Loading…
Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws
Experimental axial pullout tests of a new type of pedicle screw were done on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The manner in which specimens were secured in the testing apparatus was varied to determined influence of specimen fixation method on the maximum pedicle screw pullout force. To determine the app...
Saved in:
Published in: | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 1996-05, Vol.21 (9), p.1037-1044 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63 |
container_end_page | 1044 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1037 |
container_title | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | PFEIFFER, M GILBERTSON, L. G GOEL, V. K GRISS, P KELLER, J. C RYKEN, T. C HOFFMAN, H. E |
description | Experimental axial pullout tests of a new type of pedicle screw were done on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The manner in which specimens were secured in the testing apparatus was varied to determined influence of specimen fixation method on the maximum pedicle screw pullout force.
To determine the appropriateness of embedding (i.e., potting) spinal specimens in polymer resin (e.g., bone cement or Plastic Padding [Plastic Padding Ltd., High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, England]) for axial pullout tests of pedicle screws. Several different specimen fixation methods were examined to make recommendations for the standardization of future experimental testing protocols.
Axial pullout of transpedicular screws, although not a likely clinical mode of failure, is a popular experimental testing mode for evaluating screw-bone biomechanics. A wide variety of techniques for securing a vertebral specimen to counter the axial pullout force has been reported (including the use of polymer resin) with a correspondingly wide range in the resulting axial pullout strengths. The possible influence of the specimen fixation method on pedicle screw axial pullout strength has not been addressed previously.
Axial pullout tests of pedicle screws (DDS, Plus Endoprothetik, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) from the pedicles of 21 isolated lumber vertebral bodies were done using a Model 810 MTS Universal Testing Machine (MTS Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). The specimens were secured in a custom-made vise fixture either as is or after the vertebral bodies were potted in Plastic Padding up to the pedicle origin. Some of the potted specimens were wrapped first in latex to prevent polymer resin intrusion, and the others were unprotected. Pullout tests were attempted on both the left and right pedicles of each specimen, and the maximum pedicle screw pullout force was recorded. Measurement of bone mineral density by means of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, in addition to macroscopic and scanning electron microscopy histologic analyses, microradiography, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, was done post-test to assist in the interpretation of the data.
The maximum pedicle screw pullout force was found to be dependent on both the bone mineral density and the mode of fixation of the vertebrae. Embedding in polymer resin without protection of the specimen (i.e., latex wrapping) led to several instances of well-documented polymer resin intrusion; in these specimens, mean maximum pedicle screw pull |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00009 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78203252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78203252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMlOwzAQhi0EKqXwCEg-IG6B8Rr7iKqySJW4wDlynbEIykbsCHh7Ugidy4z--WbRTwhlcMPA5rcwRa4Fz5i1GhQwyPaSPSJLprjJGFP2mCxBaJ5xKfQpOYvxfSK0YHZBFibnEky-JJtNCOgT7QKNPfqqwZaG6sulqmtpg-mtK-lU9WNdd2OiCWOKe7jHsvI10ugH_Izn5CS4OuLFnFfk9X7zsn7Mts8PT-u7bealkCnT0gdlkWnDpGIYuCtLo6Rnxnpbaul2KD1IIcCDFUGpwBlwbQITTnPUYkWu__b2Q_cxTr8UTRU91rVrsRtjkRsOgis-geYP9EMX44Ch6IeqccN3waDYO1j8O1gcHPyV7DR6Od8Ydw2Wh8HZsql_Nfdd9K4Og2t9FQ-YAAMyz8UPsFR3dg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78203252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</source><creator>PFEIFFER, M ; GILBERTSON, L. G ; GOEL, V. K ; GRISS, P ; KELLER, J. C ; RYKEN, T. C ; HOFFMAN, H. E</creator><creatorcontrib>PFEIFFER, M ; GILBERTSON, L. G ; GOEL, V. K ; GRISS, P ; KELLER, J. C ; RYKEN, T. C ; HOFFMAN, H. E</creatorcontrib><description>Experimental axial pullout tests of a new type of pedicle screw were done on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The manner in which specimens were secured in the testing apparatus was varied to determined influence of specimen fixation method on the maximum pedicle screw pullout force.
To determine the appropriateness of embedding (i.e., potting) spinal specimens in polymer resin (e.g., bone cement or Plastic Padding [Plastic Padding Ltd., High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, England]) for axial pullout tests of pedicle screws. Several different specimen fixation methods were examined to make recommendations for the standardization of future experimental testing protocols.
Axial pullout of transpedicular screws, although not a likely clinical mode of failure, is a popular experimental testing mode for evaluating screw-bone biomechanics. A wide variety of techniques for securing a vertebral specimen to counter the axial pullout force has been reported (including the use of polymer resin) with a correspondingly wide range in the resulting axial pullout strengths. The possible influence of the specimen fixation method on pedicle screw axial pullout strength has not been addressed previously.
