Loading…

A major, novel systemic lupus erythematosus autoantibody class recognizes the E, F, and G Sm snRNP proteins as an E‐F‐G complex but not in their denatured states

Objective. To determine whether the E, F, and G Sm proteins present antigenic determinants recognized by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patient sera, and if so, whether the antigenicity depends on the native conformations of the polypeptides and/or is E‐F‐G complex restricted. Methods. Radioimmu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arthritis and rheumatism 1997-04, Vol.40 (4), p.672-682
Main Authors: Brahms, Hero, Raker, Veronica A., van Venrooij, Walther J., Lührmann, Reinhard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective. To determine whether the E, F, and G Sm proteins present antigenic determinants recognized by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patient sera, and if so, whether the antigenicity depends on the native conformations of the polypeptides and/or is E‐F‐G complex restricted. Methods. Radioimmunoprecipitation, epitope tagging, expression polymerase chain reaction, in vitro translation, in vitro reconstitution, and immunoblotting. Results. Most of the anti‐Sm SLE patient sera tested reacted with one or more of the E, F, and G proteins in immunoprecipitation studies but not on immunoblots. All sera, however, highly efficiently immunoprecipitated the E‐F‐G complex. This complex recognition was detected exclusively in anti‐Sm patient sera but not in patient sera with other serotypes. Conclusion. We demonstrate the presence of a novel and abundant anti‐Sm autoantibody class in SLE patient sera which exclusively or predominantly recognizes conformational Sm epitopes present on the E‐F‐G complex but not on the denatured proteins. This complex recognition is highly specific for sera of the anti‐Sm serotype and may be relevant for clinical diagnosis as well as for understanding the etiology of anti‐Sm auto‐antibody production.
ISSN:0004-3591
1529-0131
DOI:10.1002/art.1780400412