Correction for biases in a population-based study of family history and coronary heart disease : The Newcastle family history study I

In this paper, the authors report on the design of a population-based case-control study of family history as a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). They studied the characteristics of subjects who completed a detailed family history questionnaire in 1992-1994 as well as the accuracy of rec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of epidemiology 1998-06, Vol.147 (12), p.1123-1132
Main Authors: SILBERBERG, J. S, WLODARCZYK, J, FRYER, J, RAY, C. D, HENSLEY, M. J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aged
Bias
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiology. Vascular system
Case-Control Studies
Cause of Death
Coronary Disease - epidemiology
Coronary Disease - genetics
Coronary heart disease
Data Collection
Family Health
Female
Heart
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Risk Factors
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper, the authors report on the design of a population-based case-control study of family history as a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). They studied the characteristics of subjects who completed a detailed family history questionnaire in 1992-1994 as well as the accuracy of recall of family history in order to quantify both selection and recall biases. Coronary disease cases were enrolled through the Newcastle MONICA Project (Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease), which registered all suspected heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths in the Lower Hunter region of New South Wales, Australia, between August 1984 and March 1994. Controls were selected at random from the New South Wales electoral roll. The response rate was 76% in cases and 62% in controls; the major factor associated with participation in the study was perceived family history of CHD, more so in the control series than in the case series. Accuracy was determined by comparing information obtained from the proband with that recorded on death certificates. In first-degree relatives, sensitivity of CHD recall was 85% (95% confidence interval (CI) 74-92%) in cases and 95% (95% CI 84-99%) in controls, while specificity was 59% (95% CI 49-69%) and 74% (95% CI 65-82%), respectively. The net bias in both selection and recall is toward the null and hence the comparisons provide a conservative estimate of risk of CHD associated with a positive family history.
ISSN:0002-9262
1476-6256
DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009410