Loading…

Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review

Standards-based, computable knowledge representations for eligibility criteria are increasingly needed to provide computer-based decision support for automated research participant screening, clinical evidence application, and clinical research knowledge management. We surveyed the literature and id...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biomedical informatics 2010-06, Vol.43 (3), p.451-467
Main Authors: Weng, Chunhua, Tu, Samson W., Sim, Ida, Richesson, Rachel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353
container_end_page 467
container_issue 3
container_start_page 451
container_title Journal of biomedical informatics
container_volume 43
creator Weng, Chunhua
Tu, Samson W.
Sim, Ida
Richesson, Rachel
description Standards-based, computable knowledge representations for eligibility criteria are increasingly needed to provide computer-based decision support for automated research participant screening, clinical evidence application, and clinical research knowledge management. We surveyed the literature and identified five aspects of eligibility criteria knowledge representation that contribute to the various research and clinical applications: the intended use of computable eligibility criteria, the classification of eligibility criteria, the expression language for representing eligibility rules, the encoding of eligibility concepts, and the modeling of patient data. We consider three of these aspects (expression language, codification of eligibility concepts, and patient data modeling) to be essential constructs of a formal knowledge representation for eligibility criteria. The requirements for each of the three knowledge constructs vary for different use cases, which therefore should inform the development and choice of the constructs toward cost-effective knowledge representation efforts. We discuss the implications of our findings for standardization efforts toward knowledge representation for sharable and computable eligibility criteria.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_787204937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1532046409001592</els_id><sourcerecordid>787204937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EolD4ASwoG1OCn3nAVCoKSJVYYLZs5xo5SppiJ6D-e1y1dITpnuF850ofQlcEZwST_LbJGu0yinGVEZphzI_QGRGMppiX-PiQcz5B5yE0GBMiRH6KJhFhXFT8DD0set-pNvGw9hBgNajB9auktwm07sNp17phkxjvBvBO3SWzpN1GNYweIvTl4PsCnVjVBrjc3yl6Xzy-zZ_T5evTy3y2TA2v2JByXnFda8DClkpok1tKcWlxJQxmtWWMEl3UhaaWF1RXGgjYwtZVXQrIBRNsim52u2vff44QBtm5YKBt1Qr6MciiLCiOr4r_m4yRkoh4pojsmsb3IXiwcu1dp_xGEiy3jmUjo2O5dSwJldFxZK7366PuoD4Qv1Jj4X5XgGgjGvIyGAcrA7XzYAZZ9-6P-R_sLIwt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733181573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Weng, Chunhua ; Tu, Samson W. ; Sim, Ida ; Richesson, Rachel</creator><creatorcontrib>Weng, Chunhua ; Tu, Samson W. ; Sim, Ida ; Richesson, Rachel</creatorcontrib><description>Standards-based, computable knowledge representations for eligibility criteria are increasingly needed to provide computer-based decision support for automated research participant screening, clinical evidence application, and clinical research knowledge management. We surveyed the literature and identified five aspects of eligibility criteria knowledge representation that contribute to the various research and clinical applications: the intended use of computable eligibility criteria, the classification of eligibility criteria, the expression language for representing eligibility rules, the encoding of eligibility concepts, and the modeling of patient data. We consider three of these aspects (expression language, codification of eligibility concepts, and patient data modeling) to be essential constructs of a formal knowledge representation for eligibility criteria. The requirements for each of the three knowledge constructs vary for different use cases, which therefore should inform the development and choice of the constructs toward cost-effective knowledge representation efforts. We discuss the implications of our findings for standardization efforts toward knowledge representation for sharable and computable eligibility criteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1532-0464</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-0480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20034594</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical decision support systems ; Clinical research ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Electronic health records ; Eligibility criteria ; Humans ; Information Storage and Retrieval - methods ; Knowledge representation ; Natural Language Processing ; Patient Selection ; Vocabulary, Controlled</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical informatics, 2010-06, Vol.43 (3), p.451-467</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20034594$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weng, Chunhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Samson W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richesson, Rachel</creatorcontrib><title>Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review</title><title>Journal of biomedical informatics</title><addtitle>J Biomed Inform</addtitle><description>Standards-based, computable knowledge representations for eligibility criteria are increasingly needed to provide computer-based decision support for automated research participant screening, clinical evidence application, and clinical research knowledge management. We surveyed the literature and identified five aspects of eligibility criteria