Loading…

HIGHEST LEVEL AUTOMATISMS IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM: A THEORY OF FUNCTIONAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE HIGHEST FORMS OF BRAIN FUNCTION

A concept that all hierarchical levels of the nervous system are built according to the same functional principles is proposed. Each level is responsible for a discrete type or set of automatisms, is a learning system, and contains two distinct functional subdivisions: (1) a controller, a subsystem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Progress in neurobiology 1997-02, Vol.51 (2), p.129-166
Main Author: BAEV, KONSTANTIN V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-58289942e7cc3ac525c9e2f9ddef8c4288bd6ee633605b417581b276e4449b1e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-58289942e7cc3ac525c9e2f9ddef8c4288bd6ee633605b417581b276e4449b1e3
container_end_page 166
container_issue 2
container_start_page 129
container_title Progress in neurobiology
container_volume 51
creator BAEV, KONSTANTIN V.
description A concept that all hierarchical levels of the nervous system are built according to the same functional principles is proposed. Each level is responsible for a discrete type or set of automatisms, is a learning system, and contains two distinct functional subdivisions: (1) a controller, a subsystem providing a governing set of rules or commands — a control law — that directs the action of the recipient of these rules — the controlled object; and (2) a model, a subsystem that generates a model of object behavior, i.e. afferent information flow expected from the controlled object. A control system such as this receives two types of afferent signals — initiating and informational. The difference between these signals is that a control system minimizes initiating signals during the realization of an automatism, i.e. a control neural network utilizes informational signals to compute the proper output that minimizes the initiating input signal. A mismatch or error signal, a type of initiating signal, is responsible for learning. Both the control law and the model can be adjusted during learning. The learning process starts when the error signal increases and stops when it is minimized. A network hierarchy is structurally and functionally organized in such a way that a lower control system in the nervous system becomes the controlled object for a higher one. This hierarchy leads to a generalization of encoded functional parameters and, consequently, the working space for each higher level control system becomes more abstracted. This is the reason why each hierarchical level within the control nervous system uses detectors specific for feature of the controlled object and the environment that match the control needs in order to obtain information about the current state of the object in the environment. Movement of information toward higher hierarchical levels also is accompanied by an increase in the duration of initiating signals within each control system. The ability to store a long prehistory of preceding events is considered as the mechanism that necessitated the invention of more complex and more rapid forms of learning such as operant learning, and made possible more complex multistep computational algorithms that require memorization of the results of previous intermediate computations. The functions of the cerebellum, the limbic system and the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops are analyzed to illustrate the utility and applicability of this the
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00053-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79172413</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301008296000536</els_id><sourcerecordid>16433712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-58289942e7cc3ac525c9e2f9ddef8c4288bd6ee633605b417581b276e4449b1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtr20AQx5fQkjhpP0JgT6U5qN2XVru9FNVZ2wJZCnoEfFqs1RhU7DjV2oEe-80rP5JrTgMz_wfMD6FbSr5RQuX3knBCA0IU-6rlHSEk5IG8QCOqIh6ElKoPaPQmuULX3v8eRJITfokuNRORlmyE_s2S6cyUFU7No0lxXFf5PK6Scl7iJMPVzODMFI95XeJyUVZm_gPHh21eLHA-wZM6G1dJnsUpfiiSbJw8pKbEdXZvinSRZNNjwGvDJC-G1MH1q4iH7FfvJ_RxtVx7-HyeN6iemGo8C9J8mozjNHBc010QKqa0Fgwi5_jShSx0GthKty2slBNMqaaVAJJzScJG0ChUtGGRBCGEbijwG_TllPvcb__swe_spvMO1uvlE2z33kaaRkxQ_q6QSsF5RNkgDE9C12-972Fln_tus-z_WkrsgZE9MrIHAFZLe2Rk5eC7PRfsmw20b64zlOH-83SH4R0vHfTWuw6eHLRdD25n2233TsN_c1OVZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16433712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HIGHEST LEVEL AUTOMATISMS IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM: A THEORY OF FUNCTIONAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE HIGHEST FORMS OF BRAIN FUNCTION</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>BAEV, KONSTANTIN V.</creator><creatorcontrib>BAEV, KONSTANTIN V.</creatorcontrib><description>A concept that all hierarchical levels of the nervous system are built according to the same functional principles is proposed. Each level is responsible for a discrete type or set of automatisms, is a learning system, and contains two distinct functional subdivisions: (1) a controller, a subsystem providing a governing set of rules or commands — a control law — that directs the action of the recipient of these rules — the controlled object; and (2) a model, a subsystem that generates a model of object behavior, i.e. afferent information flow expected from the controlled object. A control system such as this receives two types of afferent signals — initiating and informational. The difference between these signals is that a control system minimizes initiating signals during the realization of an automatism, i.e. a control neural network utilizes informational signals to compute the proper output that minimizes the initiating input signal. A mismatch or error signal, a type of initiating signal, is