Loading…
A simple ultrasonographic test for preoperative haemodynamic evaluation of varicocele
According to the haemodynamic classification of varicocele type I is caused by renospermatic reflux due to a proximal nutcracker phenomenon or to valvular insufficiency of the left internal spermatic vein. Type II is due to ileospermatic reflux and type III may be characterized by a combination of I...
Saved in:
Published in: | International urology and nephrology 1998, Vol.30 (1), p.59-67 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | According to the haemodynamic classification of varicocele type I is caused by renospermatic reflux due to a proximal nutcracker phenomenon or to valvular insufficiency of the left internal spermatic vein. Type II is due to ileospermatic reflux and type III may be characterized by a combination of I and II refluxes. Although this classification proposed by Coolsaet is precious for decision making, it is seldom used in clinical practice being based on a complex angiographic evaluation which is invasive and exposes the patient (often a teenager or with infertility disturbances) to excessive radiations. The aim of the present study was to work up an original ultrasonographic test for preoperative haemodynamic evaluation of varicocele in order to indicate the most appropriate microsurgical treatment. Sixty-three patients underwent a preoperative clinico-echographic dynamic test which allowed to classify 76.9% of the cases as haemodynamic type I, 10.7% as type II and 12.3% as type III. Microsurgical shunts were performed in all cases and evaluation of recurrences was accurately carried out with ultrasonographic measurement of residual varicosities. In 6% of the cases varicosities were consistently reduced in size and in 94% absence of varicosities was demonstrated. Varicocele increased in size or was unchanged in none of the cases. In conclusion the test hereby described was shown to be simple and easily reproducible. It allowed a haemodynamic and objective classification of varicocele offering a unique opportunity for tailoring to the individual patient the most appropriate treatment. Furthermore, ultrasonographic postoperative follow-up is the most reliable and objective method to control the "true" incidence of post-varicocelectomy recurrences. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0301-1623 1573-2584 |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF02550280 |