Loading…

Virtual Electrode-Induced Phase Singularity: A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure

Delivery of a strong electric shock to the heart remains the only effective therapy against ventricular fibrillation. Despite significant improvements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of defibrillation remain poorly understood. We have recently demo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation research 1998-05, Vol.82 (8), p.918-925
Main Authors: Efimov, Igor R, Cheng, Yuanna, Van Wagoner, David R, Mazgalev, Todor, Tchou, Patrick J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3
container_end_page 925
container_issue 8
container_start_page 918
container_title Circulation research
container_volume 82
creator Efimov, Igor R
Cheng, Yuanna
Van Wagoner, David R
Mazgalev, Todor
Tchou, Patrick J
description Delivery of a strong electric shock to the heart remains the only effective therapy against ventricular fibrillation. Despite significant improvements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of defibrillation remain poorly understood. We have recently demonstrated that a monophasic defibrillation shock produces a highly nonuniform epicardial polarization pattern, referred to as a virtual electrode pattern (VEP). The VEP consists of large adjacent areas of strong positive and negative polarization. We sought to determine whether the VEP may be responsible for defibrillation failure by creating dispersion of postshock repolarization and reentry. Truncated exponential biphasic and monophasic shocks were delivered from a bipolar ICD lead in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Epicardial electrical activity was mapped during and after defibrillation shocks and shocks applied at the plateau phase of a normal action potential produced by ventricular pacing. A high-resolution fluorescence mapping system with 256 recording sites and a voltage-sensitive dye were used. Biphasic shocks with a weak second phase (70%) produced VEPs of reversed polarity. Both of these waveforms resulted in extra beats and arrhythmias. However, biphasic waveforms with intermediate second-phase voltages (20% to 70% of first-phase voltage) produced no VEP, because of an asymmetric reversal of the first-phase polarization. Therefore, there was no substrate for postshock dispersion of repolarization. Shocks producing strong VEPs resulted in postshock reentrant arrhythmias via a mechanism of phase singularity. Points of phase singularity were created by the shock in the intersection of areas of positive, negative, and no polarization, which were set by the shock to excited, excitable, and refractory states, respectively. Shock-induced VEPs may reinduce arrhythmias via a phase-singularity mechanism. Strong shocks may overcome the preshock electrical activity and create phase singularities, regardless of the preshock phase distribution. Optimal defibrillation waveforms did not produce VEPs because of an asymmetric effect of phase reversal on membrane polarization. (Circ Res. 1998;82:918-925.)
doi_str_mv 10.1161/01.RES.82.8.918
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79837680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29288393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1v1DAQxS0EKkvhzAkpQohbtjP-iB1ubdlCpSIQBcTNcpwJ6-JNip2o6n-P0a564DTSvN88Pb1h7CXCGrHBE8D118312vC1WbdoHrEVKi5rqTQ-ZisAaGstBDxlz3K-AUApeHvEjlqlG0RcsZ8_QpoXF6tNJD-nqaf6cuwXT331ZesyVddh_LVEl8J8_646rc5cDr76RH7rxpB31TRU72kIXQoxujlMY3XhQlwSPWdPBhczvTjMY_b9YvPt_GN99fnD5fnpVe0lb6E2HLoOOomGI_lm8MiV7AcHRSavAZXyje6E0VwJ6BVyBN8SKM05DtCLY_Z273ubpj8L5dnuQvZU0ow0Ldnq1gjdGCjg6__Am2lJY8lmOXKJopG8QCd7yKcp50SDvU1h59K9RbD_CreAthRuDbfGlsLLxauD7dLtqH_gDw0X_c1Bd9m7OCQ3-pAfMM4bCVoWTO6xuynOlPLvuNxRsltycd7a8kcQgLzGtjWgQEJdNgjiL_-plZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212413642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Virtual Electrode-Induced Phase Singularity: A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure</title><source>Freely Accessible Science Journals - check A-Z of ejournals</source><creator>Efimov, Igor R ; Cheng, Yuanna ; Van Wagoner, David R ; Mazgalev, Todor ; Tchou, Patrick J</creator><creatorcontrib>Efimov, Igor R ; Cheng, Yuanna ; Van Wagoner, David R ; Mazgalev, Todor ; Tchou, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><description>Delivery of a strong electric shock to the heart remains the only effective therapy against ventricular fibrillation. Despite significant improvements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of defibrillation remain poorly understood. We have recently demonstrated that a monophasic defibrillation shock produces a highly nonuniform epicardial polarization pattern, referred to as a virtual electrode pattern (VEP). The VEP consists of large adjacent areas of strong positive and negative polarization. We sought to determine whether the VEP may be responsible for defibrillation failure by creating dispersion of postshock repolarization and reentry. Truncated exponential biphasic and monophasic shocks were delivered from a bipolar ICD lead in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Epicardial electrical activity was mapped during and after defibrillation shocks and shocks applied at the plateau phase of a normal action potential produced by ventricular pacing. A high-resolution fluorescence mapping system with 256 recording sites and a voltage-sensitive dye were used. Biphasic shocks with a weak second phase (&lt;20% leading-edge voltage of the second phase with respect to the leading-edge voltage of the first phase) produced VEPs similar to monophasic shocks. Biphasic shocks with a strong second phase (&gt;70%) produced VEPs of