Axial pullout tests of pedicle screws (DDS, Plus Endoprothetik, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) from the pedicles of 21 isolated lumber vertebral bodies were done using a Model 810 MTS Universal Testing Machine (MTS Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). The specimens were secured in a custom-made vise fixture either as is or after the vertebral bodies were potted in Plastic Padding up to the pedicle origin. Some of the potted specimens were wrapped first in latex to prevent polymer resin intrusion, and the others were unprotected. Pullout tests were attempted on both the left and right pedicles of each specimen, and the maximum pedicle screw pullout force was recorded. Measurement of bone mineral density by means of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, in addition to macroscopic and scanning electron microscopy histologic analyses, microradiography, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, was done post-test to assist in the interpretation of the data.
The maximum pedicle screw pullout force was found to be dependent on both the bone mineral density and the mode of fixation of the vertebrae. Embedding in polymer resin without protection of the specimen (i.e., latex wrapping) led to several instances of well-documented polymer resin intrusion; in these specimens, mean maximum pedicle screw pullout force was significantly greater than that of specimens secured without polymer resin and that of embedded specimens for which intrusion did not occur.
Polymer resin intrusion can have a significant effect on the biomechanical characteristics of the bone-pedicle screw interface. When polymer resins are used to secure vertebral specimens for in vitro biomechanical tests of the bone-pedicle screw interface, it is important to either prevent intrusion (e.g., with a latex wrapping) or document post-test (e.g., through the methods described in this article) that intrusion did not occur for the specimens included in the analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8724087</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPINDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Density - physiology ; Bone Screws ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Female ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - anatomy & histology ; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology ; Lumbar Vertebrae - ultrastructure ; Male ; Materials Testing - methods ; Medical sciences ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic surgery ; Regression Analysis ; Specimen Handling - methods ; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1996-05, Vol.21 (9), p.1037-1044</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3080477$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8724087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PFEIFFER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILBERTSON, L. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOEL, V. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRISS, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLER, J. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RYKEN, T. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOFFMAN, H. E</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>Experimental axial pullout tests of a new type of pedicle screw were done on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The manner in which specimens were secured in the testing apparatus was varied to determined influence of specimen fixation method on the maximum pedicle screw pullout force.
To determine the appropriateness of embedding (i.e., potting) spinal specimens in polymer resin (e.g., bone cement or Plastic Padding [Plastic Padding Ltd., High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, England]) for axial pullout tests of pedicle screws. Several different specimen fixation methods were examined to make recommendations for the standardization of future experimental testing protocols.
Axial pullout of transpedicular screws, although not a likely clinical mode of failure, is a popular experimental testing mode for evaluating screw-bone biomechanics. A wide variety of techniques for securing a vertebral specimen to counter the axial pullout force has been reported (including the use of polymer resin) with a correspondingly wide range in the resulting axial pullout strengths. The possible influence of the specimen fixation method on pedicle screw axial pullout strength has not been addressed previously.
Axial pullout tests of pedicle screws (DDS, Plus Endoprothetik, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) from the pedicles of 21 isolated lumber vertebral bodies were done using a Model 810 MTS Universal Testing Machine (MTS Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). The specimens were secured in a custom-made vise fixture either as is or after the vertebral bodies were potted in Plastic Padding up to the pedicle origin. Some of the potted specimens were wrapped first in latex to prevent polymer resin intrusion, and the others were unprotected. Pullout tests were attempted on both the left and right pedicles of each specimen, and the maximum pedicle screw pullout force was recorded. Measurement of bone mineral density by means of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, in addition to macroscopic and scanning electron microscopy histologic analyses, microradiography, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, was done post-test to assist in the interpretation of the data.
The maximum pedicle screw pullout force was found to be dependent on both the bone mineral density and the mode of fixation of the vertebrae. Embedding in polymer resin without protection of the specimen (i.e., latex wrapping) led to several instances of well-documented polymer resin intrusion; in these specimens, mean maximum pedicle screw pullout force was significantly greater than that of specimens secured without polymer resin and that of embedded specimens for which intrusion did not occur.
