Loading…
Structural equation modeling and its relationship to multiple regression and factor analysis
Using a conceptual and nontechnical approach, the meaning of structural equation modeling (SEM) and the similarities to, and differences from, more commonly used procedures such as correlation, regression, path analysis, and factor analysis are explained. Application of the statistical technique is...
Saved in:
Published in: | Research in nursing & health 1998-06, Vol.21 (3), p.271-281 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 281 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 271 |
container_title | Research in nursing & health |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Musil, Carol M. Jones, Susan L. Warner, Camille D. |
description | Using a conceptual and nontechnical approach, the meaning of structural equation modeling (SEM) and the similarities to, and differences from, more commonly used procedures such as correlation, regression, path analysis, and factor analysis are explained. Application of the statistical technique is presented using data from a study of the relationships among stresses, strains, and physical health in a random sample of 492 community‐dwelling elders aged 65 and older. Advantages of each statistical procedure are described. Theoretical issues related to the use of each procedure are presented with emphasis on the need for a sound theoretical model and match between the statistical procedure and the aims of the analysis. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Res Nurs Health 21:271–281, 1998 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199806)21:3<271::AID-NUR10>3.0.CO;2-G |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79903663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79903663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-9e3e727530f827a929d14e5b5372b891bc93d8b8c0ff38faef3eff35591c71903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9r1EAUxQdR6lr9CEIeRNqHrHdmNpPM-gdK1O1C6YK11gfhMslO6ugk2c4k6H57J82SFwWf7uWecw-HHyFvKcwpAHt1crXO16cUZBazBXw9oVJmIE4ZXfI3LKXL5dn6fXx5_YnCOz6Heb55zeLVAzKbPh6SGVABscgkfUyeeP8DgNKE0SNyJAXIhLIZ-XbVub7seqdspO961Zm2iep2q61pbiPVbCPT-chpe6_472YXdW1U97YzO6uDcOu098PT4K1U2bUurMruvfFPyaNKWa-fHeYxuf744XN-Hl9sVuv87CIuFxwglprrlKUJhypjqZJMbulCJ0XCU1aE8kUp-TYrshKqimeV0hXXYUsSScuUSuDH5OWYu3PtXa99h7XxpbZWNbrtPaYymITgfCpQutZ7pyvcOVMrt0cKOFBHHKjjwBAHhjhSR0aRY6COGKjjPfVwAMw3yHAVcp8fCvRFrbdT6gFz0F8cdOVLZSunmtL4ycbYQjBGg-3LaPtlrN7_1e0_1f7VbDyE4HgMNr7Tv6dg5X6iSHma4M3lCulNInIhcjznfwC9M7pE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79903663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural equation modeling and its relationship to multiple regression and factor analysis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Musil, Carol M. ; Jones, Susan L. ; Warner, Camille D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Musil, Carol M. ; Jones, Susan L. ; Warner, Camille D.</creatorcontrib><description>Using a conceptual and nontechnical approach, the meaning of structural equation modeling (SEM) and the similarities to, and differences from, more commonly used procedures such as correlation, regression, path analysis, and factor analysis are explained. Application of the statistical technique is presented using data from a study of the relationships among stresses, strains, and physical health in a random sample of 492 community‐dwelling elders aged 65 and older. Advantages of each statistical procedure are described. Theoretical issues related to the use of each procedure are presented with emphasis on the need for a sound theoretical model and match between the statistical procedure and the aims of the analysis. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Res Nurs Health 21:271–281, 1998</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-6891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-240X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199806)21:3<271::AID-NUR10>3.0.CO;2-G</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9609512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Aged - psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Causality ; Epidemiology ; factor analysis ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; General aspects ; Health Status ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Medical sciences ; Methodology ; Models, Statistical ; multiple regression ; Nursing ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Regression Analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Stress, Psychological - psychology ; structural equation modeling (SEM)</subject><ispartof>Research in nursing & health, 1998-06, Vol.21 (3), p.271-281</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2246221$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9609512$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Musil, Carol M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, Camille D.</creatorcontrib><title>Structural equation modeling and its relationship to multiple regression and factor analysis</title><title>Research in nursing & health</title><addtitle>Res. Nurs. Health</addtitle><description>Using a conceptual and nontechnical approach, the meaning of structural equation modeling (SEM) and the similarities to, and differences from, more commonly used procedures such as correlation, regression, path analysis, and factor analysis are explained. Application of the statistical technique is presented using data from a study of the relationships among stresses, strains, and physical health in a random sample of 492 community‐dwelling elders aged 65 and older. Advantages of each statistical procedure are described. Theoretical issues related to the use of each procedure are presented with emphasis on the need for a sound theoretical model and match between the statistical procedure and the aims of the analysis. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Res Nurs Health 21:271–281, 1998</description><subject>Aged - psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>factor analysis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>multiple regression</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - psychology</subject><subject>structural equation modeling (SEM)</subject><issn>0160-6891</issn><issn>1098-240X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF9r1EAUxQdR6lr9CEIeRNqHrHdmNpPM-gdK1O1C6YK11gfhMslO6ugk2c4k6H57J82SFwWf7uWecw-HHyFvKcwpAHt1crXO16cUZBazBXw9oVJmIE4ZXfI3LKXL5dn6fXx5_YnCOz6Heb55zeLVAzKbPh6SGVABscgkfUyeeP8DgNKE0SNyJAXIhLIZ-XbVub7seqdspO961Zm2iep2q61pbiPVbCPT-chpe6_472YXdW1U97YzO6uDcOu098PT4K1U2bUurMruvfFPyaNKWa-fHeYxuf744XN-Hl9sVuv87CIuFxwglprrlKUJhypjqZJMbulCJ0XCU1aE8kUp-TYrshKqimeV0hXXYUsSScuUSuDH5OWYu3PtXa99h7XxpbZWNbrtPaYymITgfCpQutZ7pyvcOVMrt0cKOFBHHKjjwBAHhjhSR0aRY6COGKjjPfVwAMw3yHAVcp8fCvRFrbdT6gFz0F8cdOVLZSunmtL4ycbYQjBGg-3LaPtlrN7_1e0_1f7VbDyE4HgMNr7Tv6dg5X6iSHma4M3lCulNInIhcjznfwC9M7pE</recordid><startdate>199806</startdate><enddate>199806</enddate><creator>Musil, Carol M.</creator><creator>Jones, Susan L.</creator><creator>Warner, Camille D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199806</creationdate><title>Structural equation modeling and its relationship to multiple regression and factor analysis</title><author>Musil, Carol M. ; Jones, Susan L. ; Warner, Camille D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-9e3e727530f827a929d14e5b5372b891bc93d8b8c0ff38faef3eff35591c71903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Aged - psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>factor analysis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>multiple regression</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - psychology</topic><topic>structural equation modeling (SEM)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Musil, Carol M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, Camille D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Research in nursing & health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Musil, Carol M.</au><au>Jones, Susan L.</au><au>Warner, Camille D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural equation modeling and its relationship to multiple regression and factor analysis</atitle><jtitle>Research in nursing & health</jtitle><addtitle>Res. Nurs. Health</addtitle><date>1998-06</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>281</epage><pages>271-281</pages><issn>0160-6891</issn><eissn>1098-240X</eissn><abstract>Using a conceptual and nontechnical approach, the meaning of structural equation modeling (SEM) and the similarities to, and differences from, more commonly used procedures such as correlation, regression, path analysis, and factor analysis are explained. Application of the statistical technique is presented using data from a study of the relationships among stresses, strains, and physical health in a random sample of 492 community‐dwelling elders aged 65 and older. Advantages of each statistical procedure are described. Theoretical issues related to the use of each procedure are presented with emphasis on the need for a sound theoretical model and match between the statistical procedure and the aims of the analysis. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Res Nurs Health 21:271–281, 1998</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>9609512</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199806)21:3<271::AID-NUR10>3.0.CO;2-G</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0160-6891 |
ispartof | Research in nursing & health, 1998-06, Vol.21 (3), p.271-281 |
issn | 0160-6891 1098-240X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79903663 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Aged - psychology Biological and medical sciences Causality Epidemiology factor analysis Factor Analysis, Statistical General aspects Health Status Humans Longitudinal Studies Medical sciences Methodology Models, Statistical multiple regression Nursing Predictive Value of Tests Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Regression Analysis Reproducibility of Results Stress, Psychological - psychology structural equation modeling (SEM) |
title | Structural equation modeling and its relationship to multiple regression and factor analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T13%3A20%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20equation%20modeling%20and%20its%20relationship%20to%20multiple%20regression%20and%20factor%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20nursing%20&%20health&rft.au=Musil,%20Carol%20M.&rft.date=1998-06&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=281&rft.pages=271-281&rft.issn=0160-6891&rft.eissn=1098-240X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199806)21:3%3C271::AID-NUR10%3E3.0.CO;2-G&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79903663%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-9e3e727530f827a929d14e5b5372b891bc93d8b8c0ff38faef3eff35591c71903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79903663&rft_id=info:pmid/9609512&rfr_iscdi=true |