Percutaneous aspiration for bacteriological studies in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis

• Published in: British journal of surgery 1998-06, Vol.85 (6), p.755-759
• Main Authors: Paye, F., Rotman, N., Radier, C., Nouira, R., Fagniez, P.-L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Bacterial Infections - diagnosis; Biological and medical sciences; Biopsy, Needle - methods; Critical Care; Drainage - methods; Female; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen; Humans; Length of Stay; Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Multiple Organ Failure - etiology; Other diseases. Semiology; Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing - microbiology; Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing - surgery; Radiography, Interventional - methods; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0007-1323; 1365-2168
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00690.x

Background Percutaneous computed tomography (CT)‐guided aspiration of abdominal collections is performed in necrotizing pancreatitis to detect infection of necrosis, which is an adverse prognostic factor and requires surgical drainage. However, in the case of sterile aspirates, the outcome and the optimum management are subject to debate. This study examined the clinical and bacteriological outcome of patients with severe acute pancreatitis with initially sterile necrosis and assessed the efficiency of percutaneous drainage in this setting. Methods Seventeen patients hospitalized for necrotizing pancreatitis with a septic course underwent a preliminary sterile CT‐guided aspiration. Eight patients underwent simultaneous percutaneous drainage of the punctured collection. Supportive therapy was continued unless severe clinical deterioration or proven secondary infection of necrosis indicated the need for necrosectomy and drainage. Results Secondary infection of necrosis was observed in two patients of nine who had only fine‐needle aspiration cytology of the collection, and in seven of eight it was drained percutaneously (P=0·01). Only one patient drained percutaneously recovered without surgery. Surgical drainage was required in 12 patients. The hospital mortality rate was 29 per cent and was not significantly affected by the bacteriological status of necrosis. Conclusion Percutaneous drainage of sterile collections predisposed to secondary infection of the necrosis and did not cure the patients. A first sterile percutaneous aspiration did not predict a favourable course and surgery frequently remains necessary. © 1998 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd