Loading…
A key by which the toad's visual system gets access to the domain of prey
Searching for principles that allow toads to distinguish between prey and nonprey, we wondered how the toad's prey-catching activity measured as R differs in response to changes in significant configurational stimulus features. Elongated shapes moving worm-like in the direction of their longer...
Saved in:
Published in: | Physiology & behavior 1996-09, Vol.60 (3), p.877-887 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6256f25dfbbc6c1eaf98ebe08631cbe747d850e4ed90a285d1b3ac512c0474153 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6256f25dfbbc6c1eaf98ebe08631cbe747d850e4ed90a285d1b3ac512c0474153 |
container_end_page | 887 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 877 |
container_title | Physiology & behavior |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Wachowitz, S. Ewert, J.-P. |
description | Searching for principles that allow toads to distinguish between prey and nonprey, we wondered how the toad's prey-catching activity measured as
R differs in response to changes in significant configurational stimulus features. Elongated shapes moving worm-like in the direction of their longer axes are preferred prey dummies; but a toad is not a worm detector, and a worm is not the unique prey-catching releaser. Considering the frequency distributions of
R values, we show that the release of prey catching is in a specific manner sensitive to the relation between the extensions of an object parallel (
xl
1) and perpendicular (
xl
2) to its direction of movement. It is the
xl
1, and
xl
2 features-relating algorithm that provides the key (instruction) by which the toad's visual system gets access to the domain of potential prey in terms of configurational cues. This, within behaviorally relevant limits, largely invariant algorithm also holds for segmented stimuli. Further investigations show that this principle of object discrimination is not due to experimental procedures but emerges as a species-common property, of which different toad species take advantage in a species-specific manner. Neurobiological correlates are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0031-9384(96)00070-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78445859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0031938496000704</els_id><sourcerecordid>16383833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6256f25dfbbc6c1eaf98ebe08631cbe747d850e4ed90a285d1b3ac512c0474153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1r3DAQBmBREpJN2n_QgA4hHwe3kiVZ8iUQQpsGAr200JuQpXFXib3eaLwb_O-j7S57TJmDGOaZQbyEfObsC2e8-sqY4EUtjLyqq2vGmGaF_EBm3GhRKKb_HJDZnhyTE8SnjJiQ4ogcmYzKSs7Iwy19hok2E32dRz-n4xzoOLhwiXQdceU6ihOO0NO_MCJ13gNiBv9cGHoXF3Ro6TLB9JEctq5D-LR7T8nv799-3f0oHn_eP9zdPhZeyHosqlJVbalC2zS-8hxcWxtogJlKcN-AljoYxUBCqJkrjQq8Ec4rXnomteRKnJKL7d1lGl5WgKPtI3roOreAYYVWGymVUfV_Ia-EySUylFvo04CYoLXLFHuXJsuZ3URtNznaTY623jQ5aivz2tnu_qrpIeyXdtnm-flu7tC7rk1u4SPuWam1kIpndrNlkENbR0gWfYSFhxAT-NGGIb7_jzeU_Jii</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16383833</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A key by which the toad's visual system gets access to the domain of prey</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Wachowitz, S. ; Ewert, J.-P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wachowitz, S. ; Ewert, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><description>Searching for principles that allow toads to distinguish between prey and nonprey, we wondered how the toad's prey-catching activity measured as
R differs in response to changes in significant configurational stimulus features. Elongated shapes moving worm-like in the direction of their longer axes are preferred prey dummies; but a toad is not a worm detector, and a worm is not the unique prey-catching releaser. Considering the frequency distributions of
R values, we show that the release of prey catching is in a specific manner sensitive to the relation between the extensions of an object parallel (
xl
1) and perpendicular (
xl
2) to its direction of movement. It is the
xl
1, and
xl
2 features-relating algorithm that provides the key (instruction) by which the toad's visual system gets access to the domain of potential prey in terms of configurational cues. This, within behaviorally relevant limits, largely invariant algorithm also holds for segmented stimuli. Further investigations show that this principle of object discrimination is not due to experimental procedures but emerges as a species-common property, of which different toad species take advantage in a species-specific manner. Neurobiological correlates are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-507X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(96)00070-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8873264</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anatomical correlates of behavior ; Animals ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bufo bufo ; Bufonidae ; Configurational cues ; Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology ; Feature analysis ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Key stimulus concept ; Male ; Photic Stimulation ; Prey catching ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Space life sciences ; Toad ; Vision ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Physiology & behavior, 1996-09, Vol.60 (3), p.877-887</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6256f25dfbbc6c1eaf98ebe08631cbe747d850e4ed90a285d1b3ac512c0474153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6256f25dfbbc6c1eaf98ebe08631cbe747d850e4ed90a285d1b3ac512c0474153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2773451$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8873264$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wachowitz, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewert, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><title>A key by which the toad's visual system gets access to the domain of prey</title><title>Physiology & behavior</title><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><description>Searching for principles that allow toads to distinguish between prey and nonprey, we wondered how the toad's prey-catching activity measured as
R differs in response to changes in significant configurational stimulus features. Elongated shapes moving worm-like in the direction of their longer axes are preferred prey dummies; but a toad is not a worm detector, and a worm is not the unique prey-catching releaser. Considering the frequency distributions of
