Loading…

Late Results of Heterotopic Autotransplantation of Splenic Tissue into the Greater Omentum

There is still controversy about the beneficial effects of splenic autotransplantation. As a result, replantation of the spleen has almost been abandoned for surgical treatment of splenic injuries. To learn more about the long‐term effects we have analyzed eight patients 9.2 ± 1.2 years after autotr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of surgery 1998-08, Vol.22 (8), p.883-889
Main Authors: Weber, Thomas, Hanisch, Ernst, Baum, Richard Paul, Seufert, Rainer Maria
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3677-312eea36b92dc3e192447d86772671ea13279f4db995dde5fdbb4a83725096093
cites
container_end_page 889
container_issue 8
container_start_page 883
container_title World journal of surgery
container_volume 22
creator Weber, Thomas
Hanisch, Ernst
Baum, Richard Paul
Seufert, Rainer Maria
description There is still controversy about the beneficial effects of splenic autotransplantation. As a result, replantation of the spleen has almost been abandoned for surgical treatment of splenic injuries. To learn more about the long‐term effects we have analyzed eight patients 9.2 ± 1.2 years after autotransplantation of the spleen into the greater omentum. Splenic replants could be detected by scintigraphy in seven patients (87.5%). Splenic size, measured by single‐photon emission computed tomography, varied between 19.344 and 471.705 units of volume (UoV). Two patients with the smallest replants had pathologic changes of leukocytes and lymphocyte subsets in 12 of 16 measurements (75%). These changes closely resembled a spleenless state and were similar to those in the patient with no detectable splenic autograft. In contrast, five patients with large splenic replants (49.192–471.705 UoV) revealed pathologic findings in only 2 of 40 measurements (5%). Based on an extensive review of the literature and our own results, it can be concluded that splenic autotransplantation into the greater omentum is superior to splenectomy but undoubtedly less effective than in situ preservation of the spleen. Therefore splenic replantation should still be considered, particularly in pediatric surgery, when in situ preservation of the spleen is not possible by other techniques.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s002689900487
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80026052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80026052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3677-312eea36b92dc3e192447d86772671ea13279f4db995dde5fdbb4a83725096093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRan0sXQrBhbvovDKTwZUUbZVCwVYEN2GS3GAkycSZCdJ_75QWoS5c3Qvn4-NwELog-IZgLG8dxlSkSmHMU3mAxoQzGlNG2SEaYyZ4-Ak7RifOfWJMpMBihEZKSJYIPkbvc-0hegE3NN5Fpopm4MEab_q6iO4Hb7zVnesb3Xnta9NtkGXfQBfiVe3cAFHdeRP5D4imFoLMRosWOj-0Z-io0o2D8909Ra-PD6vJLJ4vpk-T-3lcMCFlzAgF0EzkipYFA6Io57JMQ0SFJKAJo1JVvMyVSsoSkqrMc65TJmmClcCKnaLrrbe35msA57O2dgU0oTOYwWXpZiCc0ABe_QE_zWC70C0L7oSQhMsAxVuosMY5C1XW27rVdp0RnG0Gz_YGD_zlTjrkLZS_9G7hkN9t8--6gfX_suztebncs_8AmH-LFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>995511547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Late Results of Heterotopic Autotransplantation of Splenic Tissue into the Greater Omentum</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Weber, Thomas ; Hanisch, Ernst ; Baum, Richard Paul ; Seufert, Rainer Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Weber, Thomas ; Hanisch, Ernst ; Baum, Richard Paul ; Seufert, Rainer Maria</creatorcontrib><description>There is still controversy about the beneficial effects of splenic autotransplantation. As a result, replantation of the spleen has almost been abandoned for surgical treatment of splenic injuries. To learn more about the long‐term effects we have analyzed eight patients 9.2 ± 1.2 years after autotransplantation of the spleen into the greater omentum. Splenic replants could be detected by scintigraphy in seven patients (87.5%). Splenic size, measured by single‐photon emission computed tomography, varied between 19.344 and 471.705 units of volume (UoV). Two patients with the smallest replants had pathologic changes of leukocytes and lymphocyte subsets in 12 of 16 measurements (75%). These changes closely resembled a spleenless state and were similar to those in the patient with no detectable splenic autograft. In contrast, five patients with large splenic replants (49.192–471.705 UoV) revealed pathologic findings in only 2 of 40 measurements (5%). Based on an extensive review of the literature and our own results, it can be concluded that splenic autotransplantation into the greater omentum is superior to splenectomy but