Loading…
Strength of two- and one-leg extension in man
Two‐ and one‐leg extension strengths were compared in 155 female and male, untrained and trained (eight bicyclists, 38 weight‐lifters) subjects and in a polio patient with almost no strength in one leg. On average two‐leg strength was 82±1.3% (SE) of the sum of the strength of the right and left leg...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta physiologica Scandinavica 1988-11, Vol.134 (3), p.333-339 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3 |
container_end_page | 339 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 333 |
container_title | Acta physiologica Scandinavica |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | SECHER, N. H. RUBE, N. ELERS, J. |
description | Two‐ and one‐leg extension strengths were compared in 155 female and male, untrained and trained (eight bicyclists, 38 weight‐lifters) subjects and in a polio patient with almost no strength in one leg. On average two‐leg strength was 82±1.3% (SE) of the sum of the strength of the right and left legs (leg‐strength ratio) with no significant difference between the untrained and trained subjects. In the polio patient two‐leg strength was lower than the strength of the strongest leg. A similar leg‐strength ratio was found when measurements were made with a knee angle of 150° (n= 128) and 90° (n= 25). The ratio did not change when re‐determined after 1 year (n= 9). Moderate changes in the subjects' position during measurements did not affect one‐leg strength (n= 13). However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus increased the leg‐strength ratio from 80 ± 2.5% to 97 ± 2.9% (P 0.01) (n= 18). In contrast, two‐arm extension strength was similar to the sum of the strength of the right and left arms (n= 15). The results demonstrate that two‐leg strength in general is lower than the sum of the strength of the right and left legs, and that this phenomenon is found even after intensive endurance or strength training. However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus can increase the relative two‐leg strength which suggests that muscle strength in man may be limited by the central nervous system's ability to activate maximally all synergistic muscles and/or to control antagonistic muscles. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08500.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78664805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78664805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkFtP4zAQhS0EgtLlJyBFSPDmMLbjGy-oQkC5aHel3RW8WY5rQ0rqQJyK8u9J1Qied15GozlzzuhD6IhATvo6nedEFgoTSUROtFJ5V4LiAPlqC40IExxTII_baAQABAsp6R7aT2nej0xRuot2GaVSczpC-E_X-vjUPWdNyLr3Bmc2zrImelz7p8yvOh9T1cSsitnCxh9oJ9g6-YOhj9G_q8u_F1N8_-v65mJyj11BNMPWKUW4ckwDLUNBfAFK24KCV7YkAFzPqHfWUaels0yEUgeQUgUJWkoX2BidbHxf2-Zt6VNnFlVyvq5t9M0yGamEKBTwXni2Ebq2San1wby21cK2H4aAWbMyc7NmZdaszJqVGViZVX98OKQsy4WffZ0OcPr98bC3ydk6tDa6Kn0naM4poaTXnW9071XtP_7jAzP5PZ2wvsYIbxyq1PnVl4NtX4yQTHLz8PPaFH2emN7dGsE-Af0xk1k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78664805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strength of two- and one-leg extension in man</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals (Backfile Content)</source><creator>SECHER, N. H. ; RUBE, N. ; ELERS, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>SECHER, N. H. ; RUBE, N. ; ELERS, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Two‐ and one‐leg extension strengths were compared in 155 female and male, untrained and trained (eight bicyclists, 38 weight‐lifters) subjects and in a polio patient with almost no strength in one leg. On average two‐leg strength was 82±1.3% (SE) of the sum of the strength of the right and left legs (leg‐strength ratio) with no significant difference between the untrained and trained subjects. In the polio patient two‐leg strength was lower than the strength of the strongest leg. A similar leg‐strength ratio was found when measurements were made with a knee angle of 150° (n= 128) and 90° (n= 25). The ratio did not change when re‐determined after 1 year (n= 9). Moderate changes in the subjects' position during measurements did not affect one‐leg strength (n= 13). However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus increased the leg‐strength ratio from 80 ± 2.5% to 97 ± 2.9% (P 0.01) (n= 18). In contrast, two‐arm extension strength was similar to the sum of the strength of the right and left arms (n= 15). The results demonstrate that two‐leg strength in general is lower than the sum of the strength of the right and left legs, and that this phenomenon is found even after intensive endurance or strength training. However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus can increase the relative two‐leg strength which suggests that muscle strength in man may be limited by the central nervous system's ability to activate maximally all synergistic muscles and/or to control antagonistic muscles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-201X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08500.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3227952</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APSCAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arm ; Arm strength ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Exercise ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Isometric Contraction ; Leg ; leg strength ; Male ; motor skill ; muscle ; Muscle Contraction ; Poliomyelitis - physiopathology ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><ispartof>Acta physiologica Scandinavica, 1988-11, Vol.134 (3), p.333-339</ispartof><rights>1988 Scandinavian Physiological Society</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1748-1716.1988.tb08500.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1748-1716.1988.tb08500.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27924,27925,46049,46473</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19552121$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3227952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SECHER, N. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUBE, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELERS, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Strength of two- and one-leg extension in man</title><title>Acta physiologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Physiol Scand</addtitle><description>Two‐ and one‐leg extension strengths were compared in 155 female and male, untrained and trained (eight bicyclists, 38 weight‐lifters) subjects and in a polio patient with almost no strength in one leg. On average two‐leg strength was 82±1.3% (SE) of the sum of the strength of the right and left legs (leg‐strength ratio) with no significant difference between the untrained and trained subjects. In the polio patient two‐leg strength was lower than the strength of the strongest leg. A similar leg‐strength ratio was found when measurements were made with a knee angle of 150° (n= 128) and 90° (n= 25). The ratio did not change when re‐determined after 1 year (n= 9). Moderate changes in the subjects' position during measurements did not affect one‐leg strength (n= 13). However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus increased the leg‐strength ratio from 80 ± 2.5% to 97 ± 2.9% (P 0.01) (n= 18). In contrast, two‐arm extension strength was similar to the sum of the strength of the right and left arms (n= 15). The results demonstrate that two‐leg strength in general is lower than the sum of the strength of the right and left legs, and that this phenomenon is found even after intensive endurance or strength training. However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus can increase the relative two‐leg strength which suggests that muscle strength in man may be limited by the central nervous system's ability to activate maximally all synergistic muscles and/or to control antagonistic muscles.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arm</subject><subject>Arm strength</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isometric Contraction</subject><subject>Leg</subject><subject>leg strength</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>motor skill</subject><subject>muscle</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction</subject><subject>Poliomyelitis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><issn>0001-6772</issn><issn>1365-201X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkFtP4zAQhS0EgtLlJyBFSPDmMLbjGy-oQkC5aHel3RW8WY5rQ0rqQJyK8u9J1Qied15GozlzzuhD6IhATvo6nedEFgoTSUROtFJ5V4LiAPlqC40IExxTII_baAQABAsp6R7aT2nej0xRuot2GaVSczpC-E_X-vjUPWdNyLr3Bmc2zrImelz7p8yvOh9T1cSsitnCxh9oJ9g6-YOhj9G_q8u_F1N8_-v65mJyj11BNMPWKUW4ckwDLUNBfAFK24KCV7YkAFzPqHfWUaels0yEUgeQUgUJWkoX2BidbHxf2-Zt6VNnFlVyvq5t9M0yGamEKBTwXni2Ebq2San1wby21cK2H4aAWbMyc7NmZdaszJqVGViZVX98OKQsy4WffZ0OcPr98bC3ydk6tDa6Kn0naM4poaTXnW9071XtP_7jAzP5PZ2wvsYIbxyq1PnVl4NtX4yQTHLz8PPaFH2emN7dGsE-Af0xk1k</recordid><startdate>198811</startdate><enddate>198811</enddate><creator>SECHER, N. H.</creator><creator>RUBE, N.</creator><creator>ELERS, J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198811</creationdate><title>Strength of two- and one-leg extension in man</title><author>SECHER, N. H. ; RUBE, N. ; ELERS, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arm</topic><topic>Arm strength</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isometric Contraction</topic><topic>Leg</topic><topic>leg strength</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>motor skill</topic><topic>muscle</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction</topic><topic>Poliomyelitis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SECHER, N. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUBE, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELERS, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta physiologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SECHER, N. H.</au><au>RUBE, N.</au><au>ELERS, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strength of two- and one-leg extension in man</atitle><jtitle>Acta physiologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Physiol Scand</addtitle><date>1988-11</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>333</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>333-339</pages><issn>0001-6772</issn><eissn>1365-201X</eissn><coden>APSCAX</coden><abstract>Two‐ and one‐leg extension strengths were compared in 155 female and male, untrained and trained (eight bicyclists, 38 weight‐lifters) subjects and in a polio patient with almost no strength in one leg. On average two‐leg strength was 82±1.3% (SE) of the sum of the strength of the right and left legs (leg‐strength ratio) with no significant difference between the untrained and trained subjects. In the polio patient two‐leg strength was lower than the strength of the strongest leg. A similar leg‐strength ratio was found when measurements were made with a knee angle of 150° (n= 128) and 90° (n= 25). The ratio did not change when re‐determined after 1 year (n= 9). Moderate changes in the subjects' position during measurements did not affect one‐leg strength (n= 13). However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus increased the leg‐strength ratio from 80 ± 2.5% to 97 ± 2.9% (P 0.01) (n= 18). In contrast, two‐arm extension strength was similar to the sum of the strength of the right and left arms (n= 15). The results demonstrate that two‐leg strength in general is lower than the sum of the strength of the right and left legs, and that this phenomenon is found even after intensive endurance or strength training. However, familiarization with the experimental apparatus can increase the relative two‐leg strength which suggests that muscle strength in man may be limited by the central nervous system's ability to activate maximally all synergistic muscles and/or to control antagonistic muscles.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>3227952</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08500.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6772 |
ispartof | Acta physiologica Scandinavica, 1988-11, Vol.134 (3), p.333-339 |
issn | 0001-6772 1365-201X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78664805 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals (Backfile Content) |
subjects | Adult Arm Arm strength Biological and medical sciences Biomechanical Phenomena Exercise Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Isometric Contraction Leg leg strength Male motor skill muscle Muscle Contraction Poliomyelitis - physiopathology Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports |
title | Strength of two- and one-leg extension in man |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A41%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strength%20of%20two-%20and%20one-leg%20extension%20in%20man&rft.jtitle=Acta%20physiologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=SECHER,%20N.%20H.&rft.date=1988-11&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=333&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=333-339&rft.issn=0001-6772&rft.eissn=1365-201X&rft.coden=APSCAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08500.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78664805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-ac88158c3902bf41e4089a420e8ab10059d2ecac2c97ca36fb9f0778f70977cf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78664805&rft_id=info:pmid/3227952&rfr_iscdi=true |