Loading…

Surgicel® Reinforced Resection Lines in Left-sided Hepatectomy with Linear Stapling Device. An Experimental Study on Pigs

Fourteen pigs underwent left-sided hepatectomy. The resection was performed with a linear stapling device and the pigs were randomised to either Surgicel® reinforced resection lines or not. The median time required for resection was 25 min (range 17-30) in the Surgicel® reinforced group compared to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:HPB Surgery 1996, Vol.1996 (2), p.97-99
Main Authors: Zilling, T, Holmin, T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 99
container_issue 2
container_start_page 97
container_title HPB Surgery
container_volume 1996
creator Zilling, T
Holmin, T
description Fourteen pigs underwent left-sided hepatectomy. The resection was performed with a linear stapling device and the pigs were randomised to either Surgicel® reinforced resection lines or not. The median time required for resection was 25 min (range 17-30) in the Surgicel® reinforced group compared to 30 min (range 21-41) in the stapled group. This difference was, however, not statistically significant (p=0.053). The postoperative haemoglobin value was lower in the stapled group compared to the Surgicel® reinforced group 69 g/1 (range 42-85) versus 82 g/1 (range 78-90) (p=0.018). The estimated blood losses by weighing the compresses were 287 ml (range 166-379) for the stapled group and 204 ml (range 152-264) for the Surgicel® reinforced group (p=0.053). The median number of additional haemostatic sutures in the Surgicel® reinforced group was 7 (range 3-11) and in the stapled group 10 (range 5-15) (p=0.038). The haemoglobin value was similar in the two groups week postoperatively; 100 g/1 (range 87-104) and 102 g/1 (range 95-114), p=0.27, in the stapled group and the Surgicel® reinforced group, respectively. In the stapled group reinforced with the Surgicel® there was one postoperative death. In the solely stapled group there was no postoperative death (p=0.5). Four out of six pigs in the Surgicel® group had massive adhesions to the resection lines. One of these six pigs was sacrificed postoperatively as it was ill and had small bowel obstruction secondary to Surgicel® induced adhesions. On the other hand, no adhesions were seen in the solely stapled pigs (p=0.09). At this point, we can not recommend the use of Surgicel® to reinforce resection lines at stapled liver resection in the clinical situation, because of the high frequency of adhesions this material creates.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/1996/86936
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78451455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>P20151216005_199612_201701200022_201701200022_97_99</airiti_id><sourcerecordid>78451455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a188t-bf00cf606dccf369487d1f01e6cb21b719785abd1a3824bf0f51663e909ca0853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkbtOwzAUhj2ASiks7Eie2NL6JLFjj1W5FFSJisJsOYlTXOVG7ADloXgIngyXdmI6l__Tr3NB6ALIGIDSCQjBJpyJiB2hIeEiDjhl4gSdWrshhCScRwM04DyBkJIh-lr13dpkuvz5xk_a1EXTZTr3qdWZM02NF6bWFhuf6MIF1uRenetWOa831RZ_GPf6B6kOr5xqS1Ov8bV-955jPK3xzWerO1Pp2qnSA32-xd51adb2DB0XqrT6_BBH6OX25nk2DxaPd_ez6SJQwLkL0oKQrGCE5VlWREzEPMmhIKBZloaQJiASTlWag4p4GHu6oMBYpAURmSKcRiN0tfdtu-at19bJyli_calq3fRWJjymENMdeHkA-7TSuWz93KrbysOxvP6w15XpjDNy0_Rd7SeXy5AAhRAYIVTuHgCh9K2EQOhPHv4rRCKFiH4B9M1-Ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78451455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgicel® Reinforced Resection Lines in Left-sided Hepatectomy with Linear Stapling Device. An Experimental Study on Pigs</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zilling, T ; Holmin, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Zilling, T ; Holmin, T</creatorcontrib><description>Fourteen pigs underwent left-sided hepatectomy. The resection was performed with a linear stapling device and the pigs were randomised to either Surgicel® reinforced resection lines or not. The median time required for resection was 25 min (range 17-30) in the Surgicel® reinforced group compared to 30 min (range 21-41) in the stapled group. This difference was, however, not statistically significant (p=0.053). The postoperative haemoglobin value was lower in the stapled group compared to the Surgicel® reinforced group 69 g/1 (range 42-85) versus 82 g/1 (range 78-90) (p=0.018). The estimated blood losses by weighing the compresses were 287 ml (range 166-379) for the stapled group and 204 ml (range 152-264) for the Surgicel® reinforced group (p=0.053). The median number of additional haemostatic sutures in the Surgicel® reinforced group was 7 (range 3-11) and in the stapled group 10 (range 5-15) (p=0.038). The haemoglobin value was similar in the two groups week postoperatively; 100 g/1 (range 87-104) and 102 g/1 (range 95-114), p=0.27, in the stapled group and the Surgicel® reinforced group, respectively. In the stapled group reinforced with the Surgicel® there was one postoperative death. In the solely stapled group there was no postoperative death (p=0.5). Four out of six pigs in the Surgicel® group had massive adhesions to the resection lines. One of these six pigs was sacrificed postoperatively as it was ill and had small bowel obstruction secondary to Surgicel® induced adhesions. On the other hand, no adhesions were seen in the solely stapled pigs (p=0.09). At this point, we can not recommend the use of Surgicel® to reinforce resection lines at stapled liver resection in the clinical situation, because of the high frequency of adhesions this material creates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/1996/86936</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8871250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Hindawi Limiteds</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cellulose, Oxidized - therapeutic use ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Hemostatics - therapeutic use ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Hepatectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surgical Stapling - methods ; Surgical Stapling - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Swine</subject><ispartof>HPB Surgery, 1996, Vol.1996 (2), p.97-99</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8871250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zilling, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmin, T</creatorcontrib><title>Surgicel® Reinforced Resection Lines in Left-sided Hepatectomy with Linear Stapling Device. An Experimental Study on Pigs</title><title>HPB Surgery</title><addtitle>HPB Surg</addtitle><description>Fourteen pigs underwent left-sided hepatectomy. The resection was performed with a linear stapling device and the pigs were randomised to either Surgicel® reinforced resection lines or not. The median time required for resection was 25 min (range 17-30) in the Surgicel® reinforced group compared to 30 min (range 21-41) in the stapled group. This difference was, however, not statistically significant (p=0.053). The postoperative haemoglobin value was lower in the stapled group compared to the Surgicel® reinforced group 69 g/1 (range 42-85) versus 82 g/1 (range 78-90) (p=0.018). The estimated blood losses by weighing the compresses were 287 ml (range 166-379) for the stapled group and 204 ml (range 152-264) for the Surgicel® reinforced group (p=0.053). The median number of additional haemostatic sutures in the Surgicel® reinforced group was 7 (range 3-11) and in the stapled group 10 (range 5-15) (p=0.038). The haemoglobin value was similar in the two groups week postoperatively; 100 g/1 (range 87-104) and 102 g/1 (range 95-114), p=0.27, in the stapled group and the Surgicel® reinforced group, respectively. In the stapled group reinforced with the Surgicel® there was one postoperative death. In the solely stapled group there was no postoperative death (p=0.5). Four out of six pigs in the Surgicel® group had massive adhesions to the resection lines. One of these six pigs was sacrificed postoperatively as it was ill and had small bowel obstruction secondary to Surgicel® induced adhesions. On the other hand, no adhesions were seen in the solely stapled pigs (p=0.09). At this point, we can not recommend the use of Surgicel® to reinforce resection lines at stapled liver resection in the clinical situation, because of the high frequency of adhesions this material creates.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cellulose, Oxidized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemostatics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling - methods</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0894-8569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkbtOwzAUhj2ASiks7Eie2NL6JLFjj1W5FFSJisJsOYlTXOVG7ADloXgIngyXdmI6l__Tr3NB6ALIGIDSCQjBJpyJiB2hIeEiDjhl4gSdWrshhCScRwM04DyBkJIh-lr13dpkuvz5xk_a1EXTZTr3qdWZM02NF6bWFhuf6MIF1uRenetWOa831RZ_GPf6B6kOr5xqS1Ov8bV-955jPK3xzWerO1Pp2qnSA32-xd51adb2DB0XqrT6_BBH6OX25nk2DxaPd_ez6SJQwLkL0oKQrGCE5VlWREzEPMmhIKBZloaQJiASTlWag4p4GHu6oMBYpAURmSKcRiN0tfdtu-at19bJyli_calq3fRWJjymENMdeHkA-7TSuWz93KrbysOxvP6w15XpjDNy0_Rd7SeXy5AAhRAYIVTuHgCh9K2EQOhPHv4rRCKFiH4B9M1-Ow</recordid><startdate>1996</startdate><enddate>1996</enddate><creator>Zilling, T</creator><creator>Holmin, T</creator><general>Hindawi