Loading…

Pilot Study of the Oral Omeprazole Test for Reflux Laryngitis

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease occasionally presents with laryngeal symptoms. Such patients are often referred for a gastroenterology evaluation. This study was designed to determine whether an empiric trial of high-dose omeprazole therapy could reliably identify patients with reflux la...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 1997-01, Vol.116 (1), p.41-46
Main Authors: Metz, David C., Childs, Marcia L., Ruiz, Cesar, Weinstein, Gregory S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-1145ec8db028901cafef1b198c84b4e6482199df8bed0e0168b7377727a78d363
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-1145ec8db028901cafef1b198c84b4e6482199df8bed0e0168b7377727a78d363
container_end_page 46
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
container_volume 116
creator Metz, David C.
Childs, Marcia L.
Ruiz, Cesar
Weinstein, Gregory S.
description BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease occasionally presents with laryngeal symptoms. Such patients are often referred for a gastroenterology evaluation. This study was designed to determine whether an empiric trial of high-dose omeprazole therapy could reliably identify patients with reflux laryngitis and thus obviate the need for a gastroenterology workup. METHODS: Patients were evaluated with a history, physical examination, esophageal manometry, upper endoscopy, and 24-hour pH-metry for determination of the presence or absence of underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease and then received an empiric trial of oral omeprazole therapy (20 mg twice daily for 1 month). A positive omeprazole test result was defined as resolution of all laryngeal symptoms on completion of the empiric trial of therapy. RESULTS: Two patients were classified as having no reflux, and eight were classified as having reflux. Omeprazole test results were positive in six patients. Five of six had reflux, but one patient had no evidence for reflux. Omeprazole test results were negative in four patients. Three of four had reflux, and one did not. Despite the absence of antisecretory therapy, laryngeal symptoms did not recur in either patient without reflux during follow-up. Laryngeal symptoms were managed in two of the three patients with reflux who had negative omeprazole test results and who were using inhalers in combination with histamine H2 receptor antagonist therapy for their reflux disease. One patient with reflux who had a negative omeprazole test result responded to higher doses of omeprazole, and the five patients with reflux who had positive omeprazole test results all responded to continuation of omeprazole. CONCLUSIONS: The omeprazole test may be useful in confirming the suspicion of reflux laryngitis in patients suspected of having this disease after an otolaryngology evaluation. However, there is a potential for false-positive and false-negative test results. A gastroenterology evaluation may aid in the identification of false-positive test results by documenting the absence of reflux in certain responders.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0194-59989770350-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78827158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1016_S0194-59989770350-4</sage_id><sourcerecordid>78827158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-1145ec8db028901cafef1b198c84b4e6482199df8bed0e0168b7377727a78d363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EKqXwBAjJJ26BdeLEthAHqChFqgii5WzlZ1NSpU2xE0F5egypKk6I0x52Znb2I-SUwQUDFl1OgSnuhUpJJQQEIXh8j_QZKOFFkol90t8JDsmRtQsAiCIheqSngEk_jPrk-qms6oZOmzbf0LqgzSvS2CQVjZe4NslnXSGdoW1oURv6jEXVftBJYjaredmU9pgcFEll8WQ7B-RldDcbjr1JfP8wvJl4mc8BPMZ4iJnMU_Clu5wlBRYsZUpmkqccIy59plReyBRzQPeaTEUghPBFImQeRMGAnHe5a1O_ta6OXpY2w6pKVli3VgspfcFC6YRBJ8xMba3BQq9NuXR9NQP9DU3_QNO_oGnuXGfb-DZdYr7zbCm5_VW3fy8r3PwnUsfjx9sR474Pzg2d2yZz1Iu6NSvH6s9CXx_rhSw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78827158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pilot Study of the Oral Omeprazole Test for Reflux Laryngitis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Metz, David C. ; Childs, Marcia L. ; Ruiz, Cesar ; Weinstein, Gregory S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Metz, David C. ; Childs, Marcia L. ; Ruiz, Cesar ; Weinstein, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease occasionally presents with laryngeal symptoms. Such patients are often referred for a gastroenterology evaluation. This study was designed to determine whether an empiric trial of high-dose omeprazole therapy could reliably identify patients with reflux laryngitis and thus obviate the need for a gastroenterology workup. METHODS: Patients were evaluated with a history, physical examination, esophageal manometry, upper endoscopy, and 24-hour pH-metry for determination of the presence or absence of underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease and then received an empiric trial of oral omeprazole therapy (20 mg twice daily for 1 month). A positive omeprazole test result was defined as resolution of all laryngeal symptoms on completion of the empiric trial of therapy. RESULTS: Two patients were classified as having no reflux, and eight were classified as having reflux. Omeprazole test results were positive