The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain

• Published in: Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 1996-11, Vol.21 (22), p.2594-2602
• Main Authors: DREYFUSS, P, MICHAELSEN, M, PAUZA, K, MCLARTY, J, BOGDUK, N
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biological and medical sciences; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; Diseases of the spine; Female; Humans; Male; Medical History Taking; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Pain - diagnosis; Pain Management; Prospective Studies; Sacroiliac Joint
• ISSN: 0362-2436; 1528-1159
• DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199611150-00009

This prospective study evaluated the diagnostic utility of historically accepted sacroiliac joint tests. A multidisciplinary expert panel recommended 12 of the "best" sacroiliac joint tests to be evaluated against a criterion standard of unequivocal gain relief after an intra-articular injection of local anesthetic into the sacroiliac joint. To identify a single sacroiliac joint test or ensemble of test that are sufficiently useful in diagnosing sacroiliac joint disorders to be clinically valuable. No previous research has been done to evaluate any physical test of sacroiliac joint pain against an accepted criterion standard. Historical data was obtained, and the 12 tests were performed by two examiners on 85 patients who subsequently underwent sacroiliac joint blocks. Ninety percent or more relief was considered a positive response, and less then 90% relief was considered a negative response. There were 45 positive and 40 negative responses. No historical feature, none of the 12 sacroiliac joint tests, and no ensemble of these 12 tests demonstrated worthwhile diagnostic value. Sacroiliac joint pain is resistant to identification by the historical and physical examination data from tests evaluated in this study.