Loading…
Influence of Training and Experience on the Perception of Multicomponent Odor Mixtures
This study examined whether a previously established (D. G. Laing & G. W. Francis, 1989) limited capacity to discriminate and identify the components of olfactory mixtures resulted from the participants' lack of familiarity with the task, training designed to optimize cognitive and perceptu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 1996-04, Vol.22 (2), p.267-277 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-7812244104f846da69b5019705eb2a5de86d505a6496ef2212ff9bbc8e257c7f3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 277 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 267 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Livermore, Andrew Laing, David G |
description | This study examined whether a previously established (D. G. Laing & G. W. Francis, 1989) limited capacity to discriminate and identify the components of olfactory mixtures resulted from the participants' lack of familiarity with the task, training designed to optimize cognitive and perceptual performance, or professional experience in odor discrimination. The participants were a trained panel of 10 women (23-43 years old), and an expert panel of 8 male professional perfumers and flavorists (25-55 years old). The individual chemical stimuli were 7 common dissimilar odorants of equal moderate intensity. An air dilution olfactometer delivered a single odorant or a mixture containing up to 5 odorants. The results indicated that for both panels only 3 or 4 components of a complex mixture could be discriminated and identified and that this capacity could not be increased by training. Therefore, the limit may be imposed physiologically or by processing constraints. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.267 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78554065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57626985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-7812244104f846da69b5019705eb2a5de86d505a6496ef2212ff9bbc8e257c7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9LJDEQxcOyoqO7X0AQmkW89WxSnb_HRdxVUPTg7jWkuyva0pPuTbph_PZmmEHBg1YdivB-9ajwCDlmdMlopX5SamTJBFRLgGVuqb6QBTOVKRko9ZUsXoEDcpjSE83FtNgn-9pUXPNqQf5dBd_PGBosBl_cR9eFLjwULrTFxXrE2G2lUEyPWNxhbHCcuvzM8M3cT10zrMYhYJiK23aIxU23nuaI6RvZ865P-H03j8jf3xf355fl9e2fq_Nf16XjDKZSaQbAOaPcay5bJ00tKDOKCqzBiRa1bAUVTnIj0QMw8N7UdaMRhGqUr47I2dZ3jMP_GdNkV11qsO9dwGFOVmkhOJXiU1AoCdLoDfjjHfg0zDHkT1jJeFVpI_lHEDCej9XUZAi2UBOHlCJ6O8Zu5eKzZdRu8rObeOwmHgtgc0uVl052znO9wvZ1ZRdY1k-3uhudHdNz42IOocdk14_jm80LE9egMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614338964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Training and Experience on the Perception of Multicomponent Odor Mixtures</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Livermore, Andrew ; Laing, David G</creator><creatorcontrib>Livermore, Andrew ; Laing, David G</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined whether a previously established (D. G. Laing & G. W. Francis, 1989) limited capacity to discriminate and identify the components of olfactory mixtures resulted from the participants' lack of familiarity with the task, training designed to optimize cognitive and perceptual performance, or professional experience in odor discrimination. The participants were a trained panel of 10 women (23-43 years old), and an expert panel of 8 male professional perfumers and flavorists (25-55 years old). The individual chemical stimuli were 7 common dissimilar odorants of equal moderate intensity. An air dilution olfactometer delivered a single odorant or a mixture containing up to 5 odorants. The results indicated that for both panels only 3 or 4 components of a complex mixture could be discriminated and identified and that this capacity could not be increased by training. Therefore, the limit may be imposed physiologically or by processing constraints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.267</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8934843</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention ; Cognition & reasoning ; Discrimination Learning ; Experience Level ; Experiences ; Familiarity ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Mental Recall ; Middle Aged ; Odor Discrimination ; Odorants ; Odors ; Odours ; Perception ; Practice (Psychology) ; Psychology ; Relationship ; Sensory perception ; Smell ; Stimulus Complexity ; Training</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 1996-04, Vol.22 (2), p.267-277</ispartof><rights>1996 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 1996</rights><rights>1996, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-7812244104f846da69b5019705eb2a5de86d505a6496ef2212ff9bbc8e257c7f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8934843$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Livermore, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laing, David G</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Training and Experience on the Perception of Multicomponent Odor Mixtures</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>This study examined whether a previously established (D. G. Laing & G. W. Francis, 1989) limited capacity to discriminate and identify the components of olfactory mixtures resulted from the participants' lack of familiarity with the task, training designed to optimize cognitive and perceptual performance, or professional experience in odor discrimination. The participants were a trained panel of 10 women (23-43 years old), and an expert panel of 8 male professional perfumers and flavorists (25-55 years old). The individual chemical stimuli were 7 common dissimilar odorants of equal moderate intensity. An air dilution olfactometer delivered a single odorant or a mixture containing up to 5 odorants. The results indicated that for both panels only 3 or 4 components of a complex mixture could be discriminated and identified and that this capacity could not be increased by training. Therefore, the limit may be imposed physiologically or by processing constraints.