Loading…
Factor Structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test in Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Groups
We used confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups. A simple three-factor model, consisting of verbal, quantitative, and analytical item types, was posed and tested for model fit. In addition...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of applied psychology 1988-08, Vol.73 (3), p.383-392 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-cc1d98f6c23076d29bde492a8216160bac9a7653dc9062215a8780339d1e02db3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 392 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 383 |
container_title | Journal of applied psychology |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Rock, Donald A Bennett, Randy Elliot Jirele, Thomas |
description | We used confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups. A simple three-factor model, consisting of verbal, quantitative, and analytical item types, was posed and tested for model fit. In addition, a higher order factor solution was computed to investigate the meaning of General Test total scores and to probe observed discrepancies in factor structure. Results suggested that the three-factor model fit better than simpler models but less well than a four-factor solution. The three-factor model showed particular problems in fit for visually impaired students taking a large-type examination and for physically impaired examinees taking a standard administration. For these groups, the item types composing the Analytical factor did not appear to function effectively as a single factor. For the large-type group, in particular, these item types exhibited different relations with the other factors, had different relations with the test's general factor, and appeared to produce different scale units. Results suggest that Analytical scores and total scores (Verbal + Quantitative + Analytical) may have different meanings across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.383 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78492735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1290489058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-cc1d98f6c23076d29bde492a8216160bac9a7653dc9062215a8780339d1e02db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kW1LHDEQx0Ox6Gn7BQQhaOm7tXnYzcNLET0L0kJrX4e5JIt77CVrkgX99s3hcUqhzIuZyfzmn4E_QqeUXFLC5TdCGG00qa3klzUU_4AWVHPdUNW1B2ixB47Qcc5rQmjLNTlEh0xLJqRYoPUt2BIT_l3SbMucPI49Lo8eLxO4GYrHv7yNyeGbZ9gMAcoQQ8ZLH3yCET_4XPAQ8B0EN1iYJu9wLfGPGB7fPS1TnKf8CX3sYcz-8y6foD-3Nw_Xd839z-X366v7BlpKS2MtdVr1wjJOpHBMr5xvNQPFqKCCrMBqkKLjzmoiGKMdKKkI59pRT5hb8RP09VV3SvFprheazZCtH0cIPs7ZSFXlJO8qeP4PuI5zCvU2I2jLNOm0rNDF_yBakVZVTFWKvVI2xZyT782Uhg2kF0OJ2XpltlaYrRVGclND8bp0tpOeVxvv9is7c-r8y24O2cLYJwh2yHtMKiqU0m8YTGCm_GIhlcGOPhuYxrff_gI1q6aN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614290597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factor Structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test in Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Groups</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Rock, Donald A ; Bennett, Randy Elliot ; Jirele, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Rock, Donald A ; Bennett, Randy Elliot ; Jirele, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>We used confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups. A simple three-factor model, consisting of verbal, quantitative, and analytical item types, was posed and tested for model fit. In addition, a higher order factor solution was computed to investigate the meaning of General Test total scores and to probe observed discrepancies in factor structure. Results suggested that the three-factor model fit better than simpler models but less well than a four-factor solution. The three-factor model showed particular problems in fit for visually impaired students taking a large-type examination and for physically impaired examinees taking a standard administration. For these groups, the item types composing the Analytical factor did not appear to function effectively as a single factor. For the large-type group, in particular, these item types exhibited different relations with the other factors, had different relations with the test's general factor, and appeared to produce different scale units. Results suggest that Analytical scores and total scores (Verbal + Quantitative + Analytical) may have different meanings across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2972676</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPGBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Achievement ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blindness - psychology ; College Students ; Disabled Persons - psychology ; Educational Measurement ; Educational psychology ; Factor Structure ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Graduate Record Examination ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Orientation. Evaluation ; Physical Disorders ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Vision Disorders</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 1988-08, Vol.73 (3), p.383-392</ispartof><rights>1988 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>1988, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-cc1d98f6c23076d29bde492a8216160bac9a7653dc9062215a8780339d1e02db3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7816889$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2972676$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rock, Donald A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Randy Elliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jirele, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Factor Structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test in Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Groups</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>We used confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups. A simple three-factor model, consisting of verbal, quantitative, and analytical item types, was posed and tested for model fit. In addition, a higher order factor solution was computed to investigate the meaning of General Test total scores and to probe observed discrepancies in factor structure. Results suggested that the three-factor model fit better than simpler models but less well than a four-factor solution. The three-factor model showed particular problems in fit for visually impaired students taking a large-type examination and for physically impaired examinees taking a standard administration. For these groups, the item types composing the Analytical factor did not appear to function effectively as a single factor. For the large-type group, in particular, these item types exhibited different relations with the other factors, had different relations with the test's general factor, and appeared to produce different scale units. Results suggest that Analytical scores and total scores (Verbal + Quantitative + Analytical) may have different meanings across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups.