Stroke unit treatment improves long-term quality of life : A randomized controlled trial

• Published in: Stroke (1970) 1998-05, Vol.29 (5), p.895-899
• Main Authors: INDREDAVIK, B, BAKKE, F, SLØRDAHL, S. A, ROKSETH, R, HAHEIM, L. L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Activities of Daily Living; Biological and medical sciences; Cerebrovascular Disorders - prevention & control; Cerebrovascular Disorders - rehabilitation; Cerebrovascular Disorders - therapy; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Follow-Up Studies; Health Status; Health Status Indicators; Hospital Units; Humans; Medical sciences; Neurology; Pain Measurement - standards; Quality of Life; Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system
• ISSN: 0039-2499; 1524-4628
• DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.29.5.895

We have previously shown that treatment of acute stroke patients in the combined acute and rehabilitation stroke unit in our hospital improves survival and functional outcome compared with treatment in general wards. The primary aim of the present trial was to examine whether the treatment in our stroke unit had an effect on different aspects of quality of life (QoL) for stroke patients 5 years after the onset of stroke. In a randomized controlled trial, 110 patients with symptoms and signs of an acute stroke were allocated to the stroke unit and 110 to general wards. No significant differences existed in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The patients alive after 5 years were assessed by the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), which were the scales used as primary outcome measures for QoL. As secondary outcome measures we used a global score for the NHP and a simple visual analogue scale (VAS). After 5 years, 45 of the patients treated in the stroke unit and 32 of those treated in general wards were alive. All surviving patients were assessed by the FAI. Thirty-seven (82.2%) of the stroke unit patients and 25 (78.1%) of the general wards patients were assessed by the NHP; 38 (84.4%) and 28 (87.5%), respectively, were assessed by the VAS. Patients treated in the stroke unit had a higher score on the FAI (P=0.0142). Assessment with the NHP showed better results in the stroke unit group for the dimensions of energy (P=0.0323), physical mobility (P=0.0415), emotional reactions (P=0.0290), social isolation (P=0.0089), and sleep (P=0.0436), although there was no difference in pain (P=0.3186). The global NHP score and VAS score also showed significantly better results in the stroke unit group (NHP, P