Loading…
Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation
This prospective multicenter study identifies the variables significant in the prediction of rehabilitation efficiency, achievement of rehabilitation potential and duration of rehabilitation stay in 258 persons with a first stroke admitted to comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation in Brisbane, Austr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Stroke (1970) 1990-02, Vol.21 (2), p.241-246 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-7881fe7e6e5e083668f3f691c0c7afc676c0dc045026348fda6e4b7cabddadec3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 246 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 241 |
container_title | Stroke (1970) |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | SHAH, S VANCLAY, F COOPER, B |
description | This prospective multicenter study identifies the variables significant in the prediction of rehabilitation efficiency, achievement of rehabilitation potential and duration of rehabilitation stay in 258 persons with a first stroke admitted to comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation in Brisbane, Australia, during 1984. All three dependent variables were poorly predicted, with only 17% of the variance in rehabilitation efficiency, only 30% of the variance in achievement of rehabilitation potential, and only 22% of the variance in duration of rehabilitation stay explained. Unlike other reports, we considered most of the major medical (side of paralysis, stroke etiology, site of the lesion, arterial distribution affected, etc.), rehabilitative (initial Barthel Index score, interval from stroke onset to acute-care hospital admission, interval from hospital admission to rehabilitation commencement, neurologic measures, etc.), and demographic (age, years of education, occupation, ethnicity, etc.) variables. The high proportion of unexplained variance is likely to be due to nonmedical factors influencing the selection of patients for rehabilitation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/01.str.21.2.241 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79651491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79651491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-7881fe7e6e5e083668f3f691c0c7afc676c0dc045026348fda6e4b7cabddadec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRaq2ePQk5iKcm3a9ssjel1A8oCFrPy2Z3FlfTRHcTof_eaEMPwxzeZ96BB6FLgjNCBFlgksUuZJRkNKOcHKEpySlPuaDlMZpizGRKuZSn6CzGD4wxZWU-QRPKcM6knKLblXPeeGjMbp6Ac2A6_wMNxDhPdGMT2wfd-bZJWpcMj9pPSAK868rXvvsPztGJ03WEi3HP0Nv9arN8TNfPD0_Lu3Vqciy7tChL4qAAATngkglROuaEJAabQjsjCmGwNZjnmArGS2e1AF4VRlfWaguGzdDNvvcrtN89xE5tfTRQ17qBto-qkCInXJIBXOxBE9oYAzj1FfxWh50iWP05U5io182LokRRNTgbLq7G6r7agj3wo6Qhvx5zHY2uXdCN8fGAiVIWw7BfpGh1JQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79651491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>SHAH, S ; VANCLAY, F ; COOPER, B</creator><creatorcontrib>SHAH, S ; VANCLAY, F ; COOPER, B</creatorcontrib><description>This prospective multicenter study identifies the variables significant in the prediction of rehabilitation efficiency, achievement of rehabilitation potential and duration of rehabilitation stay in 258 persons with a first stroke admitted to comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation in Brisbane, Australia, during 1984. All three dependent variables were poorly predicted, with only 17% of the variance in rehabilitation efficiency, only 30% of the variance in achievement of rehabilitation potential, and only 22% of the variance in duration of rehabilitation stay explained. Unlike other reports, we considered most of the major medical (side of paralysis, stroke etiology, site of the lesion, arterial distribution affected, etc.), rehabilitative (initial Barthel Index score, interval from stroke onset to acute-care hospital admission, interval from hospital admission to rehabilitation commencement, neurologic measures, etc.), and demographic (age, years of education, occupation, ethnicity, etc.) variables. The high proportion of unexplained variance is likely to be due to nonmedical factors influencing the selection of patients for rehabilitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-2499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.str.21.2.241</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2305399</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SJCCA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebrovascular Disorders - rehabilitation ; Disability Evaluation ; Forecasting ; Humans ; Marriage ; Medical sciences ; Neurology ; Prospective Studies ; Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><ispartof>Stroke (1970), 1990-02, Vol.21 (2), p.241-246</ispartof><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-7881fe7e6e5e083668f3f691c0c7afc676c0dc045026348fda6e4b7cabddadec3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6897689$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2305399$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHAH, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANCLAY, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOPER, B</creatorcontrib><title>Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation</title><title>Stroke (1970)</title><addtitle>Stroke</addtitle><description>This