in six patients. Five of six had reflux, but one patient had no evidence for reflux. Omeprazole test results were negative in four patients. Three of four had reflux, and one did not. Despite the absence of antisecretory therapy, laryngeal symptoms did not recur in either patient without reflux during follow-up. Laryngeal symptoms were managed in two of the three patients with reflux who had negative omeprazole test results and who were using inhalers in combination with histamine H2 receptor antagonist therapy for their reflux disease. One patient with reflux who had a negative omeprazole test result responded to higher doses of omeprazole, and the five patients with reflux who had positive omeprazole test results all responded to continuation of omeprazole. CONCLUSIONS: The omeprazole test may be useful in confirming the suspicion of reflux laryngitis in patients suspected of having this disease after an otolaryngology evaluation. However, there is a potential for false-positive and false-negative test results. A gastroenterology evaluation may aid in the identification of false-positive test results by documenting the absence of reflux in certain responders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-5998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0194-59989770350-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9018256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Aged ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - complications ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy ; Humans ; Laryngitis - etiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Omeprazole - administration &amp; dosage ; Omeprazole - therapeutic use ; Pilot Projects ; Predictive Value of Tests</subject><ispartof>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 1997-01, Vol.116 (1), p.41-46</ispartof><rights>1997 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>1997 American Association of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO‐HNSF)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-1145ec8db028901cafef1b198c84b4e6482199df8bed0e0168b7377727a78d363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-1145ec8db028901cafef1b198c84b4e6482199df8bed0e0168b7377727a78d363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9018256$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Metz, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Childs, Marcia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><title>Pilot Study of the Oral Omeprazole Test for Reflux Laryngitis</title><title>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</title><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease occasionally presents with laryngeal symptoms. Such patients are often referred for a gastroenterology evaluation. This study was designed to determine whether an empiric trial of high-dose omeprazole therapy could reliably identify patients with reflux laryngitis and thus obviate the need for a gastroenterology workup. METHODS: Patients were evaluated with a history, physical examination, esophageal manometry, upper endoscopy, and 24-hour pH-metry for determination of the presence or absence of underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease and then received an empiric trial of oral omeprazole therapy (20 mg twice daily for 1 month). A positive omeprazole test result was defined as resolution of all laryngeal symptoms on completion of the empiric trial of therapy. RESULTS: Two patients were classified as having no reflux, and eight were classified as having reflux. Omeprazole test results were positive in six patients. Five of six had reflux, but one patient had no evidence for reflux. Omeprazole test results were negative in four patients. Three of four had reflux, and one did not. Despite the absence of antisecretory therapy, laryngeal symptoms did not recur in either patient without reflux during follow-up. Laryngeal symptoms were managed in two of the three patients with reflux who had negative omeprazole test results and who were using inhalers in combination with histamine H2 receptor antagonist therapy for their reflux disease. One patient with reflux who had a negative omeprazole test result responded to higher doses of omeprazole, and the five patients with reflux who had positive omeprazole test results all responded to continuation of omeprazole. CONCLUSIONS: The omeprazole test may be useful in confirming the suspicion of reflux laryngitis in patients suspected of having this disease after an otolaryngology evaluation. However, there is a potential for false-positive and false-negative test results. A gastroenterology evaluation may aid in the identification of false-positive test results by documenting the absence of reflux in certain responders.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - complications</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laryngitis - etiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Omeprazole - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Omeprazole - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EKqXwBAjJJ26BdeLEthAHqChFqgii5WzlZ1NSpU2xE0F5egypKk6I0x52Znb2I-SUwQUDFl1OgSnuhUpJJQQEIXh8j_QZKOFFkol90t8JDsmRtQsAiCIheqSngEk_jPrk-qms6oZOmzbf0LqgzSvS2CQVjZe4NslnXSGdoW1oURv6jEXVftBJYjaredmU9pgcFEll8WQ7B-RldDcbjr1JfP8wvJl4mc8BPMZ4iJnMU_Clu5wlBRYsZUpmkqccIy59plReyBRzQPeaTEUghPBFImQeRMGAnHe5a1O_ta6OXpY2w6pKVli3VgspfcFC6YRBJ8xMba3BQq9NuXR9NQP9DU3_QNO_oGnuXGfb-DZdYr7zbCm5_VW3fy8r3PwnUsfjx9sR474Pzg2d2yZz1Iu6NSvH6s9CXx_rhSw</recordid><startdate>199701</startdate><enddate>199701</enddate><creator>Metz, David C.