Loading…

Duration of Tick Attachment as a Predictor of the Risk of Lyme Disease in an Area in which Lyme Disease Is Endemic

Animal studies have shown an exponential increase in the risk of Borrelia burgdorferi infection after 48–72 h of deer tick attachment. Persons with tick bites were prospectively studied to determine if those with prolonged tick attachment constitute a high-risk group for infection. Ticks were identi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of infectious diseases 1997-04, Vol.175 (4), p.996-999
Main Authors: Sood, Sunil K., Salzman, Mark B., Johnson, Barbara J. B., Happ, Christine M., Feig, Kevin, Carmody, Lillian, Rubin, Lorry G., Hilton, Eileen, Piesman, Joseph
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-520260e25ff3c7dc40bb32b509767753a25a6cb8e1c2962a383f3c60fb8744b73
cites
container_end_page 999
container_issue 4
container_start_page 996
container_title The Journal of infectious diseases
container_volume 175
creator Sood, Sunil K.
Salzman, Mark B.
Johnson, Barbara J. B.
Happ, Christine M.
Feig, Kevin
Carmody, Lillian
Rubin, Lorry G.
Hilton, Eileen
Piesman, Joseph
description Animal studies have shown an exponential increase in the risk of Borrelia burgdorferi infection after 48–72 h of deer tick attachment. Persons with tick bites were prospectively studied to determine if those with prolonged tick attachment constitute a high-risk group for infection. Ticks were identified, measured for engorgement, and assayed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for B. burgdorferi DNA. Duration of attachment was determined from the scutal index of engorgement. Of 316 submissions, 229 were deer ticks; 14% were positive by PCR. Paired sera and an intact tick for determination of duration of attachment were available for 105 subjects (109 bites). There were 4 human cases (3.7% of bites) of B. burgdorferi infection. The incidence was significantly higher for duration of attachment ⩾72 h than for
doi_str_mv 10.1086/514009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78928349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>30129446</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30129446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-520260e25ff3c7dc40bb32b509767753a25a6cb8e1c2962a383f3c60fb8744b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtrGzEURkVoSZ1H_0FBlJLdtHo_lo6dxKEuCSGB0I3QyBos2zOTSBqa_PvMYOM-Nl3dC-fou4gPgI8YfcVIiW8cM4T0ARhhTmUhBKbvwAghQgqstP4AjlJaIYQYFfIQHOr-CRZqBOK0izaHtoFtBe-DW8NxztYta99kaBO08Db6RXC5jYORlx7ehbQe9vlr7eE0JG-Th6GBtoHj6O2w_loGt_xbuE7woln4OrgT8L6ym-RPd_MYPFxe3E9mxfzm6noynheOM5ULThARyBNeVdTJhWOoLCkpOdJSSMmpJdwKVyqPHdGCWKpoLwpUlUoyVkp6DM62uU-xfe58yqYOyfnNxja-7ZKRShNFmf6viLmWUpEh8fM_4qrtYtN_whBCNVaS_HHWxTal6CvzFENt46vByAxVmW1Vvfhpl9aVtV_stV03Pf-y4zY5u6mibVxIe40IorBCv2NWqS9pjynCRDMmel5seUjZv-y5jWsjJJXczB5_mvPvkx-KTs_NjL4Bkoqvbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223918727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Duration of Tick Attachment as a Predictor of the Risk of Lyme Disease in an Area in which Lyme Disease Is Endemic</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Sood, Sunil K. ; Salzman, Mark B. ; Johnson, Barbara J. B. ; Happ, Christine M. ; Feig, Kevin ; Carmody, Lillian ; Rubin, Lorry G. ; Hilton, Eileen ; Piesman, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Sood, Sunil K. ; Salzman, Mark B. ; Johnson, Barbara J. B. ; Happ, Christine M. ; Feig, Kevin ; Carmody, Lillian ; Rubin, Lorry G. ; Hilton, Eileen ; Piesman, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>Animal studies have shown an exponential increase in the risk of Borrelia burgdorferi infection after 48–72 h of deer tick attachment. Persons with tick bites were prospectively studied to determine if those with prolonged tick attachment constitute a high-risk group for infection. Ticks were identified, measured for engorgement, and assayed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for B. burgdorferi DNA. Duration of attachment was determined from the scutal index of engorgement. Of 316 submissions, 229 were deer ticks; 14% were positive by PCR. Paired sera and an intact tick for determination of duration of attachment were available for 105 subjects (109 bites). There were 4 human cases (3.7% of bites) of B. burgdorferi infection. The incidence was significantly higher for duration of attachment ⩾72 h than for &lt;72 h: 3 (20%) of 15 vs. 1 (1.1%) of 94 (P = .008; odds ratio, 23.