Loading…

Stereotaxy Reduces Cost of Brain Tumor Resection

Background Health care professionals are under increasing pressure to contain the cost of health care. Simultaneously, medical technology continues to advance. Medical institutions must therefore consider the costs and benefits before using a new technology. Using a direct costing system, we determi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surgical neurology 1997-12, Vol.48 (6), p.542-551
Main Authors: Polinsky, Michael N, Geer, Carol P, Ross, Donald A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-ad15a73ab0aefc0b7ab31eab9d90abdb8c1e502f21fcddeee844f6c9d5e63f153
cites
container_end_page 551
container_issue 6
container_start_page 542
container_title Surgical neurology
container_volume 48
creator Polinsky, Michael N
Geer, Carol P
Ross, Donald A
description Background Health care professionals are under increasing pressure to contain the cost of health care. Simultaneously, medical technology continues to advance. Medical institutions must therefore consider the costs and benefits before using a new technology. Using a direct costing system, we determined the cost efficacy of stereotaxy applied to the resection of brain mass lesions. Methods Twenty-nine patients underwent a stereotactically guided craniotomy and brain tumor resection. Fifteen of them underwent general and fourteen received local anesthesia. Twelve other patients, comprising a historical reference group, underwent a standard craniotomy and brain tumor resection under general anesthesia. Costs were determined for every hospital charge item in all patients. Cost efficiency was then compared between the two groups. Results Patients treated stereotactically incurred additional costs in frame placement and neuroimaging. These costs were offset by savings in operating room time, patient acuity, length of stay, respiratory care, and medications. Savings were greatest for patients who had local anesthesia. Overall, patients treated by stereotactic craniotomy had a total hospitalization cost of $8,495.19, whereas those treated with standard craniotomy incurred a cost of $11,365.23 ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Stereotaxy is cost effective for the surgical treatment of brain tumors. Accurate estimates of cost can justify the use of medical technology. Directly measured cost data is a useful index for any cost containment program.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0090-3019(97)00365-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79465140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090301997003650</els_id><sourcerecordid>79465140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-ad15a73ab0aefc0b7ab31eab9d90abdb8c1e502f21fcddeee844f6c9d5e63f153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_QmFPoofVSbPZbU6ixS8oCLaeQz4mEOluarIr9t-7_cCrpzm8zzvDPISMKdxQoOXtAkBAzoCKK1FdA7CS53BEhnRaiZwxJo7J8A85JWcpfUJPCS4GZCAKgJIVQwKLFiOGVv1ssne0ncGUzUJqs-Cyh6h8ky27OsQ-S2haH5pzcuLUKuHFYY7Ix9PjcvaSz9-eX2f389ywEtpcWcpVxZQGhc6ArpRmFJUWVoDSVk8NRQ4TN6HOWIuI06JwpRGWY8kc5WxELvd71zF8dZhaWftkcLVSDYYuyUoUJacF9CDfgyaGlCI6uY6-VnEjKcitKbkzJbcapKjkzpTc9saHA52u0f61Dmr6_G6fY__lt8cok_HYGLQ-9iqkDf6fC79hc3ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79465140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stereotaxy Reduces Cost of Brain Tumor Resection</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Polinsky, Michael N ; Geer, Carol P ; Ross, Donald A</creator><creatorcontrib>Polinsky, Michael N ; Geer, Carol P ; Ross, Donald A</creatorcontrib><description>Background Health care professionals are under increasing pressure to contain the cost of health care. Simultaneously, medical technology continues to advance. Medical institutions must therefore consider the costs and benefits before using a new technology. Using a direct costing system, we determined the cost efficacy of stereotaxy applied to the resection of brain mass lesions. Methods Twenty-nine patients underwent a stereotactically guided craniotomy and brain tumor resection. Fifteen of them underwent general and fourteen received local anesthesia. Twelve other patients, comprising a historical reference group, underwent a standard craniotomy and brain tumor resection under general anesthesia. Costs were determined for every hospital charge item in all patients. Cost efficiency was then compared between the two groups. Results Patients treated stereotactically incurred additional costs in frame placement and neuroimaging. These costs were offset by savings in operating room time, patient acuity, length of stay, respiratory care, and medications. Savings were greatest for patients who had local anesthesia. Overall, patients treated by stereotactic craniotomy had a total hospitalization cost of $8,495.19, whereas those treated with standard craniotomy incurred a cost of $11,365.23 ( p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Stereotaxy is cost effective for the surgical treatment of brain tumors. Accurate estimates of cost can justify the use of medical technology. Directly measured cost data is a useful index for any cost containment program.