Loading…
Virtual Electrode-Induced Phase Singularity: A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure
Delivery of a strong electric shock to the heart remains the only effective therapy against ventricular fibrillation. Despite significant improvements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of defibrillation remain poorly understood. We have recently demo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Circulation research 1998-05, Vol.82 (8), p.918-925 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3 |
container_end_page | 925 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 918 |
container_title | Circulation research |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Efimov, Igor R Cheng, Yuanna Van Wagoner, David R Mazgalev, Todor Tchou, Patrick J |
description | Delivery of a strong electric shock to the heart remains the only effective therapy against ventricular fibrillation. Despite significant improvements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of defibrillation remain poorly understood. We have recently demonstrated that a monophasic defibrillation shock produces a highly nonuniform epicardial polarization pattern, referred to as a virtual electrode pattern (VEP). The VEP consists of large adjacent areas of strong positive and negative polarization. We sought to determine whether the VEP may be responsible for defibrillation failure by creating dispersion of postshock repolarization and reentry. Truncated exponential biphasic and monophasic shocks were delivered from a bipolar ICD lead in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Epicardial electrical activity was mapped during and after defibrillation shocks and shocks applied at the plateau phase of a normal action potential produced by ventricular pacing. A high-resolution fluorescence mapping system with 256 recording sites and a voltage-sensitive dye were used. Biphasic shocks with a weak second phase (70%) produced VEPs of reversed polarity. Both of these waveforms resulted in extra beats and arrhythmias. However, biphasic waveforms with intermediate second-phase voltages (20% to 70% of first-phase voltage) produced no VEP, because of an asymmetric reversal of the first-phase polarization. Therefore, there was no substrate for postshock dispersion of repolarization. Shocks producing strong VEPs resulted in postshock reentrant arrhythmias via a mechanism of phase singularity. Points of phase singularity were created by the shock in the intersection of areas of positive, negative, and no polarization, which were set by the shock to excited, excitable, and refractory states, respectively. Shock-induced VEPs may reinduce arrhythmias via a phase-singularity mechanism. Strong shocks may overcome the preshock electrical activity and create phase singularities, regardless of the preshock phase distribution. Optimal defibrillation waveforms did not produce VEPs because of an asymmetric effect of phase reversal on membrane polarization. (Circ Res. 1998;82:918-925.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/01.RES.82.8.918 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79837680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29288393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1v1DAQxS0EKkvhzAkpQohbtjP-iB1ubdlCpSIQBcTNcpwJ6-JNip2o6n-P0a564DTSvN88Pb1h7CXCGrHBE8D118312vC1WbdoHrEVKi5rqTQ-ZisAaGstBDxlz3K-AUApeHvEjlqlG0RcsZ8_QpoXF6tNJD-nqaf6cuwXT331ZesyVddh_LVEl8J8_646rc5cDr76RH7rxpB31TRU72kIXQoxujlMY3XhQlwSPWdPBhczvTjMY_b9YvPt_GN99fnD5fnpVe0lb6E2HLoOOomGI_lm8MiV7AcHRSavAZXyje6E0VwJ6BVyBN8SKM05DtCLY_Z273ubpj8L5dnuQvZU0ow0Ldnq1gjdGCjg6__Am2lJY8lmOXKJopG8QCd7yKcp50SDvU1h59K9RbD_CreAthRuDbfGlsLLxauD7dLtqH_gDw0X_c1Bd9m7OCQ3-pAfMM4bCVoWTO6xuynOlPLvuNxRsltycd7a8kcQgLzGtjWgQEJdNgjiL_-plZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212413642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Virtual Electrode-Induced Phase Singularity: A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure</title><source>Freely Accessible Science Journals - check A-Z of ejournals</source><creator>Efimov, Igor R ; Cheng, Yuanna ; Van Wagoner, David R ; Mazgalev, Todor ; Tchou, Patrick J</creator><creatorcontrib>Efimov, Igor R ; Cheng, Yuanna ; Van Wagoner, David R ; Mazgalev, Todor ; Tchou, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><description>Delivery of a strong electric shock to the heart remains the only effective therapy against ventricular fibrillation. Despite significant improvements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of defibrillation remain poorly understood. We have recently demonstrated that a monophasic defibrillation shock produces a highly nonuniform epicardial polarization pattern, referred to as a virtual electrode pattern (VEP). The VEP consists of large adjacent areas of strong positive and negative polarization. We sought to determine whether the VEP may be responsible for defibrillation failure by creating dispersion of postshock repolarization and reentry. Truncated exponential biphasic and monophasic shocks were delivered from a bipolar ICD lead in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Epicardial electrical activity was mapped during and after defibrillation shocks and shocks applied at the plateau phase of a normal action potential produced by ventricular pacing. A high-resolution fluorescence mapping system with 256 recording sites and a voltage-sensitive dye were used. Biphasic shocks with a weak second phase (<20% leading-edge voltage of the second phase with respect to the leading-edge voltage of the first phase) produced VEPs similar to monophasic shocks. Biphasic shocks with a strong second phase (>70%) produced VEPs of reversed polarity. Both of these waveforms resulted in