R values, we show that the release of prey catching is in a specific manner sensitive to the relation between the extensions of an object parallel (
xl
1) and perpendicular (
xl
2) to its direction of movement. It is the
xl
1, and
xl
2 features-relating algorithm that provides the key (instruction) by which the toad's visual system gets access to the domain of potential prey in terms of configurational cues. This, within behaviorally relevant limits, largely invariant algorithm also holds for segmented stimuli. Further investigations show that this principle of object discrimination is not due to experimental procedures but emerges as a species-common property, of which different toad species take advantage in a species-specific manner. Neurobiological correlates are discussed.</description><subject>Anatomical correlates of behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bufo bufo</subject><subject>Bufonidae</subject><subject>Configurational cues</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Feature analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Key stimulus concept</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Prey catching</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Toad</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>0031-9384</issn><issn>1873-507X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0E1r3DAQBmBREpJN2n_QgA4hHwe3kiVZ8iUQQpsGAr200JuQpXFXib3eaLwb_O-j7S57TJmDGOaZQbyEfObsC2e8-sqY4EUtjLyqq2vGmGaF_EBm3GhRKKb_HJDZnhyTE8SnjJiQ4ogcmYzKSs7Iwy19hok2E32dRz-n4xzoOLhwiXQdceU6ihOO0NO_MCJ13gNiBv9cGHoXF3Ro6TLB9JEctq5D-LR7T8nv799-3f0oHn_eP9zdPhZeyHosqlJVbalC2zS-8hxcWxtogJlKcN-AljoYxUBCqJkrjQq8Ec4rXnomteRKnJKL7d1lGl5WgKPtI3roOreAYYVWGymVUfV_Ia-EySUylFvo04CYoLXLFHuXJsuZ3URtNznaTY623jQ5aivz2tnu_qrpIeyXdtnm-flu7tC7rk1u4SPuWam1kIpndrNlkENbR0gWfYSFhxAT-NGGIb7_jzeU_Jii</recordid><startdate>19960901</startdate><enddate>19960901</enddate><creator>Wachowitz, S.</creator><creator>Ewert, J.-P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960901</creationdate><title>A key by which the toad's visual system gets access to the domain of prey</title><author>Wachowitz, S. ; Ewert, J.-P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6256f25dfbbc6c1eaf98ebe08631cbe747d850e4ed90a285d1b3ac512c0474153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Anatomical correlates of behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bufo bufo</topic><topic>Bufonidae</topic><topic>Configurational cues</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Feature analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Key stimulus concept</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Prey catching</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Toad</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wachowitz, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewert, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physiology & behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wachowitz, S.</au><au>Ewert, J.-P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A key by which the toad's visual system gets access to the domain of prey</atitle><jtitle>Physiology & behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><date>1996-09-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>877</spage><epage>887</epage><pages>877-887</pages><issn>0031-9384</issn><eissn>1873-507X</eissn><abstract>Searching for principles that allow toads to distinguish between prey and nonprey, we wondered how the toad's prey-catching activity measured as
R differs in response to changes in significant configurational stimulus features. Elongated shapes moving worm-like in the direction of their longer axes are preferred prey dummies; but a toad is not a worm detector, and a worm is not the unique prey-catching releaser. Considering the frequency distributions of
R values, we show that the release of prey catching is in a specific manner sensitive to the relation between the extensions of an object parallel (
xl
1) and perpendicular (
xl
2) to its direction of movement. It is the
xl
1, and
xl
2 features-relating algorithm that provides the key (instruction) by which the toad's visual system gets access to the domain of potential prey in terms of configurational cues. This, within behaviorally relevant limits, largely invariant algorithm also holds for segmented stimuli. Further investigations show that this principle of object discrimination is not due to experimental procedures but emerges as a species-common property, of which different toad species take advantage in a species-specific manner. Neurobiological correlates are discussed.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8873264</pmid><doi>10.1016/0031-9384(96)00070-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9384 |
ispartof | Physiology & behavior, 1996-09, Vol.60 (3), p.877-887 |
issn | 0031-9384 1873-507X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78445859 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Anatomical correlates of behavior Animals Behavior, Animal - physiology Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Bufo bufo Bufonidae Configurational cues Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology Feature analysis Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Key stimulus concept Male Photic Stimulation Prey catching Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Space life sciences Toad Vision Visual Perception - physiology |
title | A key by which the toad's visual system gets access to the domain of prey |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T22%3A55%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20key%20by%20which%20the%20toad's%20visual%20system%20gets%20access%20to%20the%20domain%20of%20prey&rft.jtitle=Physiology%20&%20behavior&rft.au=Wachowitz,%20S.&rft.date=1996-09-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=877&rft.epage=887&rft.pages=877-887&rft.issn=0031-9384&rft.eissn=1873-507X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0031-9384(96)00070-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16383833%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6256f25dfbbc6c1eaf98ebe08631cbe747d850e4ed90a285d1b3ac512c0474153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16383833&rft_id=info:pmid/8873264&rfr_iscdi=true |