Loading…
Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review
Standards-based, computable knowledge representations for eligibility criteria are increasingly needed to provide computer-based decision support for automated research participant screening, clinical evidence application, and clinical research knowledge management. We surveyed the literature and id...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of biomedical informatics 2010-06, Vol.43 (3), p.451-467 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353 |
container_end_page | 467 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 451 |
container_title | Journal of biomedical informatics |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Weng, Chunhua Tu, Samson W. Sim, Ida Richesson, Rachel |
description | Standards-based, computable knowledge representations for eligibility criteria are increasingly needed to provide computer-based decision support for automated research participant screening, clinical evidence application, and clinical research knowledge management. We surveyed the literature and identified five aspects of eligibility criteria knowledge representation that contribute to the various research and clinical applications: the intended use of computable eligibility criteria, the classification of eligibility criteria, the expression language for representing eligibility rules, the encoding of eligibility concepts, and the modeling of patient data. We consider three of these aspects (expression language, codification of eligibility concepts, and patient data modeling) to be essential constructs of a formal knowledge representation for eligibility criteria. The requirements for each of the three knowledge constructs vary for different use cases, which therefore should inform the development and choice of the constructs toward cost-effective knowledge representation efforts. We discuss the implications of our findings for standardization efforts toward knowledge representation for sharable and computable eligibility criteria. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_787204937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1532046409001592</els_id><sourcerecordid>787204937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EolD4ASwoG1OCn3nAVCoKSJVYYLZs5xo5SppiJ6D-e1y1dITpnuF850ofQlcEZwST_LbJGu0yinGVEZphzI_QGRGMppiX-PiQcz5B5yE0GBMiRH6KJhFhXFT8DD0set-pNvGw9hBgNajB9auktwm07sNp17phkxjvBvBO3SWzpN1GNYweIvTl4PsCnVjVBrjc3yl6Xzy-zZ_T5evTy3y2TA2v2JByXnFda8DClkpok1tKcWlxJQxmtWWMEl3UhaaWF1RXGgjYwtZVXQrIBRNsim52u2vff44QBtm5YKBt1Qr6MciiLCiOr4r_m4yRkoh4pojsmsb3IXiwcu1dp_xGEiy3jmUjo2O5dSwJldFxZK7366PuoD4Qv1Jj4X5XgGgjGvIyGAcrA7XzYAZZ9-6P-R_sLIwt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733181573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Weng, Chunhua ; Tu, Samson W. ; Sim, Ida ; Richesson, Rachel</creator><creatorcontrib>Weng, Chunhua ; Tu, Samson W. ; Sim, Ida ; Richesson, Rachel</creatorcontrib><description>Standards-based, computable knowledge representations for eligibility criteria are increasingly needed to provide computer-based decision support for automated research participant screening, clinical evidence application, and clinical research knowledge management. We surveyed the literature and identified five aspects of eligibility criteria knowledge representation that contribute to the various research and clinical applications: the intended use of computable eligibility criteria, the classification of eligibility criteria, the expression language for representing eligibility rules, the encoding of eligibility concepts, and the modeling of patient data. We consider three of these aspects (expression language, codification of eligibility concepts, and patient data modeling) to be essential constructs of a formal knowledge representation for eligibility criteria. The requirements for each of the three knowledge constructs vary for different use cases, which therefore should inform the development and choice of the constructs toward cost-effective knowledge representation efforts. We discuss the implications of our findings for standardization efforts toward knowledge representation for sharable and computable eligibility criteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1532-0464</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-0480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20034594</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical decision support systems ; Clinical research ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Electronic health records ; Eligibility criteria ; Humans ; Information Storage and Retrieval - methods ; Knowledge representation ; Natural Language Processing ; Patient Selection ; Vocabulary, Controlled</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical informatics, 2010-06, Vol.43 (3), p.451-467</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20034594$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weng, Chunhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Samson W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richesson, Rachel</creatorcontrib><title>Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review</title><title>Journal of biomedical informatics</title><addtitle>J Biomed Inform</addtitle><description>Standards-based, computable knowledge representations for eligibility criteria are increasingly needed to provide computer-based decision support for automated research participant screening, clinical evidence application, and clinical research knowledge management. We surveyed the literature and identified five aspects of eligibility criteria knowledge representation that contribute to the various research and clinical applications: the intended use of computable eligibility criteria, the classification of eligibility criteria, the expression language for representing eligibility rules, the encoding of eligibility concepts, and the modeling of patient data. We consider three of these aspects (expression language, codification of eligibility concepts, and patient data modeling) to be essential constructs of a formal knowledge representation for eligibility criteria. The requirements for each of the three knowledge constructs vary for different use cases, which therefore should inform the development and choice of the constructs toward cost-effective knowledge representation efforts. We discuss the implications of our findings for standardization efforts toward knowledge representation for sharable and computable eligibility criteria.