undoubtedly less effective than in situ preservation of the spleen. Therefore splenic replantation should still be considered, particularly in pediatric surgery, when in situ preservation of the spleen is not possible by other techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-2313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s002689900487</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9673564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer‐Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Beneficial Effect ; Child ; Compute Tomography ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hodgkin Disease - surgery ; Humans ; Late Result ; Male ; Omentum ; Pathologic Change ; Pathologic Finding ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Retrospective Studies ; Spleen - diagnostic imaging ; Spleen - transplantation ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Transplantation, Heterotopic ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>World journal of surgery, 1998-08, Vol.22 (8), p.883-889</ispartof><rights>1998 International Society of Surgery</rights><rights>by the Société Internationale de Chirugie 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3677-312eea36b92dc3e192447d86772671ea13279f4db995dde5fdbb4a83725096093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9673564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weber, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanisch, Ernst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Richard Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seufert, Rainer Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Late Results of Heterotopic Autotransplantation of Splenic Tissue into the Greater Omentum</title><title>World journal of surgery</title><addtitle>World J Surg</addtitle><description>There is still controversy about the beneficial effects of splenic autotransplantation. As a result, replantation of the spleen has almost been abandoned for surgical treatment of splenic injuries. To learn more about the long‐term effects we have analyzed eight patients 9.2 ± 1.2 years after autotransplantation of the spleen into the greater omentum. Splenic replants could be detected by scintigraphy in seven patients (87.5%). Splenic size, measured by single‐photon emission computed tomography, varied between 19.344 and 471.705 units of volume (UoV). Two patients with the smallest replants had pathologic changes of leukocytes and lymphocyte subsets in 12 of 16 measurements (75%). These changes closely resembled a spleenless state and were similar to those in the patient with no detectable splenic autograft. In contrast, five patients with large splenic replants (49.192–471.705 UoV) revealed pathologic findings in only 2 of 40 measurements (5%). Based on an extensive review of the literature and our own results, it can be concluded that splenic autotransplantation into the greater omentum is superior to splenectomy but undoubtedly less effective than in situ preservation of the spleen. Therefore splenic replantation should still be considered, particularly in pediatric surgery, when in situ preservation of the spleen is not possible by other techniques.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Beneficial Effect</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Compute Tomography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hodgkin Disease - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Late Result</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Omentum</subject><subject>Pathologic Change</subject><subject>Pathologic Finding</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spleen - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Spleen - transplantation</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterotopic</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0364-2313</issn><issn>1432-2323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRan0sXQrBhbvovDKTwZUUbZVCwVYEN2GS3GAkycSZCdJ_75QWoS5c3Qvn4-NwELog-IZgLG8dxlSkSmHMU3mAxoQzGlNG2SEaYyZ4-Ak7RifOfWJMpMBihEZKSJYIPkbvc-0hegE3NN5Fpopm4MEab_q6iO4Hb7zVnesb3Xnta9NtkGXfQBfiVe3cAFHdeRP5D4imFoLMRosWOj-0Z-io0o2D8909Ra-PD6vJLJ4vpk-T-3lcMCFlzAgF0EzkipYFA6Io57JMQ0SFJKAJo1JVvMyVSsoSkqrMc65TJmmClcCKnaLrrbe35msA57O2dgU0oTOYwWXpZiCc0ABe_QE_zWC70C0L7oSQhMsAxVuosMY5C1XW27rVdp0RnG0Gz_YGD_zlTjrkLZS_9G7hkN9t8--6gfX_suztebncs_8AmH-LFw</recordid><startdate>199808</startdate><enddate>199808</enddate><creator>Weber, Thomas</creator><creator>Hanisch, Ernst</creator><creator>Baum, Richard Paul</creator><creator>Seufert, Rainer Maria</creator><general>Springer‐Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199808</creationdate><title>Late Results of