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.2–242). PCR was an unreliable predictor of infection. Tick identification and measurement of engorgement can be used to identify a small, high-risk subset of persons who may benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/514009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9086168</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDIAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacterial diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Borrelia burgdorferi ; Borrelia burgdorferi Group - isolation &amp; purification ; Borrelia infections ; Concise Communications ; DNA, Bacterial - analysis ; Erythema ; Hematophagic engorgement ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Insect Vectors - microbiology ; Ixodes scapularis ; Ixodidae ; Lyme disease ; Lyme Disease - etiology ; Medical sciences ; Nymphs ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Preventive medicine ; Prospective Studies ; Risk ; Spirochaetales ; Ticks ; Ticks - microbiology ; Time Factors ; Tropical bacterial diseases</subject><ispartof>The Journal of infectious diseases, 1997-04, Vol.175 (4), p.996-999</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1997 University of Chicago</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Apr 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-520260e25ff3c7dc40bb32b509767753a25a6cb8e1c2962a383f3c60fb8744b73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2628180$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9086168$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sood, Sunil K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salzman, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Barbara J. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Happ, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feig, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmody, Lillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Lorry G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilton, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piesman, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>Duration of Tick Attachment as a Predictor of the Risk of Lyme Disease in an Area in which Lyme Disease Is Endemic</title><title>The Journal of infectious diseases</title><addtitle>J Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Animal studies have shown an exponential increase in the risk of Borrelia burgdorferi infection after 48–72 h of deer tick attachment. Persons with tick bites were prospectively studied to determine if those with prolonged tick attachment constitute a high-risk group for infection. Ticks were identified, measured for engorgement, and assayed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for B. burgdorferi DNA. Duration of attachment was determined from the scutal index of engorgement. Of 316 submissions, 229 were deer ticks; 14% were positive by PCR. Paired sera and an intact tick for determination of duration of attachment were available for 105 subjects (109 bites). There were 4 human cases (3.7% of bites) of B. burgdorferi infection. The incidence was significantly higher for duration of attachment ⩾72 h than for &lt;72 h: 3 (20%) of 15 vs. 1 (1.1%) of 94 (P = .008; odds ratio, 23.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.2–242). PCR was an unreliable predictor of infection. Tick identification and measurement of engorgement can be used to identify a small, high-risk subset of persons who may benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Borrelia burgdorferi</subject><subject>Borrelia burgdorferi Group - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Borrelia infections</subject><subject>Concise Communications</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</subject><subject>Erythema</subject><subject>Hematophagic engorgement</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Insect Vectors - microbiology</subject><subject>Ixodes scapularis</subject><subject>Ixodidae</subject><subject>Lyme disease</subject><subject>Lyme Disease - etiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nymphs</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Spirochaetales</subject><subject>Ticks</subject><subject>Ticks - microbiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tropical bacterial diseases</subject><issn>0022-1899</issn><issn>1537-6613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtrGzEURkVoSZ1H_0FBlJLdtHo_lo6dxKEuCSGB0I3QyBos2zOTSBqa_PvMYOM-Nl3dC-fou4gPgI8YfcVIiW8cM4T0ARhhTmUhBKbvwAghQgqstP4AjlJaIYQYFfIQHOr-CRZqBOK0izaHtoFtBe-DW8NxztYta99kaBO08Db6RXC5jYORlx7ehbQe9vlr7eE0JG-Th6GBtoHj6O2w_loGt_xbuE7woln4OrgT8L6ym-RPd_MYPFxe3E9mxfzm6noynheOM5ULThARyBNeVdTJhWOoLCkpOdJSSMmpJdwKVyqPHdGCWKpoLwpUlUoyVkp6DM62uU-xfe58yqYOyfnNxja-7ZKRShNFmf6viLmWUpEh8fM_4qrtYtN_whBCNVaS_HHWxTal6CvzFENt46vByAxVmW1Vvfhpl9aVtV_stV03Pf-y4zY5u6mibVxIe40IorBCv2NWqS9pjynCRDMmel5seUjZv-y5jWsjJJXczB5_mvPvkx-KTs_NjL4Bkoqvbg</recordid><startdate>19970401</startdate><enddate>19970401</enddate><creator>Sood, Sunil K.</creator><creator>Salzman, Mark B.</creator><creator>Johnson, Barbara J. B.</creator><creator>Happ, Christine M.</creator><creator>Feig, Kevin</creator><creator>Carmody, Lillian</creator><creator>Rubin, Lorry G.