Loading…

Advanced cardiac life support events in a community hospital and their outcome: evaluation of actual arrests

To evaluate resuscitation efforts for patients with cardiac and/or pulmonary arrest in our hospital a retrospective study was conducted and compared with available data from other community teaching hospitals. Records of 131 consecutive patients of ages 16–98 who received resuscitation according to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Resuscitation 1998-02, Vol.36 (2), p.95-99
Main Authors: Ravakhah, Keyvan, Khalafi, Kamal, Bathory, Tamas, Wang, Hsien C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-9bf600321c821e74cbf2c3bd36979c3a7e639dcf3212aded6c1b9ac9c64741cc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-9bf600321c821e74cbf2c3bd36979c3a7e639dcf3212aded6c1b9ac9c64741cc3
container_end_page 99
container_issue 2
container_start_page 95
container_title Resuscitation
container_volume 36
creator Ravakhah, Keyvan
Khalafi, Kamal
Bathory, Tamas
Wang, Hsien C
description To evaluate resuscitation efforts for patients with cardiac and/or pulmonary arrest in our hospital a retrospective study was conducted and compared with available data from other community teaching hospitals. Records of 131 consecutive patients of ages 16–98 who received resuscitation according to Advanced Cardiac Life Support protocols were reviewed. Short-term survival (return of spontaneous circulation) and discharge-from-the-hospital survival were measured. Nineteen patients (15%) were excluded from the study because the information recorded on the code record sheet was insufficient. Overall short-term survival rate was 34.8%. Resuscitations in the Emergency Room were evaluated separately, because most of them were initiated outside of the hospital. Their short-term survival was 14%, but none of them survived to be discharged. Out of 69 inpatient resuscitative efforts, 33 were successful (47.8%). Of these 33, nine (13.0%) left the hospital. The rest expired during the same hospitalization. Short-term survival for patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery was 60% (6 of 10) and 30% (3 of 10) were discharged home. Forty percent of official code records were incomplete. We concluded that better education and more emphasis on record-keeping are mandatory, with the main burden falling upon the nurse in charge to have received more precise instruction. Contrary to published data, women did not have a better survival than men ( P>0.05). There was no difference in outcomes between resident physician directed codes compared to attending physician directed codes ( P>0.05). The mean age of inpatient short-term survivors was 69.0 (±13.2) years and that of non-survivors 69.8 (±15.7) years ( P>0.05). Post-bypass surgery patients had a better survival than non-surgical patients, but the difference was not significant ( P>0.05). Survival in our hospital was comparable to one hospital and worse than another (34.8% vs. 39.6% or 63.0%). Despite success, prognosis after arrest remains poor.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00003-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79832070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300957298000033</els_id><sourcerecordid>79832070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-9bf600321c821e74cbf2c3bd36979c3a7e639dcf3212aded6c1b9ac9c64741cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVJSbZJf0JAhxDag1t9eC2rlxKWpi0Eemh6FvJoTFRsy5Xkhfz7ytllr9FFoPcZzfAMIdecfeKMN59_M8lYpbdKfNDtR1aOrOQbsuGtkhXfKnZGNifkgrxL6e_KbLU6J-fljStRb8hw5_Z2AnQUbHTeAh18jzQt8xxiprjHKSfqJ2ophHFcJp-f6VNIs892oHZyND-hjzQsueT4pVTYYbHZh4mGnlrIy8rFiCmnK_K2t0PC98f7kvy5__a4-1E9_Pr-c3f3UIFsda501zdlUsGhFRxVDV0vQHZONlppkFZhI7WDvhDCOnQN8E5b0NDUquYA8pLcHv6dY_i3lM5m9AlwGOyEYUlG6VYKplgBtwcQYkgpYm_m6Ecbnw1nZrVsXiybVaHRrXmxbGSpuz42WLoR3anqqLXkN8fcJrBDH4tin06YELqWXBXs6wHDImPvMZoEHtdt-IiQjQv-lUH-A_RImrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79832070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advanced cardiac life support events in a community hospital and their outcome: evaluation of actual arrests</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Ravakhah, Keyvan ; Khalafi, Kamal ; Bathory, Tamas ; Wang, Hsien C</creator><creatorcontrib>Ravakhah, Keyvan ; Khalafi, Kamal ; Bathory, Tamas ; Wang, Hsien C</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate resuscitation efforts for patients with cardiac and/or pulmonary arrest in our hospital a retrospective study was conducted and compared with available data from other community teaching hospitals. Records of 131 consecutive patients of ages 16–98 who received resuscitation according to Advanced Cardiac Life Support protocols were reviewed. Short-term survival (return of spontaneous circulation) and discharge-from-the-hospital survival were measured. Nineteen patients (15%) were excluded from the study because the information recorded on the code record sheet was insufficient. Overall short-term survival rate was 34.8%. Resuscitations in the Emergency Room were evaluated separately, because most of them were initiated outside of the hospital. Their short-term survival was 14%, but none of them survived to be discharged. Out of 69 inpatient resuscitative efforts, 33 were successful (47.8%). Of these 33, nine (13.0%) left the hospital. The rest expired during the same hospitalization. Short-term survival for patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery was 60% (6 of 10) and 30% (3 of 10) were discharged home. Forty percent of official code records were incomplete. We concluded that better education and more emphasis on record-keeping are mandatory, with the main burden falling upon the nurse in charge to have received more precise instruction. Contrary to published data, women did not have a better survival than men ( P&gt;0.05). There was no difference in outcomes between resident physician directed codes compared to attending physician directed codes ( P&gt;0.05). The mean age of inpatient short-term survivors was 69.0 (±13.2) years and that of non-survivors 69.8 (±15.7) years ( P&gt;0.05). Post-bypass surgery patients had a better survival than non-surgical patients, but the difference was not significant ( P&gt;0.05). Survival in our hospital was comparable to one hospital and worse than another (34.8% vs. 39.6% or 63.0%). Despite success, prognosis after arrest remains poor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-9572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00003-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9571724</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSUSBS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bypass surgery ; Cardiopulmonary arrest ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care ; Female ; Heart Arrest - mortality ; Heart Arrest - therapy ; Hospitals, Community ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Prognosis ; Resuscitation ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Resuscitation, 1998-02, Vol.36 (2), p.95-99</ispartof><rights>1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-9bf600321c821e74cbf2c3bd36979c3a7e639dcf3212aded6c1b9ac9c64741cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-9bf600321c821e74cbf2c3bd36979c3a7e639dcf3212aded6c1b9ac9c64741cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2294317$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9571724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ravakhah, Keyvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalafi, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bathory, Tamas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hsien C</creatorcontrib><title>Advanced cardiac life support events in a community hospital and their outcome: evaluation of actual arrests</title><title>Resuscitation</title><addtitle>Resuscitation</addtitle><description>To evaluate resuscitation efforts for patients with cardiac and/or pulmonary arrest in our hospital a retrospective study was conducted and compared with available data from other community teaching hospitals. Records of 131 consecutive patients of ages 16–98 who received resuscitation according to Advanced Cardiac Life Support protocols were reviewed. Short-term survival (return of spontaneous circulation) and discharge-from-the-hospital survival were measured. Nineteen patients (15%) were excluded from the study because the information recorded on the code record sheet was insufficient. Overall short-term survival rate was 34.8%. Resuscitations in the Emergency Room were evaluated separately, because most of them were initiated outside of the hospital. Their short-term survival was 14%, but none of them survived to be discharged. Out of 69 inpatient resuscitative efforts, 33 were successful (47.8%). Of these 33, nine (13.0%) left the hospital. The rest expired during the same hospitalization. Short-term survival for patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery was 60% (6 of 10) and 30% (3 of 10) were discharged home. Forty percent of official code records were incomplete. We concluded that better education and more emphasis on record-keeping are mandatory, with the main burden falling upon the nurse in charge to have received more precise instruction. Contrary to published data, women did not have a better survival than men ( P&gt;0.05). There was no difference in outcomes between resident physician directed codes compared to attending physician directed codes ( P&gt;0.05). The mean age of inpatient short-term survivors was 69.0 (±13.2) years and that of non-survivors 69.8 (±15.7) years ( P&gt;0.05). Post-bypass surgery patients had a better survival than non-surgical patients, but the difference was not significant ( P&gt;0.05). Survival in our hospital was comparable to one hospital and worse than another (34.8% vs. 39.6% or 63.0%). Despite success, prognosis after arrest remains poor.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bypass surgery</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary arrest</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - mortality</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Hospitals, Community</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Resuscitation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0300-9572</issn><issn>1873-1570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVJSbZJf0JAhxDag1t9eC2rlxKWpi0Eemh6FvJoTFRsy5Xkhfz7ytllr9FFoPcZzfAMIdecfeKMN59_M8lYpbdKfNDtR1aOrOQbsuGtkhXfKnZGNifkgrxL6e_KbLU6J-fljStRb8hw5_Z2AnQUbHTeAh18jzQt8xxiprjHKSfqJ2ophHFcJp-f6VNIs892oHZyND-hjzQsueT4pVTYYbHZh4mGnlrIy8rFiCmnK_K2t0PC98f7kvy5__a4-1E9_Pr-c3f3UIFsda501zdlUsGhFRxVDV0vQHZONlppkFZhI7WDvhDCOnQN8E5b0NDUquYA8pLcHv6dY_i3lM5m9AlwGOyEYUlG6VYKplgBtwcQYkgpYm_m6Ecbnw1nZrVsXiybVaHRrXmxbGSpuz42WLoR3anqqLXkN8fcJrBDH4tin06YELqWXBXs6wHDImPvMZoEHtdt-IiQjQv-lUH-A_RImrw</recordid><startdate>19980201</startdate><enddate>19980201</enddate><creator>Ravakhah, Keyvan</creator><creator>Khalafi, Kamal</creator><creator>Bathory, Tamas</creator><creator>Wang, Hsien