Pullout tests were attempted on both the left and right pedicles of each specimen, and the maximum pedicle screw pullout force was recorded. Measurement of bone mineral density by means of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, in addition to macroscopic and scanning electron microscopy histologic analyses, microradiography, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, was done post-test to assist in the interpretation of the data. The maximum pedicle screw pullout force was found to be dependent on both the bone mineral density and the mode of fixation of the vertebrae. Embedding in polymer resin without protection of the specimen (i.e., latex wrapping) led to several instances of well-documented polymer resin intrusion; in these specimens, mean maximum pedicle screw pullout force was significantly greater than that of specimens secured without polymer resin and that of embedded specimens for which intrusion did not occur. Polymer resin intrusion can have a significant effect on the biomechanical characteristics of the bone-pedicle screw interface. When polymer resins are used to secure vertebral specimens for in vitro biomechanical tests of the bone-pedicle screw interface, it is important to either prevent intrusion (e.g., with a latex wrapping) or document post-test (e.g., through the methods described in this article) that intrusion did not occur for the specimens included in the analysis.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Materials Testing - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMlOwzAQhi0EKqXwCEg-IG6B8Rr7iKqySJW4wDlynbEIykbsCHh7Ugidy4z--WbRTwhlcMPA5rcwRa4Fz5i1GhQwyPaSPSJLprjJGFP2mCxBaJ5xKfQpOYvxfSK0YHZBFibnEky-JJtNCOgT7QKNPfqqwZaG6sulqmtpg-mtK-lU9WNdd2OiCWOKe7jHsvI10ugH_Izn5CS4OuLFnFfk9X7zsn7Mts8PT-u7bealkCnT0gdlkWnDpGIYuCtLo6Rnxnpbaul2KD1IIcCDFUGpwBlwbQITTnPUYkWu__b2Q_cxTr8UTRU91rVrsRtjkRsOgis-geYP9EMX44Ch6IeqccN3waDYO1j8O1gcHPyV7DR6Od8Ydw2Wh8HZsql_Nfdd9K4Og2t9FQ-YAAMyz8UPsFR3dg</recordid><startdate>19960501</startdate><enddate>19960501</enddate><creator>PFEIFFER, M</creator><creator>GILBERTSON, L. G</creator><creator>GOEL, V. K</creator><creator>GRISS, P</creator><creator>KELLER, J. C</creator><creator>RYKEN, T. C</creator><creator>HOFFMAN, H. E</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960501</creationdate><title>Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws</title><author>PFEIFFER, M ; GILBERTSON, L. G ; GOEL, V. K ; GRISS, P ; KELLER, J. C ; RYKEN, T. C ; HOFFMAN, H. E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Materials Testing - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PFEIFFER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILBERTSON, L. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOEL, V. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRISS, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLER, J. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RYKEN, T. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOFFMAN, H. E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PFEIFFER, M</au><au>GILBERTSON, L. G</au><au>GOEL, V. K</au><au>GRISS, P</au><au>KELLER, J. C</au><au>RYKEN, T. C</au><au>HOFFMAN, H. E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>1996-05-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1037</spage><epage>1044</epage><pages>1037-1044</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><coden>SPINDD</coden><abstract>Experimental axial pullout tests of a new type of pedicle screw were done on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The manner in which specimens were secured in the testing apparatus was varied to determined influence of specimen fixation method on the maximum pedicle screw pullout force. To determine the appropriateness of embedding (i.e., potting) spinal specimens in polymer resin (e.g., bone cement or Plastic Padding [Plastic Padding Ltd., High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, England]) for axial pullout tests of pedicle screws. Several different specimen fixation methods were examined to make recommendations for the standardization of future experimental testing protocols. Axial pullout of transpedicular screws, although not a likely clinical mode of failure, is a popular experimental testing mode for evaluating screw-bone biomechanics. A wide variety of techniques for securing a vertebral specimen to counter the axial pullout force has been reported (including the use of polymer resin) with a correspondingly wide range in the resulting axial pullout strengths. The possible influence of the specimen fixation method on pedicle screw axial pullout strength has not been addressed previously. Axial pullout tests of pedicle screws (DDS, Plus Endoprothetik, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) from the pedicles of 21 isolated lumber vertebral bodies were done using a Model 810 MTS Universal Testing Machine (MTS Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). The specimens were secured in a custom-made vise fixture either as is or after the vertebral bodies were potted in Plastic Padding up to the pedicle origin. Some of the potted specimens were wrapped first in latex to prevent polymer resin intrusion, and the others were unprotected. Pullout tests were attempted on both the left and right pedicles of each specimen, and the maximum pedicle screw pullout force was recorded. Measurement of bone mineral density by means of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, in addition to macroscopic and scanning electron microscopy histologic analyses, microradiography, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, was done post-test to assist in the interpretation of the data. The maximum pedicle screw pullout force was found to be dependent on both the bone mineral density and the mode of fixation of the vertebrae. Embedding in polymer resin without protection of the specimen (i.e., latex wrapping) led to several instances of well-documented polymer resin intrusion; in these specimens, mean maximum pedicle screw pullout force was significantly greater than that of specimens secured without polymer resin and that of embedded specimens for which intrusion did not occur. Polymer resin intrusion can have a significant effect on the biomechanical characteristics of the bone-pedicle screw interface. When polymer resins are used to secure vertebral specimens for in vitro biomechanical tests of the bone-pedicle screw interface, it is important to either prevent intrusion (e.g., with a latex wrapping) or document post-test (e.g., through the methods described in this article) that intrusion did not occur for the specimens included in the analysis.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>8724087</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007632-199605010-00009</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1996-05, Vol.21 (9), p.1037-1044
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78203252
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analysis of Variance
Biological and medical sciences
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Density - physiology
Bone Screws
Composite Resins - chemistry
Female
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - anatomy & histology
Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology
Lumbar Vertebrae - ultrastructure
Male
Materials Testing - methods
Medical sciences
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Middle Aged
Orthopedic surgery
Regression Analysis
Specimen Handling - methods
Spinal Fusion - instrumentation
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
title Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A44%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20specimen%20fixation%20method%20on%20pullout%20tests%20of%20pedicle%20screws&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=PFEIFFER,%20M&rft.date=1996-05-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1037&rft.epage=1044&rft.pages=1037-1044&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft.coden=SPINDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007632-199605010-00009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78203252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78203252&rft_id=info:pmid/8724087&rfr_iscdi=true