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Experience Level</subject><subject>Experiences</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Odor Discrimination</subject><subject>Odorants</subject><subject>Odors</subject><subject>Odours</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Practice (Psychology)</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Relationship</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Smell</subject><subject>Stimulus Complexity</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9LJDEQxcOyoqO7X0AQmkW89WxSnb_HRdxVUPTg7jWkuyva0pPuTbph_PZmmEHBg1YdivB-9ajwCDlmdMlopX5SamTJBFRLgGVuqb6QBTOVKRko9ZUsXoEDcpjSE83FtNgn-9pUXPNqQf5dBd_PGBosBl_cR9eFLjwULrTFxXrE2G2lUEyPWNxhbHCcuvzM8M3cT10zrMYhYJiK23aIxU23nuaI6RvZ865P-H03j8jf3xf355fl9e2fq_Nf16XjDKZSaQbAOaPcay5bJ00tKDOKCqzBiRa1bAUVTnIj0QMw8N7UdaMRhGqUr47I2dZ3jMP_GdNkV11qsO9dwGFOVmkhOJXiU1AoCdLoDfjjHfg0zDHkT1jJeFVpI_lHEDCej9XUZAi2UBOHlCJ6O8Zu5eKzZdRu8rObeOwmHgtgc0uVl052znO9wvZ1ZRdY1k-3uhudHdNz42IOocdk14_jm80LE9egMw</recordid><startdate>19960401</startdate><enddate>19960401</enddate><creator>Livermore, Andrew</creator><creator>Laing, David G</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960401</creationdate><title>Influence of Training and Experience on the Perception of Multicomponent Odor Mixtures</title><author>Livermore, Andrew ; Laing, David G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-7812244104f846da69b5019705eb2a5de86d505a6496ef2212ff9bbc8e257c7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Experience Level</topic><topic>Experiences</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Odor Discrimination</topic><topic>Odorants</topic><topic>Odors</topic><topic>Odours</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Practice (Psychology)</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Relationship</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Smell</topic><topic>Stimulus Complexity</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Livermore, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laing, David G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Livermore, Andrew</au><au>Laing, David G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Training and Experience on the Perception of Multicomponent Odor Mixtures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>1996-04-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>267-277</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>This study examined whether a previously established (D. G. Laing & G. W. Francis, 1989) limited capacity to discriminate and identify the components of olfactory mixtures resulted from the participants' lack of familiarity with the task, training designed to optimize cognitive and perceptual performance, or professional experience in odor discrimination. The participants were a trained panel of 10 women (23-43 years old), and an expert panel of 8 male professional perfumers and flavorists (25-55 years old). The individual chemical stimuli were 7 common dissimilar odorants of equal moderate intensity. An air dilution olfactometer delivered a single odorant or a mixture containing up to 5 odorants. The results indicated that for both panels only 3 or 4 components of a complex mixture could be discriminated and identified and that this capacity could not be increased by training. Therefore, the limit may be imposed physiologically or by processing constraints.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>8934843</pmid><doi>10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.267</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0096-1523 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 1996-04, Vol.22 (2), p.267-277 |
issn | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78554065 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adult Attention Cognition & reasoning Discrimination Learning Experience Level Experiences Familiarity Female Human Humans Male Mental Recall Middle Aged Odor Discrimination Odorants Odors Odours Perception Practice (Psychology) Psychology Relationship Sensory perception Smell Stimulus Complexity Training |
title | Influence of Training and Experience on the Perception of Multicomponent Odor Mixtures |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A35%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Training%20and%20Experience%20on%20the%20Perception%20of%20Multicomponent%20Odor%20Mixtures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Livermore,%20Andrew&rft.date=1996-04-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=267-277&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.267&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57626985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-7812244104f846da69b5019705eb2a5de86d505a6496ef2212ff9bbc8e257c7f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614338964&rft_id=info:pmid/8934843&rfr_iscdi=true |