Loading…

Quality assessment by expert opinion in melanoma pathology: experience of the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party

Some cutaneous melanocytic lesions are notoriously difficult to diagnose by histopathology. For that reason, the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party was instituted and is regularly approached to provide an expert opinion on problem cases. In order to identify the most common diagnost...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of pathology 1997-07, Vol.182 (3), p.266-272
Main Authors: Veenhuizen, Karin C. W., De Wit, Peter E. J., Mooi, Wolter J., Scheffer, Erik, Verbeek, André L. M., Ruiter, Dirk J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4442-286d9c7915cd4e19023206fc7b7fdc23aa5c2a7fa33d4381ee6273cecf8684e73
container_end_page 272
container_issue 3
container_start_page 266
container_title The Journal of pathology
container_volume 182
creator Veenhuizen, Karin C. W.
De Wit, Peter E. J.
Mooi, Wolter J.
Scheffer, Erik
Verbeek, André L. M.
Ruiter, Dirk J.
description Some cutaneous melanocytic lesions are notoriously difficult to diagnose by histopathology. For that reason, the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party was instituted and is regularly approached to provide an expert opinion on problem cases. In order to identify the most common diagnostic problems, 1069 consecutive referral cases of submitted lesions (1992 to 1994 inclusive) were analysed. About 60 per cent of the requests came from small laboratories, with up to three consultant pathologists. Two‐thirds of the lesions reviewed concerned women and nearly 50 per cent of the patients were 30 years of age or younger. In 8 per cent of the cases, the referring pathologists felt unable to make a confident diagnosis; in 14 per cent, melanoma was suspected; and in 12 per cent, a differential diagnosis only had been formulated. The panel felt able to provide an unequivocal diagnosis in 93 per cent of the requests. Of the 158 lesions classified as ‘invasive melanoma’ by the referring pathologists, 22 were considered to be benign by the panel. Conversely, 108 invasive melanomas (panel diagnosis) had originally been considered as benign lesions, dysplastic naevi or melanoma in situ. These high numbers of discordancies reflect the intrinsic difficulty of the differential diagnoses in this selected material submitted to the panel. Diagnostic difficulties were most often encountered with Spitz naevi and dysplastic naevi. Although the rate of overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis is quite high, in the majority of cases the diagnosis of the referring pathologist matched the diagnosis of the panel. This may reflect a proper awareness of difficult melanocytic lesions in pathology practice. The activities of the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party contribute to the improvement of the quality of diagnosis in cutaneous melanocytic lesions, as they increase the number of unequivocal diagnoses and reduce the number of incorrect diagnoses. On the basis of the systematic comparison of the diagnosis by the referring pathologist and the panel, postgraduate teaching and quality control can be more focused on specific diagnostic problems. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199707)182:3<266::AID-PATH812>3.0.CO;2-#
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79364662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79364662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4442-286d9c7915cd4e19023206fc7b7fdc23aa5c2a7fa33d4381ee6273cecf8684e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1v0zAUhiMEGmXwE5AsgdB2keKP1I47hKg6tlYadFULg6sj1z1Zw_JR4lQsl_xzXKXtzZB2Zeuc149e-QmCT4x2GaX8_clsPByfMqplqGMtT5jWiqpTFvO--MCl7PcH4_PwejAfxYx_FF3aHU7OePjmSdA5PHoadDyKhyJi6nnwwrlflFKte72j4EiLSHMed4K_043J0rohxjl0LseiJouG4P0aq5qU67RIy4KkBckxM0WZG7I29arMytum36ZSLCySMiH1Csn1fulvBWb78fmmtivyZY-4Kau7tLj1mapuXgbPEpM5fLU7j4NvF5_nw1F4NbkcDwdXoY2iiIc8lkttlWY9u4yQacoFpzKxaqGSpeXCmJ7lRiVGiGUkYoYouRIWbRLLOEIljoN3LXddlb836GrIU2cx852w3DhQWshISu6D39ugrUrnKkxgXaW5qRpgFLZ2ALZ2YPvRsP1oaO2AtwMCvB0Abwd2dvyIwnACW_DrXYPNIsflAbuT4fdvd3vjrMmSyhQ2dYcYV5HkMfOxn23sT5ph86DcY93-V20_8OywZaeuxvsD21R3IJVQPbj5egmj6fTHjF_MYSb-AVu2yMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79364662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality assessment by expert opinion in melanoma pathology: experience of the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Veenhuizen, Karin C. W. ; De Wit, Peter E. J. ; Mooi, Wolter J. ; Scheffer, Erik ; Verbeek, André L. M. ; Ruiter, Dirk J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Veenhuizen, Karin C. W. ; De Wit, Peter E. J. ; Mooi, Wolter J. ; Scheffer, Erik ; Verbeek, André L. M. ; Ruiter, Dirk J.