Comparison of different methods of temporomandibular joint disc reconstruction ‐ An animal model

• Published in: Australian dental journal 1997-04, Vol.42 (2), p.121-124
• Main Authors: Ogi, Nobumi, Ishimaru, Jun‐Ichi, Kurita, Kenichi, Handa, Yujiro, Jones, Robert H. B., Goss, Alastair N.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: animal models; Animals; Cartilage - transplantation; Dentistry; Disease Models, Animal; Follow-Up Studies; Osteoarthritis - pathology; Osteoarthritis - surgery; Sheep; surgery; Temporomandibular joint; Temporomandibular Joint - pathology; Temporomandibular Joint - surgery; Temporomandibular Joint Disc - pathology; Temporomandibular Joint Disc - surgery; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - pathology; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - surgery
• ISSN: 0045-0421; 1834-7819
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1997.tb00108.x

The optimum method of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconstruction has not been defined despite numerous surgical treatments and several well controlled clinical trials. Animal models offer an experimental method allowing direct comparison of standardized surgical techniques. Advanced osteoarthrosis was induced bilaterally in 12 mature merino sheep. Three months later unilateral surgical reconstruction was performed. Four sheep had discectomy alone, four discectomy with fresh TMJ disc grafts, and four discectomy with fresh auricular grafts. All three surgical methods resulted in some reversal and repair of the osteoarthritic process, with the best result being from the auricular graft, next discectomy alone, next the disc graft, with the untreated osteoarthritic joint showing the most advanced pathosis. This study supports the role of surgical reconstruction in advanced degenerative disease of the temporomandibular joint, in particular, auricular graft reconstruction.