Postural motor programming in paraplegic patients during rehabilitation

• Published in: Ergonomics 1998-03, Vol.41 (3), p.302-316
• Main Authors: SEELEN, H. A. M., POTTEN, Y. J. M., ADAM, J. J., DRUKKER, J., SPAANS, F., HUSON, A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Biomechanics; Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord; Clinical Study Motor Control Movement Preparation Posture Rehabilitation Spinal Cord Injury; Female; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Motion control; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes); Neurology; Paraplegia - physiopathology; Paraplegia - rehabilitation; Patient rehabilitation; Postural Balance - physiology; Posture - physiology; Space life sciences; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology; Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation
• ISSN: 0014-0139; 1366-5847
• DOI: 10.1080/001401398187053

One of the basic aims in the rehabilitation of thoracic spinal cord injured (SCI) patients concerns the regaining of sitting posture control. This implies the development of new postural strategies requiring the adjustment of motor programming processes. The aim of this study was to investigate the time course of postural reorganization during active, clinical rehabilitation of thoracic SCI patients with different SCI levels. Thus changes in motor programming in sitting balance control were investigated in two groups of complete low or high thoracic SCI patients. At several stages during the rehabilitation process an experiment was held in which sitting posture was perturbed systematically using submaximal reaching movements over four reaching distances. This bimanual reaching task was presented as a visual precue choice reaction time (RT) task in which reaching distance (i.e. grade of postural perturbation) was precued. Results indicated that in both high and low thoracic SCI patients RTs in movements involving postural perturbation became shorter during the course of the rehabilitation period. However, low thoracic SCI patients were generally slower in the programming of balance perturbing movements than high thoracic SCI patients, a phenomenon that did not change over time. Furthermore, initial differences in RTs as a function of grade of postural perturbation disappeared in both groups in the course of the rehabilitation phase. Precue benefit, equally large for both groups, did not change as a function of rehabilitation time. It is concluded that the observed phenomena signify the gradual development of new central postural control processes in both SCI groups during rehabilitation. Low thoracic SCI patients, having more residual sensorimotor functions, seem to adopt more complex strategies in maintaining and restoring sitting balance that take longer to specify and to programme. High thoracic SCI patients seem to rely on simpler strategies using more passive postural support.