</creatorcontrib><description>Some cutaneous melanocytic lesions are notoriously difficult to diagnose by histopathology. For that reason, the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party was instituted and is regularly approached to provide an expert opinion on problem cases. In order to identify the most common diagnostic problems, 1069 consecutive referral cases of submitted lesions (1992 to 1994 inclusive) were analysed. About 60 per cent of the requests came from small laboratories, with up to three consultant pathologists. Two‐thirds of the lesions reviewed concerned women and nearly 50 per cent of the patients were 30 years of age or younger. In 8 per cent of the cases, the referring pathologists felt unable to make a confident diagnosis; in 14 per cent, melanoma was suspected; and in 12 per cent, a differential diagnosis only had been formulated. The panel felt able to provide an unequivocal diagnosis in 93 per cent of the requests. Of the 158 lesions classified as ‘invasive melanoma’ by the referring pathologists, 22 were considered to be benign by the panel. Conversely, 108 invasive melanomas (panel diagnosis) had originally been considered as benign lesions, dysplastic naevi or melanoma in situ. These high numbers of discordancies reflect the intrinsic difficulty of the differential diagnoses in this selected material submitted to the panel. Diagnostic difficulties were most often encountered with Spitz naevi and dysplastic naevi. Although the rate of overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis is quite high, in the majority of cases the diagnosis of the referring pathologist matched the diagnosis of the panel. This may reflect a proper awareness of difficult melanocytic lesions in pathology practice. The activities of the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party contribute to the improvement of the quality of diagnosis in cutaneous melanocytic lesions, as they increase the number of unequivocal diagnoses and reduce the number of incorrect diagnoses. On the basis of the systematic comparison of the diagnosis by the referring pathologist and the panel, postgraduate teaching and quality control can be more focused on specific diagnostic problems. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9896</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199707)182:3&lt;266::AID-PATH812&gt;3.0.CO;2-#</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9349228</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPTLAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Dermatology ; diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; dysplastic naevus ; Dysplastic Nevus Syndrome - diagnosis ; epithelioid and spindle cell ; Female ; histopathology ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Medical sciences ; melanoma ; Melanoma - diagnosis ; Middle Aged ; naevus ; naevus, epithelioid and spindle cell ; Netherlands ; Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell - diagnosis ; quality ; Quality Control ; Referral and Consultation - organization &amp; administration ; Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Spitz naevus ; Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><ispartof>The Journal of pathology, 1997-07, Vol.182 (3), p.266-272</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4442-286d9c7915cd4e19023206fc7b7fdc23aa5c2a7fa33d4381ee6273cecf8684e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2746281$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9349228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Veenhuizen, Karin C. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Wit, Peter E. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooi, Wolter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheffer, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbeek, André L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiter, Dirk J.</creatorcontrib><title>Quality assessment by expert opinion in melanoma pathology: experience of the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party</title><title>The Journal of pathology</title><addtitle>J. Pathol</addtitle><description>Some cutaneous melanocytic lesions are notoriously difficult to diagnose by histopathology. For that reason, the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party was instituted and is regularly approached to provide an expert opinion on problem cases. In order to identify the most common diagnostic problems, 1069 consecutive referral cases of submitted lesions (1992 to 1994 inclusive) were analysed. About 60 per cent of the requests came from small laboratories, with up to three consultant pathologists. Two‐thirds of the lesions reviewed concerned women and nearly 50 per cent of the patients were 30 years of age or younger. In 8 per cent of the cases, the referring pathologists felt unable to make a confident