Loading…
Late Results of Heterotopic Autotransplantation of Splenic Tissue into the Greater Omentum
There is still controversy about the beneficial effects of splenic autotransplantation. As a result, replantation of the spleen has almost been abandoned for surgical treatment of splenic injuries. To learn more about the long‐term effects we have analyzed eight patients 9.2 ± 1.2 years after autotr...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of surgery 1998-08, Vol.22 (8), p.883-889 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3677-312eea36b92dc3e192447d86772671ea13279f4db995dde5fdbb4a83725096093 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 889 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 883 |
container_title | World journal of surgery |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Weber, Thomas Hanisch, Ernst Baum, Richard Paul Seufert, Rainer Maria |
description | There is still controversy about the beneficial effects of splenic autotransplantation. As a result, replantation of the spleen has almost been abandoned for surgical treatment of splenic injuries. To learn more about the long‐term effects we have analyzed eight patients 9.2 ± 1.2 years after autotransplantation of the spleen into the greater omentum. Splenic replants could be detected by scintigraphy in seven patients (87.5%). Splenic size, measured by single‐photon emission computed tomography, varied between 19.344 and 471.705 units of volume (UoV). Two patients with the smallest replants had pathologic changes of leukocytes and lymphocyte subsets in 12 of 16 measurements (75%). These changes closely resembled a spleenless state and were similar to those in the patient with no detectable splenic autograft. In contrast, five patients with large splenic replants (49.192–471.705 UoV) revealed pathologic findings in only 2 of 40 measurements (5%). Based on an extensive review of the literature and our own results, it can be concluded that splenic autotransplantation into the greater omentum is superior to splenectomy but undoubtedly less effective than in situ preservation of the spleen. Therefore splenic replantation should still be considered, particularly in pediatric surgery, when in situ preservation of the spleen is not possible by other techniques. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s002689900487 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80026052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80026052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3677-312eea36b92dc3e192447d86772671ea13279f4db995dde5fdbb4a83725096093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRan0sXQrBhbvovDKTwZUUbZVCwVYEN2GS3GAkycSZCdJ_75QWoS5c3Qvn4-NwELog-IZgLG8dxlSkSmHMU3mAxoQzGlNG2SEaYyZ4-Ak7RifOfWJMpMBihEZKSJYIPkbvc-0hegE3NN5Fpopm4MEab_q6iO4Hb7zVnesb3Xnta9NtkGXfQBfiVe3cAFHdeRP5D4imFoLMRosWOj-0Z-io0o2D8909Ra-PD6vJLJ4vpk-T-3lcMCFlzAgF0EzkipYFA6Io57JMQ0SFJKAJo1JVvMyVSsoSkqrMc65TJmmClcCKnaLrrbe35msA57O2dgU0oTOYwWXpZiCc0ABe_QE_zWC70C0L7oSQhMsAxVuosMY5C1XW27rVdp0RnG0Gz_YGD_zlTjrkLZS_9G7hkN9t8--6gfX_suztebncs_8AmH-LFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>995511547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Late Results of Heterotopic Autotransplantation of Splenic Tissue into the Greater Omentum</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Weber, Thomas ; Hanisch, Ernst ; Baum, Richard Paul ; Seufert, Rainer Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Weber, Thomas ; Hanisch, Ernst ; Baum, Richard Paul ; Seufert, Rainer Maria</creatorcontrib><description>There is still controversy about the beneficial effects of splenic autotransplantation. As a result, replantation of the spleen has almost been abandoned for surgical treatment of splenic injuries. To learn more about the long‐term effects we have analyzed eight patients 9.2 ± 1.2 years after autotransplantation of the spleen into the greater omentum. Splenic replants could be detected by scintigraphy in seven patients (87.5%). Splenic size, measured by single‐photon emission computed tomography, varied between 19.344 and 471.705 units of volume (UoV). Two patients with the smallest replants had pathologic changes of leukocytes and lymphocyte subsets in 12 of 16 measurements (75%). These changes closely resembled a spleenless state and were similar to those in the patient with no detectable splenic autograft. In contrast, five patients with large splenic replants (49.192–471.705 UoV) revealed pathologic findings in only 2 of 40 measurements (5%). Based on an extensive review of the literature and our own results, it can be concluded that splenic autotransplantation into the greater omentum is superior to splenectomy but undoubtedly less effective than in situ preservation of the spleen. Therefore splenic replantation should still be considered, particularly in pediatric surgery, when in situ preservation of the spleen is not possible by other techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-2313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s002689900487</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9673564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer‐Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Beneficial Effect ; Child ; Compute Tomography ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hodgkin Disease - surgery ; Humans ; Late Result ; Male ; Omentum ; Pathologic Change ; Pathologic Finding ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Retrospective Studies ; Spleen - diagnostic imaging ; Spleen - transplantation ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Transplantation, Heterotopic ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>World journal of surgery, 1998-08, Vol.22 (8), p.883-889</ispartof><rights>1998 International Society of Surgery</rights><rights>by the Société Internationale de Chirugie 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3677-312eea36b92dc3e192447d86772671ea13279f4db995dde5fdbb4a83725096093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9673564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weber, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanisch, Ernst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Richard Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seufert, Rainer Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Late Results of Heterotopic Autotransplantation of Splenic Tissue into the Greater Omentum</title><title>World journal of surgery</title><addtitle>World J Surg</addtitle><description>There is still controversy about the beneficial effects of splenic autotransplantation. As a result, replantation of the spleen has almost been abandoned for surgical treatment of splenic injuries. To learn more about the long‐term effects we have analyzed eight patients 9.2 ± 1.2 years after autotransplantation of the spleen into the greater omentum. Splenic replants could be detected by scintigraphy in seven patients (87.5%). Splenic size, measured by single‐photon emission computed tomography, varied between 19.344 and 471.705 units of volume (UoV). Two patients with the smallest replants had pathologic changes of leukocytes and lymphocyte subsets in 12 of 16 measurements (75%). These changes closely resembled a spleenless state and were similar to those in the patient with no detectable splenic autograft. In contrast, five patients with large splenic replants (49.192–471.705 UoV) revealed pathologic findings in only 2 of 40 measurements (5%). Based on an extensive review of the literature and our own results, it can be concluded that splenic autotransplantation into the greater omentum is superior to splenectomy but undoubtedly less effective than in situ preservation of the spleen. Therefore splenic replantation should still be considered, particularly in pediatric surgery, when in situ preservation of the spleen is not possible by other techniques.