Evaluation of Overdiagnosis of Breast Cancer in Screening with Mammography: Results of the Nijmegen Programme

Peeters P H M (Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Social Medicine, Nijmegen University, Verlengde Groenestraat 75, 6525 EJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands), Verbeek A L M, Straatman H, Holland R, Hendriks J H C L, Mravunac M, Rothengatter C, Van Dijk-Milatz A and Werre J M. Evaluation of overdiagnos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of epidemiology 1989-06, Vol.18 (2), p.295-299
Main Authors: PEETERS, PETRA H M, VERBEEK, A L M, STRAATMAN, H, HOLLAND, R, HENDRIKS, J H C L, MRAVUNAC, M, ROTHENGATTER, C, DIJK-MILATZ, A VAN, WERRE, J M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology
Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control
Cohort Studies
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Mammary gland diseases
Mammography
Mass Screening
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Netherlands
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Tumors
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Peeters P H M (Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Social Medicine, Nijmegen University, Verlengde Groenestraat 75, 6525 EJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands), Verbeek A L M, Straatman H, Holland R, Hendriks J H C L, Mravunac M, Rothengatter C, Van Dijk-Milatz A and Werre J M. Evaluation of overdiagnosis of breast cancer in screening with mammography: results of the Nijmegen programme. International Journal of Epidemiology 1989, 18: 295–299. After 12 years of screening for breast cancer in Nijmegen (1975–86), during which period six mammographic examination rounds were carried out, the extent of overdiagnosis was evaluated. Overdiagnosis is defined as a histologically established diagnosis of invasive or intraductal breast cancer that would never have developed into a clinically manifest tumour during the patient's normal life expectancy if no screening examination had been carried out. The whole 12-year period shows an excess of 11% of breast cancer cases in Nijmegen, compared with the neighbouring city of Arnhem, where no mass screening was performed. The incidence of breast cancers in Nijmegen in the period 1975–78 is higher, compared with the incidence rates in Arnhem; the rate ratio is 1.30. For the time-intervals 1979–82 and 1983–86 the rate ratios are 1.03 and 1.01 respectively with (0.89; 1.18) and (0.86; 1.16) as 95% confidence intervals. This leads to the conclusion that there is no evidence that screening programmes using modern mammography constitute a significant risk for over-diagnosis of breast cancers.
ISSN:0300-5771
1464-3685
DOI:10.1093/ije/18.2.295