diagnosis; in 14 per cent, melanoma was suspected; and in 12 per cent, a differential diagnosis only had been formulated. The panel felt able to provide an unequivocal diagnosis in 93 per cent of the requests. Of the 158 lesions classified as ‘invasive melanoma’ by the referring pathologists, 22 were considered to be benign by the panel. Conversely, 108 invasive melanomas (panel diagnosis) had originally been considered as benign lesions, dysplastic naevi or melanoma in situ. These high numbers of discordancies reflect the intrinsic difficulty of the differential diagnoses in this selected material submitted to the panel. Diagnostic difficulties were most often encountered with Spitz naevi and dysplastic naevi. Although the rate of overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis is quite high, in the majority of cases the diagnosis of the referring pathologist matched the diagnosis of the panel. This may reflect a proper awareness of difficult melanocytic lesions in pathology practice. The activities of the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party contribute to the improvement of the quality of diagnosis in cutaneous melanocytic lesions, as they increase the number of unequivocal diagnoses and reduce the number of incorrect diagnoses. On the basis of the systematic comparison of the diagnosis by the referring pathologist and the panel, postgraduate teaching and quality control can be more focused on specific diagnostic problems. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>dysplastic naevus</subject><subject>Dysplastic Nevus Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>epithelioid and spindle cell</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>histopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>melanoma</subject><subject>Melanoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>naevus</subject><subject>naevus, epithelioid and spindle cell</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell - diagnosis</subject><subject>quality</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Spitz naevus</subject><subject>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><issn>0022-3417</issn><issn>1096-9896</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV1v0zAUhiMEGmXwE5AsgdB2keKP1I47hKg6tlYadFULg6sj1z1Zw_JR4lQsl_xzXKXtzZB2Zeuc149e-QmCT4x2GaX8_clsPByfMqplqGMtT5jWiqpTFvO--MCl7PcH4_PwejAfxYx_FF3aHU7OePjmSdA5PHoadDyKhyJi6nnwwrlflFKte72j4EiLSHMed4K_043J0rohxjl0LseiJouG4P0aq5qU67RIy4KkBckxM0WZG7I29arMytum36ZSLCySMiH1Csn1fulvBWb78fmmtivyZY-4Kau7tLj1mapuXgbPEpM5fLU7j4NvF5_nw1F4NbkcDwdXoY2iiIc8lkttlWY9u4yQacoFpzKxaqGSpeXCmJ7lRiVGiGUkYoYouRIWbRLLOEIljoN3LXddlb836GrIU2cx852w3DhQWshISu6D39ugrUrnKkxgXaW5qRpgFLZ2ALZ2YPvRsP1oaO2AtwMCvB0Abwd2dvyIwnACW_DrXYPNIsflAbuT4fdvd3vjrMmSyhQ2dYcYV5HkMfOxn23sT5ph86DcY93-V20_8OywZaeuxvsD21R3IJVQPbj5egmj6fTHjF_MYSb-AVu2yMQ</recordid><startdate>199707</startdate><enddate>199707</enddate><creator>Veenhuizen, Karin C. W.</creator><creator>De Wit, Peter E. J.</creator><creator>Mooi, Wolter J.</creator><creator>Scheffer, Erik</creator><creator>Verbeek, André L. M.</creator><creator>Ruiter, Dirk J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199707</creationdate><title>Quality assessment by expert opinion in melanoma pathology: experience of the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party</title><author>Veenhuizen, Karin C. W. ; De Wit, Peter E. J. ; Mooi, Wolter J. ; Scheffer, Erik ; Verbeek, André L. M. ; Ruiter, Dirk J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4442-286d9c7915cd4e19023206fc7b7fdc23aa5c2a7fa33d4381ee6273cecf8684e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>dysplastic naevus</topic><topic>Dysplastic Nevus Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>epithelioid and spindle cell</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>histopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>melanoma</topic><topic>Melanoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>naevus</topic><topic>naevus, epithelioid and spindle cell</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell - diagnosis</topic><topic>quality</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Spitz naevus</topic><topic>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Veenhuizen, Karin C. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Wit, Peter E. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooi, Wolter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheffer, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbeek, André L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiter, Dirk J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Veenhuizen, Karin C. W.</au><au>De Wit, Peter E. J.</au><au>Mooi, Wolter J.</au><au>Scheffer, Erik</au><au>Verbeek, André L. M.