C</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980201</creationdate><title>Advanced cardiac life support events in a community hospital and their outcome: evaluation of actual arrests</title><author>Ravakhah, Keyvan ; Khalafi, Kamal ; Bathory, Tamas ; Wang, Hsien C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-9bf600321c821e74cbf2c3bd36979c3a7e639dcf3212aded6c1b9ac9c64741cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bypass surgery</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary arrest</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - mortality</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Hospitals, Community</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Resuscitation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ravakhah, Keyvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalafi, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bathory, Tamas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hsien C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Resuscitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ravakhah, Keyvan</au><au>Khalafi, Kamal</au><au>Bathory, Tamas</au><au>Wang, Hsien C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advanced cardiac life support events in a community hospital and their outcome: evaluation of actual arrests</atitle><jtitle>Resuscitation</jtitle><addtitle>Resuscitation</addtitle><date>1998-02-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>95-99</pages><issn>0300-9572</issn><eissn>1873-1570</eissn><coden>RSUSBS</coden><abstract>To evaluate resuscitation efforts for patients with cardiac and/or pulmonary arrest in our hospital a retrospective study was conducted and compared with available data from other community teaching hospitals. Records of 131 consecutive patients of ages 16–98 who received resuscitation according to Advanced Cardiac Life Support protocols were reviewed. Short-term survival (return of spontaneous circulation) and discharge-from-the-hospital survival were measured. Nineteen patients (15%) were excluded from the study because the information recorded on the code record sheet was insufficient. Overall short-term survival rate was 34.8%. Resuscitations in the Emergency Room were evaluated separately, because most of them were initiated outside of the hospital. Their short-term survival was 14%, but none of them survived to be discharged. Out of 69 inpatient resuscitative efforts, 33 were successful (47.8%). Of these 33, nine (13.0%) left the hospital. The rest expired during the same hospitalization. Short-term survival for patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery was 60% (6 of 10) and 30% (3 of 10) were discharged home. Forty percent of official code records were incomplete. We concluded that better education and more emphasis on record-keeping are mandatory, with the main burden falling upon the nurse in charge to have received more precise instruction. Contrary to published data, women did not have a better survival than men ( P&gt;0.05). There was no difference in outcomes between resident physician directed codes compared to attending physician directed codes ( P&gt;0.05). The mean age of inpatient short-term survivors was 69.0 (±13.2) years and that of non-survivors 69.8 (±15.7) years ( P&gt;0.05). Post-bypass surgery patients had a better survival than non-surgical patients, but the difference was not significant ( P&gt;0.05). Survival in our hospital was comparable to one hospital and worse than another (34.8% vs. 39.6% or 63.0%). Despite success, prognosis after arrest remains poor.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>9571724</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00003-3</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-9572
ispartof Resuscitation, 1998-02, Vol.36 (2), p.95-99
issn 0300-9572
1873-1570
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79832070
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Aged
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Bypass surgery
Cardiopulmonary arrest
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care
Female
Heart Arrest - mortality
Heart Arrest - therapy
Hospitals, Community
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Male
Medical sciences
Prognosis
Resuscitation
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
title Advanced cardiac life support events in a community hospital and their outcome: evaluation of actual arrests
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A34%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advanced%20cardiac%20life%20support%20events%20in%20a%20community%20hospital%20and%20their%20outcome:%20evaluation%20of%20actual%20arrests&rft.jtitle=Resuscitation&rft.au=Ravakhah,%20Keyvan&rft.date=1998-02-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=95-99&rft.issn=0300-9572&rft.eissn=1873-1570&rft.coden=RSUSBS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00003-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79832070%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-9bf600321c821e74cbf2c3bd36979c3a7e639dcf3212aded6c1b9ac9c64741cc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79832070&rft_id=info:pmid/9571724&rfr_iscdi=true