prospective multicenter study identifies the variables significant in the prediction of rehabilitation efficiency, achievement of rehabilitation potential and duration of rehabilitation stay in 258 persons with a first stroke admitted to comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation in Brisbane, Australia, during 1984. All three dependent variables were poorly predicted, with only 17% of the variance in rehabilitation efficiency, only 30% of the variance in achievement of rehabilitation potential, and only 22% of the variance in duration of rehabilitation stay explained. Unlike other reports, we considered most of the major medical (side of paralysis, stroke etiology, site of the lesion, arterial distribution affected, etc.), rehabilitative (initial Barthel Index score, interval from stroke onset to acute-care hospital admission, interval from hospital admission to rehabilitation commencement, neurologic measures, etc.), and demographic (age, years of education, occupation, ethnicity, etc.) variables. The high proportion of unexplained variance is likely to be due to nonmedical factors influencing the selection of patients for rehabilitation.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><issn>0039-2499</issn><issn>1524-4628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRaq2ePQk5iKcm3a9ssjel1A8oCFrPy2Z3FlfTRHcTof_eaEMPwxzeZ96BB6FLgjNCBFlgksUuZJRkNKOcHKEpySlPuaDlMZpizGRKuZSn6CzGD4wxZWU-QRPKcM6knKLblXPeeGjMbp6Ac2A6_wMNxDhPdGMT2wfd-bZJWpcMj9pPSAK868rXvvsPztGJ03WEi3HP0Nv9arN8TNfPD0_Lu3Vqciy7tChL4qAAATngkglROuaEJAabQjsjCmGwNZjnmArGS2e1AF4VRlfWaguGzdDNvvcrtN89xE5tfTRQ17qBto-qkCInXJIBXOxBE9oYAzj1FfxWh50iWP05U5io182LokRRNTgbLq7G6r7agj3wo6Qhvx5zHY2uXdCN8fGAiVIWw7BfpGh1JQ</recordid><startdate>19900201</startdate><enddate>19900201</enddate><creator>SHAH, S</creator><creator>VANCLAY, F</creator><creator>COOPER, B</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900201</creationdate><title>Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation</title><author>SHAH, S ; VANCLAY, F ; COOPER, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-7881fe7e6e5e083668f3f691c0c7afc676c0dc045026348fda6e4b7cabddadec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHAH, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANCLAY, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOPER, B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Stroke (1970)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHAH, S</au><au>VANCLAY, F</au><au>COOPER, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation</atitle><jtitle>Stroke (1970)</jtitle><addtitle>Stroke</addtitle><date>1990-02-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>241-246</pages><issn>0039-2499</issn><eissn>1524-4628</eissn><coden>SJCCA7</coden><abstract>This prospective multicenter study identifies the variables significant in the prediction of rehabilitation efficiency, achievement of rehabilitation potential and duration of rehabilitation stay in 258 persons with a first stroke admitted to comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation in Brisbane, Australia, during 1984. All three dependent variables were poorly predicted, with only 17% of the variance in rehabilitation efficiency, only 30% of the variance in achievement of rehabilitation potential, and only 22% of the variance in duration of rehabilitation stay explained. Unlike other reports, we considered most of the major medical (side of paralysis, stroke etiology, site of the lesion, arterial distribution affected, etc.), rehabilitative (initial Barthel Index score, interval from stroke onset to acute-care hospital admission, interval from hospital admission to rehabilitation commencement, neurologic measures, etc.), and demographic (age, years of education, occupation, ethnicity, etc.) variables. The high proportion of unexplained variance is likely to be due to nonmedical factors influencing the selection of patients for rehabilitation.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>2305399</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.str.21.2.241</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-2499 |
ispartof | Stroke (1970), 1990-02, Vol.21 (2), p.241-246 |
issn | 0039-2499 1524-4628 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79651491 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Biological and medical sciences Cerebrovascular Disorders - rehabilitation Disability Evaluation Forecasting Humans Marriage Medical sciences Neurology Prospective Studies Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system |
title | Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A16%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficiency,%20effectiveness,%20and%20duration%20of%20stroke%20rehabilitation&rft.jtitle=Stroke%20(1970)&rft.au=SHAH,%20S&rft.date=1990-02-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=241-246&rft.issn=0039-2499&rft.eissn=1524-4628&rft.coden=SJCCA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.str.21.2.241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79651491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-7881fe7e6e5e083668f3f691c0c7afc676c0dc045026348fda6e4b7cabddadec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79651491&rft_id=info:pmid/2305399&rfr_iscdi=true |