Prevalence, reliability and bias of adolescents' reports of smoking and quitting

A follow‐up of smoking behaviour to age 18 in a longitudinal study of a birth cohort enabled an assessment of the prevalence of smoking and quitting among adolescents approaching adulthood. There was a dramatic increase in number of daily smokers (15% at age 15 years to 31% at age 18 years), and in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 1996-11, Vol.91 (11), p.1705-1714
Main Authors: STANTON, WARREN R., McCLELLAND, MARGUERITE, ELWOOD, CANDACE, FERRY, DON, SILVA, PHIL A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Addictive behaviors
Adolescent
Adolescents
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Bias
Biological and medical sciences
Cessation
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Incidence
Male
Medical sciences
New Zealand
New Zealand - epidemiology
Prevalence
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Relationship
Reliability
Self Disclosure
Selfreport
Smoking
Smoking - epidemiology
Smoking - psychology
Smoking Cessation - psychology
Smoking Cessation - statistics & numerical data
Smoking Prevention
Tobacco smoking
Young people
Youth
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A follow‐up of smoking behaviour to age 18 in a longitudinal study of a birth cohort enabled an assessment of the prevalence of smoking and quitting among adolescents approaching adulthood. There was a dramatic increase in number of daily smokers (15% at age 15 years to 31% at age 18 years), and in a climate of expected decreases in smoking, a history of never smoking to age 15 years was not as protective against future smoking as anticipated. Among 15–year‐olds who had experimented with smoking, only 11% per year stopped by age 18 years. Cessation rates for adolescent daily smokers were low (3% had not smoked in the last year at age 18 years), and previously have not been widely reported. We also examined some methodological issues related to self‐reported prevalence rates, in particular reliability, validity and sources of bias, finding confirmation of the accuracy of information from prospective longitudinal studies and supporting the conclusion that adolescents' recall for information beyond a 1‐year period is inconsistent.
ISSN:0965-2140
1360-0443
DOI:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1996.9111170511.x