Trial of labour after previous caesarean section in rural Zimbabwe

Objective: Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section is widely accepted in Western countries. Is a trial of labour in rural Africa also safe for mother and child? Study Design: In a case control study in rural Zimbabwe the outcome of labour of 281 women who had one or more previous caesarean...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 1997-03, Vol.72 (1), p.9-14
Main Authors: Spaans, Wilbert A., van der Velde, Frans H., van Roosmalen, Jos
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Cesarean Section
Delivery, Obstetric
Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Maternal, fetal and perinatal monitoring
Medical sciences
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Previous caesarean section
Rural Population
Scar rupture
Trial of Labor
Trial of labour
Tropical medicine
Zimbabwe
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section is widely accepted in Western countries. Is a trial of labour in rural Africa also safe for mother and child? Study Design: In a case control study in rural Zimbabwe the outcome of labour of 281 women who had one or more previous caesarean sections was compared with 4501 women who had no previous caesarean section. Maternal and perinatal mortality, the percentage of vaginal birth and factors related to the achievement of vaginal delivery were studied. Data were tested for statistical significance with a Mantel-Haenszel equation for odds ratio's. Results: No elective caesarean sections were performed. After previous caesarean section, 124 (44%) out of 281 women had a vaginal birth. One scar rupture occurred in a woman with thyrotoxicosis. Perinatal and maternal outcome did not differ significantly between cases and controls. A history of more than one previous caesarean section (Odds Ratio (OR) = 10.0; 95% Confidence Interval (CI 95%) = 4.4–23.8) or a previous caesarean section for cephalopelvic disproportion (OR = 6.2; CI 95% 3.2–12.0) increased the risk for a repeat caesarean section significantly. Conclusion: A policy to allow all women a trial of labour after a previous caesarean section did not increase adverse pregnancy outcome. Also in rural Africa it seems rational to encourage a trial of labour after one or more previous caesarean sections.
ISSN:0301-2115
1872-7654
DOI:10.1016/S0301-2115(96)02646-2