Loading…

Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation

This prospective multicenter study identifies the variables significant in the prediction of rehabilitation efficiency, achievement of rehabilitation potential and duration of rehabilitation stay in 258 persons with a first stroke admitted to comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation in Brisbane, Austr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Stroke (1970) 1990-02, Vol.21 (2), p.241-246
Main Authors: SHAH, S, VANCLAY, F, COOPER, B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-7881fe7e6e5e083668f3f691c0c7afc676c0dc045026348fda6e4b7cabddadec3
cites
container_end_page 246
container_issue 2
container_start_page 241
container_title Stroke (1970)
container_volume 21
creator SHAH, S
VANCLAY, F
COOPER, B
description This prospective multicenter study identifies the variables significant in the prediction of rehabilitation efficiency, achievement of rehabilitation potential and duration of rehabilitation stay in 258 persons with a first stroke admitted to comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation in Brisbane, Australia, during 1984. All three dependent variables were poorly predicted, with only 17% of the variance in rehabilitation efficiency, only 30% of the variance in achievement of rehabilitation potential, and only 22% of the variance in duration of rehabilitation stay explained. Unlike other reports, we considered most of the major medical (side of paralysis, stroke etiology, site of the lesion, arterial distribution affected, etc.), rehabilitative (initial Barthel Index score, interval from stroke onset to acute-care hospital admission, interval from hospital admission to rehabilitation commencement, neurologic measures, etc.), and demographic (age, years of education, occupation, ethnicity, etc.) variables. The high proportion of unexplained variance is likely to be due to nonmedical factors influencing the selection of patients for rehabilitation.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/01.str.21.2.241
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79651491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79651491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-7881fe7e6e5e083668f3f691c0c7afc676c0dc045026348fda6e4b7cabddadec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRaq2ePQk5iKcm3a9ssjel1A8oCFrPy2Z3FlfTRHcTof_eaEMPwxzeZ96BB6FLgjNCBFlgksUuZJRkNKOcHKEpySlPuaDlMZpizGRKuZSn6CzGD4wxZWU-QRPKcM6knKLblXPeeGjMbp6Ac2A6_wMNxDhPdGMT2wfd-bZJWpcMj9pPSAK868rXvvsPztGJ03WEi3HP0Nv9arN8TNfPD0_Lu3Vqciy7tChL4qAAATngkglROuaEJAabQjsjCmGwNZjnmArGS2e1AF4VRlfWaguGzdDNvvcrtN89xE5tfTRQ17qBto-qkCInXJIBXOxBE9oYAzj1FfxWh50iWP05U5io182LokRRNTgbLq7G6r7agj3wo6Qhvx5zHY2uXdCN8fGAiVIWw7BfpGh1JQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79651491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>SHAH, S ; VANCLAY, F ; COOPER, B</creator><creatorcontrib>SHAH, S ; VANCLAY, F ; COOPER, B</creatorcontrib><description>This prospective multicenter study identifies the variables significant in the prediction of rehabilitation efficiency, achievement of rehabilitation potential and duration of rehabilitation stay in 258 persons with a first stroke admitted to comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation in Brisbane, Australia, during 1984. All three dependent variables were poorly predicted, with only 17% of the variance in rehabilitation efficiency, only 30% of the variance in achievement of rehabilitation potential, and only 22% of the variance in duration of rehabilitation stay explained. Unlike other reports, we considered most of the major medical (side of paralysis, stroke etiology, site of the lesion, arterial distribution affected, etc.), rehabilitative (initial Barthel Index score, interval from stroke onset to acute-care hospital admission, interval from hospital admission to rehabilitation commencement, neurologic measures, etc.), and demographic (age, years of education, occupation, ethnicity, etc.) variables. The high proportion of unexplained variance is likely to be due to nonmedical factors influencing the selection of patients for rehabilitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-2499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.str.21.2.241</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2305399</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SJCCA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebrovascular Disorders - rehabilitation ; Disability Evaluation ; Forecasting ; Humans ; Marriage ; Medical sciences ; Neurology ; Prospective Studies ; Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><ispartof>Stroke (1970), 1990-02, Vol.21 (2), p.241-246</ispartof><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-7881fe7e6e5e083668f3f691c0c7afc676c0dc045026348fda6e4b7cabddadec3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=6897689$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2305399$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHAH, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANCLAY, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOPER, B</creatorcontrib><title>Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation</title><title>Stroke (1970)</title><addtitle>Stroke</addtitle><description>This