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-3019</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0090-3019(97)00365-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9400634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia, General - economics ; Anesthesia, Local - economics ; Brain Neoplasms - economics ; Brain Neoplasms - surgery ; Brain tumor ; cost containment ; craniotomy ; economics ; Female ; Hospital Charges - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Michigan ; Middle Aged ; Oncology Service, Hospital - economics ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stereotaxic Techniques - economics ; stereotaxy ; surgery ; Surgery Department, Hospital - economics</subject><ispartof>Surgical neurology, 1997-12, Vol.48 (6), p.542-551</ispartof><rights>1997 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-ad15a73ab0aefc0b7ab31eab9d90abdb8c1e502f21fcddeee844f6c9d5e63f153</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9400634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Polinsky, Michael N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geer, Carol P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Donald A</creatorcontrib><title>Stereotaxy Reduces Cost of Brain Tumor Resection</title><title>Surgical neurology</title><addtitle>Surg Neurol</addtitle><description>Background Health care professionals are under increasing pressure to contain the cost of health care. Simultaneously, medical technology continues to advance. Medical institutions must therefore consider the costs and benefits before using a new technology. Using a direct costing system, we determined the cost efficacy of stereotaxy applied to the resection of brain mass lesions. Methods Twenty-nine patients underwent a stereotactically guided craniotomy and brain tumor resection. Fifteen of them underwent general and fourteen received local anesthesia. Twelve other patients, comprising a historical reference group, underwent a standard craniotomy and brain tumor resection under general anesthesia. Costs were determined for every hospital charge item in all patients. Cost efficiency was then compared between the two groups. Results Patients treated stereotactically incurred additional costs in frame placement and neuroimaging. These costs were offset by savings in operating room time, patient acuity, length of stay, respiratory care, and medications. Savings were greatest for patients who had local anesthesia. Overall, patients treated by stereotactic craniotomy had a total hospitalization cost of $8,495.19, whereas those treated with standard craniotomy incurred a cost of $11,365.23 ( p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Stereotaxy is cost effective for the surgical treatment of brain tumors. Accurate estimates of cost can justify the use of medical technology. Directly measured cost data is a useful index for any cost containment program.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General - economics</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Local - economics</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Brain tumor</subject><subject>cost containment</subject><subject>craniotomy</subject><subject>economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Charges - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology Service, Hospital - economics</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stereotaxic Techniques - economics</subject><subject>stereotaxy</subject><subject>surgery</subject><subject>Surgery Department, Hospital - economics</subject><issn>0090-3019</issn><issn>1879-3339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_QmFPoofVSbPZbU6ixS8oCLaeQz4mEOluarIr9t-7_cCrpzm8zzvDPISMKdxQoOXtAkBAzoCKK1FdA7CS53BEhnRaiZwxJo7J8A85JWcpfUJPCS4GZCAKgJIVQwKLFiOGVv1ssne0ncGUzUJqs-Cyh6h8ky27OsQ-S2haH5pzcuLUKuHFYY7Ix9PjcvaSz9-eX2f389ywEtpcWcpVxZQGhc6ArpRmFJUWVoDSVk8NRQ4TN6HOWIuI06JwpRGWY8kc5WxELvd71zF8dZhaWftkcLVSDYYuyUoUJacF9CDfgyaGlCI6uY6-VnEjKcitKbkzJbcapKjkzpTc9saHA52u0f61Dmr6_G6fY__lt8cok_HYGLQ-9iqkDf6fC79hc3ig</recordid><startdate>19971201</startdate><enddate>19971201</enddate><creator>Polinsky, Michael N</creator><creator>Geer, Carol P</creator><creator>Ross, Donald A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971201</creationdate><title>Stereotaxy Reduces Cost