Loading…

Strength of two- and one-leg extension in man

Two‐ and one‐leg extension strengths were compared in 155 female and male, untrained and trained (eight bicyclists, 38 weight‐lifters) subjects and in a polio patient with almost no strength in one leg. On average two‐leg strength was 82±1.3% (SE) of the sum of the strength of the right and left leg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta physiologica Scandinavica 1988-11, Vol.134 (3), p.333-339
Main Authors: SECHER, N. H., RUBE, N., ELERS, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3
container_end_page 339
container_issue 3
container_start_page 333
container_title Acta physiologica Scandinavica
container_volume 134
creator SECHER, N. H.
RUBE, N.
ELERS, J.
description Two‐ and one‐leg extension strengths were compared in 155 female and male, untrained and trained (eight bicyclists, 38 weight‐lifters) subjects and in a polio patient with almost no strength in one leg. On average two‐leg strength was 82±1.3% (SE) of the sum of the strength of the right and left legs (leg‐strength ratio) with no significant difference between the untrained and trained subjects. In the polio patient two‐leg strength was lower than the strength of the strongest leg. A similar leg‐strength ratio was found when measurements were made with a knee angle of 150° (n= 128) and 90° (n= 25). The ratio did not change when re‐determined after 1 year (n= 9). Moderate changes in the subjects' position during measurements did not affect one‐leg strength (n= 13). However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus increased the leg‐strength ratio from 80 ± 2.5% to 97 ± 2.9% (P 0.01) (n= 18). In contrast, two‐arm extension strength was similar to the sum of the strength of the right and left arms (n= 15). The results demonstrate that two‐leg strength in general is lower than the sum of the strength of the right and left legs, and that this phenomenon is found even after intensive endurance or strength training. However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus can increase the relative two‐leg strength which suggests that muscle strength in man may be limited by the central nervous system's ability to activate maximally all synergistic muscles and/or to control antagonistic muscles.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08500.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78664805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78664805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkFtP4zAQhS0EgtLlJyBFSPDmMLbjGy-oQkC5aHel3RW8WY5rQ0rqQJyK8u9J1Qied15GozlzzuhD6IhATvo6nedEFgoTSUROtFJ5V4LiAPlqC40IExxTII_baAQABAsp6R7aT2nej0xRuot2GaVSczpC-E_X-vjUPWdNyLr3Bmc2zrImelz7p8yvOh9T1cSsitnCxh9oJ9g6-YOhj9G_q8u_F1N8_-v65mJyj11BNMPWKUW4ckwDLUNBfAFK24KCV7YkAFzPqHfWUaels0yEUgeQUgUJWkoX2BidbHxf2-Zt6VNnFlVyvq5t9M0yGamEKBTwXni2Ebq2San1wby21cK2H4aAWbMyc7NmZdaszJqVGViZVX98OKQsy4WffZ0OcPr98bC3ydk6tDa6Kn0naM4poaTXnW9071XtP_7jAzP5PZ2wvsYIbxyq1PnVl4NtX4yQTHLz8PPaFH2emN7dGsE-Af0xk1k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78664805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strength of two- and one-leg extension in man</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals (Backfile Content)</source><creator>SECHER, N. H. ; RUBE, N. ; ELERS, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>SECHER, N. H. ; RUBE, N. ; ELERS, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Two‐ and one‐leg extension strengths were compared in 155 female and male, untrained and trained (eight bicyclists, 38 weight‐lifters) subjects and in a polio patient with almost no strength in one leg. On average two‐leg strength was 82±1.3% (SE) of the sum of the strength of the right and left legs (leg‐strength ratio) with no significant difference between the untrained and trained subjects. In the polio patient two‐leg strength was lower than the strength of the strongest leg. A similar leg‐strength ratio was found when measurements were made with a knee angle of 150° (n= 128) and 90° (n= 25). The ratio did not change when re‐determined after 1 year (n= 9). Moderate changes in the subjects' position during measurements did not affect one‐leg strength (n= 13). However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus increased the leg‐strength ratio from 80 ± 2.5% to 97 ± 2.9% (P 0.01) (n= 18). In contrast, two‐arm extension strength was similar to the sum of the strength of the right and left arms (n= 15). The results demonstrate that two‐leg strength in general is lower than the sum of the strength of the right and left legs, and that this phenomenon is found even after intensive endurance or strength training. However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus can increase the relative two‐leg strength which suggests that muscle strength in man may be limited by the central nervous system's ability to activate maximally all synergistic muscles and/or to control antagonistic muscles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-201X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08500.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3227952</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APSCAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arm ; Arm strength ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Exercise ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Isometric Contraction ; Leg ; leg strength ; Male ; motor skill ; muscle ; Muscle Contraction ; Poliomyelitis - physiopathology ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><ispartof>Acta physiologica Scandinavica, 1988-11, Vol.134 (3), p.333-339</ispartof><rights>1988 Scandinavian Physiological Society</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1748-1716.1988.tb08500.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1748-1716.1988.tb08500.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27924,27925,46049,46473</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19552121$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3227952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SECHER, N. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUBE, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELERS, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Strength of two- and one-leg extension in man</title><title>Acta physiologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Physiol Scand</addtitle><description>Two‐ and one‐leg extension strengths were compared in 155 female and male, untrained and trained (eight bicyclists, 38 weight‐lifters) subjects and in a polio patient with almost no strength in one leg. On average two‐leg strength was 82±1.3% (SE) of the sum of the strength of the right and left legs (leg‐strength ratio) with no significant difference between the untrained and trained subjects. In the polio patient two‐leg strength was lower than the strength of the strongest leg. A similar leg‐strength ratio was found when measurements were made with a knee angle of 150° (n= 128) and 90° (n= 25). The ratio did not change when re‐determined after 1 year (n= 9). Moderate changes in the subjects' position during measurements did not affect one‐leg strength (n= 13). However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus increased the leg‐strength ratio from 80 ± 2.5% to 97 ± 2.9% (P 0.01) (n= 18). In contrast, two‐arm extension strength was similar to the sum of the strength of the right and left arms (n= 15). The results demonstrate that two‐leg strength in general is lower than the sum of the strength of the right and left legs, and that this phenomenon is found even after intensive endurance or strength training. However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus can increase the relative two‐leg strength which suggests that muscle strength in man may be limited by the central nervous system's ability to activate maximally all synergistic muscles and/or to control antagonistic muscles.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arm</subject><subject>Arm strength</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isometric Contraction</subject><subject>Leg</subject><subject>leg strength</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>motor skill</subject><subject>muscle</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction</subject><subject>Poliomyelitis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><issn>0001-6772</issn><issn>1365-201X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkFtP4zAQhS0EgtLlJyBFSPDmMLbjGy-oQkC5aHel3RW8WY5rQ0rqQJyK8u9J1Qied15GozlzzuhD6IhATvo6nedEFgoTSUROtFJ5V4LiAPlqC40IExxTII_baAQABAsp6R7aT2nej0xRuot2GaVSczpC-E_X-vjUPWdNyLr3Bmc2zrImelz7p8yvOh9T1cSsitnCxh9oJ9g6-YOhj9G_q8u_F1N8_-v65mJyj11BNMPWKUW4ckwDLUNBfAFK24KCV7YkAFzPqHfWUaels0yEUgeQUgUJWkoX2BidbHxf2-Zt6VNnFlVyvq5t9M0yGamEKBTwXni2Ebq2San1wby21cK2H4aAWbMyc7NmZdaszJqVGViZVX98OKQsy4WffZ0OcPr98bC3ydk6tDa6Kn0naM4poaTXnW9071XtP_7jAzP5PZ2wvsYIbxyq1PnVl4NtX4yQTHLz8PPaFH2emN7dGsE-Af0xk1k</recordid><startdate>198811</startdate><enddate>198811</enddate><creator>SECHER, N. H.</creator><creator>RUBE, N.</creator><creator>ELERS, J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198811</creationdate><title>Strength of two- and one-leg extension in man</title><author>SECHER, N. H. ; RUBE, N. ; ELERS, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arm</topic><topic>Arm strength</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isometric Contraction</topic><topic>Leg</topic><topic>leg strength</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>motor skill</topic><topic>muscle</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction</topic><topic>Poliomyelitis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SECHER, N. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUBE, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELERS, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta physiologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SECHER, N. H.</au><au>RUBE, N.</au><au>ELERS, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strength of two- and one-leg extension in man</atitle><jtitle>Acta physiologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Physiol Scand</addtitle><date>1988-11</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>333</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>333-339</pages><issn>0001-6772</issn><eissn>1365-201X</eissn><coden>APSCAX</coden><abstract>Two‐ and one‐leg extension strengths were compared in 155 female and male, untrained and trained (eight bicyclists, 38 weight‐lifters) subjects and in a polio patient with almost no strength in one leg. On average two‐leg strength was 82±1.3% (SE) of the sum of the strength of the right and left legs (leg‐strength ratio) with no significant difference between the untrained and trained subjects. In the polio patient two‐leg strength was lower than the strength of the strongest leg. A similar leg‐strength ratio was found when measurements were made with a knee angle of 150° (n= 128) and 90° (n= 25). The ratio did not change when re‐determined after 1 year (n= 9). Moderate changes in the subjects' position during measurements did not affect one‐leg strength (n= 13). However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus increased the leg‐strength ratio from 80 ± 2.5% to 97 ± 2.9% (P 0.01) (n= 18). In contrast, two‐arm extension strength was similar to the sum of the strength of the right and left arms (n= 15). The results demonstrate that two‐leg strength in general is lower than the sum of the strength of the right and left legs, and that this phenomenon is found even after intensive endurance or strength training. However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus can increase the relative two‐leg strength which suggests that muscle strength in man may be limited by the central nervous system's ability to activate maximally all synergistic muscles and/or to control antagonistic muscles.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>3227952</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08500.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6772
ispartof Acta physiologica Scandinavica, 1988-11, Vol.134 (3), p.333-339
issn 0001-6772
1365-201X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78664805
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals (Backfile Content)
subjects Adult
Arm
Arm strength
Biological and medical sciences
Biomechanical Phenomena
Exercise
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Isometric Contraction
Leg
leg strength
Male
motor skill
muscle
Muscle Contraction
Poliomyelitis - physiopathology
Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports
title Strength of two- and one-leg extension in man
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A41%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strength%20of%20two-%20and%20one-leg%20extension%20in%20man&rft.jtitle=Acta%20physiologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=SECHER,%20N.%20H.&rft.date=1988-11&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=333&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=333-339&rft.issn=0001-6772&rft.eissn=1365-201X&rft.coden=APSCAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08500.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78664805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78664805&rft_id=info:pmid/3227952&rfr_iscdi=true