prospective multicenter study identifies the variables significant in the prediction of rehabilitation efficiency, achievement of rehabilitation potential and duration of rehabilitation stay in 258 persons with a first stroke admitted to comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation in Brisbane, Australia, during 1984. All three dependent variables were poorly predicted, with only 17% of the variance in rehabilitation efficiency, only 30% of the variance in achievement of rehabilitation potential, and only 22% of the variance in duration of rehabilitation stay explained. Unlike other reports, we considered most of the major medical (side of paralysis, stroke etiology, site of the lesion, arterial distribution affected, etc.), rehabilitative (initial Barthel Index score, interval from stroke onset to acute-care hospital admission, interval from hospital admission to rehabilitation commencement, neurologic measures, etc.), and demographic (age, years of education, occupation, ethnicity, etc.) variables. The high proportion of unexplained variance is likely to be due to nonmedical factors influencing the selection of patients for rehabilitation.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><issn>0039-2499</issn><issn>1524-4628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRaq2ePQk5iKcm3a9ssjel1A8oCFrPy2Z3FlfTRHcTof_eaEMPwxzeZ96BB6FLgjNCBFlgksUuZJRkNKOcHKEpySlPuaDlMZpizGRKuZSn6CzGD4wxZWU-QRPKcM6knKLblXPeeGjMbp6Ac2A6_wMNxDhPdGMT2wfd-bZJWpcMj9pPSAK868rXvvsPztGJ03WEi3HP0Nv9arN8TNfPD0_Lu3Vqciy7tChL4qAAATngkglROuaEJAabQjsjCmGwNZjnmArGS2e1AF4VRlfWaguGzdDNvvcrtN89xE5tfTRQ17qBto-qkCInXJIBXOxBE9oYAzj1FfxWh50iWP05U5io182LokRRNTgbLq7G6r7agj3wo6Qhvx5zHY2uXdCN8fGAiVIWw7BfpGh1JQ</recordid><startdate>19900201</startdate><enddate>19900201</enddate><creator>SHAH, S</creator><creator>VANCLAY, F</creator><creator>COOPER, B</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900201</creationdate><title>Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation</title><author>SHAH, S ; VANCLAY, F ; COOPER, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-7881fe7e6e5e083668f3f691c0c7afc676c0dc045026348fda6e4b7cabddadec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHAH, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANCLAY, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOPER, B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Stroke (1970)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHAH, S</au><au>VANCLAY, F</au><au>COOPER, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation</atitle><jtitle>Stroke (1970)</jtitle><addtitle>Stroke</addtitle><date>1990-02-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>241-246</pages><issn>0039-2499</issn><eissn>1524-4628</eissn><coden>SJCCA7</coden><abstract>This prospective multicenter study identifies the variables significant in the prediction of rehabilitation efficiency, achievement of rehabilitation potential and duration of rehabilitation stay in 258 persons with a first stroke admitted to comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation in Brisbane, Australia, during 1984. All three dependent variables were poorly predicted, with only 17% of the variance in rehabilitation efficiency, only 30% of the variance in achievement of rehabilitation potential, and only 22% of the variance in duration of rehabilitation stay explained. Unlike other reports, we considered most of the major medical (side of paralysis, stroke etiology, site of the lesion, arterial distribution affected, etc.), rehabilitative (initial Barthel Index score, interval from stroke onset to acute-care hospital admission, interval from hospital admission to rehabilitation commencement, neurologic measures, etc.), and demographic (age, years of education, occupation, ethnicity, etc.) variables. The high proportion of unexplained variance is likely to be due to nonmedical factors influencing the selection of patients for rehabilitation.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>2305399</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.str.21.2.241</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-2499
ispartof Stroke (1970), 1990-02, Vol.21 (2), p.241-246
issn 0039-2499
1524-4628
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79651491
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis of Variance
Biological and medical sciences
Cerebrovascular Disorders - rehabilitation
Disability Evaluation
Forecasting
Humans
Marriage
Medical sciences
Neurology
Prospective Studies
Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system
title Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A16%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficiency,%20effectiveness,%20and%20duration%20of%20stroke%20rehabilitation&rft.jtitle=Stroke%20(1970)&rft.au=SHAH,%20S&rft.date=1990-02-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=241-246&rft.issn=0039-2499&rft.eissn=1524-4628&rft.coden=SJCCA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.str.21.2.241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79651491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-7881fe7e6e5e083668f3f691c0c7afc676c0dc045026348fda6e4b7cabddadec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79651491&rft_id=info:pmid/2305399&rfr_iscdi=true