of Brain Tumor Resection</title><author>Polinsky, Michael N ; Geer, Carol P ; Ross, Donald A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-ad15a73ab0aefc0b7ab31eab9d90abdb8c1e502f21fcddeee844f6c9d5e63f153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General - economics</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Local - economics</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Brain tumor</topic><topic>cost containment</topic><topic>craniotomy</topic><topic>economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Charges - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology Service, Hospital - economics</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stereotaxic Techniques - economics</topic><topic>stereotaxy</topic><topic>surgery</topic><topic>Surgery Department, Hospital - economics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Polinsky, Michael N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geer, Carol P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Donald A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Polinsky, Michael N</au><au>Geer, Carol P</au><au>Ross, Donald A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stereotaxy Reduces Cost of Brain Tumor Resection</atitle><jtitle>Surgical neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Neurol</addtitle><date>1997-12-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>542</spage><epage>551</epage><pages>542-551</pages><issn>0090-3019</issn><eissn>1879-3339</eissn><abstract>Background Health care professionals are under increasing pressure to contain the cost of health care. Simultaneously, medical technology continues to advance. Medical institutions must therefore consider the costs and benefits before using a new technology. Using a direct costing system, we determined the cost efficacy of stereotaxy applied to the resection of brain mass lesions. Methods Twenty-nine patients underwent a stereotactically guided craniotomy and brain tumor resection. Fifteen of them underwent general and fourteen received local anesthesia. Twelve other patients, comprising a historical reference group, underwent a standard craniotomy and brain tumor resection under general anesthesia. Costs were determined for every hospital charge item in all patients. Cost efficiency was then compared between the two groups. Results Patients treated stereotactically incurred additional costs in frame placement and neuroimaging. These costs were offset by savings in operating room time, patient acuity, length of stay, respiratory care, and medications. Savings were greatest for patients who had local anesthesia. Overall, patients treated by stereotactic craniotomy had a total hospitalization cost of $8,495.19, whereas those treated with standard craniotomy incurred a cost of $11,365.23 ( p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Stereotaxy is cost effective for the surgical treatment of brain tumors. Accurate estimates of cost can justify the use of medical technology. Directly measured cost data is a useful index for any cost containment program.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9400634</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0090-3019(97)00365-0</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-3019
ispartof Surgical neurology, 1997-12, Vol.48 (6), p.542-551
issn 0090-3019
1879-3339
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79465140
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anesthesia, General - economics
Anesthesia, Local - economics
Brain Neoplasms - economics
Brain Neoplasms - surgery
Brain tumor
cost containment
craniotomy
economics
Female
Hospital Charges - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Michigan
Middle Aged
Oncology Service, Hospital - economics
Severity of Illness Index
Stereotaxic Techniques - economics
stereotaxy
surgery
Surgery Department, Hospital - economics
title Stereotaxy Reduces Cost of Brain Tumor Resection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A28%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stereotaxy%20Reduces%20Cost%20of%20Brain%20Tumor%20Resection&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20neurology&rft.au=Polinsky,%20Michael%20N&rft.date=1997-12-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=542&rft.epage=551&rft.pages=542-551&rft.issn=0090-3019&rft.eissn=1879-3339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0090-3019(97)00365-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79465140%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-ad15a73ab0aefc0b7ab31eab9d90abdb8c1e502f21fcddeee844f6c9d5e63f153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79465140&rft_id=info:pmid/9400634&rfr_iscdi=true