</creator><creator>Childs, Marcia L.</creator><creator>Ruiz, Cesar</creator><creator>Weinstein, Gregory S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199701</creationdate><title>Pilot Study of the Oral Omeprazole Test for Reflux Laryngitis</title><author>Metz, David C. ; Childs, Marcia L. ; Ruiz, Cesar ; Weinstein, Gregory S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-1145ec8db028901cafef1b198c84b4e6482199df8bed0e0168b7377727a78d363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - complications</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laryngitis - etiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Omeprazole - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Omeprazole - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Metz, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Childs, Marcia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Metz, David C.</au><au>Childs, Marcia L.</au><au>Ruiz, Cesar</au><au>Weinstein, Gregory S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pilot Study of the Oral Omeprazole Test for Reflux Laryngitis</atitle><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><date>1997-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>41-46</pages><issn>0194-5998</issn><eissn>1097-6817</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease occasionally presents with laryngeal symptoms. Such patients are often referred for a gastroenterology evaluation. This study was designed to determine whether an empiric trial of high-dose omeprazole therapy could reliably identify patients with reflux laryngitis and thus obviate the need for a gastroenterology workup. METHODS: Patients were evaluated with a history, physical examination, esophageal manometry, upper endoscopy, and 24-hour pH-metry for determination of the presence or absence of underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease and then received an empiric trial of oral omeprazole therapy (20 mg twice daily for 1 month). A positive omeprazole test result was defined as resolution of all laryngeal symptoms on completion of the empiric trial of therapy. RESULTS: Two patients were classified as having no reflux, and eight were classified as having reflux. Omeprazole test results were positive in six patients. Five of six had reflux, but one patient had no evidence for reflux. Omeprazole test results were negative in four patients. Three of four had reflux, and one did not. Despite the absence of antisecretory therapy, laryngeal symptoms did not recur in either patient without reflux during follow-up. Laryngeal symptoms were managed in two of the three patients with reflux who had negative omeprazole test results and who were using inhalers in combination with histamine H2 receptor antagonist therapy for their reflux disease. One patient with reflux who had a negative omeprazole test result responded to higher doses of omeprazole, and the five patients with reflux who had positive omeprazole test results all responded to continuation of omeprazole. CONCLUSIONS: The omeprazole test may be useful in confirming the suspicion of reflux laryngitis in patients suspected of having this disease after an otolaryngology evaluation. However, there is a potential for false-positive and false-negative test results. A gastroenterology evaluation may aid in the identification of false-positive test results by documenting the absence of reflux in certain responders.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>9018256</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0194-59989770350-4</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0194-5998
ispartof Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 1997-01, Vol.116 (1), p.41-46
issn 0194-5998
1097-6817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78827158
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Administration, Oral
Adult
Aged
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Gastroesophageal Reflux - complications
Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis
Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy
Humans
Laryngitis - etiology
Male
Middle Aged
Omeprazole - administration & dosage
Omeprazole - therapeutic use
Pilot Projects
Predictive Value of Tests
title Pilot Study of the Oral Omeprazole Test for Reflux Laryngitis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A58%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pilot%20Study%20of%20the%20Oral%20Omeprazole%20Test%20for%20Reflux%20Laryngitis&rft.jtitle=Otolaryngology-head%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=Metz,%20David%20C.&rft.date=1997-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=41-46&rft.issn=0194-5998&rft.eissn=1097-6817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0194-59989770350-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78827158%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-1145ec8db028901cafef1b198c84b4e6482199df8bed0e0168b7377727a78d363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78827158&rft_id=info:pmid/9018256&rft_sage_id=10.1016_S0194-59989770350-4&rfr_iscdi=true