</description><subject>Achievement</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blindness - psychology</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Disabled Persons - psychology</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Graduate Record Examination</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orientation. Evaluation</subject><subject>Physical Disorders</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Vision Disorders</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kW1LHDEQx0Ox6Gn7BQQhaOm7tXnYzcNLET0L0kJrX4e5JIt77CVrkgX99s3hcUqhzIuZyfzmn4E_QqeUXFLC5TdCGG00qa3klzUU_4AWVHPdUNW1B2ixB47Qcc5rQmjLNTlEh0xLJqRYoPUt2BIT_l3SbMucPI49Lo8eLxO4GYrHv7yNyeGbZ9gMAcoQQ8ZLH3yCET_4XPAQ8B0EN1iYJu9wLfGPGB7fPS1TnKf8CX3sYcz-8y6foD-3Nw_Xd839z-X366v7BlpKS2MtdVr1wjJOpHBMr5xvNQPFqKCCrMBqkKLjzmoiGKMdKKkI59pRT5hb8RP09VV3SvFprheazZCtH0cIPs7ZSFXlJO8qeP4PuI5zCvU2I2jLNOm0rNDF_yBakVZVTFWKvVI2xZyT782Uhg2kF0OJ2XpltlaYrRVGclND8bp0tpOeVxvv9is7c-r8y24O2cLYJwh2yHtMKiqU0m8YTGCm_GIhlcGOPhuYxrff_gI1q6aN</recordid><startdate>19880801</startdate><enddate>19880801</enddate><creator>Rock, Donald A</creator><creator>Bennett, Randy Elliot</creator><creator>Jirele, Thomas</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880801</creationdate><title>Factor Structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test in Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Groups</title><author>Rock, Donald A ; Bennett, Randy Elliot ; Jirele, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-cc1d98f6c23076d29bde492a8216160bac9a7653dc9062215a8780339d1e02db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Achievement</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blindness - psychology</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Disabled Persons - psychology</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Graduate Record Examination</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orientation. Evaluation</topic><topic>Physical Disorders</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Vision Disorders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rock, Donald A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Randy Elliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jirele, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rock, Donald A</au><au>Bennett, Randy Elliot</au><au>Jirele, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factor Structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test in Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Groups</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>1988-08-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>383-392</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><coden>JAPGBP</coden><abstract>We used confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups. A simple three-factor model, consisting of verbal, quantitative, and analytical item types, was posed and tested for model fit. In addition, a higher order factor solution was computed to investigate the meaning of General Test total scores and to probe observed discrepancies in factor structure. Results suggested that the three-factor model fit better than simpler models but less well than a four-factor solution. The three-factor model showed particular problems in fit for visually impaired students taking a large-type examination and for physically impaired examinees taking a standard administration. For these groups, the item types composing the Analytical factor did not appear to function effectively as a single factor. For the large-type group, in particular, these item types exhibited different relations with the other factors, had different relations with the test's general factor, and appeared to produce different scale units. Results suggest that Analytical scores and total scores (Verbal + Quantitative + Analytical) may have different meanings across handicapped and nonhandicapped groups.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>2972676</pmid><doi>10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.383</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9010 |
ispartof | Journal of applied psychology, 1988-08, Vol.73 (3), p.383-392 |
issn | 0021-9010 1939-1854 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78492735 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Achievement Adult Biological and medical sciences Blindness - psychology College Students Disabled Persons - psychology Educational Measurement Educational psychology Factor Structure Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Graduate Record Examination Human Humans Male Orientation. Evaluation Physical Disorders Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Vision Disorders |
title | Factor Structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test in Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Groups |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A28%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factor%20Structure%20of%20the%20Graduate%20Record%20Examinations%20General%20Test%20in%20Handicapped%20and%20Nonhandicapped%20Groups&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Rock,%20Donald%20A&rft.date=1988-08-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=383-392&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft.coden=JAPGBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1290489058%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-cc1d98f6c23076d29bde492a8216160bac9a7653dc9062215a8780339d1e02db3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614290597&rft_id=info:pmid/2972676&rfr_iscdi=true |