Dual matrix ordered subsets reconstruction for accelerated 3D scatter compensation in single-photon emission tomography

• Published in: European journal of nuclear medicine 1998, Vol.25 (1), p.8-18
• Main Authors: KAMPHUIS, C, BEEKMAN, F. J, VAN RIJK, P. P, VIERGEVER, M. A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; Biological and medical sciences; Compensation; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Medical sciences; Miscellaneous. Technology; Radionuclide investigations; Studies; Thorax - anatomy & histology; Tomography; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - statistics & numerical data
• ISSN: 0340-6997; 1619-7070; 1619-7089
• DOI: 10.1007/s002590050188

Three-dimensional (3D) iterative maximum likelihood expectation maximization (ML-EM) algorithms for single-photon emission tomography (SPET) are capable of correcting image-degrading effects of non-uniform attenuation, distance-dependent camera response and patient shape-dependent scatter. However, the resulting improvements in quantitation, resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) are obtained at the cost of a huge computational burden. This paper presents a new acceleration method for ML-EM: dual matrix ordered subsets (DM-OS). DM-OS combines two acceleration methods: (a) different matrices for projection and back-projection and (b) ordered subsets of projections. DM-OS was compared with ML-EM on simulated data and on physical thorax phantom data, for both 180 degrees and 360 degrees orbits. Contrast, normalized standard deviation and mean squared error were calculated for the digital phantom experiment. DM-OS resulted in similar image quality to ML-EM, even for speed-up factors of 200 compared to ML-EM in the case of 120 projections. The thorax phantom data could be reconstructed 50 times faster (60 projections) using DM-OS with preservation of image quality. ML-EM and DM-OS with scatter compensation showed significant improvement of SNR compared to ML-EM without scatter compensation. Furthermore, inclusion of complex image formation models in the computer code is simplified in the case of DM-OS. It is thus shown that DM-OS is a fast and relatively simple algorithm for 3D iterative scatter compensation, with similar results to conventional ML-EM, for both 180 degrees and 360 degrees acquired data.