Loading…

Factor Structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test in Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Groups

We used confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups. A simple three-factor model, consisting of verbal, quantitative, and analytical item types, was posed and tested for model fit. In addition...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied psychology 1988-08, Vol.73 (3), p.383-392
Main Authors: Rock, Donald A, Bennett, Randy Elliot, Jirele, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-cc1d98f6c23076d29bde492a8216160bac9a7653dc9062215a8780339d1e02db3
cites
container_end_page 392
container_issue 3
container_start_page 383
container_title Journal of applied psychology
container_volume 73
creator Rock, Donald A
Bennett, Randy Elliot
Jirele, Thomas
description We used confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups. A simple three-factor model, consisting of verbal, quantitative, and analytical item types, was posed and tested for model fit. In addition, a higher order factor solution was computed to investigate the meaning of General Test total scores and to probe observed discrepancies in factor structure. Results suggested that the three-factor model fit better than simpler models but less well than a four-factor solution. The three-factor model showed particular problems in fit for visually impaired students taking a large-type examination and for physically impaired examinees taking a standard administration. For these groups, the item types composing the Analytical factor did not appear to function effectively as a single factor. For the large-type group, in particular, these item types exhibited different relations with the other factors, had different relations with the test's general factor, and appeared to produce different scale units. Results suggest that Analytical scores and total scores (Verbal + Quantitative + Analytical) may have different meanings across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.383
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78492735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1290489058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-cc1d98f6c23076d29bde492a8216160bac9a7653dc9062215a8780339d1e02db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kW1LHDEQx0Ox6Gn7BQQhaOm7tXnYzcNLET0L0kJrX4e5JIt77CVrkgX99s3hcUqhzIuZyfzmn4E_QqeUXFLC5TdCGG00qa3klzUU_4AWVHPdUNW1B2ixB47Qcc5rQmjLNTlEh0xLJqRYoPUt2BIT_l3SbMucPI49Lo8eLxO4GYrHv7yNyeGbZ9gMAcoQQ8ZLH3yCET_4XPAQ8B0EN1iYJu9wLfGPGB7fPS1TnKf8CX3sYcz-8y6foD-3Nw_Xd839z-X366v7BlpKS2MtdVr1wjJOpHBMr5xvNQPFqKCCrMBqkKLjzmoiGKMdKKkI59pRT5hb8RP09VV3SvFprheazZCtH0cIPs7ZSFXlJO8qeP4PuI5zCvU2I2jLNOm0rNDF_yBakVZVTFWKvVI2xZyT782Uhg2kF0OJ2XpltlaYrRVGclND8bp0tpOeVxvv9is7c-r8y24O2cLYJwh2yHtMKiqU0m8YTGCm_GIhlcGOPhuYxrff_gI1q6aN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614290597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factor Structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test in Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Groups</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Rock, Donald A ; Bennett, Randy Elliot ; Jirele, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Rock, Donald A ; Bennett, Randy Elliot ; Jirele, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>We used confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups. A simple three-factor model, consisting of verbal, quantitative, and analytical item types, was posed and tested for model fit. In addition, a higher order factor solution was computed to investigate the meaning of General Test total scores and to probe observed discrepancies in factor structure. Results suggested that the three-factor model fit better than simpler models but less well than a four-factor solution. The three-factor model showed particular problems in fit for visually impaired students taking a large-type examination and for physically impaired examinees taking a standard administration. For these groups, the item types composing the Analytical factor did not appear to function effectively as a single factor. For the large-type group, in particular, these item types exhibited different relations with the other factors, had different relations with the test's general factor, and appeared to produce different scale units. Results suggest that Analytical scores and total scores (Verbal + Quantitative + Analytical) may have different meanings across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2972676</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPGBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Achievement ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blindness - psychology ; College Students ; Disabled Persons - psychology ; Educational Measurement ; Educational psychology ; Factor Structure ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Graduate Record Examination ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Orientation. Evaluation ; Physical Disorders ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Vision Disorders</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 1988-08, Vol.73 (3), p.383-392</ispartof><rights>1988 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>1988, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-cc1d98f6c23076d29bde492a8216160bac9a7653dc9062215a8780339d1e02db3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7816889$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2972676$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rock, Donald A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Randy Elliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jirele, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Factor Structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test in Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Groups</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>We used confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups. A simple three-factor model, consisting of verbal, quantitative, and analytical item types, was posed and tested for model fit. In addition, a higher order factor solution was computed to investigate the meaning of General Test total scores and to probe observed discrepancies in factor structure. Results suggested that the three-factor model fit better than simpler models but less well than a four-factor solution. The three-factor model showed particular problems in fit for visually impaired students taking a large-type examination and for physically impaired examinees taking a standard administration. For these groups, the item types composing the Analytical factor did not appear to function effectively as a single factor. For the large-type group, in particular, these item types exhibited different relations with the other factors, had different relations with the test's general factor, and appeared to produce different scale units. Results suggest that Analytical scores and total scores (Verbal + Quantitative + Analytical) may have different meanings across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups.</description><subject>Achievement</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blindness - psychology</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Disabled Persons - psychology</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Graduate Record Examination</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orientation. Evaluation</subject><subject>Physical Disorders</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Vision Disorders</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kW1LHDEQx0Ox6Gn7BQQhaOm7tXnYzcNLET0L0kJrX4e5JIt77CVrkgX99s3hcUqhzIuZyfzmn4E_QqeUXFLC5TdCGG00qa3klzUU_4AWVHPdUNW1B2ixB47Qcc5rQmjLNTlEh0xLJqRYoPUt2BIT_l3SbMucPI49Lo8eLxO4GYrHv7yNyeGbZ9gMAcoQQ8ZLH3yCET_4XPAQ8B0EN1iYJu9wLfGPGB7fPS1TnKf8CX3sYcz-8y6foD-3Nw_Xd839z-X366v7BlpKS2MtdVr1wjJOpHBMr5xvNQPFqKCCrMBqkKLjzmoiGKMdKKkI59pRT5hb8RP09VV3SvFprheazZCtH0cIPs7ZSFXlJO8qeP4PuI5zCvU2I2jLNOm0rNDF_yBakVZVTFWKvVI2xZyT782Uhg2kF0OJ2XpltlaYrRVGclND8bp0tpOeVxvv9is7c-r8y24O2cLYJwh2yHtMKiqU0m8YTGCm_GIhlcGOPhuYxrff_gI1q6aN</recordid><startdate>19880801</startdate><enddate>19880801</enddate><creator>Rock, Donald A</creator><creator>Bennett, Randy Elliot</creator><creator>Jirele, Thomas</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880801</creationdate><title>Factor Structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test in Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Groups</title><author>Rock, Donald A ; Bennett, Randy Elliot ; Jirele, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-cc1d98f6c23076d29bde492a8216160bac9a7653dc9062215a8780339d1e02db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Achievement</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blindness - psychology</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Disabled Persons - psychology</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Graduate Record Examination</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orientation. Evaluation</topic><topic>Physical Disorders</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Vision Disorders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rock, Donald A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Randy Elliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jirele, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rock, Donald A</au><au>Bennett, Randy Elliot</au><au>Jirele, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factor Structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test in Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Groups</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>1988-08-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>383-392</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><coden>JAPGBP</coden><abstract>We used confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups. A simple three-factor model, consisting of verbal, quantitative, and analytical item types, was posed and tested for model fit. In addition, a higher order factor solution was computed to investigate the meaning of General Test total scores and to probe observed discrepancies in factor structure. Results suggested that the three-factor model fit better than simpler models but less well than a four-factor solution. The three-factor model showed particular problems in fit for visually impaired students taking a large-type examination and for physically impaired examinees taking a standard administration. For these groups, the item types composing the Analytical factor did not appear to function effectively as a single factor. For the large-type group, in particular, these item types exhibited different relations with the other factors, had different relations with the test's general factor, and appeared to produce different scale units. Results suggest that Analytical scores and total scores (Verbal + Quantitative + Analytical) may have different meanings across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>2972676</pmid><doi>10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.383</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9010
ispartof Journal of applied psychology, 1988-08, Vol.73 (3), p.383-392
issn 0021-9010
1939-1854
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78492735
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Achievement
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Blindness - psychology
College Students
Disabled Persons - psychology
Educational Measurement
Educational psychology
Factor Structure
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Graduate Record Examination
Human
Humans
Male
Orientation. Evaluation
Physical Disorders
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Vision Disorders
title Factor Structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test in Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Groups
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A28%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factor%20Structure%20of%20the%20Graduate%20Record%20Examinations%20General%20Test%20in%20Handicapped%20and%20Nonhandicapped%20Groups&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Rock,%20Donald%20A&rft.date=1988-08-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=383-392&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft.coden=JAPGBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1290489058%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-cc1d98f6c23076d29bde492a8216160bac9a7653dc9062215a8780339d1e02db3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614290597&rft_id=info:pmid/2972676&rfr_iscdi=true