Loading…

Motion specific responses from a blind hemifield

In a previous study we showed that fast moving stimuli activate V5, an area specialized for motion, at very short latencies through a pathway that reaches it without passing through VI. Using the same technique of visual evoked responses, we have tested our conclusions by studying patient GY, whose...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain (London, England : 1878) England : 1878), 1996-12, Vol.119 (6), p.1971-1982
Main Authors: ffytche, D. H., Guy, C. N., Zeki, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-43e26ba0edc712273d9aef25ba787bdd9c9ae4061bce26253e552877414edaac3
cites
container_end_page 1982
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1971
container_title Brain (London, England : 1878)
container_volume 119
creator ffytche, D. H.
Guy, C. N.
Zeki, S.
description In a previous study we showed that fast moving stimuli activate V5, an area specialized for motion, at very short latencies through a pathway that reaches it without passing through VI. Using the same technique of visual evoked responses, we have tested our conclusions by studying patient GY, whose VI is damaged but whose V5 is intact. In spite of the contralateral hemi-blindness due to his VI lesion, GY has a residual visual capacity that allows him to perceive, consciously, fast but not slow moving stimuli presented in his affected hemifield. By stimulating GY's ‘blind’ hemifield and comparing the responses with those obtained from normal subjects, we were able to study the relative contribution of VI and V5 to the visual evoked response to motion in normal subjects. We found that GY's early response to fast motion is preserved and correlates with activity elicited in control subjects over area V5, while slow motion, pattern offset, and pattern reversal stimuli failed to elicit responses in GY. The results confirm our previous conclusions: namely, that the early part of the motion evoked response is generated in area V5 and that signals reach this area through a dynamically parallel pathway that bypasses area V1. They go on to demonstrate that neurophysiological activity in the prestriate cortex correlates with the conscious visual perception of motion.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/brain/119.6.1971
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78684931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78684931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-43e26ba0edc712273d9aef25ba787bdd9c9ae4061bce26253e552877414edaac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtLJDEQh4Os6Kx69yI0i-ytx1SeneMivmB8HBTES0inqzHaj9lkBvS_N-MMc9jLnorw-6oq9RFyDHQK1PCzOrownAGYqZqC0bBDJiAULRlI9YNMKKWqrIyk--RnSm-UguBM7ZE9QyFnMCH0dlyEcSjSHH1ogy8ipvk4JExFG8e-cEXdhaEpXrHPMXbNIdltXZfwaFMPyNPlxeP5dTm7v7o5_zMrvVCwKAVHpmpHsfEaGNO8MQ5bJmunK103jfH5LaiC2meQSY5SskprAQIb5zw_IL_Xc-dx_LvEtLB9SB67zg04LpPVlaqE4fBfkOUloA3N4K9_wLdxGYd8hAUjBVNaVxmia8jHMaWIrZ3H0Lv4aYHalXL7rdxm5VbZlfLccrKZu6x7bLYNG8c5P93kLnnXtdENPqQtlm83UK2-V66xkBb4sY1dfLdKcy3t9fOLFVLpy6vZnX3gX00hl2I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195426778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Motion specific responses from a blind hemifield</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>ffytche, D. H. ; Guy, C. N. ; Zeki, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>ffytche, D. H. ; Guy, C. N. ; Zeki, S.</creatorcontrib><description>In a previous study we showed that fast moving stimuli activate V5, an area specialized for motion, at very short latencies through a pathway that reaches it without passing through VI. Using the same technique of visual evoked responses, we have tested our conclusions by studying patient GY, whose VI is damaged but whose V5 is intact. In spite of the contralateral hemi-blindness due to his VI lesion, GY has a residual visual capacity that allows him to perceive, consciously, fast but not slow moving stimuli presented in his affected hemifield. By stimulating GY's ‘blind’ hemifield and comparing the responses with those obtained from normal subjects, we were able to study the relative contribution of VI and V5 to the visual evoked response to motion in normal subjects. We found that GY's early response to fast motion is preserved and correlates with activity elicited in control subjects over area V5, while slow motion, pattern offset, and pattern reversal stimuli failed to elicit responses in GY. The results confirm our previous conclusions: namely, that the early part of the motion evoked response is generated in area V5 and that signals reach this area through a dynamically parallel pathway that bypasses area V1. They go on to demonstrate that neurophysiological activity in the prestriate cortex correlates with the conscious visual perception of motion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2156</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/brain/119.6.1971</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9010001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRAIAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; dynamic parallelism ; Electroencephalography ; Functional Laterality ; Humans ; Injuries of the nervous system and the skull. Diseases due to physical agents ; Male ; Medical sciences ; motion evoked response ; residual vision ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; Vision Disorders - physiopathology ; Visual Cortex - pathology ; Visual Cortex - physiopathology ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Brain (London, England : 1878), 1996-12, Vol.119 (6), p.1971-1982</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Dec 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-43e26ba0edc712273d9aef25ba787bdd9c9ae4061bce26253e552877414edaac3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2539180$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9010001$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ffytche, D. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, C. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeki, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Motion specific responses from a blind hemifield</title><title>Brain (London, England : 1878)</title><addtitle>Brain</addtitle><description>In a previous study we showed that fast moving stimuli activate V5, an area specialized for motion, at very short latencies through a pathway that reaches it without passing through VI. Using the same technique of visual evoked responses, we have tested our conclusions by studying patient GY, whose VI is damaged but whose V5 is intact. In spite of the contralateral hemi-blindness due to his VI lesion, GY has a residual visual capacity that allows him to perceive, consciously, fast but not slow moving stimuli presented in his affected hemifield. By stimulating GY's ‘blind’ hemifield and comparing the responses with those obtained from normal subjects, we were able to study the relative contribution of VI and V5 to the visual evoked response to motion in normal subjects. We found that GY's early response to fast motion is preserved and correlates with activity elicited in control subjects over area V5, while slow motion, pattern offset, and pattern reversal stimuli failed to elicit responses in GY. The results confirm our previous conclusions: namely, that the early part of the motion evoked response is generated in area V5 and that signals reach this area through a dynamically parallel pathway that bypasses area V1. They go on to demonstrate that neurophysiological activity in the prestriate cortex correlates with the conscious visual perception of motion.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>dynamic parallelism</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Functional Laterality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the nervous system and the skull. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>motion evoked response</subject><subject>residual vision</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Vision Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - pathology</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>0006-8950</issn><issn>1460-2156</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtLJDEQh4Os6Kx69yI0i-ytx1SeneMivmB8HBTES0inqzHaj9lkBvS_N-MMc9jLnorw-6oq9RFyDHQK1PCzOrownAGYqZqC0bBDJiAULRlI9YNMKKWqrIyk--RnSm-UguBM7ZE9QyFnMCH0dlyEcSjSHH1ogy8ipvk4JExFG8e-cEXdhaEpXrHPMXbNIdltXZfwaFMPyNPlxeP5dTm7v7o5_zMrvVCwKAVHpmpHsfEaGNO8MQ5bJmunK103jfH5LaiC2meQSY5SskprAQIb5zw_IL_Xc-dx_LvEtLB9SB67zg04LpPVlaqE4fBfkOUloA3N4K9_wLdxGYd8hAUjBVNaVxmia8jHMaWIrZ3H0Lv4aYHalXL7rdxm5VbZlfLccrKZu6x7bLYNG8c5P93kLnnXtdENPqQtlm83UK2-V66xkBb4sY1dfLdKcy3t9fOLFVLpy6vZnX3gX00hl2I</recordid><startdate>19961201</startdate><enddate>19961201</enddate><creator>ffytche, D. H.</creator><creator>Guy, C. N.</creator><creator>Zeki, S.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961201</creationdate><title>Motion specific responses from a blind hemifield</title><author>ffytche, D. H. ; Guy, C. N. ; Zeki, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-43e26ba0edc712273d9aef25ba787bdd9c9ae4061bce26253e552877414edaac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>dynamic parallelism</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Functional Laterality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the nervous system and the skull. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>motion evoked response</topic><topic>residual vision</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Vision Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - pathology</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ffytche, D. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, C. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeki, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain (London, England : 1878)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ffytche, D. H.</au><au>Guy, C. N.</au><au>Zeki, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Motion specific responses from a blind hemifield</atitle><jtitle>Brain (London, England : 1878)</jtitle><addtitle>Brain</addtitle><date>1996-12-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1971</spage><epage>1982</epage><pages>1971-1982</pages><issn>0006-8950</issn><eissn>1460-2156</eissn><coden>BRAIAK</coden><abstract>In a previous study we showed that fast moving stimuli activate V5, an area specialized for motion, at very short latencies through a pathway that reaches it without passing through VI. Using the same technique of visual evoked responses, we have tested our conclusions by studying patient GY, whose VI is damaged but whose V5 is intact. In spite of the contralateral hemi-blindness due to his VI lesion, GY has a residual visual capacity that allows him to perceive, consciously, fast but not slow moving stimuli presented in his affected hemifield. By stimulating GY's ‘blind’ hemifield and comparing the responses with those obtained from normal subjects, we were able to study the relative contribution of VI and V5 to the visual evoked response to motion in normal subjects. We found that GY's early response to fast motion is preserved and correlates with activity elicited in control subjects over area V5, while slow motion, pattern offset, and pattern reversal stimuli failed to elicit responses in GY. The results confirm our previous conclusions: namely, that the early part of the motion evoked response is generated in area V5 and that signals reach this area through a dynamically parallel pathway that bypasses area V1. They go on to demonstrate that neurophysiological activity in the prestriate cortex correlates with the conscious visual perception of motion.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>9010001</pmid><doi>10.1093/brain/119.6.1971</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-8950
ispartof Brain (London, England : 1878), 1996-12, Vol.119 (6), p.1971-1982
issn 0006-8950
1460-2156
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78684931
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
dynamic parallelism
Electroencephalography
Functional Laterality
Humans
Injuries of the nervous system and the skull. Diseases due to physical agents
Male
Medical sciences
motion evoked response
residual vision
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
Vision Disorders - physiopathology
Visual Cortex - pathology
Visual Cortex - physiopathology
Visual Perception
title Motion specific responses from a blind hemifield
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A00%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Motion%20specific%20responses%20from%20a%20blind%20hemifield&rft.jtitle=Brain%20(London,%20England%20:%201878)&rft.au=ffytche,%20D.%20H.&rft.date=1996-12-01&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1971&rft.epage=1982&rft.pages=1971-1982&rft.issn=0006-8950&rft.eissn=1460-2156&rft.coden=BRAIAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/brain/119.6.1971&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78684931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-43e26ba0edc712273d9aef25ba787bdd9c9ae4061bce26253e552877414edaac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195426778&rft_id=info:pmid/9010001&rfr_iscdi=true