extra beats and arrhythmias. However, biphasic waveforms with intermediate second-phase voltages (20% to 70% of first-phase voltage) produced no VEP, because of an asymmetric reversal of the first-phase polarization. Therefore, there was no substrate for postshock dispersion of repolarization. Shocks producing strong VEPs resulted in postshock reentrant arrhythmias via a mechanism of phase singularity. Points of phase singularity were created by the shock in the intersection of areas of positive, negative, and no polarization, which were set by the shock to excited, excitable, and refractory states, respectively. Shock-induced VEPs may reinduce arrhythmias via a phase-singularity mechanism. Strong shocks may overcome the preshock electrical activity and create phase singularities, regardless of the preshock phase distribution. Optimal defibrillation waveforms did not produce VEPs because of an asymmetric effect of phase reversal on membrane polarization. (Circ Res. 1998;82:918-925.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.82.8.918</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9576111</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIRUAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac dysrhythmias ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Electric Countershock - instrumentation ; Electric Countershock - methods ; Heart ; Heart - physiology ; Heart - physiopathology ; In Vitro Techniques ; Medical sciences ; Models, Cardiovascular ; Rabbits ; Time Factors ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Circulation research, 1998-05, Vol.82 (8), p.918-925</ispartof><rights>1998 American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Heart Association, Inc. May 4, 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2264074$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9576111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Efimov, Igor R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yuanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wagoner, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazgalev, Todor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchou, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><title>Virtual Electrode-Induced Phase Singularity: A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure</title><title>Circulation research</title><addtitle>Circ Res</addtitle><description>Delivery of a strong electric shock to the heart remains the only effective therapy against ventricular fibrillation. Despite significant improvements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of defibrillation remain poorly understood. We have recently demonstrated that a monophasic defibrillation shock produces a highly nonuniform epicardial polarization pattern, referred to as a virtual electrode pattern (VEP). The VEP consists of large adjacent areas of strong positive and negative polarization. We sought to determine whether the VEP may be responsible for defibrillation failure by creating dispersion of postshock repolarization and reentry. Truncated exponential biphasic and monophasic shocks were delivered from a bipolar ICD lead in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Epicardial electrical activity was mapped during and after defibrillation shocks and shocks applied at the plateau phase of a normal action potential produced by ventricular pacing. A high-resolution fluorescence mapping system with 256 recording sites and a voltage-sensitive dye were used. Biphasic shocks with a weak second phase (<20% leading-edge voltage of the second phase with respect to the leading-edge voltage of the first phase) produced VEPs similar to monophasic shocks. Biphasic shocks with a strong second phase (>70%) produced VEPs of reversed polarity. Both of these waveforms resulted in extra beats and arrhythmias. However, biphasic waveforms with intermediate second-phase voltages (20% to 70% of first-phase voltage) produced no VEP, because of an asymmetric reversal of the first-phase polarization. Therefore, there was no substrate for postshock dispersion of repolarization. Shocks producing strong VEPs resulted in postshock reentrant arrhythmias via a mechanism of phase singularity. Points of phase singularity were created by the shock in the intersection of areas of positive, negative, and no polarization, which were set by the shock to excited, excitable, and refractory states, respectively. Shock-induced VEPs may reinduce arrhythmias via a phase-singularity mechanism. Strong shocks may overcome the preshock electrical activity and create phase singularities, regardless of the preshock phase distribution. Optimal defibrillation waveforms did not produce VEPs because of an asymmetric effect of phase reversal on membrane polarization. (Circ Res. 1998;82:918-925.)</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac dysrhythmias</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - methods</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart - physiology</subject><subject>Heart - physiopathology</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>0009-7330</issn><issn>1524-4571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc1v1DAQxS0EKkvhzAkpQohbtjP-iB1ubdlCpSIQBcTNcpwJ6-JNip2o6n-P0a564DTSvN88Pb1h7CXCGrHBE8D118312vC1WbdoHrEVKi5rqTQ-ZisAaGstBDxlz3K-AUApeHvEjlqlG0RcsZ8_QpoXF6tNJD-nqaf6cuwXT331ZesyVddh_LVEl8J8_646rc5cDr76RH7rxpB31TRU72kIXQoxujlMY3XhQlwSPWdPBhczvTjMY_b9YvPt_GN99fnD5fnpVe0lb6E2HLoOOomGI_lm8MiV7AcHRSavAZXyje6E0VwJ6BVyBN8SKM05DtCLY_Z273ubpj8L5dnuQvZU0ow0Ldnq1gjdGCjg6__Am2lJY8lmOXKJopG8QCd7yKcp50SDvU1h59K9RbD_CreAthRuDbfGlsLLxauD7dLtqH_gDw0X_c1Bd9m7OCQ3-pAfMM4bCVoWTO6xuynOlPLvuNxRsltycd7a8kcQgLzGtjWgQEJdNgjiL_-plZE</recordid><startdate>19980504</startdate><enddate>19980504</enddate><creator>Efimov, Igor