</creator><creator>Hilton, Eileen</creator><creator>Piesman, Joseph</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970401</creationdate><title>Duration of Tick Attachment as a Predictor of the Risk of Lyme Disease in an Area in which Lyme Disease Is Endemic</title><author>Sood, Sunil K. ; Salzman, Mark B. ; Johnson, Barbara J. B. ; Happ, Christine M. ; Feig, Kevin ; Carmody, Lillian ; Rubin, Lorry G. ; Hilton, Eileen ; Piesman, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-520260e25ff3c7dc40bb32b509767753a25a6cb8e1c2962a383f3c60fb8744b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Borrelia burgdorferi</topic><topic>Borrelia burgdorferi Group - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Borrelia infections</topic><topic>Concise Communications</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</topic><topic>Erythema</topic><topic>Hematophagic engorgement</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Insect Vectors - microbiology</topic><topic>Ixodes scapularis</topic><topic>Ixodidae</topic><topic>Lyme disease</topic><topic>Lyme Disease - etiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nymphs</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Spirochaetales</topic><topic>Ticks</topic><topic>Ticks - microbiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tropical bacterial diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sood, Sunil K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salzman, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Barbara J. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Happ, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feig, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmody, Lillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Lorry G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilton, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piesman, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sood, Sunil K.</au><au>Salzman, Mark B.</au><au>Johnson, Barbara J. B.</au><au>Happ, Christine M.</au><au>Feig, Kevin</au><au>Carmody, Lillian</au><au>Rubin, Lorry G.</au><au>Hilton, Eileen</au><au>Piesman, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Duration of Tick Attachment as a Predictor of the Risk of Lyme Disease in an Area in which Lyme Disease Is Endemic</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>J Infect Dis</addtitle><date>1997-04-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>175</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>996</spage><epage>999</epage><pages>996-999</pages><issn>0022-1899</issn><eissn>1537-6613</eissn><coden>JIDIAQ</coden><abstract>Animal studies have shown an exponential increase in the risk of Borrelia burgdorferi infection after 48–72 h of deer tick attachment. Persons with tick bites were prospectively studied to determine if those with prolonged tick attachment constitute a high-risk group for infection. Ticks were identified, measured for engorgement, and assayed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for B. burgdorferi DNA. Duration of attachment was determined from the scutal index of engorgement. Of 316 submissions, 229 were deer ticks; 14% were positive by PCR. Paired sera and an intact tick for determination of duration of attachment were available for 105 subjects (109 bites). There were 4 human cases (3.7% of bites) of B. burgdorferi infection. The incidence was significantly higher for duration of attachment ⩾72 h than for &lt;72 h: 3 (20%) of 15 vs. 1 (1.1%) of 94 (P = .008; odds ratio, 23.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.2–242). PCR was an unreliable predictor of infection. Tick identification and measurement of engorgement can be used to identify a small, high-risk subset of persons who may benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>9086168</pmid><doi>10.1086/514009</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1899
ispartof The Journal of infectious diseases, 1997-04, Vol.175 (4), p.996-999
issn 0022-1899
1537-6613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78928349
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Animals
Bacterial diseases
Biological and medical sciences
Borrelia burgdorferi
Borrelia burgdorferi Group - isolation & purification
Borrelia infections
Concise Communications
DNA, Bacterial - analysis
Erythema
Hematophagic engorgement
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Infections
Infectious diseases
Insect Vectors - microbiology
Ixodes scapularis
Ixodidae
Lyme disease
Lyme Disease - etiology
Medical sciences
Nymphs
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Preventive medicine
Prospective Studies
Risk
Spirochaetales
Ticks
Ticks - microbiology
Time Factors
Tropical bacterial diseases
title Duration of Tick Attachment as a Predictor of the Risk of Lyme Disease in an Area in which Lyme Disease Is Endemic
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T08%3A58%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Duration%20of%20Tick%20Attachment%20as%20a%20Predictor%20of%20the%20Risk%20of%20Lyme%20Disease%20in%20an%20Area%20in%20which%20Lyme%20Disease%20Is%20Endemic&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Sood,%20Sunil%20K.&rft.date=1997-04-01&rft.volume=175&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=996&rft.epage=999&rft.pages=996-999&rft.issn=0022-1899&rft.eissn=1537-6613&rft.coden=JIDIAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/514009&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30129446%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-520260e25ff3c7dc40bb32b509767753a25a6cb8e1c2962a383f3c60fb8744b73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223918727&rft_id=info:pmid/9086168&rft_jstor_id=30129446&rfr_iscdi=true