Limiteds</general><scope>188</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1996</creationdate><title>Surgicel® Reinforced Resection Lines in Left-sided Hepatectomy with Linear Stapling Device. An Experimental Study on Pigs</title><author>Zilling, T ; Holmin, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a188t-bf00cf606dccf369487d1f01e6cb21b719785abd1a3824bf0f51663e909ca0853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cellulose, Oxidized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemostatics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling - methods</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zilling, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmin, T</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>HPB Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zilling, T</au><au>Holmin, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgicel® Reinforced Resection Lines in Left-sided Hepatectomy with Linear Stapling Device. An Experimental Study on Pigs</atitle><jtitle>HPB Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>HPB Surg</addtitle><date>1996</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>1996</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>97-99</pages><issn>0894-8569</issn><abstract>Fourteen pigs underwent left-sided hepatectomy. The resection was performed with a linear stapling device and the pigs were randomised to either Surgicel® reinforced resection lines or not. The median time required for resection was 25 min (range 17-30) in the Surgicel® reinforced group compared to 30 min (range 21-41) in the stapled group. This difference was, however, not statistically significant (p=0.053). The postoperative haemoglobin value was lower in the stapled group compared to the Surgicel® reinforced group 69 g/1 (range 42-85) versus 82 g/1 (range 78-90) (p=0.018). The estimated blood losses by weighing the compresses were 287 ml (range 166-379) for the stapled group and 204 ml (range 152-264) for the Surgicel® reinforced group (p=0.053). The median number of additional haemostatic sutures in the Surgicel® reinforced group was 7 (range 3-11) and in the stapled group 10 (range 5-15) (p=0.038). The haemoglobin value was similar in the two groups week postoperatively; 100 g/1 (range 87-104) and 102 g/1 (range 95-114), p=0.27, in the stapled group and the Surgicel® reinforced group, respectively. In the stapled group reinforced with the Surgicel® there was one postoperative death. In the solely stapled group there was no postoperative death (p=0.5). Four out of six pigs in the Surgicel® group had massive adhesions to the resection lines. One of these six pigs was sacrificed postoperatively as it was ill and had small bowel obstruction secondary to Surgicel® induced adhesions. On the other hand, no adhesions were seen in the solely stapled pigs (p=0.09). At this point, we can not recommend the use of Surgicel® to reinforce resection lines at stapled liver resection in the clinical situation, because of the high frequency of adhesions this material creates.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Hindawi Limiteds</pub><pmid>8871250</pmid><doi>10.1155/1996/86936</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-8569
ispartof HPB Surgery, 1996, Vol.1996 (2), p.97-99
issn 0894-8569
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78451455
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Cellulose, Oxidized - therapeutic use
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
Hemostatics - therapeutic use
Hepatectomy - methods
Hepatectomy - statistics & numerical data
Male
Statistics, Nonparametric
Surgical Stapling - methods
Surgical Stapling - statistics & numerical data
Swine
title Surgicel® Reinforced Resection Lines in Left-sided Hepatectomy with Linear Stapling Device. An Experimental Study on Pigs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A11%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgicel%C2%AE%20Reinforced%20Resection%20Lines%20in%20Left-sided%20Hepatectomy%20with%20Linear%20Stapling%20Device.%20An%20Experimental%20Study%20on%20Pigs&rft.jtitle=HPB%20Surgery&rft.au=Zilling,%20T&rft.date=1996&rft.volume=1996&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=97-99&rft.issn=0894-8569&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/1996/86936&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E78451455%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a188t-bf00cf606dccf369487d1f01e6cb21b719785abd1a3824bf0f51663e909ca0853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78451455&rft_id=info:pmid/8871250&rft_airiti_id=P20151216005_199612_201701200022_201701200022_97_99&rfr_iscdi=true