R</creator><creator>Cheng, Yuanna</creator><creator>Van Wagoner, David R</creator><creator>Mazgalev, Todor</creator><creator>Tchou, Patrick J</creator><general>American Heart Association, Inc</general><general>Lippincott</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980504</creationdate><title>Virtual Electrode-Induced Phase Singularity: A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure</title><author>Efimov, Igor R ; Cheng, Yuanna ; Van Wagoner, David R ; Mazgalev, Todor ; Tchou, Patrick J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac dysrhythmias</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - methods</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart - physiology</topic><topic>Heart - physiopathology</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Efimov, Igor R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yuanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wagoner, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazgalev, Todor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchou, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Efimov, Igor R</au><au>Cheng, Yuanna</au><au>Van Wagoner, David R</au><au>Mazgalev, Todor</au><au>Tchou, Patrick J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Virtual Electrode-Induced Phase Singularity: A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure</atitle><jtitle>Circulation research</jtitle><addtitle>Circ Res</addtitle><date>1998-05-04</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>918</spage><epage>925</epage><pages>918-925</pages><issn>0009-7330</issn><eissn>1524-4571</eissn><coden>CIRUAL</coden><abstract>Delivery of a strong electric shock to the heart remains the only effective therapy against ventricular fibrillation. Despite significant improvements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of defibrillation remain poorly understood. We have recently demonstrated that a monophasic defibrillation shock produces a highly nonuniform epicardial polarization pattern, referred to as a virtual electrode pattern (VEP). The VEP consists of large adjacent areas of strong positive and negative polarization. We sought to determine whether the VEP may be responsible for defibrillation failure by creating dispersion of postshock repolarization and reentry. Truncated exponential biphasic and monophasic shocks were delivered from a bipolar ICD lead in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Epicardial electrical activity was mapped during and after defibrillation shocks and shocks applied at the plateau phase of a normal action potential produced by ventricular pacing. A high-resolution fluorescence mapping system with 256 recording sites and a voltage-sensitive dye were used. Biphasic shocks with a weak second phase (<20% leading-edge voltage of the second phase with respect to the leading-edge voltage of the first phase) produced VEPs similar to monophasic shocks. Biphasic shocks with a strong second phase (>70%) produced VEPs of reversed polarity. Both of these waveforms resulted in extra beats and arrhythmias. However, biphasic waveforms with intermediate second-phase voltages (20% to 70% of first-phase voltage) produced no VEP, because of an asymmetric reversal of the first-phase polarization. Therefore, there was no substrate for postshock dispersion of repolarization. Shocks producing strong VEPs resulted in postshock reentrant arrhythmias via a mechanism of phase singularity. Points of phase singularity were created by the shock in the intersection of areas of positive, negative, and no polarization, which were set by the shock to excited, excitable, and refractory states, respectively. Shock-induced VEPs may reinduce arrhythmias via a phase-singularity mechanism. Strong shocks may overcome the preshock electrical activity and create phase singularities, regardless of the preshock phase distribution. Optimal defibrillation waveforms did not produce VEPs because of an asymmetric effect of phase reversal on membrane polarization. (Circ Res. 1998;82:918-925.)</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>American Heart Association, Inc</pub><pmid>9576111</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.RES.82.8.918</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-7330 |
ispartof | Circulation research, 1998-05, Vol.82 (8), p.918-925 |
issn | 0009-7330 1524-4571 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79837680 |
source | Freely Accessible Science Journals - check A-Z of ejournals |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Cardiac dysrhythmias Cardiology. Vascular system Electric Countershock - instrumentation Electric Countershock - methods Heart Heart - physiology Heart - physiopathology In Vitro Techniques Medical sciences Models, Cardiovascular Rabbits Time Factors Treatment Failure |
title | Virtual Electrode-Induced Phase Singularity: A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A03%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Virtual%20Electrode-Induced%20Phase%20Singularity:%20A%20Basic%20Mechanism%20of%20Defibrillation%20Failure&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20research&rft.au=Efimov,%20Igor%20R&rft.date=1998-05-04&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=918&rft.epage=925&rft.pages=918-925&rft.issn=0009-7330&rft.eissn=1524-4571&rft.coden=CIRUAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.RES.82.8.918&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29288393%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4290-820bb0b41821ec6fc1254dfa0c42ec70155c67b3872530d51210c9e057221f0d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212413642&rft_id=info:pmid/9576111&rfr_iscdi=true |