Heterotopic Autotransplantation of Splenic Tissue into the Greater Omentum</title><author>Weber, Thomas ; Hanisch, Ernst ; Baum, Richard Paul ; Seufert, Rainer Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3677-312eea36b92dc3e192447d86772671ea13279f4db995dde5fdbb4a83725096093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Beneficial Effect</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Compute Tomography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hodgkin Disease - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Late Result</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Omentum</topic><topic>Pathologic Change</topic><topic>Pathologic Finding</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spleen - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Spleen - transplantation</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterotopic</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weber, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanisch, Ernst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Richard Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seufert, Rainer Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weber, Thomas</au><au>Hanisch, Ernst</au><au>Baum, Richard Paul</au><au>Seufert, Rainer Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Late Results of Heterotopic Autotransplantation of Splenic Tissue into the Greater Omentum</atitle><jtitle>World journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>World J Surg</addtitle><date>1998-08</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>883</spage><epage>889</epage><pages>883-889</pages><issn>0364-2313</issn><eissn>1432-2323</eissn><abstract>There is still controversy about the beneficial effects of splenic autotransplantation. As a result, replantation of the spleen has almost been abandoned for surgical treatment of splenic injuries. To learn more about the long‐term effects we have analyzed eight patients 9.2 ± 1.2 years after autotransplantation of the spleen into the greater omentum. Splenic replants could be detected by scintigraphy in seven patients (87.5%). Splenic size, measured by single‐photon emission computed tomography, varied between 19.344 and 471.705 units of volume (UoV). Two patients with the smallest replants had pathologic changes of leukocytes and lymphocyte subsets in 12 of 16 measurements (75%). These changes closely resembled a spleenless state and were similar to those in the patient with no detectable splenic autograft. In contrast, five patients with large splenic replants (49.192–471.705 UoV) revealed pathologic findings in only 2 of 40 measurements (5%). Based on an extensive review of the literature and our own results, it can be concluded that splenic autotransplantation into the greater omentum is superior to splenectomy but undoubtedly less effective than in situ preservation of the spleen. Therefore splenic replantation should still be considered, particularly in pediatric surgery, when in situ preservation of the spleen is not possible by other techniques.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer‐Verlag</pub><pmid>9673564</pmid><doi>10.1007/s002689900487</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-2313
ispartof World journal of surgery, 1998-08, Vol.22 (8), p.883-889
issn 0364-2313
1432-2323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80026052
source Springer Link
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Beneficial Effect
Child
Compute Tomography
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hodgkin Disease - surgery
Humans
Late Result
Male
Omentum
Pathologic Change
Pathologic Finding
Radionuclide Imaging
Retrospective Studies
Spleen - diagnostic imaging
Spleen - transplantation
Transplantation, Autologous
Transplantation, Heterotopic
Ultrasonography
title Late Results of Heterotopic Autotransplantation of Splenic Tissue into the Greater Omentum
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T01%3A58%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Late%20Results%20of%20Heterotopic%20Autotransplantation%20of%20Splenic%20Tissue%20into%20the%20Greater%20Omentum&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Weber,%20Thomas&rft.date=1998-08&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=889&rft.pages=883-889&rft.issn=0364-2313&rft.eissn=1432-2323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s002689900487&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80026052%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3677-312eea36b92dc3e192447d86772671ea13279f4db995dde5fdbb4a83725096093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=995511547&rft_id=info:pmid/9673564&rfr_iscdi=true