The left hemisphere and the selection of learned actions

• Published in: Neuropsychologia 1998, Vol.36 (1), p.11-24
• Main Authors: Rushworth, Matthew F.S., Nixon, Philip D., Wade, Derick T., Renowden, Shelley, Passingham, Richard E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Adult and adolescent clinical studies; Aged; apraxia; Apraxias - physiopathology; Biological and medical sciences; Brain - pathology; Cerebral Cortex - physiology; Corpus Striatum; Female; Functional Laterality; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; motor learning; Motor Skills; Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology; parietal cortex; premotor cortex; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychopathology. Psychiatry; Reinforcement (Psychology); striatum; subcortical fascicles; Thalamus
• ISSN: 0028-3932; 1873-3514
• DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00101-2

The left hemisphere's dominance for movement is well known. The basis of its dominance is less clear. We have tested 16 left hemisphere (LH) patients, 17 right hemisphere (RH) patients and 12 neurologically normal controls on a battery of five tasks. The tasks were based on animal lesion and recording studies, and human imaging and magnetic stimulation studies that identified two distributed systems that are important for the selection of motor responses and object-oriented responses. The LH patients were impaired on three response selection tasks: learning to select between joystick movement responses instructed by visual cues; learning to select between analogous object-oriented responses instructed by visual cues; learning to select movements in a sequence. Although we replicated the finding that LH damage impairs sequencing, some of the impaired tasks had no sequencing element. We therefore argue that the LH deficits are best explained as an impairment of response selection. This was confirmed by showing that LH subjects were unimpaired on a more demanding task—object discrimination learning—which imposed a greater memory load but had no response selection element. Moreover, the LH deficits could not be attributed to disorganization of movement kinematics. The lesions of the impaired LH group were widespread but always included the distributed systems known to be important for response selection—the dorsolateral frontal and parietal cortices, striatum, thalamus and white matter fascicles.