reversed polarity. Both of these waveforms resulted in extra beats and arrhythmias. However, biphasic waveforms with intermediate second-phase voltages (20% to 70% of first-phase voltage) produced no VEP, because of an asymmetric reversal of the first-phase polarization. Therefore, there was no substrate for postshock dispersion of repolarization. Shocks producing strong VEPs resulted in postshock reentrant arrhythmias via a mechanism of phase singularity. Points of phase singularity were created by the shock in the intersection of areas of positive, negative, and no polarization, which were set by the shock to excited, excitable, and refractory states, respectively. Shock-induced VEPs may reinduce arrhythmias via a phase-singularity mechanism. Strong shocks may overcome the preshock electrical activity and create phase singularities, regardless of the preshock phase distribution. Optimal defibrillation waveforms did not produce VEPs because of an asymmetric effect of phase reversal on membrane polarization. (Circ Res. 1998;82:918-925.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.82.8.918</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9576111</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIRUAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac dysrhythmias ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Electric Countershock - instrumentation ; Electric Countershock - methods ; Heart ; Heart - physiology ; Heart - physiopathology ; In Vitro Techniques ; Medical sciences ; Models, Cardiovascular ; Rabbits ; Time Factors ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Circulation research, 1998-05, Vol.82 (8), p.918-925</ispartof><rights>1998 American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Heart Association, Inc. May 4, 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2264074$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9576111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Efimov, Igor R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yuanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wagoner, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazgalev, Todor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchou, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><title>Virtual Electrode-Induced Phase Singularity: A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure</title><title>Circulation research</title><addtitle>Circ Res</addtitle><description>Delivery of a strong electric shock to the heart remains the only effective therapy against ventricular fibrillation. Despite significant improvements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of defibrillation remain poorly understood. We have recently demonstrated that a monophasic defibrillation shock produces a highly nonuniform epicardial polarization pattern, referred to as a virtual electrode pattern (VEP). The VEP consists of large adjacent areas of strong positive and negative polarization. We sought to determine whether the VEP may be responsible for defibrillation failure by creating dispersion of postshock repolarization and reentry. Truncated exponential biphasic and monophasic shocks were delivered from a bipolar ICD lead in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Epicardial electrical activity was mapped during and after defibrillation shocks and shocks applied at the plateau phase of a normal action potential produced by ventricular pacing. A high-resolution fluorescence mapping system with 256 recording sites and a voltage-sensitive dye were used. Biphasic shocks with a weak second phase (&lt;20% leading-edge voltage of the second phase with respect to the leading-edge voltage of the first phase) produced VEPs similar to monophasic shocks. Biphasic shocks with a strong second phase (&gt;70%) produced VEPs of reversed polarity. Both of these waveforms resulted in extra beats and arrhythmias. However, biphasic waveforms with intermediate second-phase voltages (20% to 70% of first-phase voltage) produced no VEP, because of an asymmetric reversal of the first-phase polarization. Therefore, there was no substrate for postshock dispersion of repolarization. Shocks producing strong VEPs resulted in postshock reentrant arrhythmias via a mechanism of phase singularity. Points of phase singularity were created by the shock in the intersection of areas of positive, negative, and no polarization, which were set by the shock to excited, excitable, and refractory states, respectively. Shock-induced VEPs may reinduce arrhythmias via a phase-singularity mechanism. Strong shocks may overcome the preshock electrical activity and create phase singularities, regardless of the preshock phase distribution. Optimal defibrillation waveforms did not produce VEPs because of an asymmetric effect of phase reversal on membrane polarization. (Circ Res. 1998;82:918-925.)