The effect of prior back surgery on surgical outcome in patients operated on for lumbar spinal stenosis. A matched-pair study

It has been widely observed that the outcome after repeat lumbar surgery is rarely comparable to that of primary surgery. In particular, the results of repeat surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) have not been favourable. We used a matched-pair format in an attempt to decrease the confounding fa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta neurochirurgica 1996-01, Vol.138 (4), p.357-363
Main Authors: Herno, A, Airaksinen, O, Saari, T, Sihvonen, T, Luukkonen, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Disability Evaluation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Male
Matched-Pair Analysis
Middle Aged
Myelography
Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging
Postoperative Complications - surgery
Reoperation
Spinal Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Spinal Stenosis - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:It has been widely observed that the outcome after repeat lumbar surgery is rarely comparable to that of primary surgery. In particular, the results of repeat surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) have not been favourable. We used a matched-pair format in an attempt to decrease the confounding factors so as to determine as exactly as possible the effect of prior back surgery on the LSS patients' surgical outcome. The matching criteria were sex, age, myelographic findings, major symptom, and duration of symptoms. From one group of 251 patients without prior back surgery (SO patients) and another of fifty-three patients with one preceding back operation (RS patients), forty-one similar matched patients pairs (one SO and one RS-patient) were formed. There were 8 female and 33 male pairs. The mean age of the SO patients was 51.6 and of the RS patient 51.4 years, and the mean follow-up time was 4.6 and 4.4 years. The assessment of outcome was based on a subjective disability questionnaire. The SO patients fared significantly better than the RS patients (32.1 versus 41.3, P = 0.026). A short time interval between operations in the RS patients had a worsening effect on outcome, but this trend was not significant. We concluded that one preceding back operation had a worsening effect on the outcome of patients operated on for LSS. As a whole, the results of RS patients were unfavourable. The proper time for achieving good surgical results in LSS patients is the initial operation.
ISSN:0001-6268
0942-0940
DOI:10.1007/BF01420296