Loading…

Congenital rubella syndrome in the United States, 1970-1985: on the verge of elimination

The National Congenital Rubella Syndrome Registry, a passive surveillance system, and the Birth Defects Monitoring Program, a newborn hospital discharge data set, are used to monitor the incidence of congenital rubella syndrome in the United States. Reports to the registry contain clinical and labor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of epidemiology 1989-02, Vol.129 (2), p.349-361
Main Authors: COCHI, S. L, EDMONDS, L. E, DYER, K, GREAVES, W. L, MARKS, J. S, ROVIRA, E. Z, PREBLUD, S. R, ORENSTEIN, W. A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 361
container_issue 2
container_start_page 349
container_title American journal of epidemiology
container_volume 129
creator COCHI, S. L
EDMONDS, L. E
DYER, K
GREAVES, W. L
MARKS, J. S
ROVIRA, E. Z
PREBLUD, S. R
ORENSTEIN, W. A
description The National Congenital Rubella Syndrome Registry, a passive surveillance system, and the Birth Defects Monitoring Program, a newborn hospital discharge data set, are used to monitor the incidence of congenital rubella syndrome in the United States. Reports to the registry contain clinical and laboratory data which allow cases to be classified into six categories according to the likelihood of having congenital rubella syndrome. The monitoring program records newborn discharge diagnoses, without detailed information, of a nonrandom sample of about one fourth of the births in the United States annually. To evaluate the two systems and to estimate the actual incidence of congenital rubella syndrome, the authors collected hospital discharge summaries on all cases as reported by the monitoring program from 1970-1985 and classified them by the registry criteria. Of the 392 cases reported to the monitoring program during 1970-1985, 24% (n = 93) could be classified as confirmed or compatible compared with 79% (n = 415) of the 526 cases reported to the registry (rate ratio = 3.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-3.8). Diagnosis of congenital rubella syndrome was made during the neonatal period for 68% (263 of 389) registry cases for whom such data were available. When the Lincoln-Peterson capture-recapture method of estimating population size for independent surveillance systems was used, an estimated 1,064 confirmed and compatible cases (95% CI 668-1,460) diagnosed during the neonatal period occurred during 1970-1979, for an average of 106 cases per year. During 1980-1985, an estimate of 122 neonatal confirmed and compatible cases (95% CI 8-236) occurred, for an average of 20 cases per year. A downward secular trend in the incidence of congenital rubella syndrome beginning in 1980 was observed. The registry detected 22% of all neonatal confirmed and compatible cases, the monitoring program detected 8%, and the two systems combined detected a total of 28%. The results indicate that congenital rubella syndrome may be on the verge of elimination in the United States.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115138
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78846715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1306654226</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p294t-fed2792894ad32c05c0080fa039b21ad3ce4c14c8ecd5d9de8e8f298e95d39183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1r3DAQBmBRGtLNtj-hINqQU7wdSZYs5RaWfEEghyTQm9FK49SLLW0lO2T_fVzi9tBLToJ5H4bRS8g3BisGRvyIL01MfhvHFGyXV3aLK8uYZEJ_IAtWVqpQXKqPZAEAvDBc8U_kKOctAGNGwiE55IZxKOWC_FzH8IShHWxH07jBrrM074NPsUfaBjr8Qvo4xejp_WAHzKeUmQoKZrQ8o_ENPGN6Qhobil3bt8EObQyfyUEzHYdf5ndJHi8vHtbXxe3d1c36_LbYcVMORYOeV4ZrU1ovuAPpADQ0FoTZcDbNHJaOlU6j89Ibjxp1w41GI70wTIslOXnbu0vx94h5qPs2uz__CBjHXFdal6pi8l049cdBy2qC3_-Df5uumQClZMm5mtTXWY2bHn29S21v076em53y4zm32dmuSTa4Nv9jlQCtuBCvgMWKYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1306654226</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Congenital rubella syndrome in the United States, 1970-1985: on the verge of elimination</title><source>Oxford University Press Archive</source><creator>COCHI, S. L ; EDMONDS, L. E ; DYER, K ; GREAVES, W. L ; MARKS, J. S ; ROVIRA, E. Z ; PREBLUD, S. R ; ORENSTEIN, W. A</creator><creatorcontrib>COCHI, S. L ; EDMONDS, L. E ; DYER, K ; GREAVES, W. L ; MARKS, J. S ; ROVIRA, E. Z ; PREBLUD, S. R ; ORENSTEIN, W. A</creatorcontrib><description>The National Congenital Rubella Syndrome Registry, a passive surveillance system, and the Birth Defects Monitoring Program, a newborn hospital discharge data set, are used to monitor the incidence of congenital rubella syndrome in the United States. Reports to the registry contain clinical and laboratory data which allow cases to be classified into six categories according to the likelihood of having congenital rubella syndrome. The monitoring program records newborn discharge diagnoses, without detailed information, of a nonrandom sample of about one fourth of the births in the United States annually. To evaluate the two systems and to estimate the actual incidence of congenital rubella syndrome, the authors collected hospital discharge summaries on all cases as reported by the monitoring program from 1970-1985 and classified them by the registry criteria. Of the 392 cases reported to the monitoring program during 1970-1985, 24% (n = 93) could be classified as confirmed or compatible compared with 79% (n = 415) of the 526 cases reported to the registry (rate ratio = 3.