Loading…

Intravenous Digital Subtraction Angiography and Lung Imaging: Compared Value in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

In a prospective study, 42 consecutive patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism underwent ventilation-perfuston (V-Q) lung Imaging and digital subtraction anglography (DSA) concurrently with selective conventional pulmonary anglography (CPA). Thirty-eight studies achieved within 24 hour...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical nuclear medicine 1989-03, Vol.14 (3), p.183-186
Main Authors: ROSSO, JEAN, MUSSET, DOMINIQUE, PETITPRETZ, PATRICK, MENSCH, JANINE, DUROUX, PIERRE, GALLE, PIERRE, MEIGNAN, MICHEL
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In a prospective study, 42 consecutive patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism underwent ventilation-perfuston (V-Q) lung Imaging and digital subtraction anglography (DSA) concurrently with selective conventional pulmonary anglography (CPA). Thirty-eight studies achieved within 24 hours were reviewed independently by two pairs of observers. The findings were compared using CPA as the gold standard. V-Q lung Imaging had a high percentage of indeterminate results, but none were false negative nor false positive. DSA had a lower percentage of indeterminate results but missed four of the 25 positive cases and erroneously affirmed the presence of pulmonary embolism In three cases. Therefore, the authors think that V-Q lung imaging should remain the screening examination of choice for evaluating patients with suspected pulmonary embollsm.
ISSN:0363-9762
1536-0229
DOI:10.1097/00003072-198903000-00009