Loading…
Externally Cued and Internally Generated Selection: Differences in Distractor Analysis and Inhibition
In most studies of selective attention, the experimenter informs the participant what the target is and what action is required. For example, participants may be told to name the red drawing. The present study shows that under such conditions of external selection, distractor inhibition is used to e...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 1997-12, Vol.23 (6), p.1617-1630 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In most studies of selective attention, the experimenter
informs the participant what the target is and what action is
required. For example, participants may be told to name the red
drawing. The present study shows that under such conditions of
external
selection, distractor inhibition is used to
ensure that selection is efficient. In external selection, analysis
of distractors is limited, causing later recognition of distractor
items to be poor. In contrast, during real-world selection a person
may be confronted with a number of potential targets and may have to
decide what will be the target for action. Under these conditions of
internal
selection, inhibition of distracting
information does not occur. Moreover, distractors are more fully
analyzed and thus better recognized at a later test. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0096-1523.23.6.1617 |