responsible for learning. Both the control law and the model can be adjusted during learning. The learning process starts when the error signal increases and stops when it is minimized. A network hierarchy is structurally and functionally organized in such a way that a lower control system in the nervous system becomes the controlled object for a higher one. This hierarchy leads to a generalization of encoded functional parameters and, consequently, the working space for each higher level control system becomes more abstracted. This is the reason why each hierarchical level within the control nervous system uses detectors specific for feature of the controlled object and the environment that match the control needs in order to obtain information about the current state of the object in the environment. Movement of information toward higher hierarchical levels also is accompanied by an increase in the duration of initiating signals within each control system. The ability to store a long prehistory of preceding events is considered as the mechanism that necessitated the invention of more complex and more rapid forms of learning such as operant learning, and made possible more complex multistep computational algorithms that require memorization of the results of previous intermediate computations. The functions of the cerebellum, the limbic system and the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops are analyzed to illustrate the utility and applicability of this theoretical concept. Basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops are described as modeling, predictive loops, and their dopaminergic innervation as an error distribution system. © 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0082</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00053-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9247962</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Automatism ; Models, Neurological ; Nervous System Physiological Phenomena</subject><ispartof>Progress in neurobiology, 1997-02, Vol.51 (2), p.129-166</ispartof><rights>1997 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-58289942e7cc3ac525c9e2f9ddef8c4288bd6ee633605b417581b276e4449b1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-58289942e7cc3ac525c9e2f9ddef8c4288bd6ee633605b417581b276e4449b1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9247962$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BAEV, KONSTANTIN V.</creatorcontrib><title>HIGHEST LEVEL AUTOMATISMS IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM: A THEORY OF FUNCTIONAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE HIGHEST FORMS OF BRAIN FUNCTION</title><title>Progress in neurobiology</title><addtitle>Prog Neurobiol</addtitle><description>A concept that all hierarchical levels of the nervous system are built according to the same functional principles is proposed. Each level is responsible for a discrete type or set of automatisms, is a learning system, and contains two distinct functional subdivisions: (1) a controller, a subsystem providing a governing set of rules or commands — a control law — that directs the action of the recipient of these rules — the controlled object; and (2) a model, a subsystem that generates a model of object behavior, i.e. afferent information flow expected from the controlled object. A control system such as this receives two types of afferent signals — initiating and informational. The difference between these signals is that a control system minimizes initiating signals during the realization of an automatism, i.e. a control neural network utilizes informational signals to compute the proper output that minimizes the initiating input signal. A mismatch or error signal, a type of initiating signal, is responsible for learning. Both the control law and the model can be adjusted during learning. The learning process starts when the error signal increases and stops when it is minimized. A network hierarchy is structurally and functionally organized in such a way that a lower control system in the nervous system becomes the controlled object for a higher one. This hierarchy leads to a generalization of encoded functional parameters and, consequently, the working space for each higher level control system becomes more abstracted. This is the reason why each hierarchical level within the control nervous system uses detectors specific for feature of the controlled object and the environment that match the control needs in order to obtain information about the current state of the object in the environment. Movement of information toward higher hierarchical levels also is accompanied by an increase in the duration of initiating signals within each control system. The ability to store a long prehistory of preceding events is considered as the mechanism that necessitated the invention of more complex and more rapid forms of learning such as operant learning, and made possible more complex multistep computational algorithms that require memorization of the results of previous intermediate computations. The functions of the cerebellum, the limbic system and the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops are analyzed to illustrate the utility and applicability of this theoretical concept. Basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops are described as modeling, predictive loops, and their dopaminergic innervation as an error distribution system. © 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</description><subject>Automatism</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Nervous System Physiological Phenomena</subject><issn>0301-0082</issn><issn>1873-5118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtr20AQx5fQkjhpP0JgT6U5qN2XVru9FNVZ2wJZCnoEfFqs1RhU7DjV2oEe-80rP5JrTgMz_wfMD6FbSr5RQuX3knBCA0IU-6rlHSEk5IG8QCOqIh6ElKoPaPQmuULX3v8eRJITfokuNRORlmyE_s2S6cyUFU7No0lxXFf5PK6Scl7iJMPVzODMFI95XeJyUVZm_gPHh21eLHA-wZM6G1dJnsUpfiiSbJw8pKbEdXZvinSRZNNjwGvDJC-G1MH1q4iH7FfvJ_RxtVx7-HyeN6iemGo8C9J8mozjNHBc010QKqa0Fgwi5_jShSx0GthKty2slBNMqaaVAJJzScJG0ChUtGGRBCGEbijwG_TllPvcb__swe_spvMO1uvlE2z33kaaRkxQ_q6QSsF5RNkgDE9C12-972Fln_tus-z_WkrsgZE9MrIHAFZLe2Rk5eC7PRfsmw20b64zlOH-83SH4R0vHfTWuw6eHLRdD25n2233TsN_c1OVZg</recordid><startdate>19970201</startdate><enddate>19970201</enddate><creator>BAEV, KONSTANTIN V.