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-3.8). Diagnosis of congenital rubella syndrome was made during the neonatal period for 68% (263 of 389) registry cases for whom such data were available. When the Lincoln-Peterson capture-recapture method of estimating population size for independent surveillance systems was used, an estimated 1,064 confirmed and compatible cases (95% CI 668-1,460) diagnosed during the neonatal period occurred during 1970-1979, for an average of 106 cases per year. During 1980-1985, an estimate of 122 neonatal confirmed and compatible cases (95% CI 8-236) occurred, for an average of 20 cases per year. A downward secular trend in the incidence of congenital rubella syndrome beginning in 1980 was observed. The registry detected 22% of all neonatal confirmed and compatible cases, the monitoring program detected 8%, and the two systems combined detected a total of 28%. The results indicate that congenital rubella syndrome may be on the verge of elimination in the United States.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115138</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2912045</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Biological and medical sciences ; Data Collection ; Disease Outbreaks ; Human viral diseases ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences ; Patient Discharge ; Population Surveillance ; Random Allocation ; Registries ; Research Design ; Rubella - epidemiology ; Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - classification ; Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - diagnosis ; Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - epidemiology ; Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - prevention &amp; control ; Time Factors ; United States ; Viral diseases ; Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 1989-02, Vol.129 (2), p.349-361</ispartof><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7308623$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2912045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>COCHI, S. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EDMONDS, L. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DYER, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREAVES, W. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARKS, J. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROVIRA, E. Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PREBLUD, S. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ORENSTEIN, W. A</creatorcontrib><title>Congenital rubella syndrome in the United States, 1970-1985: on the verge of elimination</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>The National Congenital Rubella Syndrome Registry, a passive surveillance system, and the Birth Defects Monitoring Program, a newborn hospital discharge data set, are used to monitor the incidence of congenital rubella syndrome in the United States. Reports to the registry contain clinical and laboratory data which allow cases to be classified into six categories according to the likelihood of having congenital rubella syndrome. The monitoring program records newborn discharge diagnoses, without detailed information, of a nonrandom sample of about one fourth of the births in the United States annually. To evaluate the two systems and to estimate the actual incidence of congenital rubella syndrome, the authors collected hospital discharge summaries on all cases as reported by the monitoring program from 1970-1985 and classified them by the registry criteria. Of the 392 cases reported to the monitoring program during 1970-1985, 24% (n = 93) could be classified as confirmed or compatible compared with 79% (n = 415) of the 526 cases reported to the registry (rate ratio = 3.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-3.8). Diagnosis of congenital rubella syndrome was made during the neonatal period for 68% (263 of 389) registry cases for whom such data were available. When the Lincoln-Peterson capture-recapture method of estimating population size for independent surveillance systems was used, an estimated 1,064 confirmed and compatible cases (95% CI 668-1,460) diagnosed during the neonatal period occurred during 1970-1979, for an average of 106 cases per year. During 1980-1985, an estimate of 122 neonatal confirmed and compatible cases (95% CI 8-236) occurred, for an average of 20 cases per year. A downward secular trend in the incidence of congenital rubella syndrome beginning in 1980 was observed. The registry detected 22% of all neonatal confirmed and compatible cases, the monitoring program detected 8%, and the two systems combined detected a total of 28%. The results indicate that congenital rubella syndrome may be on the verge of elimination in the United States.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks</subject><subject>Human viral diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Rubella - epidemiology</subject><subject>Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - classification</subject><subject>Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - diagnosis</subject><subject>Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - epidemiology</subject><subject>Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0E1r3DAQBmBRGtLNtj-hINqQU7wdSZYs5RaWfEEghyTQm9FK49SLLW0lO2T_fVzi9tBLToJ5H4bRS8g3BisGRvyIL01MfhvHFGyXV3aLK8uYZEJ_IAtWVqpQXKqPZAEAvDBc8U_kKOctAGNGwiE55IZxKOWC_FzH8IShHWxH07jBrrM074NPsUfaBjr8Qvo4xejp_WAHzKeUmQoKZrQ8o_ENPGN6Qhobil3bt8EObQyfyUEzHYdf5ndJHi8vHtbXxe3d1c36_LbYcVMORYOeV4ZrU1ovuAPpADQ0FoTZcDbNHJaOlU6j89Ibjxp1w41GI70wTIslOXnbu0vx94h5qPs2uz__CBjHXFdal6pi8l049cdBy2qC3_-Df5uumQClZMm5mtTXWY2bHn29S21v076em53y4zm32dmuSTa4Nv9jlQCtuBCvgMWKYg</recordid><startdate>19890201</startdate><enddate>19890201</enddate><creator>COCHI, S. L</creator><creator>EDMONDS, L. E</creator><creator>DYER, K</creator><creator>GREAVES, W. L</creator><creator>MARKS, J. S</creator><creator>ROVIRA, E. Z</creator><creator>PREBLUD, S. R</creator><creator>ORENSTEIN, W. A</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>School of Hygiene and Public Health of the Johns Hopkins University</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890201</creationdate><title>Congenital rubella syndrome in the United States, 1970-1985: on the verge of elimination</title><author>COCHI, S. L ; EDMONDS, L. E ; DYER, K ; GREAVES, W. L ; MARKS, J. S ; ROVIRA, E. Z ; PREBLUD, S. R ; ORENSTEIN, W. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p294t-fed2792894ad32c05c0080fa039b21ad3ce4c14c8ecd5d9de8e8f298e95d39183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks</topic><topic>Human viral diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Rubella - epidemiology</topic><topic>Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - classification</topic><topic>Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - diagnosis</topic><topic>Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - epidemiology</topic><topic>Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>COCHI, S. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EDMONDS, L. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DYER, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREAVES, W. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARKS, J. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROVIRA, E. Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PREBLUD, S. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ORENSTEIN, W. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>COCHI, S. L</au><au>EDMONDS, L. E</au><au>DYER, K</au><au>GREAVES, W. L</au><au>MARKS, J. S</au><au>ROVIRA, E. Z</au><au>PREBLUD, S. R</au><au>ORENSTEIN, W. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Congenital rubella syndrome in the United States, 1970-1985: on the verge of elimination</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1989-02-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>349-361</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><coden>AJEPAS</coden><abstract>The National Congenital Rubella Syndrome Registry, a passive surveillance system, and the Birth Defects Monitoring Program, a newborn hospital discharge data set, are used to monitor the incidence of congenital rubella syndrome in the United States. Reports to the registry contain clinical and laboratory data which allow cases to be classified into six categories according to the likelihood of having congenital rubella syndrome. The monitoring program records newborn discharge diagnoses, without detailed information, of a nonrandom sample of about one fourth of the births in the United States annually. To evaluate the two systems and to estimate the actual incidence of congenital rubella syndrome, the authors collected hospital discharge summaries on all cases as reported by the monitoring program from 1970-1985 and classified them by the registry criteria. Of the 392 cases reported to the monitoring program during 1970-1985, 24% (n = 93) could be classified as confirmed or compatible compared with 79% (n = 415) of the 526 cases reported to the registry (rate ratio = 3.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-3.8). Diagnosis of congenital rubella syndrome was made during the neonatal period for 68% (263 of 389) registry cases for whom such data were available. When the Lincoln-Peterson capture-recapture method of estimating population size for independent surveillance systems was used, an estimated 1,064 confirmed and compatible cases (95% CI 668-1,460) diagnosed during the neonatal period occurred during 1970-1979, for an average of 106 cases per year. During 1980-1985, an estimate of 122 neonatal confirmed and compatible cases (95% CI 8-236) occurred, for an average of 20 cases per year. A downward secular trend in the incidence of congenital rubella syndrome beginning in 1980 was observed. The registry detected 22% of all neonatal confirmed and compatible cases, the monitoring program detected 8%, and the two systems combined detected a total of 28%. The results indicate that congenital rubella syndrome may be on the verge of elimination in the United States.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>2912045</pmid><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115138</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9262
ispartof American journal of epidemiology, 1989-02, Vol.129 (2), p.349-361
issn 0002-9262
1476-6256
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78846715
source Oxford University Press Archive
subjects Age Factors
Biological and medical sciences
Data Collection
Disease Outbreaks
Human viral diseases
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Infectious diseases
Medical sciences
Patient Discharge
Population Surveillance
Random Allocation
Registries
Research Design
Rubella - epidemiology
Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - classification
Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - diagnosis
Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - epidemiology
Rubella Syndrome, Congenital - prevention & control
Time Factors
United States
Viral diseases
Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye
title Congenital rubella syndrome in the United States, 1970-1985: on the verge of elimination
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A11%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Congenital%20rubella%20syndrome%20in%20the%20United%20States,%201970-1985:%20on%20the%20verge%20of%20elimination&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=COCHI,%20S.%20L&rft.date=1989-02-01&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=349-361&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft.coden=AJEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115138&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1306654226%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p294t-fed2792894ad32c05c0080fa039b21ad3ce4c14c8ecd5d9de8e8f298e95d39183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1306654226&rft_id=info:pmid/2912045&rfr_iscdi=true