Polymer resin intrusion can have a significant effect on the biomechanical characteristics of the bone-pedicle screw interface. When polymer resins are used to secure vertebral specimens for in vitro biomechanical tests of the bone-pedicle screw interface, it is important to either prevent intrusion (e.g., with a latex wrapping) or document post-test (e.g., through the methods described in this article) that intrusion did not occur for the specimens included in the analysis.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Materials Testing - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMlOwzAQhi0EKqXwCEg-IG6B8Rr7iKqySJW4wDlynbEIykbsCHh7Ugidy4z--WbRTwhlcMPA5rcwRa4Fz5i1GhQwyPaSPSJLprjJGFP2mCxBaJ5xKfQpOYvxfSK0YHZBFibnEky-JJtNCOgT7QKNPfqqwZaG6sulqmtpg-mtK-lU9WNdd2OiCWOKe7jHsvI10ugH_Izn5CS4OuLFnFfk9X7zsn7Mts8PT-u7bealkCnT0gdlkWnDpGIYuCtLo6Rnxnpbaul2KD1IIcCDFUGpwBlwbQITTnPUYkWu__b2Q_cxTr8UTRU91rVrsRtjkRsOgis-geYP9EMX44Ch6IeqccN3waDYO1j8O1gcHPyV7DR6Od8Ydw2Wh8HZsql_Nfdd9K4Og2t9FQ-YAAMyz8UPsFR3dg</recordid><startdate>19960501</startdate><enddate>19960501</enddate><creator>PFEIFFER, M</creator><creator>GILBERTSON, L. G</creator><creator>GOEL, V. K</creator><creator>GRISS, P</creator><creator>KELLER, J. C</creator><creator>RYKEN, T. C</creator><creator>HOFFMAN, H. E</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960501</creationdate><title>Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws</title><author>PFEIFFER, M ; GILBERTSON, L. G ; GOEL, V. K ; GRISS, P ; KELLER, J. C ; RYKEN, T. C ; HOFFMAN, H. E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Materials Testing - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PFEIFFER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILBERTSON, L. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOEL, V. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRISS, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLER, J. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RYKEN, T. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOFFMAN, H. E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PFEIFFER, M</au><au>GILBERTSON, L. G</au><au>GOEL, V. K</au><au>GRISS, P</au><au>KELLER, J. C</au><au>RYKEN, T. C</au><au>HOFFMAN, H. E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>1996-05-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1037</spage><epage>1044</epage><pages>1037-1044</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><coden>SPINDD</coden><abstract>Experimental axial pullout tests of a new type of pedicle screw were done on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The manner in which specimens were secured in the testing apparatus was varied to determined influence of specimen fixation method on the maximum pedicle screw pullout force.
To determine the appropriateness of embedding (i.e., potting) spinal specimens in polymer resin (e.g., bone cement or Plastic Padding [Plastic Padding Ltd., High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, England]) for axial pullout tests of pedicle screws. Several different specimen fixation methods were examined to make recommendations for the standardization of future experimental testing protocols.
Axial pullout of transpedicular screws, although not a likely clinical mode of failure, is a popular experimental testing mode for evaluating screw-bone biomechanics. A wide variety of techniques for securing a vertebral specimen to counter the axial pullout force has been reported (including the use of polymer resin) with a correspondingly wide range in the resulting axial pullout strengths. The possible influence of the specimen fixation method on pedicle screw axial pullout strength has not been addressed previously.
Axial pullout tests of pedicle screws (DDS, Plus Endoprothetik, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) from the pedicles of 21 isolated lumber vertebral bodies were done using a Model 810 MTS Universal Testing Machine (MTS Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). The specimens were secured in a custom-made vise fixture either as is or after the vertebral bodies were potted in Plastic Padding up to the pedicle origin. Some of the potted specimens were wrapped first in latex to prevent polymer resin intrusion, and the others were unprotected. Pullout tests were attempted on both the left and right pedicles of each specimen, and the maximum pedicle screw pullout force was recorded. Measurement of bone mineral density by means of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, in addition to macroscopic and scanning electron microscopy histologic analyses, microradiography, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, was done post-test to assist in the interpretation of the data.
The maximum pedicle screw pullout force was found to be dependent on both the bone mineral density and the mode of fixation of the vertebrae. Embedding in polymer resin without protection of the specimen (i.e., latex wrapping) led to several instances of well-documented polymer resin intrusion; in these specimens, mean maximum pedicle screw pullout force was significantly greater than that of specimens secured without polymer resin and that of embedded specimens for which intrusion did not occur.
Polymer resin intrusion can have a significant effect on the biomechanical characteristics of the bone-pedicle screw interface. When polymer resins are used to secure vertebral specimens for in vitro biomechanical tests of the bone-pedicle screw interface, it is important to either prevent intrusion (e.g., with a latex wrapping) or document post-test (e.g., through the methods described in this article) that intrusion did not occur for the specimens included in the analysis.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>8724087</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007632-199605010-00009</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0362-2436 |
ispartof | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1996-05, Vol.21 (9), p.1037-1044 |
issn | 0362-2436 1528-1159 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78203252 |
source | HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Analysis of Variance Biological and medical sciences Biomechanical Phenomena Bone Density - physiology Bone Screws Composite Resins - chemistry Female Humans Lumbar Vertebrae - anatomy & histology Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology Lumbar Vertebrae - ultrastructure Male Materials Testing - methods Medical sciences Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Middle Aged Orthopedic surgery Regression Analysis Specimen Handling - methods Spinal Fusion - instrumentation Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases |
title | Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A44%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20specimen%20fixation%20method%20on%20pullout%20tests%20of%20pedicle%20screws&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=PFEIFFER,%20M&rft.date=1996-05-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1037&rft.epage=1044&rft.pages=1037-1044&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft.coden=SPINDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007632-199605010-00009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78203252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-64cf59e1681451ef2add854c189c9d64abe4c04330c093f55f210268f13a62e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78203252&rft_id=info:pmid/8724087&rfr_iscdi=true |