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970201</creationdate><title>HIGHEST LEVEL AUTOMATISMS IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM: A THEORY OF FUNCTIONAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE HIGHEST FORMS OF BRAIN FUNCTION</title><author>BAEV, KONSTANTIN V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-58289942e7cc3ac525c9e2f9ddef8c4288bd6ee633605b417581b276e4449b1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Automatism</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Nervous System Physiological Phenomena</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BAEV, KONSTANTIN V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Progress in neurobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BAEV, KONSTANTIN V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HIGHEST LEVEL AUTOMATISMS IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM: A THEORY OF FUNCTIONAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE HIGHEST FORMS OF BRAIN FUNCTION</atitle><jtitle>Progress in neurobiology</jtitle><addtitle>Prog Neurobiol</addtitle><date>1997-02-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>129-166</pages><issn>0301-0082</issn><eissn>1873-5118</eissn><abstract>A concept that all hierarchical levels of the nervous system are built according to the same functional principles is proposed. Each level is responsible for a discrete type or set of automatisms, is a learning system, and contains two distinct functional subdivisions: (1) a controller, a subsystem providing a governing set of rules or commands — a control law — that directs the action of the recipient of these rules — the controlled object; and (2) a model, a subsystem that generates a model of object behavior, i.e. afferent information flow expected from the controlled object. A control system such as this receives two types of afferent signals — initiating and informational. The difference between these signals is that a control system minimizes initiating signals during the realization of an automatism, i.e. a control neural network utilizes informational signals to compute the proper output that minimizes the initiating input signal. A mismatch or error signal, a type of initiating signal, is responsible for learning. Both the control law and the model can be adjusted during learning. The learning process starts when the error signal increases and stops when it is minimized. A network hierarchy is structurally and functionally organized in such a way that a lower control system in the nervous system becomes the controlled object for a higher one. This hierarchy leads to a generalization of encoded functional parameters and, consequently, the working space for each higher level control system becomes more abstracted. This is the reason why each hierarchical level within the control nervous system uses detectors specific for feature of the controlled object and the environment that match the control needs in order to obtain information about the current state of the object in the environment. Movement of information toward higher hierarchical levels also is accompanied by an increase in the duration of initiating signals within each control system. The ability to store a long prehistory of preceding events is considered as the mechanism that necessitated the invention of more complex and more rapid forms of learning such as operant learning, and made possible more complex multistep computational algorithms that require memorization of the results of previous intermediate computations. The functions of the cerebellum, the limbic system and the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops are analyzed to illustrate the utility and applicability of this theoretical concept. Basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops are described as modeling, predictive loops, and their dopaminergic innervation as an error distribution system. © 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>9247962</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00053-6</doi><tpages>38</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-0082
ispartof Progress in neurobiology, 1997-02, Vol.51 (2), p.129-166
issn 0301-0082
1873-5118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79172413
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Automatism
Models, Neurological
Nervous System Physiological Phenomena
title HIGHEST LEVEL AUTOMATISMS IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM: A THEORY OF FUNCTIONAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE HIGHEST FORMS OF BRAIN FUNCTION
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A59%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HIGHEST%20LEVEL%20AUTOMATISMS%20IN%20THE%20NERVOUS%20SYSTEM:%20A%20THEORY%20OF%20FUNCTIONAL%20PRINCIPLES%20UNDERLYING%20THE%20HIGHEST%20FORMS%20OF%20BRAIN%20FUNCTION&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20neurobiology&rft.au=BAEV,%20KONSTANTIN%20V.&rft.date=1997-02-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=129-166&rft.issn=0301-0082&rft.eissn=1873-5118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00053-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16433712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-58289942e7cc3ac525c9e2f9ddef8c4288bd6ee633605b417581b276e4449b1e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16433712&rft_id=info:pmid/9247962&rfr_iscdi=true