Electrophysiological correlates of prior training: an in vitro study of an area of the avian brain which is essential for early learning

• Published in: Brain research 1996-02, Vol.708 (1), p.100-107
• Main Authors: Bradley, P.M., Burns, B.D., King, T.M., Webb, A.C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Avoidance Learning; Behavioral psychophysiology; Biological and medical sciences; Brain - physiology; Brain Mapping; Chickens; Domestic chick; Electrophysiology; Evoked Potentials; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; In Vitro Techniques; Learning; Neuronal plasticity; Neurons - physiology; NMDA receptor; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Passive-avoidance learning; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate - physiology; Time Factors
• ISSN: 0006-8993; 1872-6240
• DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01470-5

Day-old domestic chicks will peck at any small, distinct object, such as a metal bead. One-trial passive avoidance learning can be established by coating the metal bead with methyl anthranilate (MeA) and allowing the birds to peck it once, after which they conspicuously avoid it. We have used birds successfully trained not to peck metal beads, and a control set of chicks where the training beads were innocuously dipped in water. Brain slices were prepared from both groups, containing the left, intermediate, medial part of the hyperstriatum ventrale (IMHV) - a region essential for this form of early learning. The electrophysiological properties of neurones in the IMHV were examined in vitro. Neurones recorded intracellularly in slices taken from MeA-trained birds had higher membrane resistances than did cells from water-trained controls. MeA training was also associated with an increased incidence of spontaneous, large EPSPs. Field responses to local electrical stimulation appeared to be somewhat greater in MeA-trained birds than in water-trained controls. In contrast, field potentials proved harder to potentiate with a burst of relatively high frequency stimulation in MeA-trained birds: the change in amplitude was less in MeA-trained birds, and there was less variability than in slices from water-trained controls.