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Beneficial Effect</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Compute Tomography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hodgkin Disease - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Late Result</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Omentum</subject><subject>Pathologic Change</subject><subject>Pathologic Finding</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spleen - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Spleen - transplantation</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterotopic</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0364-2313</issn><issn>1432-2323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRan0sXQrBhbvovDKTwZUUbZVCwVYEN2GS3GAkycSZCdJ_75QWoS5c3Qvn4-NwELog-IZgLG8dxlSkSmHMU3mAxoQzGlNG2SEaYyZ4-Ak7RifOfWJMpMBihEZKSJYIPkbvc-0hegE3NN5Fpopm4MEab_q6iO4Hb7zVnesb3Xnta9NtkGXfQBfiVe3cAFHdeRP5D4imFoLMRosWOj-0Z-io0o2D8909Ra-PD6vJLJ4vpk-T-3lcMCFlzAgF0EzkipYFA6Io57JMQ0SFJKAJo1JVvMyVSsoSkqrMc65TJmmClcCKnaLrrbe35msA57O2dgU0oTOYwWXpZiCc0ABe_QE_zWC70C0L7oSQhMsAxVuosMY5C1XW27rVdp0RnG0Gz_YGD_zlTjrkLZS_9G7hkN9t8--6gfX_suztebncs_8AmH-LFw</recordid><startdate>199808</startdate><enddate>199808</enddate><creator>Weber, Thomas</creator><creator>Hanisch, Ernst</creator><creator>Baum, Richard Paul</creator><creator>Seufert, Rainer Maria</creator><general>Springer‐Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199808</creationdate><title>Late Results of Heterotopic Autotransplantation of Splenic Tissue into the Greater Omentum</title><author>Weber, Thomas ; Hanisch, Ernst ; Baum, Richard Paul ; Seufert, Rainer Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3677-312eea36b92dc3e192447d86772671ea13279f4db995dde5fdbb4a83725096093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Beneficial Effect</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Compute Tomography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hodgkin Disease - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Late Result</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Omentum</topic><topic>Pathologic Change</topic><topic>Pathologic Finding</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spleen - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Spleen - transplantation</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterotopic</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weber, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanisch, Ernst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Richard Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seufert, Rainer Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weber, Thomas</au><au>Hanisch, Ernst</au><au>Baum, Richard Paul</au><au>Seufert, Rainer Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Late Results of Heterotopic Autotransplantation of Splenic Tissue into the Greater Omentum</atitle><jtitle>World journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>World J Surg</addtitle><date>1998-08</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>883</spage><epage>889</epage><pages>883-889</pages><issn>0364-2313</issn><eissn>1432-2323</eissn><abstract>There is still controversy about the beneficial effects of splenic autotransplantation. As a result, replantation of the spleen has almost been abandoned for surgical treatment of splenic injuries. To learn more about the long‐term effects we have analyzed eight patients 9.2 ± 1.2 years after autotransplantation of the spleen into the greater omentum. Splenic replants could be detected by scintigraphy in seven patients (87.5%). Splenic size, measured by single‐photon emission computed tomography, varied between 19.344 and 471.705 units of volume (UoV). Two patients with the smallest replants had pathologic changes of leukocytes and lymphocyte subsets in 12 of 16 measurements (75%). These changes closely resembled a spleenless state and were similar to those in the patient with no detectable splenic autograft. In contrast, five patients with large splenic replants (49.192–471.705 UoV) revealed pathologic findings in only 2 of 40 measurements (5%). Based on an extensive review of the literature and our own results, it can be concluded that splenic autotransplantation into the greater omentum is superior to splenectomy but undoubtedly less effective than in situ preservation of the spleen. Therefore splenic replantation should still be considered, particularly in pediatric surgery, when in situ preservation of the spleen is not possible by other techniques.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer‐Verlag</pub><pmid>9673564</pmid><doi>10.1007/s002689900487</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-2313 |
ispartof | World journal of surgery, 1998-08, Vol.22 (8), p.883-889 |
issn | 0364-2313 1432-2323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80026052 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Beneficial Effect Child Compute Tomography Female Follow-Up Studies Hodgkin Disease - surgery Humans Late Result Male Omentum Pathologic Change Pathologic Finding Radionuclide Imaging Retrospective Studies Spleen - diagnostic imaging Spleen - transplantation Transplantation, Autologous Transplantation, Heterotopic Ultrasonography |
title | Late Results of Heterotopic Autotransplantation of Splenic Tissue into the Greater Omentum |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T01%3A58%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Late%20Results%20of%20Heterotopic%20Autotransplantation%20of%20Splenic%20Tissue%20into%20the%20Greater%20Omentum&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Weber,%20Thomas&rft.date=1998-08&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=889&rft.pages=883-889&rft.issn=0364-2313&rft.eissn=1432-2323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s002689900487&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80026052%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3677-312eea36b92dc3e192447d86772671ea13279f4db995dde5fdbb4a83725096093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=995511547&rft_id=info:pmid/9673564&rfr_iscdi=true |