</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac dysrhythmias</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - methods</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart - physiology</subject><subject>Heart - physiopathology</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>0009-7330</issn><issn>1524-4571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc1v1DAQxS0EKkvhzAkpQohbtjP-iB1ubdlCpSIQBcTNcpwJ6-JNip2o6n-P0a564DTSvN88Pb1h7CXCGrHBE8D118312vC1WbdoHrEVKi5rqTQ-ZisAaGstBDxlz3K-AUApeHvEjlqlG0RcsZ8_QpoXF6tNJD-nqaf6cuwXT331ZesyVddh_LVEl8J8_646rc5cDr76RH7rxpB31TRU72kIXQoxujlMY3XhQlwSPWdPBhczvTjMY_b9YvPt_GN99fnD5fnpVe0lb6E2HLoOOomGI_lm8MiV7AcHRSavAZXyje6E0VwJ6BVyBN8SKM05DtCLY_Z273ubpj8L5dnuQvZU0ow0Ldnq1gjdGCjg6__Am2lJY8lmOXKJopG8QCd7yKcp50SDvU1h59K9RbD_CreAthRuDbfGlsLLxauD7dLtqH_gDw0X_c1Bd9m7OCQ3-pAfMM4bCVoWTO6xuynOlPLvuNxRsltycd7a8kcQgLzGtjWgQEJdNgjiL_-plZE</recordid><startdate>19980504</startdate><enddate>19980504</enddate><creator>Efimov, Igor R</creator><creator>Cheng, Yuanna</creator><creator>Van Wagoner, David R</creator><creator>Mazgalev, Todor</creator><creator>Tchou, Patrick J</creator><general>American Heart Association, Inc</general><general>Lippincott</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980504</creationdate><title>Virtual Electrode-Induced Phase Singularity: A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure</title><author>Efimov, Igor R ; Cheng, Yuanna ; Van Wagoner, David R ; Mazgalev, Todor ; Tchou, Patrick J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac dysrhythmias</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - methods</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart - physiology</topic><topic>Heart - physiopathology</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Efimov, Igor R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yuanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wagoner, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazgalev, Todor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchou, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Efimov, Igor R</au><au>Cheng, Yuanna</au><au>Van Wagoner, David R</au><au>Mazgalev, Todor</au><au>Tchou, Patrick J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Virtual Electrode-Induced Phase Singularity: A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure</atitle><jtitle>Circulation research</jtitle><addtitle>Circ Res</addtitle><date>1998-05-04</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>918</spage><epage>925</epage><pages>918-925</pages><issn>0009-7330</issn><eissn>1524-4571</eissn><coden>CIRUAL</coden><abstract>Delivery of a strong electric shock to the heart remains the only effective therapy against ventricular fibrillation. Despite significant improvements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of defibrillation remain poorly understood. We have recently demonstrated that a monophasic defibrillation shock produces a highly nonuniform epicardial polarization pattern, referred to as a virtual electrode pattern (VEP). The VEP consists of large adjacent areas of strong positive and negative polarization. We sought to determine whether the VEP may be responsible for defibrillation failure by creating dispersion of postshock repolarization and reentry. Truncated exponential biphasic and monophasic shocks were delivered from a bipolar ICD lead in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Epicardial electrical activity was mapped during and after defibrillation shocks and shocks applied at the plateau phase of a normal action potential produced by ventricular pacing. A high-resolution fluorescence mapping system with 256 recording sites and a voltage-sensitive dye were used. Biphasic shocks with a weak second phase (&lt;20% leading-edge voltage of the second phase with respect to the leading-edge voltage of the first phase) produced VEPs similar to monophasic shocks. Biphasic shocks with a strong second phase (&gt;70%) produced VEPs of reversed polarity. Both of these waveforms resulted in extra beats and arrhythmias. However, biphasic waveforms with intermediate second-phase voltages (20% to 70% of first-phase voltage) produced no VEP, because of an asymmetric reversal of the first-phase polarization. Therefore, there was no substrate for postshock dispersion of repolarization. Shocks producing strong VEPs resulted in postshock reentrant arrhythmias via a mechanism of phase singularity. Points of phase singularity were created by the shock in the intersection of areas of positive, negative, and no polarization, which were set by the shock to excited, excitable, and refractory states, respectively. Shock-induced VEPs may reinduce arrhythmias via a phase-singularity mechanism. Strong shocks may overcome the preshock electrical activity and create phase singularities, regardless of the preshock phase distribution. Optimal defibrillation waveforms did not produce VEPs because of an asymmetric effect of phase reversal on membrane polarization. (Circ Res. 1998;82:918-925.)</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>American Heart Association, Inc</pub><pmid>9576111</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.RES.82.8.918</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7330
ispartof Circulation research, 1998-05, Vol.82 (8), p.918-925
issn 0009-7330
1524-4571
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79837680
source Freely Accessible Science Journals - check A-Z of ejournals
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac dysrhythmias
Cardiology. Vascular system
Electric Countershock - instrumentation
Electric Countershock - methods
Heart
Heart - physiology
Heart - physiopathology
In Vitro Techniques
Medical sciences
Models, Cardiovascular
Rabbits
Time Factors
Treatment Failure
title Virtual Electrode-Induced Phase Singularity: A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A03%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Virtual%20Electrode-Induced%20Phase%20Singularity:%20A%20Basic%20Mechanism%20of%20Defibrillation%20Failure&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20research&rft.au=Efimov,%20Igor%20R&rft.date=1998-05-04&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=918&rft.epage=925&rft.pages=918-925&rft.issn=0009-7330&rft.eissn=1524-4571&rft.coden=CIRUAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.RES.82.8.918&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29288393%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212413642&rft_id=info:pmid/9576111&rfr_iscdi=true