knowledge representation that contribute to the various research and clinical applications: the intended use of computable eligibility criteria, the classification of eligibility criteria, the expression language for representing eligibility rules, the encoding of eligibility concepts, and the modeling of patient data. We consider three of these aspects (expression language, codification of eligibility concepts, and patient data modeling) to be essential constructs of a formal knowledge representation for eligibility criteria. The requirements for each of the three knowledge constructs vary for different use cases, which therefore should inform the development and choice of the constructs toward cost-effective knowledge representation efforts. We discuss the implications of our findings for standardization efforts toward knowledge representation for sharable and computable eligibility criteria.</description><subject>Clinical decision support systems</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Eligibility criteria</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval - methods</subject><subject>Knowledge representation</subject><subject>Natural Language Processing</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Vocabulary, Controlled</subject><issn>1532-0464</issn><issn>1532-0480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EolD4ASwoG1OCn3nAVCoKSJVYYLZs5xo5SppiJ6D-e1y1dITpnuF850ofQlcEZwST_LbJGu0yinGVEZphzI_QGRGMppiX-PiQcz5B5yE0GBMiRH6KJhFhXFT8DD0set-pNvGw9hBgNajB9auktwm07sNp17phkxjvBvBO3SWzpN1GNYweIvTl4PsCnVjVBrjc3yl6Xzy-zZ_T5evTy3y2TA2v2JByXnFda8DClkpok1tKcWlxJQxmtWWMEl3UhaaWF1RXGgjYwtZVXQrIBRNsim52u2vff44QBtm5YKBt1Qr6MciiLCiOr4r_m4yRkoh4pojsmsb3IXiwcu1dp_xGEiy3jmUjo2O5dSwJldFxZK7366PuoD4Qv1Jj4X5XgGgjGvIyGAcrA7XzYAZZ9-6P-R_sLIwt</recordid><startdate>201006</startdate><enddate>201006</enddate><creator>Weng, Chunhua</creator><creator>Tu, Samson W.</creator><creator>Sim, Ida</creator><creator>Richesson, Rachel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201006</creationdate><title>Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review</title><author>Weng, Chunhua ; Tu, Samson W. ; Sim, Ida ; Richesson, Rachel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Clinical decision support systems</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Eligibility criteria</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval - methods</topic><topic>Knowledge representation</topic><topic>Natural Language Processing</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Vocabulary, Controlled</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weng, Chunhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Samson W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richesson, Rachel</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical informatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weng, Chunhua</au><au>Tu, Samson W.</au><au>Sim, Ida</au><au>Richesson, Rachel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical informatics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomed Inform</addtitle><date>2010-06</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>451</spage><epage>467</epage><pages>451-467</pages><issn>1532-0464</issn><eissn>1532-0480</eissn><abstract>Standards-based, computable knowledge representations for eligibility criteria are increasingly needed to provide computer-based decision support for automated research participant screening, clinical evidence application, and clinical research knowledge management. We surveyed the literature and identified five aspects of eligibility criteria knowledge representation that contribute to the various research and clinical applications: the intended use of computable eligibility criteria, the classification of eligibility criteria, the expression language for representing eligibility rules, the encoding of eligibility concepts, and the modeling of patient data. We consider three of these aspects (expression language, codification of eligibility concepts, and patient data modeling) to be essential constructs of a formal knowledge representation for eligibility criteria. The requirements for each of the three knowledge constructs vary for different use cases, which therefore should inform the development and choice of the constructs toward cost-effective knowledge representation efforts. We discuss the implications of our findings for standardization efforts toward knowledge representation for sharable and computable eligibility criteria.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20034594</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1532-0464
ispartof Journal of biomedical informatics, 2010-06, Vol.43 (3), p.451-467
issn 1532-0464
1532-0480
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_787204937
source Elsevier
subjects Clinical decision support systems
Clinical research
Clinical Trials as Topic
Electronic health records
Eligibility criteria
Humans
Information Storage and Retrieval - methods
Knowledge representation
Natural Language Processing
Patient Selection
Vocabulary, Controlled
title Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A09%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Formal%20representation%20of%20eligibility%20criteria:%20A%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20informatics&rft.au=Weng,%20Chunhua&rft.date=2010-06&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=467&rft.pages=451-467&rft.issn=1532-0464&rft.eissn=1532-0480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E787204937%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733181573&rft_id=info:pmid/20034594&rfr_iscdi=true