</au><au>Ruiter, Dirk J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality assessment by expert opinion in melanoma pathology: experience of the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of pathology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Pathol</addtitle><date>1997-07</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>182</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>266</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>266-272</pages><issn>0022-3417</issn><eissn>1096-9896</eissn><coden>JPTLAS</coden><abstract>Some cutaneous melanocytic lesions are notoriously difficult to diagnose by histopathology. For that reason, the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party was instituted and is regularly approached to provide an expert opinion on problem cases. In order to identify the most common diagnostic problems, 1069 consecutive referral cases of submitted lesions (1992 to 1994 inclusive) were analysed. About 60 per cent of the requests came from small laboratories, with up to three consultant pathologists. Two‐thirds of the lesions reviewed concerned women and nearly 50 per cent of the patients were 30 years of age or younger. In 8 per cent of the cases, the referring pathologists felt unable to make a confident diagnosis; in 14 per cent, melanoma was suspected; and in 12 per cent, a differential diagnosis only had been formulated. The panel felt able to provide an unequivocal diagnosis in 93 per cent of the requests. Of the 158 lesions classified as ‘invasive melanoma’ by the referring pathologists, 22 were considered to be benign by the panel. Conversely, 108 invasive melanomas (panel diagnosis) had originally been considered as benign lesions, dysplastic naevi or melanoma in situ. These high numbers of discordancies reflect the intrinsic difficulty of the differential diagnoses in this selected material submitted to the panel. Diagnostic difficulties were most often encountered with Spitz naevi and dysplastic naevi. Although the rate of overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis is quite high, in the majority of cases the diagnosis of the referring pathologist matched the diagnosis of the panel. This may reflect a proper awareness of difficult melanocytic lesions in pathology practice. The activities of the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party contribute to the improvement of the quality of diagnosis in cutaneous melanocytic lesions, as they increase the number of unequivocal diagnoses and reduce the number of incorrect diagnoses. On the basis of the systematic comparison of the diagnosis by the referring pathologist and the panel, postgraduate teaching and quality control can be more focused on specific diagnostic problems. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>9349228</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199707)182:3&lt;266::AID-PATH812&gt;3.0.CO;2-#</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3417
ispartof The Journal of pathology, 1997-07, Vol.182 (3), p.266-272
issn 0022-3417
1096-9896
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79364662
source Wiley
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child, Preschool
Dermatology
diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
dysplastic naevus
Dysplastic Nevus Syndrome - diagnosis
epithelioid and spindle cell
Female
histopathology
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Medical sciences
melanoma
Melanoma - diagnosis
Middle Aged
naevus
naevus, epithelioid and spindle cell
Netherlands
Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell - diagnosis
quality
Quality Control
Referral and Consultation - organization & administration
Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis
Spitz naevus
Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions
title Quality assessment by expert opinion in melanoma pathology: experience of the Pathology Panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A14%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20assessment%20by%20expert%20opinion%20in%20melanoma%20pathology:%20experience%20of%20the%20Pathology%20Panel%20of%20the%20Dutch%20Melanoma%20Working%20Party&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20pathology&rft.au=Veenhuizen,%20Karin%20C.%20W.&rft.date=1997-07&rft.volume=182&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=266&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=266-272&rft.issn=0022-3417&rft.eissn=1096-9896&rft.coden=JPTLAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199707)182:3%3C266::AID-PATH812%3E3.0.CO;2-%23&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79364662%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4442-286d9c7915cd4e19023206fc7b7fdc23aa5c2a7fa33d4381ee6273cecf8684e73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79364662&rft_id=info:pmid/9349228&rfr_iscdi=true