</description><subject>Clinical decision support systems</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Eligibility criteria</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval - methods</subject><subject>Knowledge representation</subject><subject>Natural Language Processing</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Vocabulary, Controlled</subject><issn>1532-0464</issn><issn>1532-0480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EolD4ASwoG1OCn3nAVCoKSJVYYLZs5xo5SppiJ6D-e1y1dITpnuF850ofQlcEZwST_LbJGu0yinGVEZphzI_QGRGMppiX-PiQcz5B5yE0GBMiRH6KJhFhXFT8DD0set-pNvGw9hBgNajB9auktwm07sNp17phkxjvBvBO3SWzpN1GNYweIvTl4PsCnVjVBrjc3yl6Xzy-zZ_T5evTy3y2TA2v2JByXnFda8DClkpok1tKcWlxJQxmtWWMEl3UhaaWF1RXGgjYwtZVXQrIBRNsim52u2vff44QBtm5YKBt1Qr6MciiLCiOr4r_m4yRkoh4pojsmsb3IXiwcu1dp_xGEiy3jmUjo2O5dSwJldFxZK7366PuoD4Qv1Jj4X5XgGgjGvIyGAcrA7XzYAZZ9-6P-R_sLIwt</recordid><startdate>201006</startdate><enddate>201006</enddate><creator>Weng, Chunhua</creator><creator>Tu, Samson W.</creator><creator>Sim, Ida</creator><creator>Richesson, Rachel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201006</creationdate><title>Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review</title><author>Weng, Chunhua ; Tu, Samson W. ; Sim, Ida ; Richesson, Rachel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Clinical decision support systems</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Eligibility criteria</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval - methods</topic><topic>Knowledge representation</topic><topic>Natural Language Processing</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Vocabulary, Controlled</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weng, Chunhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Samson W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richesson, Rachel</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical informatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weng, Chunhua</au><au>Tu, Samson W.</au><au>Sim, Ida</au><au>Richesson, Rachel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical informatics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomed Inform</addtitle><date>2010-06</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>451</spage><epage>467</epage><pages>451-467</pages><issn>1532-0464</issn><eissn>1532-0480</eissn><abstract>Standards-based, computable knowledge representations for eligibility criteria are increasingly needed to provide computer-based decision support for automated research participant screening, clinical evidence application, and clinical research knowledge management. We surveyed the literature and identified five aspects of eligibility criteria knowledge representation that contribute to the various research and clinical applications: the intended use of computable eligibility criteria, the classification of eligibility criteria, the expression language for representing eligibility rules, the encoding of eligibility concepts, and the modeling of patient data. We consider three of these aspects (expression language, codification of eligibility concepts, and patient data modeling) to be essential constructs of a formal knowledge representation for eligibility criteria. The requirements for each of the three knowledge constructs vary for different use cases, which therefore should inform the development and choice of the constructs toward cost-effective knowledge representation efforts. We discuss the implications of our findings for standardization efforts toward knowledge representation for sharable and computable eligibility criteria.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20034594</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1532-0464 |
ispartof | Journal of biomedical informatics, 2010-06, Vol.43 (3), p.451-467 |
issn | 1532-0464 1532-0480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_787204937 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Clinical decision support systems Clinical research Clinical Trials as Topic Electronic health records Eligibility criteria Humans Information Storage and Retrieval - methods Knowledge representation Natural Language Processing Patient Selection Vocabulary, Controlled |
title | Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A09%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Formal%20representation%20of%20eligibility%20criteria:%20A%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20informatics&rft.au=Weng,%20Chunhua&rft.date=2010-06&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=467&rft.pages=451-467&rft.issn=1532-0464&rft.eissn=1532-0480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E787204937%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-4494bdbe05f8a5bc6f2208f095c03df3321b7d7b2f472b9be1ef7fd9d85e65353%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733181573&rft_id=info:pmid/20034594&rfr_iscdi=true |