Biases in the interpretation and use of research results

The latter half of this century has seen an erosion in the perceived legitimacy of science as an impartial means of finding truth. Many research topics are the subject of highly politicized dispute; indeed, the objectivity of the entire discipline of psychology has been called into question. This es...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annual review of psychology 1998-01, Vol.49 (1), p.259-287
Main Author: MACCOUN, R. J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Ethical aspects
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Methodology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Research methods
Science
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The latter half of this century has seen an erosion in the perceived legitimacy of science as an impartial means of finding truth. Many research topics are the subject of highly politicized dispute; indeed, the objectivity of the entire discipline of psychology has been called into question. This essay examines attempts to use science to study science: specifically, bias in the interpretation and use of empirical research findings. I examine theory and research on a range of cognitive and motivational mechanisms for bias. Interestingly, not all biases are normatively proscribed; biased interpretations are defensible under some conditions, so long as those conditions are made explicit. I consider a variety of potentially corrective mechanisms, evaluate prospects for collective rationality, and compare inquisitorial and adversarial models of science.
ISSN:0066-4308
1545-2085
DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.259